Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 39
Filter
1.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol ; 24(3): 365-384, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37156973

ABSTRACT

The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is an auditory neuroprosthesis that provides hearing by electrically stimulating the cochlear nucleus (CN) of the brainstem. Our previous study (McInturff et al., 2022) showed that single-pulse stimulation of the dorsal (D)CN subdivision with low levels of current evokes responses that have early latencies, different than the late response patterns observed from stimulation of the ventral (V)CN. How these differing responses encode more complex stimuli, such as pulse trains and amplitude modulated (AM) pulses, has not been explored. Here, we compare responses to pulse train stimulation of the DCN and VCN, and show that VCN responses, measured in the inferior colliculus (IC), have less adaption, higher synchrony, and higher cross-correlation. However, with high-level DCN stimulation, responses become like those to VCN stimulation, supporting our earlier hypothesis that current spreads from electrodes on the DCN to excite neurons located in the VCN. To AM pulses, stimulation of the VCN elicits responses with larger vector strengths and gain values especially in the high-CF portion of the IC. Additional analysis using neural measures of modulation thresholds indicate that these measures are lowest for VCN. Human ABI users with low modulation thresholds, who score best on comprehension tests, may thus have electrode arrays that stimulate the VCN. Overall, the results show that the VCN has superior response characteristics and suggest that it should be the preferred target for ABI electrode arrays in humans.


Subject(s)
Auditory Brain Stem Implants , Cochlear Nucleus , Animals , Humans , Heart Rate , Cochlear Nucleus/physiology , Hearing , Models, Animal , Electric Stimulation/methods
2.
Elife ; 112022 05 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35608242

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implants (CIs) provide sound and speech sensations for patients with severe to profound hearing loss by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve. While most CI users achieve some degree of open set word recognition under quiet conditions, hearing that utilizes complex neural coding (e.g., appreciating music) has proved elusive, probably because of the inability of CIs to create narrow regions of spectral activation. Several novel approaches have recently shown promise for improving spatial selectivity, but substantial design differences from conventional CIs will necessitate much additional safety and efficacy testing before clinical viability is established. Outside the cochlea, magnetic stimulation from small coils (micro-coils) has been shown to confine activation more narrowly than that from conventional microelectrodes, raising the possibility that coil-based stimulation of the cochlea could improve the spectral resolution of CIs. To explore this, we delivered magnetic stimulation from micro-coils to multiple locations of the cochlea and measured the spread of activation utilizing a multielectrode array inserted into the inferior colliculus; responses to magnetic stimulation were compared to analogous experiments with conventional microelectrodes as well as to responses when presenting auditory monotones. Encouragingly, the extent of activation with micro-coils was ~60% narrower compared to electric stimulation and largely similar to the spread arising from acoustic stimulation. The dynamic range of coils was more than three times larger than that of electrodes, further supporting a smaller spread of activation. While much additional testing is required, these results support the notion that magnetic micro-coil CIs can produce a larger number of independent spectral channels and may therefore improve auditory outcomes. Further, because coil-based devices are structurally similar to existing CIs, fewer impediments to clinical translational are likely to arise.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Acoustic Stimulation , Animals , Cochlea/physiology , Cochlear Nerve/physiology , Electric Stimulation , Humans , Magnetic Phenomena , Mice
3.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol ; 23(3): 391-412, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35381872

ABSTRACT

The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is an auditory neuroprosthesis that provides hearing to deaf patients by electrically stimulating the cochlear nucleus (CN) of the brainstem. Whether such stimulation activates one or the other of the CN's two major subdivisions is not known. Here, we demonstrate clear response differences from the stimulation of the dorsal (D) vs. ventral (V) subdivisions of the CN in a mouse model of the ABI with a surface-stimulating electrode array. For the DCN, low levels of stimulation evoked multiunit responses in the inferior colliculus (IC) that were unimodally distributed with early latencies (avg. peak latency of 3.3 ms). However, high levels of stimulation evoked a bimodal distribution with the addition of a late latency response peak (avg. peak latency of 7.1 ms). For the VCN, in contrast, electrical stimulation elicited multiunit responses that were usually unimodal and had a latency similar to the DCN's late response. Local field potentials (LFP) from the IC showed components that correlated with early and late multiunit responses. Surgical cuts to sever the output of the DCN, the dorsal acoustic stria (DAS), gave insight into the origin of these early and late responses. Cuts eliminated early responses but had little-to-no effect on late responses. The early responses thus originate from cells that project through the DAS, such as DCN's pyramidal and giant cells. Late responses likely arise from the spread of stimulation from a DCN-placed electrode array to the VCN and could originate in bushy and/or stellate cells. In human ABI users, the spread of stimulation in the CN may result in abnormal response patterns that could hinder performance.


