Surgical management of complicated rectovaginal fistulas and the role of omentoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients with rectovaginal fistulas have a significantly reduced quality of life. Therefore, surgical therapy is often needed even in palliative cases. The aim of the present study was to perform an analysis of the results of the different treatment options available today. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent treatment for rectovaginal fistulas at the Department of Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck and the Department of Surgery, WKK Heide, between January 2000 and September 2016. Complication and recurrence rate were retrospectively evaluated. The median follow-up period was 13 months (range 3-36 months). RESULTS: During the observation period, 58 patients underwent surgery (53 curative, 5 palliative) for rectovaginal fistulas. All patients who underwent curative surgery had an omentoplasty, and 39 of 53 (73.6%) patients underwent a resection. Thirty of 39 (77.0%) resections were low anterior resection, while non-continence-preserving resection included subtotal colectomy (n = 5), pelvic exenteration (n = 2), and proctectomy (n = 2). The fistulas were mainly secondary to inflammatory bowel disease (n = 18) or diverticulitis (n = 13), while 19 fistulas were a complication of different cancers or precancerous lesions. The median follow-up time was 13 months (range 6-36). Four patients (6.9%) had fistula recurrence (3 recurrences after low anterior resection, 1 after primary fistula closure). The mortality rate was 6.9% (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: Non-resecting methods should be used only in uncomplicated fistulas. Rectovaginal fistulas secondary to inflammatory or malignant disease mostly require extensive therapy. Omentoplasty is effective for the treatment of both high and low rectovaginal fistulas.

Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality in Esophageal Perforation: Retrospective Study of 80 Patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Esophageal perforation is a life-threatening disease. Factors impacting morbidity and mortality include the cause and site of the perforation, the time to diagnosis, and the therapeutic procedure. This study aimed to identify risk factors for morbidity and mortality after esophageal perforation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data collected from all patients treated for esophageal perforation at the Department of Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck Campus, from January 1986 through December 2011. RESULTS: Altogether, 80 patients (52 men, 28 women; mean age 65 years) were treated. The cause of perforation was intraluminal in 44 (55%) (group A) and extraluminal in 2 (3%) (group B). Spontaneous perforations were observed in 12 (15%) (group C). Perforations were due to a preexisting esophageal disease in 22 (28%) (group D). The survival rate was higher for group A (82%) than for groups B (50%), C (57%), and D (59%). The distal third of the esophagus had the highest prevalence of perforations (49, 61%) independent of the cause. Mortality, however, was independent of the perforation site. Perforations were diagnosed within 24 h in 57% (n = 46) of patients, associated with a statistically significant lower mortality rate (p = 0.035). Altogether, 40 patients underwent non-operative treatment, and among those 27 had endoscopic treatment. Emergency thoracic surgery was performed in 40 patients: direct suture of the defect (n = 26), partial esophageal resection (n = 11), other (n = 3). Significantly higher morbidity (p = 0.007) and prolonged hospitalization (p < 0.0001) was observed among patients who underwent emergency surgery. Mortality was higher in the surgical group (14/40) than in the non-operative treatment group (9/40) but without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Intraluminal perforations, rapid initiation of therapy, and non-operative treatment were associated with favorable outcomes. The perforation site did not have an impact on outcomes. Esophageal resection was associated with high mortality.

