Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation.

Effective science communication is challenging when scientific messages are informed by a continually updating evidence base and must often compete against misinformation. We argue that we need a new program of science communication as collective intelligence-a collaborative approach, supported by technology. This would have four key advantages over the typical model where scientists communicate as individuals: scientific messages would be informed by (a) a wider base of aggregated knowledge, (b) contributions from a diverse scientific community, (c) participatory input from stakeholders, and (d) better responsiveness to ongoing changes in the state of knowledge.

Micropipette aspiration as a tool for single-particle X-ray imaging and diffraction.

A sample environment and manipulation tool is presented for single-particle X-ray experiments in an aqueous environment. The system is based on a single water droplet, positioned on a substrate that is structured by a hydrophobic and hydrophilic pattern to stabilize the droplet position. The substrate can support several droplets at a time. Evaporation is prevented by covering the droplet by a thin film of mineral oil. In this windowless fluid which minimizes background signal, single particles can be probed and manipulated by micropipettes, which can easily be inserted and steered in the droplet. Holographic X-ray imaging is shown to be well suited to observe and monitor the pipettes, as well as the droplet surface and the particles. Aspiration and force generation are also enabled based on an application of controlled pressure differences. Experimental challenges are addressed and first results are presented, obtained at two different undulator endstations with nano-focused beams. Finally, the sample environment is discussed in view of future coherent imaging and diffraction experiments with synchrotron radiation and single X-ray free-electron laser pulses.

When Science Becomes Embroiled in Conflict: Recognizing the Public's Need for Debate while Combating Conspiracies and Misinformation.

Most democracies seek input from scientists to inform policies. This can put scientists in a position of intense scrutiny. Here we focus on situations in which scientific evidence conflicts with people's worldviews, preferences, or vested interests. These conflicts frequently play out through systematic dissemination of disinformation or the spreading of conspiracy theories, which may undermine the public's trust in the work of scientists, muddy the waters of what constitutes truth, and may prevent policy from being informed by the best available evidence. However, there are also instances in which public opposition arises from legitimate value judgments and lived experiences. In this article, we analyze the differences between politically-motivated science denial on the one hand, and justifiable public opposition on the other. We conclude with a set of recommendations on tackling misinformation and understanding the public's lived experiences to preserve legitimate democratic debate of policy.