Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 61
Filter
1.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(3): 483-489, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38329493

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Antibiotic resistance is an unavoidable consequence of antibiotic use and growing rates of resistance are an urgent issue. Methenamine is a non-antibiotic alternative used for urinary tract infection (UTI) prophylaxis. The objective of this review is to evaluate recently published literature regarding the efficacy and safety of methenamine for UTI prophylaxis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were queried in March 2023 using the following search terms: urinary tract infection, cystitis, bacteriuria, or dysuria, and methenamine. Studies prior to 2012 were excluded from this review to focus on appraisal of the most recent evidence. Prospective and controlled retrospective trials were included for review. RESULTS: A total of seven studies (three prospective and four retrospective) met the inclusion criteria for review. Two of the 3 prospective studies demonstrated no or non-inferior differences in clinical efficacy to prevent recurrent UTIs between methenamine and antibiotic prophylaxis and the third showed decreased rates of UTI with methenamine use in patients with short-term indwelling catheters compared with cranberry alone. The retrospective studies consistently supported the efficacy and safety of methenamine for UTI prophylaxis in a variety of populations and clinical settings. Adverse effects reported with methenamine were similar to comparators and included nausea, abdominal pain, and headache. CONCLUSIONS: The use of methenamine for UTI prophylaxis was shown to be effective in a variety of settings without an increased risk of adverse effects compared with prophylactic antibiotics. Larger blinded clinical trials are needed to further define the role of methenamine in UTI prophylaxis.


Subject(s)
Methenamine , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Methenamine/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Antibiotic Prophylaxis
2.
Hum Psychopharmacol ; 38(2): e2864, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36843057

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxyzine for insomnia in adults. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was conducted to identify relevant published studies through October 2022 using the search terms: hydroxyzine and sleep, insomnia, sleep disorder or sleep initiation and maintenance disorders. Studies identified for review included prospective, interventional designs or cohort trials that reported impact of hydroxyzine on sleep in adults. Animal studies, case reports, non-English articles, letters to the editor, case studies, and conference abstracts were excluded. Data were extracted using a standardized systematic process. RESULTS: Five articles were identified for inclusion, including 1 open-label and 4 randomized controlled trials, evaluating a total of 207 patients receiving hydroxyzine 25 mg, 50 mg, or 100 mg at bedtime. Mixed efficacy was demonstrated in the sleep measures of sleep onset, sleep maintenance, and sleep quality. The most common adverse drug effect was dry mouth, although 4 of the 5 studies did not report safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The studies in this review suggest hydroxyzine could be considered as a short-term treatment option for adults with insomnia for whom previous therapy was ineffective, not tolerated, or contraindicated. Additional long-term studies with an active comparator are needed to further establish its role in insomnia treatment.


Subject(s)
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Humans , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Hydroxyzine/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Sleep
3.
JMIR Form Res ; 6(12): e34893, 2022 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36548028

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal medication adherence is a significant problem for patients with serious mental illness. Measuring medication adherence through subjective and objective measures can be challenging, time-consuming, and inaccurate. OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this feasibility and acceptability study was to evaluate the impact of a digital medicine system (DMS) among Veterans (patients) with serious mental illness as compared with treatment as usual (TAU) on medication adherence. METHODS: This open-label, 2-site, provider-randomized trial assessed aripiprazole refill adherence in Veterans with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder. We randomized 26 providers such that their patients either received TAU or DMS for a period of 90 days. Semistructured interviews with patients and providers were used to examine the feasibility and acceptability of using the DMS. RESULTS: We enrolled 46 patients across 2 Veterans Health Administration sites: 21 (46%) in DMS and 25 (54%) in TAU. There was no difference in the proportion of days covered by medication refill over 3 and 6 months (0.82, SD 0.24 and 0.75, SD 0.26 in DMS vs 0.86, SD 0.19 and 0.82, SD 0.21 in TAU, respectively). The DMS arm had 0.85 (SD 0.20) proportion of days covered during the period they were engaged with the DMS (mean 144, SD 100 days). Interviews with patients (n=14) and providers (n=5) elicited themes salient to using the DMS. Patient findings described the positive impact of the DMS on medication adherence, challenges with the DMS patch connectivity and skin irritation, and challenges with the DMS app that affected overall use. Providers described an overall interest in using a DMS as an objective measure to support medication adherence in their patients. However, providers described challenges with the DMS dashboard and integrating DMS data into their workflow, which decreased the usability of the DMS for providers. CONCLUSIONS: There was no observed difference in refill rates. Among those who engaged in the DMS arm, the proportion of days covered by refills were relatively high (mean 0.85, SD 0.20). The qualitative analyses highlighted areas for further refinement of the DMS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03881449; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03881449.