Laparoscopic resection of right colon cancer-a matched pairs analysis.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopy for colorectal cancer resection bares early post-operative advantages and results in equal oncologic long-term outcome. However, data on laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy is scarce. Aim of the present study was to analyze a well selected collective of patients with right-sided colon cancer treated open and laparoscopically with regard to peri-operative and long-term outcome. METHODS: We analyzed all patients who underwent right-sided hemi-colectomy for colon cancer between January 1996 and March 2013. Data was extracted from our prospective database. Inclusion criteria were tumor localization in the ascending colon, oncologic resection, histology of an adenocarcinoma, tumors UICC I-III, and R0 resection. Exclusion criteria were multiple malignancies including colon, emergency operation, adenoma or pT0 status, and UICC IV. For the matched pairs approach between patients undergoing laparoscopic (LAP) or open (OPEN) surgery, the parameters age, UICC stage, tumor grading, and sex were applied. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients was included in the analysis with n = 94 in both the LAP and the OPEN group. Some peri-operative results demonstrated advantages for laparoscopy including median return to liquid (p < 0.0001) and solid diet (p = 0.008), median length of ICU stay (p < 0.0001), and median length of hospital stay (p = 0.022). No significant differences were revealed for complication rates, rates of anastomotic leakage, or 30-day mortality. Lymph node yield was identical. Also, no differences in oncologic long-term outcome were detected. Rates for local recurrence were 4.3 and 2.0 %. CONCLUSION: This matched pairs analysis verifies peri-operative advantages of laparoscopy explicitly for the sub-group of CRC patients undergoing right-sided hemi-colectomy in comparison to open surgery while demonstrating equivalent oncologic long-term results.

Laparoscopy for bowel obstruction--a contradiction? Results of a multi-institutional survey in Germany.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate on the acceptance and frequency of laparoscopic surgery for the management of acute and chronic bowel obstruction in a general patient population in German hospitals. METHODS: To receive an authoritative opinion on laparoscopic treatment of bowel obstruction in Germany, a cross-sectional online study was conducted. We designed an online-based survey, supported by the German College of Surgeons (Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgen, BDC) to get multi-institutional-based data from various level providers of patient care. RESULTS: Between January and February 2014, we received completed questionnaires from 235 individuals (16.7 %). The participating surgeons were a representative sample of German hospitals with regard to hospital size, level of center size, and localization. A total of 74.9 % (n = 176) of all responders stated to use laparoscopy as the initial step of exploration in expected bowel obstruction. This procedure was highly statistically associated with the frequency of overall laparoscopic interventions and laparoscopic experience. The overall conversion rate was reported to be 29.4 %. CONCLUSIONS: This survey, investigating on the use of laparoscopic exploration or interventions in bowel obstruction, was able to show that by now, a majority of the responding surgeons accept laparoscopy as an initial step for exploration of the abdomen in the case of bowel obstruction. Laparoscopy was considered to be at least comparable to open surgery in an emergency setting. Furthermore, data analysis demonstrated generally accepted advantages and disadvantages of the laparoscopic approach. Indications for or against laparoscopy are made after careful consideration in each individual case.

[The validity of routine data on quality assurance: A qualitative systematic review]. / Die Validität von Routinedaten zur Qualitätssicherung : Eine qualitative systematische Übersichtsarbeit.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of the quality of medical practice is a legitimate requirement by society. Reliable methods for measurement of the quality of performance are sought worldwide. Quality is often quantified by using administrative data and in Germany this method has been implemented by the health insurance company AOK. OBJECTIVES: (1) How is the AOK quality system rated by senior consultant surgeons? (2) How valid are quality statements derived from administrative data? METHODS: This article was compiled following the PRISMA (i.e. preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) statement for qualitative systematic reviews. In order to answer the first question the Professional Association of German Surgeons (Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgen) initiated two surveys and to answer the second question a structured literature search following the PICO (i.e. patient problem or population, intervention, comparison control or comparator and outcomes) format was initiated. In addition numerous websites were contacted. RESULTS: Of the responding senior consultant surgeons 95% considered that the AOK method of quality measurement by administrative data is not objective. One third was definitely wrongly classified. The literature search revealed that no validation data exist for the AOK indicators, including the Elixhauser comorbidity risk score. Altogether, the sensitivity of indicators is poor when good sensitivity is defined by the Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care (AQUA Institute) as ≥ 80 < 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Quality statements resulting from administrative data alone are unreliable.

[Positioning Injuries to Peripheral Nerves during Laparoscopic Colon and Rectum Surgery]. / Lagerungsbedingte Nervenläsionen in der laparoskopischen kolorektalen Chirurgie.

