Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 41
Filter
1.
Minerva Chir ; 68(2): 163-8, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23612229

ABSTRACT

AIM: The standard to treat liver tumors is a resection. When the future liver remnant (FLRV) is below 30% (healthy livers) or 40% (cirrhotic livers or previous chemotherapy), surgery carries the risk of severe complications. Portal vein embolization (PVE) gained a worldwide diffusion as a tool to augment the FLRV. Cell therapies are recent players at the frontiers of medicine. This study presents a clinical experience to evaluate the synergistic effect of combined PVE and autologous CD133+ cells coadministration. METHODS: Sixteen patients have been enrolled in the study up today. Inclusion criteria were: primary or metastatic liver malignancy with a FLRV<30% or 40%. A baseline volumetric CT-scan was obtained. CD34+ were mobilized to the blood stream by G-CSF administration and collected by immunomagnetic separation. Simultaneously with PVE, cells were administered to the non occluded liver segments. Follow-up CT scans were taken at 30th post treatment day. RESULTS: The patients (N.=6) showed an increased volume gain (Mann-Whitney test P<0.001, two sided) compared to a set of cases whose treatment was PVE only (N.=10). DISCUSSION: The use of autologous stem cells as an augmenter of liver regeneration has a clinical potential to improve the resectability of liver tumors.


Subject(s)
Antigens, CD/analysis , Embolization, Therapeutic , Glycoproteins/analysis , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Liver Regeneration , Peptides/analysis , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Portal Vein , AC133 Antigen , Antigens, CD34/analysis , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/pharmacology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization , Leukapheresis , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Liver/pathology , Liver/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Organ Size , Tomography, Spiral Computed , Transplantation, Autologous
3.
Ann Oncol ; 21(12): 2382-2389, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20497963

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the consistent clinical results demonstrated by studies on anti-angiogenic drugs targeted against the vascular endothelial growth factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, no specific direct/indirect biomarker of their efficacy has been validated. In this field, circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and endothelial progenitor cells (CEPs) have recently been proposed as noninvasive biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The absolute numbers of CEPs, total CECs (tCECs) and their resting (rCECs) and activated subsets were evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry in 40 mCRC patients at baseline and before the administration of the third and sixth course of a bevacizumab-based first-line treatment. Fifty healthy subjects were utilized as control. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 80%, overall clinical benefit was 90% and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.8 months. In our patients, tCECs and rCECs were significantly increased compared with healthy subjects. The patients who achieved a radiological response showed, at baseline, a significant decrease of rCECs and a trend in decrease of tCECs in comparison with patients not achieving response. Finally, a baseline absolute number of tCEC and rCEC <40 cells/ml was evidenced in patients with a longer PFS. No correlation was found regarding CEP. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests significant correlations between both tCEC and rCEC baseline levels and the antitumor efficacy of a bevacizumab-based combination therapy in mCRC patients, thus confirming that these biomarkers could be used in the clinical setting as an early predictor of tumor response.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Carcinoma/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Endothelial Cells/pathology , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/pathology , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Bevacizumab , Biomarkers, Pharmacological/blood , Carcinoma/blood , Carcinoma/diagnosis , Carcinoma/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Disease Progression , Endothelial Cells/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/drug effects , Prognosis , Stem Cells/pathology , Stem Cells/physiology
4.
Br J Cancer ; 98(2): 328-34, 2008 Jan 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18026187

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to verify through relative survival (an estimate of cancer-specific survival) the true prognostic factors of colorectal cancer. The study involved 506 patients who underwent locally radical resection. All the clinical, histological and laboratory parameters were prognostically analysed for both overall and relative survival. This latter was calculated from the expected survival of the general population with identical age, sex and calendar years of observation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to the proportional hazards model. Liver metastases, age, lymph node involvement and depth of bowel wall involvement were independent prognosticators of both overall and relative survival, whereas carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was predictive only of relative survival. Increasing age was unfavourably related to overall survival, but mildly protective with regard to relative survival. Three out of the five prognostic factors identified are the cornerstones of the current staging systems, and were confirmed as adequate by the analysis of relative survival. The results regarding age explain the conflicting findings so far obtained from studies considering overall survival only and advise against the adoption of absolute age limits in therapeutic protocols. Moreover, the prechemotherapy CEA level showed a high clinical value.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Carcinoembryonic Antigen/physiology , Carcinoma/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoembryonic Antigen/blood , Carcinoma/blood , Carcinoma/mortality , Carcinoma/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Survival Analysis
5.
Oncology ; 72(5-6): 267-73, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18187947

