Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
2.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 103(8): 741-747, 2021 04 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33587517

ABSTRACT

➤: Osteoporosis is common in orthopaedic patients, not only in those sustaining fragility fractures but also in patients ≥50 years old who are having elective orthopaedic surgery. ➤: The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) has developed consensus-based recommendations for secondary fracture prevention for all patients who are ≥65 years old with a hip or spine fracture. ➤: The ASBMR encourages orthopaedic surgeons to "Own the Bone," by beginning prevention of a secondary fracture during hospitalization for a fragility fracture, if practicable, and arranging follow-up for continued bone health care after discharge. ➤: The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) recognized that many poor outcomes and complications of elective orthopaedic surgery are related to osteoporosis. ➤: The ISCD used an evidence-based approach to create official positions to identify which patients ≥50 years old who are having elective orthopaedic surgery should undergo assessment of bone health and how this should be performed.


Subject(s)
Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporosis/therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Perioperative Care/methods , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Secondary Prevention/methods , Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Absorptiometry, Photon/standards , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Elective Surgical Procedures/standards , Humans , Orthopedic Procedures/standards , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporotic Fractures/etiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/surgery , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Perioperative Care/standards , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Assessment , Secondary Prevention/standards
3.
Acta Orthop ; 87(2): 152-7, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26986550

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is continuing confusion among practitioners with regard to the optimal choice of anesthetic type for repair of hip fractures. We investigated whether type of anesthetic was associated with short-term mortality after hip fracture surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with surgically treated hip fractures, performed between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2012. Exposure of interest was anesthesia type (general, spinal/neuroaxial, and mixed). Endpoints were 30-, 90-, and 365-day post-surgery mortality. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. RESULTS: Of the 7,585 participants, 5,412 (71%) were women and the median age was 80 (IQR: 72-85) years old. Of the total cohort, 4,257 (56%) received general anesthesia, 3,059 (40%) received spinal/neuroaxial, and 269 (4%) received mixed anesthesia. Overall, the incidence of 30-, 90-, and 365-day mortality was 4% (n = 307), 8% (n = 583), and 15% (n = 1,126), respectively. When compared with general anesthesia, the 365-day odds of mortality was marginally lower in patients with spinal/neuroaxial anesthesia (OR = 0.84, CI: 0.70-1.0), but it was similar in patients with mixed anesthesia (OR = 1.3, CI: 0.70-2.3). No other statistically significant differences were observed. INTERPRETATION: Regarding mortality, this study does not support specific recommendations regarding the type of anesthetic in surgery of fractured hips.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Conduction/mortality , Anesthesia, General/mortality , Hip Fractures/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia, Spinal/mortality , California/epidemiology , Female , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 11: 4, 2016 Jan 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26746904

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures result in both health and cost burdens from a public health perspective and have a major impact on the health care system in the USA. The purpose was to examine whether there were systematic differences in hip fracture incidence and 30-, 90-, and 365-day mortality after hip fracture in the California population as a function of age, gender, and race/ethnicity from 2000-2011. METHODS: This was a population-based study from 2000 to 2011 using data from the California Office of Statewide Health and Planning and Development (OSHPD, N = 317,677), California State Death Statistical Master File records (N = 224,899), and the US Census 2000 and 2010. There were a total of 317,677 hospital admissions for hip fractures over the 12-year span and 24,899 deaths following hip fractures. All participants without linkage (substituted for social security) numbers were excluded from mortality rate calculations. Variation in incidence and mortality rates across time, gender, race/ethnicity, and age were assessed using Poisson regression models. Odds ratio and 95 % confidence intervals are provided. RESULTS: The incidence rate of hip fractures decreased between 2000 and 2011 (odds ratio (OR) = 0.98, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.98, 0.98). Mortality rates also decreased over time. There were gender, race/ethnicity, and age group differences in both incidence and mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: Males were half as likely to sustain a hip fracture, but their mortality within a year of the procedure is almost twice the rate than women. As age increased, the prevalence of hip fracture increased dramatically, but mortality did not increase as steeply. Caucasians were more likely to sustain a hip fracture and to die within 1 year after a hip fracture. The disparities in subpopulations will allow for targeted population interventions and opportunities for further research.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures/ethnology , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asian/statistics & numerical data , California/epidemiology , Female , Hip Fractures/mortality , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Sex Distribution
7.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 23(2): 131-7, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25624365

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this clinical practice guideline is to help improve treatment and management of hip fractures in the elderly based on current best evidence. The guideline contains twenty-five recommendations, including both diagnosis and treatment. Of those recommendations, strong evidence supports regional analgesia to improve preoperative pain control, similar outcomes for general or spinal anesthesia, arthroplasty for patients with unstable (displaced) femoral neck fractures, the use of a cephalomedullary device for the treatment of patients with subtrochanteric or reverse obliquity fractures, a blood transfusion threshold of no higher than 8 g/dL in asymptomatic postoperative patients, intensive physical therapy postdischarge, use of an interdisciplinary care program in patients with mild to moderate dementia, and multimodal pain management after hip fracture surgery. In addition to the recommendations, the work group highlighted the need for better research in the treatment of hip fractures.


Subject(s)
Disease Management , Hip Fractures/surgery , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Risk Factors
10.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 32(12): 585-92, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14713064

ABSTRACT

We investigated the role of toe implants in systemic disease and evaluated local complications after foot surgery. Information was obtained from the medical records of Kaiser Permanente (northern California) patients who had undergone toe surgery between 1979 and 1988. Computerized hospitalization records were used to identify patients with toe implants (N=814) and matched controls with foot surgery not involving implants (N=837). Brain cancer and alopecia areata occurred more among implant patients, whereas dysphagia occurred more among nonimplant patients. A larger proportion of implant patients were diagnosed with pain and swelling, tendonitis, and osteomyelitis or periostitis. Nonimplant patients were more often diagnosed with derangement of foot or ankle and delayed postoperative healing. We did not find a general association between implants and connective tissue diseases.


Subject(s)
Prostheses and Implants/adverse effects , Toes , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alopecia Areata/etiology , Brain Neoplasms/etiology , Cohort Studies , Connective Tissue Diseases/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Silicone Elastomers , Toes/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...