Laparoscopic colon and rectum operations expose peripheral nerves to risk due to extreme patient positions needed to achieve gravity displacement during the surgical procedures. The general incidence of position-caused nerve injuries in surgery is not well known and is estimated to be about 0.5 % in the literature. There are no current data concerning laparoscopic operations. This study assesses the incidence and outcome of surgery-associated neurological symptoms after laparoscopic colon and rectum surgical procedures. We analysed the number of position-caused nerve injuries and their outcome from 1992-2010 in a prospectively managed data base. Risk factors like age, BMI, procedure duration and abduction of the upper extremities were analysed. There were 19 (0.7 %) position-caused nerve injuries among 2698 laparoscopic operations on the colon and rectum. The incidence of surgery-associated neurological symptoms was 1.08 % after laparoscopic rectum and 0.54 % after laparoscopic colon surgical procedures. Both operation time (267 vs. 185 minutes) and BMI (27.93 vs. 25.79 kg/m(2)) were revealed as risk factors for position-caused nerve injuries. Adduction of the upper extremities reduced the incidence of positioning nerve injuries from 0.23 % to 0.1 %. Postoperative neurological symptoms were in most cases reversible (89.47 %). The incidence of postoperative nerve injuries since 2007 is low after laparoscopic rectum and colon operations and is mostly completely reversible. Both procedure duration and BMI are probable risk factors for surgery-associated nerve injuries. Adduction of the upper extremities provides an opportunity to reduce position-caused nerve injuries.

[Gastric and duodenal perforations: what is the role of laparoscopic surgery?]. / Magen- und Duodenalperforation: Welchen Stellenwert hat die laparoskopische Chirurgie?

INTRODUCTION: The gastric and duodenal perforations are a life-threatening complication of peptic ulcer disease with the indication for immediate surgical intervention. To which extent laparoscopy is a suitable method in an acute situation was examined in the present investigation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of all patients within a period of 15 years (01/1996-12/2010) who were operated laparoscopically because of a perforated gastric or duodenal ulcer, were collected prospectively in terms of age, gender, localisation of perforation, diagnostics, symptoms, surgical procedures, intraoperative and postoperative complications and postoperative course, and were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: During the observation period 45 patients were operated laparoscopically due to gastric or duodenal perforation. The median age at operation was 58 (18-91) years. An NSAID medication was present in 11 (24.4 %) patients. The perforation was juxtapyloric in 12 (26.7 %) patients, postpyloric in 10 (22.2 %) patients, one (2.2 %) patient in each small and greater curvature, in 18 (40.0 %) at the front and in three (6.7 %) patients on the rear wall. In two cases, previous surgical treatment in the upper abdomen was performed. After primary diagnostic laparoscopy, an indication for conversion was seen in 20 (44.4 %) patients. During laparoscopically completed operations simple suturing was done in 18/25 (72.0 %) patients and excision and suturing was performed in 7/25 (37.8 %) patients. After conversion simple suturing was observed in 7/20 (35.0 %) patients, whereas in 10/20 (50.0 %) patients excision and suturing was performed. 3/20 (15.0 %) patients underwent a resective operation. The median operative time was 105 (40-306) minutes and mean hospitalisation 11 (4-66) days. The ICU stay was in median 2 (0-37) days. Major complications were seen in 11 (24.4 %) patients, namely re-laparotomy (n = 7; 15.6 %) and haemorrhage (n = 4; 8.9 %). Minor complications were observed in 8 (17.8 %) of cases. The mortality rate was 11.1 % (n = 5). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic treatment of gastric and duodenal perforations is a minimally invasive therapeutic option for the definitive treatment of this life-threatening disease. The indication for a laparoscopic approach has to be considered individually and depends to a decisive extent on the experience of the laparoscopic surgeon.