4.
Fed Pract ; 39(8): 356-360a, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36425808

ABSTRACT

Background: Many veterans are eligible to receive prescriptions from community-based pharmacies. Swift and accurate review of prior authorization drug requests by the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) pharmacy is necessary to mitigate treatment delays, medication misuse, adverse drug events, medication errors, and unnecessary cost to the health care system. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of community care prior authorization drug requests to assess the direct cost savings achieved through a centralized process and to characterize submitted requests. Results: The centralized community care pharmacy team demonstrated a cost savings of $515,872.31 over 6 months and increased patient safety. Community care prior authorization drug requests had a 46.2% approval rate. Coordination of care took an average of 8 days. Conclusions: Use of a centralized community care pharmacy team could result in significant annual cost savings for the VA. Considering the approval rate seen in this study, VA could allocate resources to educate community-based prescribers about its formulary to increase the approval rate and reduce administrative burden for VA pharmacies and prescribers.

5.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 79(8): 683-688, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34864858

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the development of a pilot specialty medication clinical dashboard targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor therapy. SUMMARY: This was a quality improvement project conducted between August 2019 and April 2020. The dashboard was designed with collaboration between clinical pharmacists and specialty providers in rheumatology, gastroenterology, and dermatology. Data was queried from the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse. Patients with an active prescription or intravenous order for a TNF-α inhibitor were included. Dashboard flag criteria focused on TNF-α inhibitor safety and adherence monitoring. Flag results from the dashboard were characterized from data captured at a single time point. For 431 patients on TNF-α inhibitor treatment at the institution, 304 flags corresponding to 223 unique patients (51.7%) were identified on the dashboard: 3% of patients had a new infection, 9% had overdue monitoring laboratory tests, 5% had a critical laboratory result, 2% were on 2 biologic agents, 27% were overdue for a refill, 6% had an emergency department visit, and 2% had an inpatient admission. No patients were flagged for heart failure exacerbation or new malignancy. Seventeen percent of patients were prescribed high-dose etanercept or adalimumab, representing a potential annual cost savings of $302,497 if 50% of these patients had their dose successfully reduced to labeled dosing. Opportunities for pharmacist intervention utilizing the dashboard were identified and characterized through chart review of flagged patients. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists have the opportunity to improve safety and adherence for TNF-α inhibitor therapy through use of a specialty medication clinical dashboard. The dashboard should be used in conjunction with collaborative practice protocols.


Subject(s)
Medication Therapy Management , Pharmacists , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Data Display , Humans , Immunologic Factors , Medication Adherence , Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs , Quality Improvement , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/adverse effects , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
6.
Headache ; 61(8): 1207-1213, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34352118

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy and safety of memantine for the prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine. BACKGROUND: Migraine is a prevalent chronic disease with significant costs to the health care system. Although various prophylactic treatment options are available, these medications have limitations based on efficacy, potential side effects, and patient preference. Memantine is an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist used in dementia treatment that may have potential benefit for migraine prophylaxis. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was conducted to identify relevant published studies through December 2020 using the search terms: migraine disorders, migraine, headache disorders, or headache and memantine. Studies selected for the systematic review included prospective, interventional designs and evaluated memantine for prophylaxis of migraine. Animal studies, case reports, abstracts, review articles, protocols without results, and studies not written in English were excluded. Data were extracted using a standardized systematic process and included author, publication date, study design, sample size, patient characteristics, treatment regimen, clinical efficacy outcomes, and adverse drug effects. RESULTS: Four articles were identified for inclusion representing two prospective open-label studies and two randomized, double-blind trials, evaluating 183 patients on memantine overall. A reduction in number of migraine days and headache severity were shown in all four studies in the participants treated with memantine. The most common adverse effects included somnolence, sedation, and nausea, none of which were severe. CONCLUSION: The studies in this review establish that memantine has the potential for use as a treatment option for episodic migraine. Additional long-term studies using an active comparator would be useful to further elucidate its role.