Subject(s)
Auditory Brain Stem Implants , Cochlear Nucleus , Inferior Colliculi , Animals , Cochlear Nucleus/physiology , Decorin , Electric Stimulation , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Hearing , Humans , Inferior Colliculi/physiology , Mice
4.
Ear Hear ; 42(6): 1741-1754, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34282087

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Factors contributing to auditory brainstem implant (ABI) outcomes are poorly understood. The aims of this study are to (1) characterize ABI electrode array position on postoperative imaging and (2) determine if variability in position is related to perceptual outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. Subjects were selected from the adult ABI recipient population at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. Postoperative three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) reconstruction of the head was used to measure ABI array position in 20 adult ABI recipients (17 with Neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2) and three non-NF2 recipients). Three-dimensional electrode array position was determined based on angles from the horizontal using posterior and lateral views and on distances between the proximal array tip superiorly from the basion (D1), laterally (D2P) and posteriorly (D2L) from the midline. Array position was correlated with perceptual data (in 15 of the 20 recipients who used their ABI). Perceptual data included the number of electrodes that provided auditory sensation, location and type of side effects, level of speech perception (from no sound to open-set word recognition of monosyllables) and the amount of charge required for auditory perception. RESULTS: Although the 3D orientation of the ABI array exhibited a variety of angles, all arrays were posteriorly tilted from the lateral view and most were medially tilted from the posterior view. ABI position relative to the basion from posterior showed mean distances of 1.71 ± 0.42 and 1.1 ± 0.29 cm for D1 and D2, respectively, and a mean D2 of 1.30 ± 0.45 cm from the lateral view. A strong linear negative correlation was found between the number of active electrodes and the distance of the proximal array tip laterally from the basion (D2P; rs = -0.73, p = 0.006) when measured in the posterior view. Although side effects were experienced in all recipients and varied in type and location across the array, electrodes in the middle part of the array tended to elicit auditory sensations while the proximal and distal tips of the array tended to elicit nonauditory side effects. Arrays with and without low charge thresholds appeared to generally overlap in position. However, the two recipients with the best (open-set) speech perception had low charge thresholds and had arrays that were tilted superiorly in the posterior view. CONCLUSION: ABI recipients with better speech perception appear to share a profile of arrays that are tilted superiorly as compared to recipients with lower speech perception levels. These ABI recipients have a high number of active electrodes (10 or more) and require less electrical charge on individual electrodes to achieve optimal stimulation.


Subject(s)
Auditory Brain Stem Implantation , Auditory Brain Stem Implants , Neurofibromatosis 2 , Speech Perception , Adult , Auditory Brain Stem Implantation/methods , Electrodes , Humans , Neurofibromatosis 2/complications , Neurofibromatosis 2/diagnostic imaging , Neurofibromatosis 2/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Speech Perception/physiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33997720

ABSTRACT

The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) was originally developed to provide rehabilitation of retrocochlear deafness caused by neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Recent studies of the ABI have investigated outcomes in non-NF2 cohorts, such as patients with cochlear nerve aplasia or cochlear ossification and more recently, intractable tinnitus. New technologies that improve the ABI-neural tissue interface are being explored as means to improve performance and decrease side effects. Innovative discoveries in optogenetics and bioengineering present opportunities to continually evolve this technology into the future, enhancing spatial selectivity of neuronal activation in the cochlear nucleus and preventing side effects through reduction in activation of non-target neuronal circuitry. These advances will improve surgical planning and ultimately improve patients' audiological capabilities. ABI research has rapidly increased in the 21st century and applications of this technology are likely to continually evolve. Herein, we aim to characterize ongoing clinical, basic science, and bioengineering advances in ABIs and discuss future directions of this technology.

