Dry eye in the upper blepharoplasty patient: a study comparing orbicularis-sparing versus orbicularis-excising techniques.

PURPOSE: To compare subjective and objective dry eye syndrome (DES) metrics preoperatively and postoperatively in patients undergoing bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty (ULB) using orbicularis-sparing versus orbicularis-excising techniques. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on patients without prior DES or other severe conditions who presented to our institution between 2017 and 2019 for routine functional ULB. Patients were randomized into two treatment arms: bilateral ULB using the orbicularis-sparing technique or bilateral ULB using the orbicularis-excising technique. One subjective and seven objective DES assessments were performed on all patients preoperatively and 1 month and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients were recruited for the study. Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) scores decreased in both treatment groups at 1 month and 1 year postoperatively. This change did not significantly vary based on surgical technique. Objective DES assessments were not significantly changed at both postoperative time points for either group. There was a correlation between the severity of preoperative DES symptoms and the subjective improvement of DES symptoms postoperatively in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: ULB with an orbicularis-sparing or orbicularis-excising technique does not worsen subjective or objective DES metrics and so, surgeons may confidently use either surgical technique. These findings may impact postoperative expectations for surgeons and patients alike.

Surgical outcomes following strabismus surgery for abducens nerve palsy.

PURPOSE: To assess ocular alignment outcomes and their stability for patients who underwent strabismus surgery for abducens nerve palsy and to identify preoperative patient variables that predict surgical success or repeated surgeries. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with abducens nerve palsy and who subsequently underwent strabismus surgery. RESULTS: A total of 209 patients (386 procedures) were included. The mean number of surgeries for patients was 1.9 ± 1.4. Success was achieved after a single surgery for 112 patients (53.6%), and success was achieved for an additional 42 patients, for a total of 154 patients (73.7%), following all surgeries. Preoperative abduction deficit severity was the only variable predictive of surgical success, with mild deficits having the highest odds of both initial success (OR = 5.555; CI, 2.722-11.336) and final success (OR = 5.294; 95% CI, 1.931-14.512). When analyzing survival time until additional surgery, the median survival was 406 days; abduction deficit severity, older age, other coincidental motility abnormalities, greater magnitude esotropia, and surgical technique were predictive of repeat surgical incidence. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient cohort, preoperative abduction deficit was an important predictor of both surgical success and repeat surgical incidence for abducens nerve palsy. Older patient age, additional motility abnormalities, and greater amounts of baseline strabismus were also associated with greater likelihood of multiple surgeries.