Subject(s)
Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/pharmacology , Memantine/pharmacology , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate/antagonists & inhibitors , Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/adverse effects , Humans , Memantine/adverse effects , Outcome Assessment, Health Care
7.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 36(9): 1304-1312, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33829530

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Geriatric depression is common and is often associated with coexisting medical illnesses, cognitive dysfunction, or both. Treatment with pharmacotherapy is usually required, and many patients may not respond to initial therapy. Thus, there is a need for adjunctive treatment options. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate (MPH) in the treatment of geriatric depression. METHODS: PubMed (1946-December 2020) and Embase (1947-December 2020) were queried using the following search terms: geriatrics, aged, geriatric patient, or elderly and depressive disorder, depression, major depression or late-life depression, and MPH. Studies were included if they were a randomized-controlled trial or open-label trial that investigated use of MPH for treatment of depression in adults aged 60 years and older. RESULTS: After screening per the inclusion criteria, five prospective trials were included. All studies found improvement in depressive symptoms with use of MPH or MPH combined with citalopram. Study durations ranged from 8 to 16 weeks and MPH dosing ranged from 5 to 90 mg per day. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the reviewed literature, MPH appears to be most effective when combined with citalopram and used short-term. MPH should be initiated at a low dose and titrated up to 10 or 20 mg per day based on response. Larger, long-term trials are needed to further define the role of MPH in this population.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Methylphenidate , Aged , Citalopram , Depression/drug therapy , Humans , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Pharm Pract ; 34(1): 23-27, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31232150

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Completion of postgraduate residency training gives pharmacists an opportunity to gain advanced practice experience, yet the availability of these positions is often limited. Through participation in an investigational drug service (IDS), residency programs may be able to expand learning experiences while demonstrating a financial benefit to the institution. The purpose of this assessment is to examine the economic value generated by pharmacy resident involvement within an IDS. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective record review. All resident dispensations within the IDS from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017, were evaluated for cost avoidance, revenue, and waived revenue. Cost avoidance was defined as the cost of medications the institution would have incurred had the sponsor not provided therapies free of charge. Medical center contract acquisition costs were used to determine cost avoidance. Total economic value accounted for the personnel costs of resident dispensations. Descriptive statistics were utilized for all assessments. RESULTS: A total of 444 resident dispensations occurred during the study period on 15 IDS protocols. The total cost avoidance for resident dispensations was US$144 898. Total revenue for these dispensations was US$1424, and waived revenue fees totaled US$17 625. After accounting for the personnel cost of dispensations by the residents, the total economic value of resident participation in the IDS was US$159 150. CONCLUSION: Resident participation in the IDS contributed economic value to the institution. The IDS provides a unique learning experience for the pharmacy residents, cost savings for the institution, and supports the advancement of patient care.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Services , Pharmacy Residencies , Pharmacy Service, Hospital , Pharmacy , Drugs, Investigational , Humans , Pharmacists , Retrospective Studies
10.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 27(1): 156-164, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32955997

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is an adverse effect of certain chemotherapy agents that can result in dose reductions, permanent nerve damage, and chronic pain. Although pharmacological agents have been studied in this setting, there is no standard of care for the prevention of CIPN. Thus, the objective of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy and safety of cryotherapy for the prevention of CIPN. DATA SOURCES: PubMed (1946 to February 2020) and Embase (1947 to February 2020) were utilized to conduct a literature search using the following search terms: antineoplastic agent(s), taxoid(s), or chemotherapy and neuralgia, peripheral nervous system diseases, peripheral neuropathy, or paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy and cryotherapy, cryotherapy device, hypothermia, low temperature procedures, or ice. DATA SUMMARY: A total of 11 studies were included in the final assessment. Results of this systematic review indicate that the efficacy of cryotherapy in preventing CIPN is conflicting. This may be due to studies utilizing differing cryotherapy administration methods, study design, and including only a small number of patients. All included studies utilized cryotherapy with taxane-based chemotherapy treatments and cooling gloves and socks was the most common method of administration. Overall, cryotherapy was well-tolerated and no serious adverse effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the absence of serious adverse effects, cryotherapy is a reasonable option to consider to prevent CIPN in patients receiving taxane-based chemotherapy. However, additional research is needed, including larger, better designed studies, to fully delineate the role of cryotherapy for CIPN.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Cryotherapy/methods , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Humans , Hypothermia, Induced
11.
J Crit Care ; 59: 1-5, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32480359