[Diagnostics and therapy for neuroendocrine neoplasia of an unknown primary - a plea for open exploration]. / Diagnostik und Therapie bei neuroendokrinen Neoplasien mit unklarem Primarius - ein Plädoyer für die offene Exploration.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) are a rare and heterogenous tumour entity. The subgroup with unknown primary tumour (N-CUP) seems to have a worse prognosis as resection of the primary is necessary for cure. The diagnostics and therapeutic algorithms for N-CUP in a German single centre are presented. PATIENTS/METHODS: Analysis of the surgical databank showed 35 cases of N-CUP in 261 cases with NEN from gastroenteropancreatic and lung origin over 2 decades (03/1990-03/2011). Three groups were built: K1 - primary detection after operative exploration (n = 10), K2 - unknown primary after operative exploration (n = 10) and K3 - no operative exploration for various reasons (n = 13). RESULTS: Initially 13.4 % (35/261) of patients presented as N-CUP, after intensified diagnostics 12.7 % (33/261) and after operative exploration 8.8 % (23/261) remained with unknown primary tumour. The sex ratio was 1 : 1, the median age is significantly higher in N-CUP [63.8 years (y) vs. 55.9 y, p = 0.004), the 5-year-survival is lower (58 vs. 72 %, n. s.). compared to NEN with known primary. Operative exploration was performed in 60.6 % (20/33), 30 % (6/20) of them were found to have inoperable situations, in 20 % (4/20) single site metastases were removed completely and in 50 % (10/20) a primary tumour was detected (8 × midgut, 2 × pancreas) intraoperatively. In these cases 70 % (7/10) got complete tumour resection (R0) and in 30 % (3/10) primary tumour resection with debulking of liver metastasis was done. In K3 (39.4 %, 13/33) most patients [69.2 % (9/13)] were treated with chemotherapy. The median age in K1 was significantly lower than in K3 (54.9 y vs. 68.3 y, p = 0.028), male dominance was seen in K3 (3,3 : 1, n. s.). The average Ki-67 index was 4.3, 23.8 and 53 % in K1, K2 and K3 (p < 0.0001 for K1 and K3 and p = 0.035 for K2 and K3), respectively. The death rate was 20, 30 and 76.9 % in K1, K2 and K3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Primary tumours of the midgut and pancreas are often found in the subset of well differentiated neuroendocrine CUP syndrome after open surgical exploration. A high rate of complete tumour resection and cure can be achieved in these cases. After common diagnostic tools (CT, MRI and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy), immunhistochemistry can give important hints (CDX-2 for midgut, TTF-1 for lung and thyroid) for a primary lesion. Also in single site metastasis without primary tumour detection a good clinical outcome is seen after complete resection.

Treatment, outcome and quality of life after Fournier's gangrene: a multicentre study.

AIM: The object of this study was to describe the course of Fournier's gangrene and assess quality of life in a group of affected patients. METHOD: We evaluated patients who received inpatient treatment for Fournier's gangrene at five hospitals in northern Germany from 1995 to 2010. Surviving patients were asked to take part in a clinical follow-up and complete the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) quality-of-life questionnaire and a disease-specific questionnaire including a physical examination. RESULTS: Of the 86 patients, 72 (83.7%) were men. The mean age of the patients was 57.9 ± 13.9 (25-89) years. The mean length of hospital stay was 52.0 ± 54.0 (1-329) days. Fourteen (16.3%) patients (eight men) died primarily from Fournier's gangrene. The most common aetiological event was anogenital abscess formation (n = 24; 27.9%). Seventy-one (82.5%) patients had a mixed polymicrobial infection. SF-36 physical role functioning (P = 0.010), physical functioning (P = 0.008), general health (P = 0.010) and physical health summary (P = 0.006) scores were significantly lower than those of the normal population. Deterioration in sexual function was reported by 65% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with Fournier's gangrene experience persistent physical and mental health problems for a long period of time following their primary hospital stay and must receive long-term care from a variety of specialists, otherwise the disease leads to an increase in the duration of morbidity and a decrease in quality of life.

Obstructive defecation syndrome: 19 years of experience with laparoscopic resection rectopexy.