6.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base ; 81(2): 114-120, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32206528

ABSTRACT

Objective The auditory brain stem implant (ABI) is a neuroprosthesis placed on the surface of the cochlear nucleus (CN) to provide hearing sensations in children and adults who are not candidates for cochlear implantation. Contemporary ABI arrays are stiff and do not conform to the curved brain stem surface. Recent advancements in microfabrication techniques have enabled the development of flexible surface arrays, but these have only been applied in animal models. Herein, we measure the surface curvature of the human CN and adjoining regions to assist in the design and placement of next-generation conformable clinical ABI arrays. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions from ultrahigh T1-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences and histologic reconstructions based on postmortem adult human brain stem specimens were used. Design This is a retrospective review of radiologic data and postmortem histologic axial sections. Setting This is set at the tertiary referral center. Participants Data were acquired from healthy adults. Main Outcome Measures The main outcome measures are principal curvature values (Kmin and Kmax) and global radius of curvature. Results The CN was successfully extracted and rendered as a 3D surface in all cases. Significant curvatures of the CN in both histologic and radiographic reconstructions were found with global radius of curvature ranging from 2.08 to 8.5 mm. In addition, local curvature analysis revealed that the surface is highly complex. Conclusion Detailed rendering of the human CN is feasible using histology and 3D MRI reconstruction and highlights complex surface topography that is not recapitulated by contemporary stiff ABI arrays.

7.
Otol Neurotol ; 41(4): e484-e493, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32176138

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The cochlear nucleus (CN) is the target of the auditory brainstem implant (ABI). Most ABI candidates have Neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2) and distorted brainstem anatomy from bilateral vestibular schwannomas. The CN is difficult to characterize as routine structural MRI does not resolve detailed anatomy. We hypothesize that diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) enables both in vivo localization and quantitative measurements of CN morphology. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 7 Tesla (T) DTI images of 100 subjects (200 CN) and relevant anatomic structures using an MRI brainstem atlas with submillimetric (50 µm) resolution. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Young healthy normal hearing adults. INTERVENTION: Diagnostic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diffusion scalar measures such as fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), mode of anisotropy (Mode), principal eigenvectors of the CN, and the adjacent inferior cerebellar peduncle (ICP). RESULTS: The CN had a lamellar structure and ventral-dorsal fiber orientation and could be localized lateral to the inferior cerebellar peduncle (ICP). This fiber orientation was orthogonal to tracts of the adjacent ICP where the fibers run mainly caudal-rostrally. The CN had lower FA compared to the medial aspect of the ICP (0.44 ±â€Š0.09 vs. 0.64 ±â€Š0.08, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: 7T DTI enables characterization of human CN morphology and neuronal substructure. An ABI array insertion vector directed more caudally would better correspond to the main fiber axis of CN. State-of-the-art DTI has implications for ABI preoperative planning and future image guidance-assisted placement of the electrode array.


Subject(s)
Auditory Brain Stem Implants , Cochlear Nucleus , White Matter , Adult , Anisotropy , Diffusion Tensor Imaging , Humans
8.
Laryngoscope ; 130(2): 507-513, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31095742

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR) guide placement of the multichannel auditory brainstem implant (ABI) array during surgery. EABRs are also recorded under anesthesia in nontumor pediatric ABI recipients prior to device activation to confirm placement and guide device programming. We examine the influence of anesthesia on evoked response morphology in pediatric ABI users by comparing intraoperative with postoperative EABR recordings. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: Seven children underwent ABI surgery by way of retrosigmoid craniotomy. General anesthesia included inhaled sevoflurane induction and propofol maintenance during which EABRs were recorded to confirm accurate positioning of the ABI. A mean of 7.7 ± 2.8 weeks following surgery, the ABI was activated under general anesthesia or sedation (dexmedetomidine) and EABR recordings were made. A qualitative analysis of intraoperative and postoperative waveform morphology was performed. RESULTS: Seven subjects (mean age 20.6 months) underwent nine ABI surgeries (seven primary, two revisions) and nine activations. EABRs were observed in eight of nine postoperative recordings. In three cases, intraoperative EABRs during general anesthesia were similar to postoperative EABRs with sedation. In one case, sevoflurane and propofol were used for intra- and postoperative recordings, and waveforms were also similar. In four cases, amplitude and latency changes were observed for intraoperative versus postoperative EABRs. CONCLUSION: Similarity of EABR morphology in the anesthetized versus sedated condition suggests that anesthesia does not have a large effect on far-field evoked potentials. Changes in EABR waveform morphology observed postoperatively may be influenced by other factors such as movements of the surface array. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:507-513, 2020.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics/pharmacology , Auditory Brain Stem Implants , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/drug effects , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Anesthesia, General , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Conscious Sedation , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Propofol/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage
9.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am ; 53(1): 171-183, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31739905