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In advanced colorectal cancer (ACC), FOLFOX4 has been accepted as a standard chemotherapeutic regimen. Due to the neurotoxicity induced by oxaliplatin, which occurs in about 50% of patients during the 6-month FOLFOX4 regimen, and the frequent need for hospitalization, alternative regimens may be required. We aimed to determine whether a 'maintenance' therapy with oral UFT (uracil-tegafur) in patients responding to FOLFOX4 is able to maintain the response and improve the quality of life (QoL) as a result of the outpatient regimen and lower psychological distress. METHODS: Untreated patients with ACC who did not progress after 6 months of FOLFOX4 received oral UFT until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The aim of the study was to maintain the response obtained with the FOLFOX4 regimen for at least 6 months. The secondary objective was to evaluate QoL during the two different treatment regimens utilizing the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: From January 2003 to August 2004, out of the enrolled 30 patients [22 males and 8 females; 2 patients with a complete response (CR), 14 patients with a partial response (PR) and 6 patients in stable disease (SD) after 6 months of FOLFOX4] 22 continued therapy with UFT until progression without significant toxicity; the remaining 8 patients (27%) had progressive disease (PD) during or at the end of FOLFOX4 and were treated with other regimen. After 6 months of UFT, 4 patients (13%) had CR, 6 patients (20%) PR and 4 patients (13%) SD; 16 patients (53%) progressed. Median follow-up was 31 months [interquartile range (IQR): 20-31 months]; 14 patients died of PD. The median time to progression was 13.9 (IQR: 7.7-20.1) months and the median survival time was 31 months (IQR: 20-31 months). Evaluation of QoL demonstrated a trend towards better QoL during UFT treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the feasibility of maintaining good response and improving QoL (measured by SF-36) with an oral fluoropyrimidine after combination chemotherapy in ACC patients; moreover, since UFT can be used orally, patient compliance is increased and the duration of hospitalization can be decreased.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Disease Progression , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Quality of Life , Remission Induction , Tegafur/administration & dosage , Uracil/administration & dosage
6.
Eur J Cancer ; 39(1): 31-7, 2003 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12504655

ABSTRACT

In this study we evaluated whether a good response to conventional chemotherapy, i.e. a significant tumour reduction, is a prerequisite for improved survival in multiple myeloma (MM). Between January 1987 and March 1990, 341 consecutive previously untreated patients with MM received chemotherapy within the prospective, multicentre, randomised Protocol MM87. Of these, 258 patients were evaluable for both response and long-term survival and 244 (94.6%) have died. The median survival of all patients was 40 months (6-162 months). The median survival did not differ between patients who had complete response (CR) (50 months (9-162 months)), partial response (PR) (46 months (8-147 months)) or stable disease (SD) (41 months (7-135 months)). The median survival was shorter (13.6 months (6-135 months)) (P<0.0001) in patients whose disease progressed while they were receiving first induction chemotherapy. Causes of death were more frequently (P=0.04) related to MM in patients who had progressive disease (PD) than in patients who had a CR or PR or SD. The main clinical and laboratory characteristics were similar in the four groups. These data indicate that patients who maintain SD during first-line chemotherapy have a prognosis similar to that of patients who attain a response. Only patients whose disease progresses have a distinctly worse outcome.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Analysis of Variance , Cause of Death , Drug Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Peptichemio/administration & dosage , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Software Design , Survival Analysis , Vincristine/administration & dosage
8.
Br J Cancer ; 85(2): 141-6, 2001 Jul 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11461067

