Low-Dose vs High-Dose Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 2-Year Results From the COMPARE Trial.

BACKGROUND: So far only 1-year data have been reported for direct comparisons of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) using different coating technologies. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report the 24-month results on the efficacy and safety of low-dose vs high-dose PCBs with nominal paclitaxel densities of 2.0 and 3.5 µg/mm2 and different coating technologies for femoropopliteal interventions from the COMPARE (Compare I Pilot Study for the Treatment of Subjects With Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease) trial. Procedural characteristics of clinically driven (CD) target lesion revascularization (TLR) were analyzed. METHODS: Within a prospective, multicenter, clinical trial, 414 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford categories 2-4, maximum lesion length 30 cm) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular treatment with either a low-dose (Ranger) or a high-dose (IN.PACT) PCB after stratification for lesion length. Two-year follow-up included assessment of primary patency (defined as absence of CD TLR or binary restenosis with a peak systolic velocity ratio >2.4 by duplex ultrasound), safety, and functional and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: At 2 years, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary patency were 70.6% and 71.4% for the low-dose and high-dose PCBs (log-rank P = 0.96), respectively. One major amputation occurred in the high-dose group, and rates of all-cause mortality (3.6% vs 2.2%; P = 0.55) and CD TLR (17.3% vs 13.0%; P = 0.31) were similar between the groups. Among a total of 57 CD TLRs, 44.6% were performed for reocclusion and 28.1% for in-stent restenosis. Functional and clinical benefits over baseline were sustained in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year results of the COMPARE trial demonstrate a sustained treatment benefit of both low-dose and high-dose PCBs for femoropopliteal interventions including a wide range of lesion lengths. (Compare I Pilot Study for the Treatment of Subjects With Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease; NCT02701543).

Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Femoropopliteal Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty : 5-Year Results of the Randomized Controlled EffPac Trial.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess 5-year effectiveness and safety of femoropopliteal angioplasty with the Luminor® 35 drug-coated balloon (DCB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EffPac trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that enrolled 171 patients of Rutherford category 2 to 4 with medium length femoropopliteal lesions. Patients were allocated 1:1 to either Luminor® 35 DCB angioplasty or plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Assessment at 5 years included primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), clinical improvement, and target limb amputation. Long-term vital status was ascertained in 97.1% of the participants. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier curves at 5 years demonstrate a primary patency of 61.4% after DCB angioplasty and 53.5% after POBA (log-rank p = 0.040) with a decreasing difference throughout the observation period. Freedom from TLR was 82.1% and 73.7%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.050). Incidence of primary clinical improvement was similar between groups (61% DCB vs. 64% POBA, p = 0.94). Major target limb amputation was necessary in one POBA-group participant. Freedom from all-cause death at 5 years was 88.5% after DCB and 86.0% after POBA (log-rank p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Primary patency after femoropopliteal DCB angioplasty remained superior to POBA throughout 5 years, however, with decreasing difference. Clinical improvement, freedom from TLR, and all-cause mortality were similar between groups over the long term. (Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Coated Luminor® Balloon Catheter Versus Uncoated Balloon Catheter in the Superficial Femoral Artery [EffPac]; NCT02540018).

Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty of Femoropopliteal Lesions Maintained Superior Efficacy over Conventional Balloon: 2-year Results of the Randomized EffPac Trial.

Background Paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) catheter angioplasty is the preferred treatment for revascularization of femoropopliteal lesions in peripheral artery disease, but mortality is a safety concern. Purpose To assess 2-year efficacy and safety of DCB angioplasty compared with conventional balloon angioplasty (also known as plain old balloon angioplasty or POBA). Materials and Methods This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled consecutive participants with symptomatic superficial femoral and/or popliteal artery disease at 11 German centers between September 2015 and December 2016. Participants underwent DCB angioplasty or conventional balloon angioplasty. Primary outcome of 6-month late lumen loss showed superiority of DCB angioplasty over conventional balloon angioplasty. Evaluation at 2 years included secondary outcomes of primary patency and target lesion revascularization (TLR) estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis, clinical and hemodynamic improvement, quality of life, target limb amputation, and all-cause mortality. Results A total of 171 participants (mean age, 69 years ± 8; 111 men) were evaluated. At 2 years, primary patency was achieved in 90.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80.4%, 95.2%) of DCB angioplasty and 62.7% (95% CI: 50.0%, 73.0%) of conventional balloon angioplasty participants (P < .001). Freedom from TLR occurred in 97.2% (95% CI: 89.1%, 99.3%) of DCB angioplasty and 78% (95% CI: 66.5%, 86.0%) of conventional balloon angioplasty participants (P = .001). The groups did not differ in sustained improvement from baseline to 2 years in Rutherford-Becker category (row mean scores difference, 1.7; P = .19) and showed no difference in mean improvement in the Walking Impairment Questionnaire score (-0.8%; 95% CI: -11.8%, 10.2%; P = .88), EuroQol Group's five-dimension index of quality of life (-0.06; 95% CI: -0.17, 0.03; P = .20), or ankle-brachial index (0.03; 95% CI: -0.08, 0.14; P = .57). No major amputation was necessary. One DCB angioplasty and two conventional balloon angioplasty participants died (risk ratio, 0.48; 95% CI: 0.04, 5.10). Conclusion At 2 years after paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty, primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization remained superior compared with conventional balloon angioplasty. DCB angioplasty resulted in sustained clinical and hemodynamic improvement with no increased risk of mortality. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material in available for this article.

COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions.

AIMS: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal interventions have not been tested against each other. We aimed to directly compare efficacy and safety of a high-dose (In.Pact™) vs. low-dose (Ranger™) DCB with nominal paclitaxel densities of 3.5 vs. 2.0 µg/mm2. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority, clinical trial 414 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford classification 2-4) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular treatment with either high- or low-dose DCB after stratification for lesion length. Primary efficacy and safety endpoints comprised primary patency and freedom from major adverse events (i.e. device and procedure-related deaths through 1 month, major amputations, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 12 months). We set a non-inferiority margin of -10% at 12 months. Total occlusions were observed frequently (>40%) and provisional stenting was performed in every fourth intervention. Non-inferiority was determined for both primary efficacy and safety endpoints at 12 months. Primary patency was 81.5% in the high-dose and 83.0% in low-dose DCB group {difference: 1.5% [lower bound of the 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI) -5.2%]; Pnon-inferiority < 0.01}. Freedom from major adverse events was determined in 92.6% in high-dose and in 91.0% in low-dose DCB group [difference -1.6% (lower bound of the 90% two-sided CI -6.5%); Pnon-inferiority < 0.01]. Overall death rate was low (2.0%) and no major amputation occurred. CONCLUSION: Two DCBs with different coating characteristics exhibited comparable results with excellent effectiveness and safety through 12 months for femoropopliteal interventions including a wide range of lesion lengths. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02701543).

Efficacy and safety of a novel paclitaxel-nano-coated balloon for femoropopliteal angioplasty: one-year results of the EffPac trial.

AIMS: Although paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty is an established endovascular treatment for peripheral artery disease, restenosis remains a major concern. Thus, we compared a novel paclitaxel-coated DCB with nano-coating technology with uncoated plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicentre trial randomly assigned 171 patients with stenotic and occlusive lesions of the femoropopliteal artery to angioplasty with a novel DCB or uncoated POBA. The primary endpoint, late lumen loss at six months, was 0.92 mm lower in the DCB group (95% CI: -1.36 to -0.49 mm, p<0.001). Patients showed improved walking after DCB treatment at six months (p=0.021). In the DCB group, 44.6% and 50% of the patients improved by three Rutherford-Becker classification stages after six to 12 months, respectively (POBA: 27.8% and 36.8%, respectively). Only one patient needed TLR (1.3%) in the DCB group, compared to 14 patients (18.7%) in the POBA group after 12 months (relative risk [RR]=0.08, 95% CI: 0.01-0.53, p<0.001). Primary patency was 90.3% (DCB group) versus 65.3% (POBA group) after 12 months (RR=1.38, 95% CI: 1.14-1.67, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The novel DCB was effective and safe for inhibiting restenosis. Moreover, it demonstrated a better improvement in walking than POBA and showed no mortality concerns due to paclitaxel application after 12 months. Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT02540018

Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Drug-Coated Balloon Revascularization in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials of drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) for femoropopliteal interventions reported superior patency rates for both strategies compared to standard balloon angioplasty. To date, head-to-head comparisons are missing. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to compare DES versus DCB for femoropopliteal lesions through 36 months. METHODS: Within a multicenter, randomized trial, 150 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal disease were randomly assigned to primary DES implantation or DCB angioplasty with bailout stenting after stratification for lesion length (≤10 cm, >10 cm to ≤20 cm, and >20 cm to ≤30 cm). The primary effectiveness endpoint was primary patency at 12 months assessed by Kaplan-Meier. Secondary endpoints comprised major adverse events including death, major amputations, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: More than one-half of lesions were total occlusions, and the stenting rate was 25.3% in the DCB group. Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary patency were 79% and 80% for DES and DCB at 12 months (p = 0.96) but decreased to 54% and 38% through 36 months (p = 0.17), respectively. Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization was >90% at 12 months but dropped to around 70% at 36 months in both groups. Overall, the mortality rate through 36 months was 7.3%, with 1 procedure-related death in the DCB group. Improvement of clinical outcomes was sustained through 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patency rates at 12 months suggest comparable effectiveness and safety of DES versus DCB plus bailout stenting in femoropopliteal interventions; a trend in favor of the DES was observed up to 36 months. (Randomized Evaluation of the Zilver PTX Stent vs. Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloons for Treatment of Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease of the Femoropopliteal Artery [REAL PTX]; NCT01728441).