ABSTRACT

Despite advances in implant hardware, neuroprosthetic devices in otolaryngology have sustained evolutionary rather than revolutionary changes over the past half century. Although electrical stimulation has the capacity for facile activation of neurons and high temporal resolution, it has limited spatial selectivity. Alternative strategies for neuronal stimulation are being investigated to improve spatial resolution. In particular, light-based neuronal stimulation is a viable alternative and complement to electrical stimulation. This article provides a broad overview of light-based neuronal stimulation technologies. Specific examples of active research on light-based prostheses, including cochlear implants, auditory brainstem implants, retinal implants, and facial nerve implants, are reviewed.


Subject(s)
Cranial Nerves/physiology , Deafness/therapy , Neural Prostheses , Optogenetics/methods , Animals , Cranial Nerves/surgery , Electric Stimulation , Humans , Optogenetics/instrumentation
10.
Sci Transl Med ; 11(514)2019 10 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31619546

ABSTRACT

Auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) provide sound awareness to deaf individuals who are not candidates for the cochlear implant. The ABI electrode array rests on the surface of the cochlear nucleus (CN) in the brainstem and delivers multichannel electrical stimulation. The complex anatomy and physiology of the CN, together with poor spatial selectivity of electrical stimulation and inherent stiffness of contemporary multichannel arrays, leads to only modest auditory outcomes among ABI users. Here, we hypothesized that a soft ABI could enhance biomechanical compatibility with the curved CN surface. We developed implantable ABIs that are compatible with surgical handling, conform to the curvature of the CN after placement, and deliver efficient electrical stimulation. The soft ABI array design relies on precise microstructuring of plastic-metal-plastic multilayers to enable mechanical compliance, patterning, and electrical function. We fabricated soft ABIs to the scale of mouse and human CN and validated them in vitro. Experiments in mice demonstrated that these implants reliably evoked auditory neural activity over 1 month in vivo. Evaluation in human cadaveric models confirmed compatibility after insertion using an endoscopic-assisted craniotomy surgery, ease of array positioning, and robustness and reliability of the soft electrodes. This neurotechnology offers an opportunity to treat deafness in patients who are not candidates for the cochlear implant, and the design and manufacturing principles are broadly applicable to implantable soft bioelectronics throughout the central and peripheral nervous system.


Subject(s)
Auditory Brain Stem Implants , Animals , Cochlear Implants , Cochlear Nucleus , Deafness/therapy , Electric Stimulation , Humans , Mice
11.
J Neurophysiol ; 122(5): 1962-1974, 2019 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31533018

ABSTRACT

Optogenetics comprise a promising alternative to electrical stimulation for characterization of neural circuits and for the next generation of neural prostheses. Optogenetic stimulation relies on expression of photosensitive microbial proteins in animal cells to initiate a flow of ions into the cells in response to visible light. Here, we generated a novel transgenic mouse model in which we studied the optogenetic activation of spiral ganglion neurons, the primary afferent neurons of the auditory system, and showed a strong optogenetic response, with a similar amplitude as the acoustically evoked response. A twofold increase in the level of channelrhodopsin expression significantly increased the photosensitivity at both the single cell and organismal levels but also partially compromised the native electrophysiological properties of the neurons. The importance of channelrhodopsin expression level to optogenetic stimulation, revealed by these quantitative measurements, will be significant for the characterization of neural circuitry and for the use of optogenetics in neural prostheses.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study reveals a dose-response relationship between channelrhodopsin expression and optogenetic excitation. Both single cell and organismal responses depend on the expression level of the heterologous protein. Expression level of the opsin is thus an important variable in determining the outcome of an optogenetic experiment. These results are key to the implementation of neural prostheses based on optogenetics, such as next generation cochlear implants, which would use light to elicit a neural response to sound.