ABSTRACT

Sequential administration of the association of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) and paclitaxel could be better tolerated than the association of an anthracycline and paclitaxel while having a similar antitumour effect. 69 patients with advanced breast cancer previously untreated with anthracyclines or paclitaxel entered a phase II multicentre study in which FEC was followed by paclitaxel. Both regimens were administered 4 times every 21 days. The median follow-up is 20 months and 38/69 patients have died. Grade III-IV toxicity was acceptable. Leukopenia occurred in 26% of patients, thrombocytopenia in 2% and anaemia in 4%. One patient had reversible heart failure during FEC therapy. Peripheral neuropathy and arthralgia-myalgia occurred in 9% and 4% of patients, respectively and one patient had respiratory hypersensitivity during paclitaxel treatment. 9 patients did not complete therapy because of: treatment refusal (n = 1), cardiac toxicity (n = 1), early death during FEC chemotherapy (n = 1), major protocol violations (n = 4), hypersensitivity reaction (n = 1) and early death during paclitaxel chemotherapy (n = 1). The overall response rate was 65% (95% CI = 53-76), and 7% of patients had stable disease. Therapy was defined as having failed in 28% of patients because they were not evaluable (13%) or had progressive disease (15%). The median time to progression and survival are 13.2 and 23.5 months, respectively. Sequential FEC-paclitaxel is a suitable strategy for patients with metastatic breast cancer who have not been previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes. In fact, it avoids major haematologic toxicity and has a good antitumour effect.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Epirubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Survival Analysis
9.
Oncol Rep ; 8(4): 801-5, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11410787

ABSTRACT

With respect to their association, sequential non-cross-resistant cytostatics could be better tolerated and allow a similar antitumor effect. From January, 1998 to July, 1999, 42 consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines as adjuvant- or first-line therapy entered a phase II multicenter study where docetaxel (TXT, 100 mg/m2/3 weeks/4 times) was followed by vinorelbine (VNR, 25 mg/m2/10 days/8 times). Median follow-up is 21 months and 22/42 patients have died. Four patients did not complete therapy due to early death, grade 3-4 gastrointestinal mucosytis (2 patients) and grade 3 neurotoxicity during TXT therapy. Overall response rate was 57%, and 5% of patients had stable disease. There were 38% of therapy failures due to non-evaluability (10%) or progressive disease (28%). Median time to progression and survival are 10.1 and 17.1 months. Sequential TXT-VNB is a suitable strategy for MBC patients previously treated with anthracyclines. It avoids haematologic toxicity and allows a good antitumor effect. Careful monitoring of intestinal mucosytis is required.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Taxoids , Adult , Aged , Anthracyclines/administration & dosage , Anthracyclines/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Docetaxel , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Paclitaxel/analogs & derivatives , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Vinblastine/administration & dosage , Vinblastine/adverse effects , Vinblastine/analogs & derivatives , Vinorelbine
11.
Oncol Rep ; 7(3): 585-9, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10767372

ABSTRACT

Paclitaxel and its analogue docetaxel show a significant antitumor activity, particularly evident in breast cancer. Paclitaxel has also been proved to be effective as a peripheral blood progenitor cell (CPC) mobilizing agent. To optimize the use of active, disease-specific drugs as CPC priming, we have evaluated the effects of either paclitaxel or docetaxel both at standard dosages and followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), on circulating CPC release and function in 18 patients with advanced breast cancer who had failed previous anthracycline-based regimens. The reported differences in biological behaviour between bone marrow and blood-derived hematopoietic progenitor cells and the ability of both paclitaxel and docetaxel to induce apoptosis, prompted us to simultaneously evaluate the cell cycle perturbations induced on CD34+ cells. Median CD34+ peaks were 24 microl (range: 10-58) in the paclitaxel-treated patients and 39 microl (range: 17-91), respectively, in the patients who received docetaxel. After paclitaxel, the percentage of CD34+ cells in S-phase was low (bromodeoxyuridine, BrdU, labelling index = 3.4+/-2%) with a concomitant presence of early apoptotic cells (8.1+/-3%). On the contrary, after docetaxel, the percentage of CD34+ cells in S-phase was higher (BrdU labelling index = 14.5+/-4%, p<0.05 vs. paclitaxel), while early apoptotic cells were detected at a similar rate (8. 6+/-3%, p = n.s. vs. paclitaxel). In conclusion, when used at standard dosages, with respect to paclitaxel + G-CSF, docetaxel + G-CSF is a more satisfactory tool to mobilize CPC and to induce them into the cell cycle. These data should be taken into account when combinations of docetaxel with other agents are explored as CPC mobilizing regimens for autografting.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis/drug effects , Breast Neoplasms/blood , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Cycle/drug effects , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/pathology , Paclitaxel/analogs & derivatives , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Taxoids , Adult , Antigens, CD34/blood , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Docetaxel , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/drug effects , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging
12.
Int J Oncol ; 16(4): 769-76, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10717247