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of suvorexant for the prevention of delirium during acute hospitalization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pubmed (1946 to December 2019) and Embase (1947 to December 2019) were queried using the search term combination: delirium, confusion, cognitive defect, encephalopathy, critically ill patient, critical illness, or hospitalization and suvorexant or orexin receptor antagonist. Studies analyzed for relevance evaluated clinical outcomes of patients treated with suvorexant for prevention of delirium. Studies appropriate to the objective were evaluated, including two randomized controlled trials and four retrospective studies. RESULTS: In acutely hospitalized patients, treatment with suvorexant 15 to 20 mg alone or in combination with ramelteon resulted in a reduction in development of delirium, time until delirium onset, and length of hospital stay. When assessed, suvorexant was well tolerated and adverse effects were no worse than placebo. CONCLUSION: Based on the reviewed literature, suvorexant has shown positive outcomes in the prevention of delirium during an acute hospitalization. Larger trials comparing the efficacy of suvorexant to other sleep modulating options are necessary to further delineate its role for the prevention of delirium.


Subject(s)
Azepines/administration & dosage , Azepines/adverse effects , Critical Care/methods , Delirium/prevention & control , Length of Stay , Orexin Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Orexin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Triazoles/administration & dosage , Triazoles/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Critical Illness , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Indenes/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Receptor, Melatonin, MT1/agonists , Receptor, Melatonin, MT2/agonists , Retrospective Studies , Sleep/drug effects , Treatment Outcome
12.
Clin Rheumatol ; 39(11): 3287-3294, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32418037

ABSTRACT

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are more likely to develop hyperuricemia and gout. Allopurinol and febuxostat are the most commonly used urate-lowering therapies with established safety and efficacy in CKD patients. The objective of the systematic review is to assess the long-term renal outcomes of allopurinol compared with febuxostat in patients with hyperuricemia and CKD or kidney transplantation. PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to December 2019 using the key terms "allopurinol," "febuxostat," "xanthine oxidase inhibitors," "gout suppressants," "hyperuricemia," "gout," "chronic renal insufficiency," and "kidney transplantation." Studies with follow-up duration ≥ 12 months were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Three retrospective observational studies with follow-up duration ranging from 1 to 5 years were reviewed. Febuxostat patients had a significantly higher estimated glomerular filtration rate, reduced risk for renal disease progression, and reduced serum uric acid levels compared with allopurinol patients. All studies had a serious risk of bias. Febuxostat may be more renoprotective than allopurinol in patients with both hyperuricemia and CKD based on evidence from small long-term retrospective studies with serious risk of bias. More methodologically rigorous studies are needed to determine the clinical applicability of these results.


Subject(s)
Gout , Hyperuricemia , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Allopurinol/therapeutic use , Febuxostat/therapeutic use , Gout/complications , Gout/drug therapy , Gout Suppressants/therapeutic use , Humans , Hyperuricemia/complications , Hyperuricemia/drug therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Uric Acid
13.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 50(2): 452-456, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31898274

ABSTRACT

Influenza prophylaxis with oseltamivir is recommended for exposed high-risk patients. Patients with many comorbidities have an increased likelihood of co-administration of oseltamivir and warfarin. Evidence of a drug interaction is conflicting in the literature and is limited to a 5-day treatment course. This study evaluates the impact of prophylactic oseltamivir on international normalized ratio (INR) in patients taking warfarin. This retrospective cohort study conducted within the Veterans Health Administration included patients on warfarin who received oseltamivir for influenza prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was change in INR from baseline to day 10 of oseltamivir treatment. Secondary endpoints included change in INR based on renal function and duration of oseltamivir prophylaxis, trend in INR, and frequency of bleeding and thrombosis events. A total of 1041 patients were included and received oseltamivir for a mean of 12.9 days. The mean post-oseltamivir INR was significantly increased compared to the pre-oseltamivir INR (2.39 to 2.52; p < 0.001). Patients with a creatinine clearance of 31-60 mL/min had a significant increase in INR (2.40 to 2.59; p < 0.01). There was an increase in INR when oseltamivir was used for 7 or 8-10 days. Of included patients, 5.1% and 1.8% had a recorded thrombosis or bleeding event, respectively. There was a significant increase in INR in patients on chronic warfarin therapy and concomitant prophylactic oseltamivir, but this change may only be clinically significant for certain patient populations. The most impact on INR was within 7-10 days of oseltamivir initiation and in patients with impaired renal function.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Monitoring , International Normalized Ratio , Oseltamivir/therapeutic use , Stroke/prevention & control , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Blood Coagulation/drug effects , Drug Interactions , Female , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Kidney/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Oseltamivir/adverse effects , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Stroke/blood , Stroke/diagnosis , Time Factors , Venous Thromboembolism/blood , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Warfarin/adverse effects
14.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 52(6): 381-390, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31900002

