Timing is Everything: Stochastic Optogenetic Stimulation Reduces Adaptation in Retinal Ganglion Cells.

Optogenetics gives us unprecedented power to investigate brain connectivity. The ability to activate neural circuits with single cell resolution and its ease of application has provided a wealth of knowledge in brain function. More recently, optogenetics has shown tremendous utility in prosthetics applications, including vision restoration for patients with retinitis pigmentosa. One of the disadvantages of optogenetics, however, is its poor temporal bandwidth, i.e. the cell's inability to fire at a rate that matches the optical stimulation rate at high frequencies (>30 Hz). This research proposes a new strategy to overcome the temporal limits of optogenetic stimulation. Using whole-cell current clamp recordings in mouse retinal ganglion cells expressing channelrhodopsin-2 (H134R variant), we observed that randomizing inter-pulse intervals can significantly increase a retinal ganglion cell's temporal response to high frequency stimulation.Clinical Relevance- A significant disadvantage of optogenetic stimulation is its poor temporal dynamics which prohibit its widespread use in retinal prosthetics. We have shown that randomizing the interval between stimulation pulses reduces adaptation in retinal ganglion cells. This stimulation strategy may contribute to new levels of functional restoration in therapeutics which incorporate optogenetics.

Temporal Modulation of the Response of Sensory Fibers to Paired-Pulse Stimulation.

Multi-channel nerve cuff electrode arrays can provide sensory feedback to prosthesis users. To develop efficacious stimulation protocols, an understanding of the impact that spatio-temporal patterned stimulation can have on the response of sensory fibers is crucial. We used experimental and modelling methods to investigate the response of nerve fibers to paired-pulse stimulation. Nerve cuff electrode arrays were implanted for stimulation of the sciatic nerves of rats and the sensory compound action potentials were recorded from the L4 dorsal root. A model of the nerve cuff electrode array and sciatic nerve was also developed. The experimental and modelling results were compared. Experiments showed that it took 8 ms for the sensory fibers to completely recover from a conditioning stimulus, regardless of the relative position of the electrodes used for stimulation. The results demonstrate that the electrodes on the cuff cannot be considered independent. Additionally, at 120% of the threshold, there is a large overlap in the fibers that were activated by the different electrodes. If a stimulus paradigm considered the electrodes as independent, stimuli from the different electrodes would need to be interleaved, and the intervals between the stimuli should be greater than 8 ms.

In vivo comparison of the charge densities required to evoke motor responses using novel annular penetrating microelectrodes.

Electrodes for cortical stimulation need to deliver current to neural tissue effectively and safely. We have developed electrodes with a novel annular geometry for use in cortical visual prostheses. Here, we explore a critical question on the ideal annulus height to ensure electrical stimulation will be safe and effective. We implanted single electrodes into the motor cortex of anesthetized rats and measured the current required to evoke a motor response to stimulation, and the charge injection capacity (CIC) of the electrodes. We compared platinum iridium (PtIr) electrodes with different annulus heights, with and without a coating of porous titanium nitride (TiN). Threshold charge densities to evoke a motor response ranged from 12 to 36 µC.cm(-2).ph(-1). Electrodes with larger geometric surface areas (GSAs) required higher currents to evoke responses, but lower charge densities. The addition of a porous TiN coating did not significantly influence the current required to evoke a motor response. The CIC of both electrode types was significantly reduced in vivo compared with in vitro measurements. The measured CIC was 72 and 18 µC.cm(-2).ph(-1) for electrodes with and without a TiN coating, respectively. These results support the use of PtIr annular electrodes with annulus heights greater than 100 µm (GSA of 38, 000 µm(2)). However, if the electrodes are coated with porous TiN the annulus height can be reduced to 40 µm (GSA of 16,000 µm(2)).

In vivo comparison of the charge densities required to evoke motor responses using novel annular penetrating microelectrodes.

Electrodes for cortical stimulation need to deliver current to neural tissue effectively and safely. We have developed electrodes with a novel annular geometry for use in cortical visual prostheses. Here, we explore a critical question on the ideal annulus height to ensure electrical stimulation will be safe and effective. We implanted single electrodes into the motor cortex of anesthetized rats and measured the current required to evoke a motor response to stimulation, and the charge injection capacity (CIC) of the electrodes. We compared platinum iridium (PtIr) electrodes with different annulus heights, with and without a coating of porous titanium nitride (TiN). Threshold charge densities to evoke a motor response ranged from 12 to 36 µC.cm(-2).ph(-1). Electrodes with larger geometric surface areas (GSAs) required higher currents to evoke responses, but lower charge densities. The addition of a porous TiN coating did not significantly influence the current required to evoke a motor response. The CIC of both electrode types was significantly reduced in vivo compared with in vitro measurements. The measured CIC was 72 and 18 µC.cm(-2).ph(-1) for electrodes with and without a TiN coating, respectively. These results support the use of PtIr annular electrodes with annulus heights greater than 100 µm (GSA of 38, 000 µm(2)). However, if the electrodes are coated with porous TiN the annulus height can be reduced to 40 µm (GSA of 16,000 µm(2)).