Subject(s)
Channelrhodopsins/physiology , Cochlea/physiology , Electrophysiological Phenomena , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Neurons, Afferent/physiology , Optogenetics , Spiral Ganglion/physiology , Animals , Mice , Mice, Transgenic , Models, Animal
12.
Hear Res ; 377: 339-352, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30867111

ABSTRACT

Auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) restore hearing to deaf individuals not eligible for cochlear implants. Speech comprehension in ABI users is generally poor compared to that of cochlear implant users, and side effects are common. The poor performance may result from activating broad areas and multiple neuronal populations of the cochlear nucleus, however detailed studies of the responses to surface stimulation of the cochlear nucleus are lacking. A conformable electrode array was microfabricated to fit on the rat's dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). It hosts 20 small electrodes (each 100 µm diam.). The array was tested by recording evoked potentials and neural activity along the tonotopic axis of the inferior colliculus (IC). Almost all bipolar electrode pairs elicited responses, in some cases with an even, or relatively constant, pattern of thresholds and supra-threshold measures along the long axis of the array. This pattern suggests that conformable arrays can provide relatively constant excitation along the surface of the DCN and thus might decrease the ABI side effects caused by spread of high current to adjacent structures. We also examined tonotopic patterns of the IC responses. Compared to sound-evoked responses, electrically-evoked response mappings had less tonotopic organization and were broader in width. They became more tonotopic when the evoked activity common to all electrodes and the late phase of response were subtracted out, perhaps because the remaining activity is from tonotopically organized principal cells of the DCN. Responses became less tonotopic when inter-electrode distance was increased from 400 µm to 800 µm but were relatively unaffected by changing to monopolar stimulation. The results illustrate the challenges of using a surface array to present tonotopic cues and improve speech comprehension in humans who use the ABI.


Subject(s)
Auditory Brain Stem Implants , Cochlear Nucleus/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Hearing , Inferior Colliculi/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Animals , Auditory Pathways/physiology , Electric Stimulation , Male , Materials Testing , Prosthesis Design , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
13.
Front Neurosci ; 13: 10, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30760974

ABSTRACT

The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) was first developed nearly 40 years ago and provides auditory rehabilitation to patients who are deaf and ineligible for cochlear implant surgery due to abnormalities of the cochlea and cochlear nerve. The aims of the following review are to describe the history of the ABI and innovations leading up to the modern ABI system, as well as highlight areas of future development in implant design.

14.
Mol Ther ; 26(8): 1931-1939, 2018 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30017876

ABSTRACT

Optogenetics is a transformative technology based on light-sensitive microbial proteins, known as opsins, that enable precise modulation of neuronal activity with pulsed radiant energy. Optogenetics has been proposed as a means to improve auditory implant outcomes by reducing channel interaction and increasing electrode density, but the introduction of opsins into cochlear spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) in vivo has been challenging. Here we test opsin delivery using a synthetically developed ancestral adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector called Anc80L65. Wild-type C57BL/6 mouse pups were injected via the round window of cochlea with Anc80L65 carrying opsin Chronos under the control of a CAG promoter. Following an incubation of 6-22 weeks, pulsed blue light was delivered to cochlear SGNs via a cochleosotomy approach and flexible optical fiber. Optically evoked auditory brainstem responses (oABRs) and multiunit activity in inferior colliculus (IC) were observed. Post-experiment cochlear histology demonstrated opsin expression in SGNs (mean = 74%), with an even distribution of opsin along the cochlear basal/apical gradient. This study is the first to describe robust SGN transduction, opsin expression, and optically evoked auditory electrophysiology in neonatal mice. Ultimately, this work may provide the basis for a new generation of cochlear implant based on light.


Subject(s)
Genetic Vectors/administration & dosage , Opsins/genetics , Optogenetics/methods , Spiral Ganglion/metabolism , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Cochlear Implants , Dependovirus/genetics , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Humans , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Neurons/metabolism , Opsins/metabolism , Optical Fibers , Spiral Ganglion/physiology
15.
Ear Hear ; 38(6): e343-e351, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28700445

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) provides sound awareness to patients who are ineligible for cochlear implantation. Auditory performance varies widely among similar ABI cohorts. We hypothesize that differences in electrode array position contribute to this variance. Herein, we classify ABI array position based on postoperative imaging and investigate the relationship between position and perception. DESIGN: Retrospective review of pediatric and adult ABI users with postoperative computed tomography. To standardize views across subjects, true axial reformatted series of scans were created using the McRae line. Using multiplanar reconstructions, basion and electrode array tip coordinates and array angles from vertical were measured. From a lateral view, array angles (V) were classified into types I to IV, and from posterior view, array angles (T) were classified into types A to D. Array position was further categorized by measuring distance vertical from basion (D1) and lateral from midline (D2). Differences between array classifications were compared with audiometric thresholds, number of active electrodes, and pitch ranking. RESULTS: Pediatric (n = 4, 2 with revisions) and adult (n = 7) ABI subjects were included in this study. Subjects had a wide variety of ABI array angles, but most were aimed superiorly and posteriorly (type II, n = 7) from lateral view and upright or medially tilted from posterior view (type A, n = 6). Mean pediatric distances were 8 to 42% smaller than adults for D1 and D2. In subjects with perceptual data, electrical thresholds and the number of active electrodes differed among classification types. CONCLUSIONS: In this first study to classify ABI electrode array orientation, array position varied widely. This variability may explain differences in auditory performance.