BACKGROUND: In obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) combinations of morphologic alterations of the pelvic floor and the colorectum are nearly always evident. Laparoscopic resection rectopexy (LRR) aims at restoring physiological function. We present the results of 19 years of experience with this procedure in patients with ODS. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2012, 264 patients underwent LRR for ODS at our department. Perioperative and follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS: The female/male ratio was 25.4:1, mean age was 61.3 years (±14.3 years), and mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.2 kg/m(2) (±4.2 kg/m(2)). The pathological conditions most frequently found in combination were a sigmoidocele plus a rectocele (n = 79) and a sigmoidocele plus a rectal prolapse or intussusception (n = 69). The conversion rate was 2.3 % (n = 6). The mortality rate was 0.75 % (n = 2), the rate of complications requiring surgical re-intervention was 4.3 % (n = 11), and the rate of minor complications was 19.8 % (n = 51). Follow-up data were available for 161 patients with a mean follow-up of 58.2 months (±47.1 months). Long-term results showed that 79.5 % of patients (n = 128) reported at least an improvement of symptoms. In cases of a sigmoidocele (n = 63 available for follow-up) or a rectal prolapse II°/III° (n = 72 available for follow-up), the improvement rates were 79.4 % (n = 50) and 81.9 % (n = 59), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LRR is a safe and effective procedure. Our perioperative results and long-term functional outcome strengthen the evidence regarding benefits of LRR in patients with an outlet obstruction. However, careful patient selection is essential.

[Open surgical versus laparoscopic treatment of iatrogenic colon perforation - results of a 13-year experience]. / Offen chirurgische versus laparoskopische Versorgung der iatrogenen Kolonperforation - Ergebnisse nach 13 Jahren Erfahrungen.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic colon perforation is a rare but life-threatening complication of colonscopy. As in other diseases, laparoscopic treatment has increasingly been propagated for the treatment of colonic disorders in the last years. The aim of this comparative study was to answer the question of whether laparoscopic surgical treatment may serve as a suitable treatment for the acute colon perforation comparable to open surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data of all patients who underwent surgery for iatrogenic colon perforation within a 13-year time period (1997-2009) were recorded prospectively and analysed retrospectively with regard to different perioperative parameters. In the following analysis the laparoscopically and open surgically treated patients were compared. RESULTS: In the observation period 24 patients with iatrogenic colon perforation were treated laparoscopically and 12 patients with open surgery. There were no significant differences concerning age in both groups. In both groups resection of the affected region was preferred [open surgically: 58 % (n = 7), laparoscopically: 80 % (n = 19)]. The median operation time was 105 min (range: 35 - 180) for the open surgically treated patients and 165 min (90 - 420) for laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.006). In 4 cases of the laparoscopic group a conversion via laparotomy was -necessary. There was no significant difference concerning the hospital stay between both groups with 14.5 days (7-40) for the open surgical and 11 days (7-25) for the laparoscopic group. Concerning the postoperative morbidity a significantly higher incidence could be seen in the open surgical group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: An iatrogenic colon perforation mostly leeds to the immediate indication for a surgical treatment. The morbidity and mortality is -primarily determined through the appearance of postoperative complications due to delays in diagnostics and treatment. In this study the feasibility of a laparoscopic treatment could be shown. The laparoscopy with its minimal access trauma offers an enlargement of the diagnostics as well as a safe treatment of the perforation in most patients. However, the laparoscopic treatment especially in emergancy situations requires -advanced experience of the surgeon and always needs a critical benefit-risk consideration in the individual situation.

Pancreatic carcinoma cell lines reflect frequency and variability of cancer stem cell markers in clinical tissue.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most deadly malignancies with insufficient therapeutic options and poor outcome. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are thought to be responsible for progression and therapy resistance. We investigated the potential of pancreatic cell lines for CSC research by analyzing to what extent they contain CSC populations and how representative these are compared to clinical tissue. METHODS: Six pancreatic cancer cell lines were analyzed by flow cytometry for CD326, CD133, CD44, CD24, CXCR4 and ABCG2. Subsequently, 70 primary pancreatic tissues were evaluated for CD326, CD133 and CD44 by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: All the cell lines but one showed a stable expression pattern throughout biological replicates. Marker expression in clinical tissue of CD44 distinguished normal patients from pancreatic carcinoma patients with a sensitivity of 50% at 80% specificity and metastasized from nonmetastasized carcinomas with 69% sensitivity at 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a link between elevated CD44 expression, malignancy and metastasis of pancreatic tissue. Furthermore, individual pancreatic cell lines show a substantial amount of cells with CSC properties which is comparable with interpatient variability detected in primary tissue. These pancreatic cancer cell lines could thus serve for urgently needed pharmacological CSC in vitro research.