ABSTRACT

In metastatic breast cancer (MBC) doubling the epirubicin (EPI) dose intensity (DI) within the FEC (5-fluorouracil, EPI, cyclophosphamide) regimen could increase the response rate (RR) and ameliorate the quality of life (QoL) over standard FEC. From May, 1995, 74 consecutive patients with MBC were randomly treated with 6 courses of two FEC regimens containing 60 (60FEC) or 120 (120FEC, supported by primary G-CSF) mg/m2 of EPI. Drugs were administered every 21 days. The QoL was assessed over and after treatment by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (VER 2.0) and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires, compiled by the patient, and the Spitzer's QL-index, compiled by the physician. The study was prematurely closed in May, 1997, due to RR and QoL data of 4th interim analysis. The delivered EPI DI was 20.0 and 37.9 mg/m2/week in 60- and in 120FEC, respectively. Among the two regimens, there was no statistically significant difference in RR or in improvement of baseline overall QoL. With respect to 60FEC patients, the 120FEC patients had longer time to progression (19.2 vs 13.1 mos, p=0.04). Over baseline, the 120- but not the 60FEC patients had significantly greater pain decrease and lower deterioration of body image. In MBC, both 60- and 120FEC regimens furnished the same RR and improvement in overall baseline QoL. With respect to 60FEC patients, the 120FEC patients experienced longer time to progression. Over baseline, pain decrease and preservation of body image were also greater in these patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Epirubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life
13.
Br J Cancer ; 82(7): 1254-60, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10755397

ABSTRACT

We conducted a randomized trial to evaluate whether melphalan-prednisone (MPH-P) treatment administered just after diagnosis improves survival of stage I multiple myeloma (MM). Between January 1987 and March 1993, 145 consecutive previously untreated patients with stage I MM were randomized between treatment with MPH-P (administered for 4 days every 6 weeks) just after diagnosis and treatment only at disease progression. Survival was not influenced by MPH-P treatment either administered just after diagnosis or at disease progression (64 vs 71 months respectively). Comparing the first with the second group the odds ratio of death is 1.17 (95% confidence interval 0.57-2.42; P = 0.64). Disease progression occurred within a year in about 50% of patients who were initially untreated. Response rate was similar in both groups, but duration of response was shorter in patients who were treated at disease progression (48 vs 79 months, P = 0.044). Patients actually treated at disease progression (34/70) survived shorter than those who had neither disease progression nor treatment (56 vs > 92 months; P = 0.005). Starting MPH-P just after diagnosis does not improve survival and response rate in stage I MM, with respect to deferring therapy until disease progression. However, patients with stage I MM randomized to have treatment delayed and who actually progressed and were treated had shorter survival than those with stable disease and no treatment. Biologic or other disease features could identify these subgroups of patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Male , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
14.
Int J Oncol ; 15(4): 811-5, 1999 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10493966

