ABSTRACT
Objectives: Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) may have untapped potential in clinical diagnostics. Previous studies determined reference intervals using an enzyme-linked immunoassay, but there is a need for reference intervals using a faster assay if the analysis is to be used in emergency medicine. The current study aims to determine reference intervals for suPAR using a fully automated particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline A28-A3c. Design and methods: Blood samples were prospectively collected from Danish blood donors. Plasma suPAR was analyzed on the cobas 8000 module c502 in an open channel using a PETIA. Sex-partitioned reference intervals were determined using a parametric quantile approach. Results: The study included 241 participants-123 females and 118 males. The common reference interval for suPAR was 1.56-4.11 ng/mL (95% confidence intervals (CI) for the lower and upper limits were 1.56-1.63 and 3.81-4.47, respectively). The reference interval for females was 1.59-4.65 ng/mL (95% CIs 1.48-1.70 and 4.09-5.48, respectively) and for males, 1.56-3.59 ng/mL (95% CIs 1.47-1.65 and 3.31-3.93, respectively). Conclusions: Our results support using sex-partitioned reference intervals for suPAR and provide a basis for future studies using the PETIA method.
ABSTRACT
Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is a promising biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of interstitial lung disease. However, reference intervals in Northern Europeans remain to be established using a latex-particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay. The participants were Danish blood donors subjected to strict health requirements. Analyses were performed using the Nanopia KL-6 reagent on the cobas 8000 module c502. Sex-partitioned reference intervals were determined using a parametric quantile approach according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline EP28-A3c. The study included 240 participants-121 females and 119 males. The common reference interval was 59.4-398.5 U/mL (95% confidence intervals (CI) for the lower and upper limits were 47.3-71.9 and 369.5-430.1, respectively). For females, the reference interval was 56.8-324.0 U/mL (95% CIs for the lower and upper limits were 36.1-77.6 and 303.3-344.7, respectively). For males, the reference interval was 51.5-448.7 U/mL (95% CIs for the lower and upper limits were 32.8-71.2 and 397.3-508.1, respectively). These results emphasize the importance of sex partitioning when evaluating KL-6 reference intervals. The reference intervals increase the clinical applicability of the KL-6 biomarker and provide a basis for future scientific studies of its utility in patient management.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To examine the association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use and mortality, postoperative complications, and quality of in-hospital care in hip fracture patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a nationwide cohort study based on individual-level linked, prospectively collected data from Danish population-based national registries covering all hospitals in Denmark. The health care system in Denmark is tax-funded, and all citizens have equal access to health care services. We included patients with first-time hospitalization due to hip fracture undergoing surgery from 2006-2016. We estimated the risk of 30-day mortality, any unplanned readmission, any reoperation, specific postoperative complications including cardiovascular events and major bleeding, and quality of in-hospital care using Cox and Poisson regression analyses comparing current and former SSRI users with non-users. RESULTS: In 68,487 hip fracture patients, 13,272 (19%) were current SSRI users, 2,777 (4%) were former SSRI users, and 52,438 (77%) were SSRI non-users. The 30-day mortality risk was 13% in current SSRI users (HR 1.16, 1.10-1.21) and 12% in former (HR 1.15, 1.04-1.27) compared with 10% in non-users. The HR for any unplanned readmission was 1.11 (1.02-1.20) in current and 1.13 (1.01-1.27) in former SSRI users and for any reoperation 1.21 (1.11-1.31) in current and 1.04 (0.84-1.28) in former SSRI users compared with non-users. The risk of venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding were similar irrespective of SSRI use. No association between current and former SSRI use and quality of in-hospital care was found. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, 30-day mortality and overall readmission risk were elevated in both current and former SSRI users compared with non-users. Those currently using SSRI had a 26% increased reoperation risk compared with non-users. However, SSRI use was not associated with increased risk of other postoperative complications and lower quality of in-hospital care. A limitation of this study was the inability to control for potential confounding of social deprivation.