[Increase in skin surface temperature in spinal anesthesia. Predictive value for probability of surgical tolerance]. / Hauttemperaturerhöhungen bei Spinalanästhesie. Prädiktiver Wert als Vorhersagewahrscheinlichkeit einer chirurgischen Toleranz.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia causes sympathetic blockade which leads to changes in the local temperature of the skin surface due to hyperemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: These changes in skin temperature were used in a newly developed method for estimating the level of analgesia. A total of 11 patients who were scheduled for surgical procedures of the lower extremities with symmetrical spinal anesthesia were included in the clinical study. By means of an electronic digital multi-channel body temperature measurement device with eight high precision temperature sensors placed on defined dermatomes, patient skin temperature was continuously measured at 2 s intervals and documented before, during and for 45 min after spinal anesthesia. Simultaneously, a neurological pin-prick test was carried on at regular intervals every 2 min on the defined dermatomes to calculate the correlation between the effects of analgesia and corresponding changes in skin temperature. RESULTS: The analyzed correlations showed that there is a minimum of 1.05°C temperature difference before and after spinal anesthesia especially on the lower extremities (foot, knee, inguinal) of patient dermatomes. The collected data of varying temperature differences were systematically evaluated using statistical software which led to a deeper understanding of the interdependency between temperature differences at different dermatomes. These interdependencies of temperature differences were used to develop a systematic analgesia level measurement algorithm. The algorithm calculates the skin temperature differences at specified dermatomes to find the accurate level of analgesia and also to find the forward and reverse progresses of analgesia. The developed mathematical method shows that it is possible to predict the level of analgesia up to an accuracy of 95% after spinal anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, it can be concluded that systematic processing of skin temperature data, collected at defined dermatomes can be used as a promising parameter for predicting surgical tolerance. The objective is to improve this experimental method with an extended patient population study.

[Laparoscopic resection rectopexy as treatment for obstructive defecation syndrome]. / Die laparoskopische Resektionsrektopexie zur Therapie des obstruktiven Defäkationssyndroms.

Anorectal outlet obstruction constitutes one form of chronic constipation. Combinations of morphological alterations of the pelvis, the pelvic floor and the colorectum are nearly always evident. The goal of the diagnostic work-up is to identify those patients who will profit from a surgical intervention. Resection rectopexy aims at restoring the physiological anatomy thereby ameliorating the functional interaction of structures effected with the laparoscopic approach entailing all advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Besides a detailed description of the surgical technique used and an algorithm for indications to operate we present our results after 19 years of experience. Throughout this period, 264 laparoscopic resection rectopexies for outlet obstruction were performed. With a mean follow-up of 58.2 months the rate of improvement of obstructive symptoms was 79.5 % (n = 128 of 161 available for follow-up). Present studies suggest that (laparoscopic) resection rectopexy entails better results in comparison to non-resecting procedures and procedures with the implantation of allogenic material. Certainly, in order to achieve these results a correct patient selection and an expertise in laparoscopic surgery are essential. Both the perioperative and the functional results of our own collective fortify the advantages of laparoscopic resection rectopexy in patients with an outlet obstruction.

[Surgical treatment and prognosis of rectovaginal fistulae according to their origin]. / Chirurgische Versorgung und Prognose rektovaginaler Fisteln in Abhängigkeit ihrer Genese.

