Recent Developments in NSG and NRG Humanized Mouse Models for Their Use in Viral and Immune Research.

Humanized mouse models have been widely used in virology, immunology, and oncology in the last decade. With advances in the generation of knockout mouse strains, it is now possible to generate animals in which human immune cells or human tissue can be engrafted. These models have been used for the study of human infectious diseases, cancers, and autoimmune diseases. In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of humanized mice to model human-specific viral infections. A human immune system in these models is crucial to understand the pathogenesis observed in human patients, which allows for better treatment design and vaccine development. Recent advances in our knowledge about viral pathogenicity and immune response using NSG and NRG mice are reviewed in this paper.

Use of Hu-PBL Mice to Study Pathogenesis of Human-Restricted Viruses.

Different humanized mouse models have been developed to study human diseases such as autoimmune illnesses, cancer and viral infections. These models are based on the use of immunodeficient mouse strains that are transplanted with human tissues or human immune cells. Among the latter, mice transplanted with hematopoietic stem cells have been widely used to study human infectious diseases. However, mouse models built upon the transplantation of donor-specific mature immune cells are still under development, especially in the field of viral infections. These models can retain the unique immune memory of the donor, making them suitable for the study of correlates of protection upon natural infection or vaccination. Here, we will review some of these models and how they have been applied to virology research. Moreover, the future applications and the potential of these models to design therapies against human viral infections are discussed.

Inactivation Methods for Experimental Nipah Virus Infection.

Nipah virus (NiV) is an emerging zoonotic paramyxovirus that causes severe disease in humans and livestock. Due to its high pathogenicity in humans and the lack of available vaccines and therapeutics, NiV needs to be handled in biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) laboratories. Safe inactivation of samples containing NiV is thus necessary to allow further processing in lower containment areas. To date, there is only limited information available on NiV inactivation methods validated by BSL-4 facilities that can be used as a reference. Here, we compare some of the most common inactivation methods in order to evaluate their efficacy at inactivating NiV in infected cells, supernatants and organs. Thus, several physical and chemical inactivation methods, and combinations thereof, were assessed. Viral replication was monitored for 3 weeks and NiV presence was assessed by RT-qPCR, plaque assay and indirect immunofluorescence. A total of nineteen methods were shown to reduce NiV infectious particles in cells, supernatants and organs to undetectable levels. Therefore, we provide a list of methods for the safe and efficient inactivation of NiV.

Inhibitors of the p38 cell signaling pathway as antiviral compounds against Junín virus.

In the present study, we analyzed the modulation of p38 cell signaling by Junín virus (JUNV) and evaluated the antiviral activity of p38 inhibitors against JUNV. While JUNV induced a progressive activation of p38 throughout the infection in Vero cells, a partial downregulation of p38 phosphorylation was observed in HEK293 and HeLa cells. The compounds SB203580 and SB202190, which are selective inhibitors of p38, significantly reduced viral protein expression and viral yield in the cell lines examined, indicating that the p38 signaling pathway might be a promising antiviral target against JUNV infection.

Raf/MEK/ERK pathway activation is required for Junín virus replication.

In the present work we investigated the importance of the Raf/MEK/ERK signalling pathway in the multiplication of the arenavirus Junín (JUNV) in monkey and human cell cultures. We established that JUNV induces a biphasic activation of ERK and we proved that a specific inhibitor of the ERK pathway, U0126, impairs viral replication. Furthermore, U0126 exerted inhibitory action against the arenaviruses Tacaribe and Pichinde. Moreover, treatment with known ERK activators such as phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and serum increased viral yields whereas ERK silencing by small interfering RNAs caused the inhibition of viral multiplication. Therefore, activation of the Raf/MEK/ERK signalling pathway is required to ensure efficient JUNV replication and may constitute a host target for the development of novel effective therapeutic strategies to deal with arenavirus infections.