ABSTRACT

Background:Helicobacter pylori is one of the most common chronic infections and is a leading cause of gastric cancer. There are currently several short-course treatment options available for the treatment of H. pylori. However, there has been a significant increase in global resistance patterns for H. pylori and there is a need for alternative treatment regimens. Nitazoxanide (NTZ) is an anti-protozoal agent that has been evaluated within several studies for the treatment of H. pylori. The objective of this review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NTZ-based treatments for a H. pylori infection.Methods: Pubmed (1946-August 2019) and Embase (1947-August 2019) were queried using the following search terms: Helicobacter, Helicobacter infection, Helicobacter pylori, nitazoxanide, tizoxanide, thiazoles, thiazole derivative and NTZ. Appropriate studies were evaluated with varying treatment regimens and cure rates.Results: Ten studies that utilized a NTZ-based treatment for H. pylori were identified from the literature search. Eight of the ten studies demonstrated a cure rate of greater than 80% in at least one NTZ-based treatment arm. Gastrointestinal side effects were the most commonly reported adverse drug reaction in the studies.Conclusions: Nitazoxanide-based treatments appear to be an effective treatment for H. pylori. While the ideal NTZ combination therapy is uncertain, a combination with a proton-pump inhibitor and one to two antibiotics has demonstrated the highest rates of H. pylori eradication. Nitazoxanide-based treatments are well-tolerated and minimal discontinuation due to side effects were reported in the studies.


Subject(s)
Helicobacter Infections , Nitro Compounds/therapeutic use , Thiazoles/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter pylori , Humans , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
15.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 26(2): 306-311, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31006341

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Phenazopyridine is a urinary tract analgesic indicated for short-term treatment of irritation in the lower urinary tract. Despite the lack of evidence for extended use, it is often used in varying durations for supportive care for cancer patients with radiation-induced cystitis. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of adverse drug reactions in patients with radiation cystitis receiving long-term phenazopyridine (>14-day supply) compared to a matched comparator group. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared adverse events among cancer patients with and without phenazopyridine exposure. Included patients received radiation and at least one chronic medication between 1 July 2008 and 30 June 2017. The phenazopyridine group also received >14-day supply of phenazopyridine during the study period. Patients were matched based on gender, age (±5 years), cancer diagnosis, and palliative or curative treatment intent. Data collection occurred at baseline, during the time of presumed exposure, and through the end of the study period for surveillance purposes. RESULTS: A total of 272 patients received phenazopyridine for >14-day supply during the study period. Of these, 90 patients were included and matched to an equal number of patients in the comparator group. The included patients were similar between groups and were largely male with a diagnosis of prostate cancer. Most patients received between a 30- and 60-day supply of phenazopyridine. There were a total of 13 adverse drug reactions in the phenazopyridine group and 18 in the comparator group (p = 0.32). No differences were identified between the phenazopyridine and comparator groups for the incidence of individual adverse drug reactions, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, or new diagnoses of hepatocellular or colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in adverse drug reactions among patients receiving phenazopyridine for >14 days compared to a matched comparator group. The overall incidence of adverse events in both groups was low.