INTRODUCTION: The rectovaginal fistula is a rare entity with heterogenic causality. Its genesis seems to predict the extent of operative treatment and the prognostic outcome. The aim of this study was to present different surgical techniques in the treatment of rectovaginal fistulas and their results in correspondence to the genesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1 / 2000 and 1 / 2010, the data of patients with rectovaginal fistulas were collected. The retrospective analysis included biographic and anamnestic data as well as clinical parameters, general and specific complications and postoperative data. RESULTS: In a timespan of ten years 36 patients with rectovaginal fistulas were treated. The most common causes were inflammatory diseases (n = 21) and earlier surgical measures (n = 6). Moreover tumour-associated fistulas (n = 5) and fistulas with unknown genesis (n = 4) were seen. As surgical techniques anterior resection (n = 21), transrectal flap plasty (n = 7), subtotal colectomy (n = 3), pelvine exenteration (n = 2) and rectal exstirpation (n = 1) were used. The closure of the vaginal lesion was performed by single suture (n = 25), flap plasty (n = 6), transvaginal omental plasty (n = 2) and posterior vaginal plasty (n = 1). All patients were provided with an omental plasty to perform a safe division of the concerned regions. Patients with a low fistula ( < 6 cm) were treated with transperineal omental plasty. The median follow-up was 12 months (6 - 36). Within this timespan 6 patients suffered from major complications [ARDS, anastomosis insufficiency, postoperative bleeding, recurrence of fistula (n = 3)]. Three patients died in the postoperative period (cerebellar infarct, septic complication associated with Crohn's disease, multiorgan failure in tumour recurrence). CONCLUSION: The genesis of rectovaginal fistulae is an important predictor for the size of resection which can range from simple excision to exenteration. For optimal therapy the surgical intervention needs to be integrated into an interdisciplinary therapy concept.

[Clinical trials with medical devices: lack of quality illustrated for faecal incontinence]. / Therapiestudien mit Medizinprodukten: Mangelnde Qualität illustriert anhand analer Inkontinenz.

BACKGROUND: Medical devices must be safe and functioning states the law. Treatments with medical devices need not be efficacious to be allowed. We investigated special requirements and problems arising from the law. METHODS: The market for medical devices is contrasted with that for drugs. The requirements of relevant laws are discussed. Finally, published clinical studies on anal incontinence are analysed with respect to their methodological quality. RESULTS: Clinical trials of medical devices for treat-ing anal incontinence are of poor methodological quality thus preventing evaluation of the devices' utility. CONCLUSION: Large, high quality clinical studies of the efficacy of medical devices for treating anal incontinence are urgently needed. Only such studies enable health technology assessment and comprehensible decisions on reimbursement by health insurance.

Transperineal omentum flap for the anatomic reconstruction of the rectovaginal space in the therapy of rectovaginal fistulas.

AIM: Deep rectovaginal fistulas are a rare entity and pose a delicate challenge for the surgeon. The present study introduces different operative interventions involved in transperineal omental flap surgery. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of all patients treated with a low or mid rectovaginal or enterovaginal fistula at the Department of Surgery of the University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, was performed. Treatment results were discussed with respect to aetiology, localization, morbidity and outcome. RESULTS: Between the years 2000 and 2010, a total of nine patients with a low or mid rectovaginal fistula were treated at our clinic. After local fistulectomy, all patients were additionally treated by a laparoscopically assisted omental flap reconstruction of the rectovaginal and perineal space. Eight of the nine patients received a protective ileostomy or colostomy. Only the patient with a history of Crohn's disease had no ileostomy raised. At a median follow-up of 22 months, no patient experienced recurrence of a rectovaginal fistula. Perioperative mortality was zero and minor complications were observed in 22%. Major complications were an anastomotic insufficiency after low anterior resection that was treated without further interventions. Another complication was a persistent fistula within the sphincter that needed re-operation and bovine plug repair combined with a mucosa flap. CONCLUSIONS: Complete omental reconstruction of the rectovaginal space appears decisive in the operative therapy of deep rectovaginal or enterovaginal fistulas. Comparative studies on standard therapies are necessary although direct comparison of case series is difficult.

Simultaneous laparoscopic pyloroplasty and ileocecal resection in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: The initial manifestation of Crohn's disease is often located within the terminal ileum. Other portions of the G.I. tract may be affected, however, as the disease involves the entire organ system. The disease often progresses chronically in flares and remissions and involves all layers of the intestinal wall, leading to strictures, stenosis and fistulas. These complications should only be treated surgically when clinically relevant in order to prevent acute exacerbations. METHODS: Laparoscopic surgery offers one the possibility to minimize surgical trauma with its very small incisions and proper dissection through the correct anatomical layers with 10-fold optic magnification. RESULTS: Multifocal procedures can be carried out in the same operation. We present the case of a 26-year-old female with terminal ileum stenosis and gastric outlet obstruction, who underwent simultaneous laparoscopic pyloroplasty and ileocecal resection. DISCUSSION: Providing the surgeon possesses the necessary expertise, complex laparoscopic simultaneous procedures.