Subject(s)
Auditory Brain Stem Implantation/methods , Auditory Brain Stem Implants , Auditory Perception , Brain Stem/diagnostic imaging , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Vestibulocochlear Nerve/abnormalities , Adult , Aged , Audiometry , Child, Preschool , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Infant , Middle Aged , Nervous System Malformations/complications , Neurofibromatosis 2/complications , Postoperative Period , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
16.
J Neurophysiol ; 115(3): 1644-53, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26823515

ABSTRACT

Medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons provide an efferent innervation to outer hair cells (OHCs) of the cochlea, but their tonotopic mapping is incompletely known. In the present study of anesthetized guinea pigs, the MOC mapping was investigated using in vivo, extracellular recording, and labeling at a site along the cochlear course of the axons. The MOC axons enter the cochlea at its base and spiral apically, successively turning out to innervate OHCs according to their characteristic frequencies (CFs). Recordings made at a site in the cochlear basal turn yielded a distribution of MOC CFs with an upper limit, or "edge," due to usually absent higher-CF axons that presumably innervate more basal locations. The CFs at the edge, normalized across preparations, were equal to the CFs of the auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) at the recording sites (near 16 kHz). Corresponding anatomical data from extracellular injections showed spiraling MOC axons giving rise to an edge of labeling at the position of a narrow band of labeled ANFs. Overall, the edges of the MOC CFs and labeling, with their correspondences to ANFs, suggest similar tonotopic mappings of these efferent and afferent fibers, at least in the cochlear basal turn. They also suggest that MOC axons miss much of the position of the more basally located cochlear amplifier appropriate for their CF; instead, the MOC innervation may be optimized for protection from damage by acoustic overstimulation.


Subject(s)
Cochlea/innervation , Cochlear Nerve/cytology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Animals , Axons/physiology , Brain Stem/cytology , Brain Stem/physiology , Cochlea/physiology , Cochlear Nerve/physiology , Female , Guinea Pigs , Male
17.
J Mater Chem B ; 3(25): 5021-5027, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26207184

ABSTRACT

The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) restores hearing in patients with damaged auditory nerves. One of the main ideas to improve the efficacy of ABIs is to increase spatial specificity of stimulation, in order to minimize extra-auditory side-effects and to maximize the tonotopy of stimulation. This study reports on the development of a microfabricated conformable electrode array with small (100 µm diameter) electrode sites. The latter are coated with a conducting polymer, PEDOT:PSS, to offer high charge injection properties and to safely stimulate the auditory system with small stimulation sites. We report on the design and fabrication of the polymer implant, and characterize the coatings in physiological conditions in vitro and under mechanical deformation. We characterize the coating electrochemically and during bending tests. We present a proof of principle experiment where the auditory system is efficiently activated by the flexible polymeric interface in a rat model. These results demonstrate the potential of using conducting polymer coatings on small electrode sites for electrochemically safe and efficient stimulation of the central auditory system.

18.
J Vis Exp ; (95): 52426, 2015 Jan 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25650555

ABSTRACT

Investigation into the use of virus-mediated gene transfer to arrest or reverse hearing loss has largely been relegated to the peripheral auditory system. Few studies have examined gene transfer to the central auditory system. The dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) of the brainstem, which contains second order neurons of the auditory pathway, is a potential site for gene transfer. In this protocol, a technique for direct and maximal exposure of the murine DCN via a posterior fossa approach is demonstrated. This approach allows for either acute or survival surgery. Following direct visualization of the DCN, a host of experiments are possible, including injection of opsins into the cochlear nucleus and subsequent stimulation by an optical fiber coupled to a blue light laser. Other neurophysiology experiments, such as electrical stimulation and neural injector tracings are also feasible. The level of visualization and the duration of stimulation achievable make this approach applicable to a wide range of experiments.