Svelte integrated delivery system performance examined through diagnostic catheter delivery: the SPEED registry.

AIMS: The multi-center SPEED registry evaluated the procedural success and in-hospital clinical outcomes of direct stenting with the Svelte 'all-in-one' coronary stent Integrated Delivery System (IDS) through diagnostic catheters to identify the clinical indications for which this approach is appropriately suited. METHODS & RESULTS: Forty-eight (48) patients with 54 lesions of lengths ≤20 mm and RVD 2.5-3.5 mm were targeted for direct stenting through diagnostic catheters (4-6F) via radial or femoral approach. Procedural characteristics early in an investigator's experience (28 lesions) were compared with outcomes following experience (26 lesions). Procedure, device and strategy success were realized in 54 (100%), 50 (93%) and 46 (85%) lesions, respectively, with strategy success significantly related to RVD (P = 0.05), lesion location (P = 0.01), and diagnostic catheter size (P = 0.05). Significant improvement in crossing and intervention time and trends toward improvement in device and strategy success, reductions in procedure and radiation time and contrast use were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Direct stenting through diagnostic catheters via radial or femoral approach using the Svelte IDS is feasible and associated with good in-hospital outcomes. This approach offers the attractive option of assessing lesions via diagnostic catheter and, depending upon vessel anatomy and lesion morphology, continuing with ad-hoc interventional treatment using the same diagnostic catheter. Improvements in strategy success and procedural efficiencies, based on operator experience, facilitate catheter downsizing and reduce intervention time, ancillary product use and overall procedure costs. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[Takotsubo syndrome from original description up to now]. / Das Takotsubo-Syndrom von der Erstbeschreibung bis heute.

Stress-induced cardiomyopathy, also known as takotsubo syndrome, imitates an acute ST elevation myocardial infarction or an acute coronary syndrome, but without concomitant coronary artery disease. It mainly affects postmenopausal women, but no established epidemiologic data of this syndrome are available to date. Furthermore, the underlying etiologies are still largely unknown. The most frequently described trigger is strong emotional stress. Supportive therapy with aspirin, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is recommended. The abnormal kinetics usually reverse or improve within 4-5 weeks. Compared with acute myocardial infarction, takotsubo cardiomyopathy carries a favorable prognosis. However, severe complications, including ventricular fibrillation and cardiogenic shock, may still occur.

Contribution of right-sided heart enlargement to cardiomegaly on chest roentgenogram in diastolic and systolic heart failure.

We investigated the contribution of a dilated right-sided heart to roentgenographic cardiomegaly in patients with heart failure (HF) and a normal ejection fraction (EF; diastolic HF) and those with HF and a decreased EF (systolic HF). We compared the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) on upright chest roentgenograms and major- and minor-axis dimensions of the 4 cardiac chambers on echocardiograms in patients with HF and a normal EF (> or =0.50, n = 35) and those with a decreased EF (<0.50, n = 37) and examined the correlation between the CTR and cardiac chamber dimensions. The CTR did not differ between patients with normal and decreased EF values (0.58 +/- 0.07 vs 0.60 +/- 0.06, p = 0.26). Left-side cardiac chamber dimensions were substantially smaller in patients with a normal EF than in those with a decreased EF (left ventricular minor-axis dimension, 4.4 +/- 0.7 vs 5.8 +/- 0.8 cm, p <0.001). In contrast, right-side cardiac chamber dimensions were generally similar between groups. The CTR correlated with major-axis dimensions of the right ventricle and right atrium (p <0.01 for the 2 comparisons), but not with the left-side cardiac chamber dimensions (all p values >0.05). In conclusion, the CTR predominantly reflects right- rather than left-sided heart size in patients with HF. Right-sided heart size is similar between patients with normal and decreased EF values. Thus, despite the substantial difference in left ventricular size and EF, there is substantial overlap in the CTR between patients with diastolic and systolic HFs and the CTR is unable to discriminate between groups.

Usefulness of an elevated B-type natriuretic peptide in predicting survival in patients with aortic stenosis treated without surgery.

Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) may remain asymptomatic with good prognoses for many years but have poor prognoses once they develop symptoms. Because the presence of symptoms is subjective, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) may provide a more objective indication of the prognoses of patients with AS. We evaluated 124 patients with AS (valve area <1.2 cm(2)) with clinical evaluation, Doppler echocardiography, and BNP assessment and obtained up to 2 years of follow-up without valve replacement. Patients with syncope, angina, and/or heart failure were considered to have symptoms. The 24 patients without symptoms had lower BNP levels (187 +/- 193 pg/ml) than the 100 patients with symptoms (930 +/- 928 pg/ml, p <0.001). BNP indicated symptom status, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.87 (p <0.001). The optimal discrimination of symptoms occurred with BNP >190 pg/ml. Survival was significantly influenced by the presence of symptoms (relative risk [RR] 7.5, p <0.01) and BNP tertile (RR 2.9, p <0.001). The 1-year mortality rate without surgery was 6% for BNP <296 pg/ml, 34% for BNP 296 to 819 pg/ml, and 60% for BNP >819 pg/ml. No patients with BNP <100 pg/ml died. The combination of BNP and symptoms provided a better prediction of survival than symptoms alone (chi-square 13.6, p <0.001). BNP significantly (RR 2.8, p <0.01) influenced survival after correction for other univariate predictors (coronary artery disease, symptoms, functional class, ejection fraction, and aortic valve area). In conclusion, elevated BNP indicates progressively worse survival in patients with AS treated medically. Thus, the measurement of BNP supplements the evaluation of symptoms in determining the prognoses of patients with AS.

Therapy for diastolic heart failure.

There is little objective to guide the therapy of patients with diastolic heart failure. Because of the similarities of pathophysiology abnormalities in diastolic and systolic heart failure, it is a reasonable inference to suggest that the proven therapy for systolic heart failure may also be of benefit in patients with diastolic heart failure. Treatment of underlying or exacerbating conditions in diastolic heart failure, such as hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, ischemia, diabetes, anemia, obesity and pulmonary disease is an important means of managing diastolic heart failure. Control of systolic blood pressure is effective in improving and preventing the development of diastolic heart failure. Treatment of diastolic heart failure is most effective when it is associated with hypertension. Production of systolic arterial pressure acutely reduces pulmonary congestion, ischemia, and chronically may lead to regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Patients with diastolic heart failure in the absence of hypertension are very difficult to treat.

Statin therapy may be associated with lower mortality in patients with diastolic heart failure: a preliminary report.

BACKGROUND: No therapy has been shown to improve survival in heart failure (HF) with a normal ejection fraction (EF). There are plausible reasons to hypothesize that statins may be of benefit in HF with a normal EF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 137 patients with HF and an EF > or =0.50. The effect of treatment received at study entry on survival was determined. During a follow-up of 21+/-12 months, 20 deaths were observed. Treatment with an ACE inhibitor or receptor blocker, beta-blocker, or calcium blocker had no significant effect on survival. In contrast, treatment with a statin was associated with a substantial improvement in survival (relative risk of death [95% CI] 0.22 [0.07 to 0.64]; P=0.006). Patients receiving statins had higher baseline LDL cholesterol than those not receiving statins (153+/-45 versus 98+/-33 mg/dL, P<0.01). After statin therapy, LDL cholesterol levels fell to a similar level (101+/-32 mg/dL) as in patients not receiving statins (98+/-33 mg/dL). After adjustment for differences in baseline clinical variables between groups (hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and serum creatinine), statin therapy was associated with lower mortality (adjusted relative risk of death [95% CI] 0.20 [0.06 to 0.62]; P=0.005). Similarly, after propensity matching, statin therapy was associated with improved survival (log-rank 6.12; P=0.013) and a trend toward improved survival without cardiovascular hospitalization (log-rank 3.02; P=0.082). CONCLUSIONS: Statin therapy may be associated with improved survival in patients with HF and a normal EF.

Contribution of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction to heart failure regardless of ejection fraction.