[A comparison of the use of electrochemical treatment and radio frequency ablation in porcine liver]. / Intrahepatische Ablation: Radiofrequenzablation versus Elektrochemische Lyse.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and electrochemical treatment (ECT) are competing methods of intrahepatic ablation. We compared RFA and ECT in a perfusion model and in vivo in pigs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-seven fresh porcine livers were obtained from a slaughterhouse and placed ex vivo into a perfusion model. RFA or ECT electrodes were inserted under ultrasound guidance in perivascular locations at a distance of 10 mm from a portal vessel. A total of 83 areas of ablation were created. In vivo ablations were performed at perivascular sites in 10 laparotomised pigs. Four areas of ablation were created per liver using RFA or ECL. Inflammatory parameters, liver values and cytokine levels were determined before and after surgery and on days 1, 3 and 7 after surgery. On day 7, the livers were harvested and specimens were analysed histo-logically by independent experts. RESULTS: In 29% of 59 ex vivo RFA ablations, the target temperature was not reached and the procedure was discontinued. Intact hepatocytes were detected in close proximity to 70 % of the vessels within necrotic areas. In 24 ECT applications, treatment time depended on the charge delivered and ranged between 50 min at 150 coulombs (C) and 200 min at 600 C. The pH level was 0.9 at the anode and 12.2 at the cathode. ECT always led to complete perivascular necrosis and vessel wall destruction. The animals had an in vivo -median weight of 39.5 kg. Neither RFA nor ECT caused major complications such as bleeding, bile leaks or abscesses. Treatment time was 67 min (200 C) for ECT and 12.4 min for RFA. In 73% of the cases, RFA led to incomplete perivascular areas of necrosis. ECT induced complete perivascular necrosis and vessel wall destruction. On day 1 after surgery, both ECT and RFA were associated with a significant increase in monocyte, C-reactive protein and aspartate aminotransferase levels. Leukocyte counts were elevated only after ECT, bilirubin levels only after RFA. There were no significant differences in interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and IL-1ß. CONCLUSION: Both RFA and ECL are safe methods of intrahepatic ablation. As a result of a heat sink effect of blood flow in nearby vessels, RFA leads to incomplete necrosis in perivascular sites both ex vivo and in vivo. ECT has the disadvantage of long treatment times but the advantage of lower costs since the platinum electrodes are reusable. Without a reduction in liver perfusion, the central application of RFA in close proximity to vessels should be considered problematic.

Laparoscopic extraperitoneal rectal cancer surgery: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic approach is increasingly applied in colorectal surgery. Although laparoscopic surgery in colon cancer has been proved to be safe and feasible with equivalent long-term oncological outcome compared to open surgery, safety and long-term oncological outcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer remain controversial. Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery might be efficacious, but indications and limitations are not clearly defined. Therefore, the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) has developed this clinical practice guideline. METHODS: An international expert panel was invited to appraise the current literature and to develop evidence-based recommendations. The expert panel constituted for a consensus development conference in May 2010. Thereafter, the recommendations were presented at the annual congress of the EAES in Geneva in June 2010 in a plenary session. A second consensus process (Delphi process) of the recommendations with the explanatory text was necessary due to the changes after the consensus conference. RESULTS: Laparoscopic surgery for extraperitoneal (mid- and low-) rectal cancer is feasible and widely accepted. The laparoscopic approach must offer the same quality of surgical specimen as in open surgery. Short-term outcomes such as bowel function, surgical-site infections, pain and hospital stay are slightly improved with the laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer is not inferior to the open in terms of disease-free survival, overall survival or local recurrence. Laparoscopic pelvic dissection may impair genitourinary and sexual function after rectal resection, like in open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for mid- and low-rectal cancer can be recommended under optimal conditions. Still, most level 1 evidence is for colon cancer surgery rather than rectal cancer. Upcoming results from large randomised trials are awaited to strengthen the evidence for improved short-term results and equal long-term results in comparison with the open approach.