Subject(s)
Cystitis/drug therapy , Phenazopyridine/administration & dosage , Phenazopyridine/adverse effects , Radiation Injuries/drug therapy , Aged , Cohort Studies , Cystitis/diagnosis , Drug Administration Schedule , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Injuries/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies
16.
J Subst Abuse Treat ; 107: 38-43, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31757263

ABSTRACT

Memantine is commonly used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease. Due to its antagonism of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, which has been shown to block rewarding and reinforcing effects of morphine, memantine has been investigated for potential utilization in opioid use disorder (OUD). The objective of this systematic review is to assess the evidence available to determine the safety and efficacy of memantine as treatment for OUD. Pubmed (1946-August 2019) and Embase (1947-August 2019) were queried using the following search terms: opioid-related disorders, opioids, substance withdrawal syndrome, withdrawal syndrome, opiate addiction, opiate, opiate dependence, opiate substitution treatment, managed opioid withdrawal, or drug withdrawal and memantine. After assessing studies appropriate for the objective, one single-blind and five double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were included. Of the included studies, four demonstrated beneficial effects of memantine either as monotherapy or adjunct to methadone or buprenorphine on reducing opioid cravings and methadone dose, increasing retention rates, and improving cognitive performance in patients with OUD. Two studies did not show benefit on patient retention rates with memantine adjunct to naltrexone. Study durations ranged from 3 to 13 weeks, and memantine dosing ranged from 5 to 60 mg/day. Memantine was well tolerated with similar rates of adverse effects between treatment groups. Based on the reviewed literature, memantine appears most beneficial as an adjunctive treatment for OUD when combined with methadone or buprenorphine, but not naltrexone. Larger studies with longer periods of treatment and follow-up are needed to support the use of memantine in the management of OUD.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Buprenorphine/pharmacology , Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/pharmacology , Memantine/pharmacology , Methadone/pharmacology , Naltrexone/pharmacology , Narcotic Antagonists/pharmacology , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Buprenorphine/administration & dosage , Drug Therapy, Combination , Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/adverse effects , Humans , Memantine/adverse effects , Methadone/administration & dosage , Naltrexone/administration & dosage , Narcotic Antagonists/administration & dosage
17.
Dermatol Ther ; 32(6): e13103, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31583801

ABSTRACT

Bacterial folliculitis, rosacea, and other common skin conditions have been linked to infestation by Demodex mites (human demodicosis). Currently, there is little guidance for treatment of inflammatory conditions associated with demodicosis. Thus, the objective of this review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatments utilized for Demodex infestation. PubMed (1946 to January 2019) and Embase (1947 to January 2019) were searched with the following term combinations: Demodex mites, Demodex folliculitis, demodicosis, Demodex folliculorum, or Demodex brevis and articles evaluating treatment of body surface colonization with Demodex mites were included. Common interventions used for Demodex infestation include metronidazole-based therapies, permethrin, benzoyl benzoate, crotamiton, lindane, and sulfur. Short courses of metronidazole taken orally have shown efficacy in reducing Demodex density. Additionally, topical administration of permethrin daily or twice daily was shown to be efficacious across multiple studies. Crotamiton and benzyl benzoate were also efficacious treatments. Several therapies were associated with mild-to-moderate skin irritation. Due to limited data, no standard of care can be identified at this time. Efficacious treatment options may include permethrin, crotamiton, benzyl benzoate, and oral metronidazole; however, long-term efficacy has not been established.


Subject(s)
Mite Infestations/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , Benzoates/administration & dosage , Folliculitis/drug therapy , Humans , Metronidazole/administration & dosage , Permethrin/administration & dosage , Rosacea/drug therapy , Toluidines/administration & dosage
18.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 17(6): 419-424, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31585694

ABSTRACT

Pazopanib is a protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor that limits tumor growth through angiogenesis inhibition. The use of other protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors, specifically sunitinib, within non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) has led to increased survival with a decreased adverse event profile. The data for the treatment of nccRCC is limited, with most studies evaluating the use of sunitinib. Therefore, the evaluation of pazopanib is of particular clinical interest in the treatment of nccRCC. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of pazopanib for nccRCC. PubMed (1946 to April 2019) and Embase (1947 to April 2019) were queried using the search term combination: protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor or pazopanib and non clear cell renal cell carcinoma or non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Studies evaluating clinical outcomes of pazopanib for nccRCC were included, represented by 3 retrospective cohort studies and 1 single-arm, open-label prospective study. In patients with advanced or metastatic nccRCC, treatment with pazopanib resulted in positive effects for multiple markers of efficacy, including progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rates. The median duration of follow-up ranged from 11.8 months to 24.4 months. Pazopanib was well-tolerated in most studies. The most commonly reported adverse events were fatigue, diarrhea, and hypertension. Pazopanib appears to be an effective and safe option for the treatment of advanced or metastatic nccRCC. Future investigation with larger randomized controlled trials is warranted to further define the role of pazopanib in patients with nccRCC.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Fatigue/chemically induced , Fatigue/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertension/chemically induced , Hypertension/epidemiology , Indazoles , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Progression-Free Survival , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/adverse effects
19.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun ; 14: 100354, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31011657