Subject(s)
Auditory Pathways/physiology , Cochlear Nucleus/physiology , Cochlear Nucleus/surgery , Animals , Brain Stem/physiology , Electric Stimulation/methods , Gene Transfer Techniques , Mice , Models, Animal , Neurons/physiology , Optogenetics
19.
Hear Res ; 322: 235-41, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25598479

ABSTRACT

Contemporary auditory brainstem implant (ABI) performance is limited by reliance on electrical neurostimulation with its accompanying channel cross talk and current spread to non-auditory neurons. A new generation ABI based on optogenetic technology may ameliorate limitations fundamental to electrical stimulation. The most widely studied opsin is channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2); however, its relatively slow kinetic properties may prevent the encoding of auditory information at high stimulation rates. In the present study, we compare the temporal resolution of light-evoked responses of ChR2 to a recently developed fast opsin, Chronos, to ChR2 in a murine ABI model. Viral mediated gene transfer via a posterolateral craniotomy was used to express Chronos or ChR2 in the cochlear nucleus (CN). Following a four to eight week incubation period, blue light (473 nm) was delivered via an optical fiber placed directly on the surface of the infected CN, and neural activity was recorded in the contralateral inferior colliculus (IC). Both ChR2 and Chronos evoked sustained responses to all stimuli, even at high pulse rates. In addition, optical stimulation evoked excitatory responses throughout the tonotopic axis of the IC. Synchrony of the light-evoked response to stimulus rates of 14-448 pulses/s was higher in Chronos compared to ChR2 mice (p < 0.05 at 56, 168, and 224 pulses/s). Our results demonstrate that Chronos has the ability to drive the auditory system at higher stimulation rates than ChR2 and may be a more ideal opsin for manipulation of auditory pathways in future optogenetic-based neuroprostheses. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Lasker Award".


Subject(s)
Auditory Brain Stem Implants , Auditory Pathways/physiology , Cochlear Nucleus/physiology , Gene Transfer Techniques , Opsins/biosynthesis , Optogenetics , Rhodopsin/biosynthesis , Animals , Auditory Pathways/metabolism , Cochlear Nucleus/metabolism , Dependovirus/genetics , Evoked Potentials , Genetic Vectors , Kinetics , Light , Mice, Inbred CBA , Microinjections , Opsins/genetics , Photic Stimulation , Prosthesis Design , Rhodopsin/genetics
20.
Brain Res ; 1599: 44-56, 2015 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25481416

ABSTRACT

Optogenetics has become an important research tool and is being considered as the basis for several neural prostheses. However, few studies have applied optogenetics to the auditory brainstem. This study explored whether optical activation of the cochlear nucleus (CN) elicited responses in neurons in higher centers of the auditory pathway and whether it elicited an evoked response. Viral-mediated gene transfer was used to express channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) in the mouse CN. Blue light was delivered via an optical fiber placed near the surface of the infected CN and recordings were made in higher-level centers. Optical stimulation evoked excitatory multiunit spiking activity throughout the tonotopic axis of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (IC) and the auditory cortex (Actx). The pattern and magnitude of IC activity elicited by optical stimulation was comparable to that obtained with a 50dB SPL acoustic click. This broad pattern of activity was consistent with histological confirmation of green fluorescent protein (GFP) label of cell bodies and axons throughout the CN. Increasing pulse rates up to 320Hz did not significantly affect threshold or bandwidth of the IC responses, but rates higher than 50Hz resulted in desynchronized activity. Optical stimulation also evoked an auditory brainstem response, which had a simpler waveform than the response to acoustic stimulation. Control cases showed no responses to optical stimulation. These data suggest that optogenetic control of central auditory neurons is feasible, but opsins with faster channel kinetics may be necessary to convey information at rates typical of many auditory signals.


Subject(s)
Auditory Pathways/physiology , Cochlear Nucleus/physiology , Optogenetics/methods , Acoustic Stimulation , Action Potentials , Animals , Auditory Cortex/cytology , Auditory Cortex/physiology , Auditory Pathways/cytology , Channelrhodopsins , Cochlear Nucleus/cytology , Electric Stimulation , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Feasibility Studies , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism , Inferior Colliculi/cytology , Inferior Colliculi/physiology , Mice, Inbred CBA , Neurons/cytology , Neurons/physiology , Photic Stimulation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...