ABSTRACT

Topotecan is a new antineoplastic agent active in ovarian cancer, with promising activity in small cell lung cancer and predictable toxicity. As a part of our ongoing attempt to optimize the use of disease-specific drugs as circulating progenitor cell (CPC) priming in solid tumors, we have evaluated the effects on CPC release of single-agent Topotecan followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) + human recombinant erythropoietin (rhEPO), together with the cell cycle status of the collected CD34+ cells. Ten pretreated patients with small cell lung cancer received Topotecan (1 mg/m2, i.v. for 5 consecutive days) followed by G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day, s.c.) + rhEPO (10,000 I.U. daily, s.c.), starting 24 h after Topotecan. The combination was well tolerated and no relevant side-effects were recorded. On day +10 (range +9 to +11) after the last dose of Topotecan, the median WBC count and the CD34+ cell peak were 8.2 x 10(3) microl (range 4.9-13.9) and 55 microl (range 28-75), respectively. Using flow cytometry, a detailed cell cycle analysis was performed on these CD34+ cells. The cell cycle distribution was determined by DNA content coupled with bromodeoxyuridine incorporation analysis. Apoptosis was evaluated by quantitating DNA strand breaks. The percentage of CD34+ cells in active S-phase was 10.2+/-5%, while early apoptotic CD34+ cells were detected in a low percentage (5.5+/-3%). Topotecan followed by G-CSF + rhEPO mobilizes CPCs effectively. This sequence exerts a stimulation on CD34+ cell cycle with a protective effect from chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Taken together, these data could be of value for the incorporation of Topotecan, as well as of the combination of G-CSF and rhEPO, into high-dose chemotherapy programs with CPC support.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Small Cell/drug therapy , Erythropoietin/therapeutic use , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/drug effects , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Topotecan/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Antigens, CD34/metabolism , Apoptosis , Bromodeoxyuridine , Cell Cycle/drug effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Flow Cytometry , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/cytology , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/metabolism , Humans , Leukocyte Count/drug effects , Middle Aged , Platelet Count/drug effects , Recombinant Proteins , Time Factors , Topotecan/adverse effects
15.
Tumori ; 84(5): 540-6, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9862513

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The neutropenia induced by six courses of an intensified FEC regimen is expected to be checked by early primary administration of G-CSF which is stopped eight days before the next chemotherapy course. Less information is available about megakaryocytic and erythroid toxicity over six courses. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-six consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer completed six courses of a randomized treatment with two FEC regimens administered every 21 days, in which 600 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide and 5-FUwas associated with 60 or 120 mg/m2 of epirubicin (60FEC, 35 patients, vs 120FEC, 31 patients). 120FEC was supported by early primary G-CSF (days 4 to 13). Blood counts were obtained seven times during each course. RESULTS: The non-hematologic toxicity over 364 courses was similar in 60FEC and 120FEC. No cumulative hematologic toxicity was observed for white blood cells (WBC) and platelets (PLT), while for hemoglobin (Hb) a somewhat higher cumulative toxicity was observed with 120FEC than with 60FEC. WBC, PLT and Hb grade III-IV toxicity occurred in 40.1% and 45.6% (P=ns), in 23.1% and 0.8% (P <.0001) and in 15.6% and 3.0% (P <.005) of the two regimens, respectively. There were no febrile or hemorrhagic episodes. The epirubicin relative dose intensity delivered was 1.95 in 120FEC with respect to 60FEC. CONCLUSIONS: Our G-CSF schedule permitted to deliver six courses of 120FEC without any clinically relevant side effects. Grade III-IV leukopenia was similar with 120FEC and 60FEC, while grade III-IV thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred more often with 120FEC than with 60FEC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bone Marrow/drug effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Epirubicin/administration & dosage , Epirubicin/adverse effects , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
16.
Oncol Rep ; 5(4): 915-8, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9625845

ABSTRACT

Between May 1995 and July 1997, paclitaxel (TX) (175 mg/m2 by 3 h i. v. infusion every 21 days) was administered to 70 consecutive patients (median age: 57 years) previously treated with the FEC regimen (cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2, plus epirubicin, 60 or 120 mg/m2) as an adjuvant setting or as a first-line therapy for metastatic disease. Sixty-eight patients were evaluable for response, while two died early. Patients received a median of 4.7 (3-12 course) of TX for a total of 211 courses. The overall response and stable disease rate was 54% in 11 patients, who relapsed following adjuvant FEC, and 60% in 57 patients, who received FEC as first treatment for their metastatic disease. No complete respose was obtained. In patients pretreated for metastatic disease, response and stable disease rates were similar irrespective of previous response to FEC. Main hematologic toxicity of TX was of short duration, grade II/III leukopenia (86% of patients) and non-hematologic toxicity was grade II/III peripheral neuropathy, related to the cumulative dose of TX. At this schedule, TX offers a significant rate of partial responses or disease stabilization in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with FEC.