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An investigational drug service (IDS) has a foundational role in ensuring the safe and efficient management of investigational drugs. The objective of this assessment is to determine economic value of an IDS within a Veterans Affairs health care system. METHODS: This assessment was a single-center retrospective record review. Study protocols managed by the IDS over a 2-year period were evaluated for cost avoidance, revenue, and waived revenue. Cost avoidance was defined as the cost savings generated when a research subject received sponsor-provided treatment in place of a therapy that would have been otherwise funded by the institution. Revenue from fees charged to investigators and waived revenue based on the standardized IDS fee schedule were also totaled. The total economic value to the institution accounted for the personnel costs of the IDS. RESULTS: Twenty-three investigational study protocols managed by the IDS resulted in economic outcomes. The total cost avoidance during the two-year period was $482,627.33. The total revenue and waived revenue associated with the IDS was $16,822 and $54,200, respectively. Oncology protocols had the highest contribution to the outcomes of cost avoidance and revenue and mental health protocols had the highest contribution for waived revenue. The overall economic value of the IDS to the institution was $393,649.33. CONCLUSIONS: Over a two-year period, the IDS demonstrated a substantial economic value that was largely driven by cost avoidance. Revenue generation from fees charged to investigators and cost savings to the investigator through waived revenue also contributed economic benefits to the institution.

20.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 25(3): 411-416, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30816815

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The establishment of a formulary management system ensures that health care professionals work together in an integrated patient care process to promote clinically sound, safe, and cost-effective medication therapy. Pharmacists have a foundational role within this system. A pharmacist-adjudicated prior authorization drug request (PADR) consult service has the potential to optimize drug therapy by decreasing medication misuse, minimizing adverse drug events (ADEs), and preventing medication errors. OBJECTIVES: To (a) determine cost avoidance associated with pharmacist-adjudicated PADR safety interventions within the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System and (b) evaluate cost savings associated with pharmacist-adjudicated PADRs not approved due to a safety intervention, evaluate cost avoidance and direct cost savings based on clinical specialty of pharmacist adjudicating PADR, and characterize severity of avoided ADEs. METHODS: Pharmacist-adjudicated PADRs not approved between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017, because of safety interventions were retrospectively reviewed. Cost avoidance was determined by multiplying the probability of ADE occurrence in the absence of PADR safety intervention by the estimated cost avoided based on the type of intervention. Direct cost savings was calculated by totaling the cost of requested medications not approved for each PADR and subtracting the cost of recommended alternative therapies and cost of pharmacist PADR review. All potential ADEs avoided were reviewed by a panel of 3 clinical pharmacists to validate ADE classification and ADE probability and severity scores. Descriptive statistics were used for all analyses. RESULTS: Of the 910 PADRs that were not approved during the study period, 96 met inclusion criteria. Pharmacist-adjudicated PADR safety interventions resulted in a total cost avoidance of $24,485.34 (mean = $255.06) and a direct cost savings of $288,695.63 (mean = $3,007.25). The practice settings of anticoagulation and infectious diseases PADRs resulted in the largest contribution to cost avoidance and direct cost savings, respectively. Prevented ADEs were classified as major for 64.6% of the PADRs. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist-adjudicated PADR safety reviews resulted in substantial economic benefit and prevention of major ADEs. This analysis supports the pharmacist's role in a formulary management system to optimize medication therapy. DISCLOSURES: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for profit sectors. The authors have nothing to disclose.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Prior Authorization/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Consultants , Cost Savings , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/economics , Female , Formularies, Hospital as Topic , Hospitals, Veterans/economics , Hospitals, Veterans/organization & administration , Humans , Male , Medication Errors/economics , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Pharmacists/economics , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/economics , Prior Authorization/economics , Professional Role , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...