Heart failure (HF) has been classified as systolic and diastolic based on the left ventricular ejection fraction. We hypothesized that left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is an important element of HF regardless of ejection fraction. Two hundred six patients who had clinical HF were compared with 72 age-matched controls. Diastolic dysfunction, as assessed by the mitral filling pattern and tissue Doppler imaging, was present in >90% of patients who had HF regardless of ejection fraction and was more frequent and severe than in age-matched controls (p <0.001). In patients who had HF, B-type natriuretic peptide correlated with diastolic dysfunction (r = 0.62, p <0.001) but not with ejection fraction or end-diastolic volume index (EDVI). The degree of diastolic dysfunction influenced survival rate (risk ratio 1.64, p <0.05), whereas ejection fraction and EDVI did not. Systolic function measured by systolic mitral annular velocity was decreased in patients who had HF and an ejection fraction /=0.50 (6.6 +/- 1.8 cm/s) compared with control subjects (8.0 +/- 2.1 cm/s, p <0.01). Patients who had HF and an ejection fraction >/=0.50 had an increased ratio of ventricular mass to EDVI. Patients who had HF and an ejection fraction /=0.50 is associated with mild systolic dysfunction and an increased ratio of left ventricular mass to EDVI. In HF with an ejection fraction

Relation of anemia to diastolic heart failure and the effect on outcome.

We evaluated the frequency and importance of anemia in 137 patients with heart failure and a normal ejection fraction (diastolic heart failure). We found that anemia is common in these patients and is associated with greater elevations in serum B-type natriuretic peptide, more severe diastolic dysfunction, and a worse prognosis.

Effect of candesartan and verapamil on exercise tolerance in diastolic dysfunction.

Diastolic dysfunction may be exacerbated by increased systolic blood pressure (SBP) during exercise. Ang II may contribute to this process. We performed a randomized, double-blind, crossover study of two weeks of candesartan (16 mg) and verapamil (SR 160 mg). The 21 subjects were 64 +/- 10 years old with ejection fraction greater than 50%, no ischemia, mitral flow velocity E/A less than 1, normal resting SBP (< 150 mm Hg), and SBP greater than 200 mm Hg during exercise. Exercise tolerance was assessed using a Modified Bruce Protocol at baseline and after each two-week treatment period, separated by a two-week washout period. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire. During exercise, Ang II levels increased from 29 +/- 18 to 33 +/- 18 pg/ml (P < 0.05). SBP during exercise was 213 +/- 9 mm Hg at baseline and similarly reduced by candesartan (198 +/- 18, P < 0.01) and verapamil (197 +/- 14, P < 0.01). With candesartan, exercise time increased from 793 +/- 182 seconds to 845 +/- 163 seconds (P < 0.05), and QOL improved from 11 +/- 14 to 5 +/- 6 (P < 0.05). In contrast, verapamil did not significantly improve exercise time or QOL. In patients with mild diastolic dysfunction at rest and a hypertensive response to exercise, both Ang II receptor blockade and verapamil blunted the hypertensive response to exercise. Ang II blockade increased exercise tolerance and improved QOL.

Diastolic mitral annular velocity during the development of heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the mechanism of reduced diastolic mitral annular velocity with diastolic dysfunction, despite elevated left atrial (LA) pressure. BACKGROUND: The peak rate of left ventricular (LV) early diastolic filling (E) and velocity of the mitral annulus due to long-axis lengthening (E(M)) are reduced in mild diastolic dysfunction. With more severe dysfunction, E increases in response to increased LA pressures. In contrast, E(M) decreases, despite increased LA pressure. METHODS: We studied eight dogs instrumented to measure LA pressure, LV pressure, and internal dimensions during the progressive development of heart failure (HF) produced by rapid pacing. RESULTS: Early diastolic filling decreased after four days of pacing from 114 +/- 32 to 88 +/- 22 ml/s (p < 0.05), but with more severe HF, it progressively increased to 155 +/- 32 ml/s (p < 0.05). In contrast, E(M) progressively decreased from 44 +/- 12 mm/s during the control period to 24 +/- 8 mm/s after four weeks (p < 0.05). Although E(M) was related to the time constant of LV relaxation (tau) (R(2) = 0.85), E was not. The latter occurred coincident with termination of the early diastolic LA to LV pressure gradient during all conditions. In contrast, with increasing HF, E(M) was progressively delayed after LA to LV pressure crossover by 37 +/- 12 ms (p < 0.05). The time from E to E(M) was related to tau (R(2) = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: With slowed relaxation during the development of HF, E(M) is reduced and delayed so that it occurs after early, rapid filling. Thus, with slowed relaxation, E(M) does not respond to the early diastolic LA to LV pressure gradient, because it occurs when LV pressure is greater than or equal to LA pressure.

Magnetic resonance imaging in detection and functional assessment of coronary artery disease.

The past few years have brought significant improvements in the field of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which evolved from an experimental technique to a clinically accepted method of coronary artery disease detection (stress MRI) and viability assessment. In this article, we describe current MRI technology for detection and functional assessment of ischemia, such as dobutamine/atropine MRI, perfusion techniques, viability, and flow reserve in native coronary arteries and grafts. With further refinement in the technology, wide acceptance of cardiovascular MRI is anticipated in clinical practice.