Subject(s)
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Middle Aged , Retreatment , Treatment Outcome
17.
Br J Cancer ; 77(3): 485-91, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9472648

ABSTRACT

Age could influence the prognosis of multiple myeloma patients treated with conventional chemotherapy. Between January 1987 and March 1990, 341 consecutive previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma received chemotherapy within the prospective, multicentre, randomized Protocol MM87. Survival was evaluated in patients aged > or < or = 66 years (the median age for the whole series) and in a subgroup of patients aged < 55 years. These groups were similar for main clinical characteristics, including results of cytostatic treatment. As of May 1996, 271 (79%) of the 341 patients had died, and median follow-up of the 70 (21%) living patients was 82 months. Overall, younger patients survived longer than older ones. In fact, in patients > and < or = 66 years, median survival was 31 and 44 months (P < 0.00095) and the percentage of patients surviving over 72 months was 17% and 32% (P = 0.0018) respectively; in patients < 55 years, these figures were 57 months and 35% respectively (P = 0.02 and 0.01, with respect to patients aged > 55 years). In all groups, about 50% of the patients surviving over 72 months had stage I disease. For multiple myeloma patients treated with chemotherapy, survival is favourably affected by relatively young age and early stage of disease.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate
19.
Br J Cancer ; 73(9): 1101-7, 1996 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8624271

ABSTRACT

The current prognostic systems have failed to identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients who require aggressive therapy. These staging systems do not reliably distinguish patients with different prognoses. This paper explores the possibility of improving the prognostic forecast in MM by considering some clinical characteristics at diagnosis together with response to first-line chemotherapy. A total of 231 patients were prospectively randomised in a multicentre trial to no therapy vs melphalan + prednisone (MP) for stage I, MP in stage II, and MP vs peptichemio, vincristine and prednisone for stage III. The clinical features of these groups were evaluated for prognostic variables predictive of overall survival by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. The independently significant variables were incorporated into a model that identified three groups of patients with different risks of death and different overall survival. Three variables retained statistical significance: the staging system proposed by the British Medical Research Council, a composite parameter integrating the percentage of bone marrow plasma cells with cytological features of the infiltrating elements (plasma cell vs plasmablast), and response to 6 months of first-line chemotherapy. These three variables led the proposal of a scoring system able to identify three different risk classes (with median overall survival of 52, 28 and 13 months respectively) and to estimate individual patient prognosis more flexibly. The proposed risk classes, drawn from both diagnostic and therapeutic parameters, are thought to be a clinical and investigational instrument for separating MM patients into comparable groups, for selecting the best available therapy and for evaluating response with respect to the disease of each new patient.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Peptichemio/therapeutic use , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Vincristine/therapeutic use , Aged , Bone Marrow/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunoglobulin Isotypes/blood , Male , Multiple Myeloma/immunology , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Staging , Plasma Cells/immunology , Plasma Cells/pathology , Probability , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Survival Rate , Time Factors
20.
Br J Cancer ; 73(6): 794-7, 1996 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8611382

ABSTRACT

In a multicentre study, 83 patients with advanced and previously uniformly treated multiple myeloma (MM) were randomised between cyclophosphamide (600 mg m-2) and epirubicin (70 mg m-2), administered every 3 weeks for three courses and both associated with prednisone and interferon-alpha2b. Both regimens were administered on an outpatient basis and had low haematological toxicity. Clinical results were similar. Overall response rate (43%) and median response and survival (5.9 and 14.1 months respectively) compare well with those obtained with more aggressive chemotherapy schedules.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Epirubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Interferon alpha-2 , Interferon-alpha/administration & dosage , Male , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Myeloproliferative Disorders/chemically induced , Peptichemio/administration & dosage , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins , Vincristine/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...