Reflectance confocal microscopy analysis of equivocal melanocytic lesions with severe regression.

BACKGROUND: The differential diagnosis between regressing nevi and melanoma might be challenging; regressing areas can represent a confounding factor for the diagnosis and the histology still remain mandatory to rule out melanoma. Reflectance confocal microscopy may add valuable information by revealing features suggestive of the nature of the melanocytic proliferation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of confocal microscopy in the management of regressive melanocytic lesions. METHODS: The dermoscopic analysis of 92 melanocytic lesions showing that more than 30% of regressions have been retrospectively considered, among them, 32 melanocytic lesions with a 7 check point list ≥3 they were assessed at the rcm and subsequently excised. For each selected lesion, dermoscopic features of regression (white scar-like areas, blue areas, blue white areas), distribution of regressing areas (central, peripheral, or both) and the percentage of regression have been examined by an expert in dermoscopy, blinded to the histological and confocal diagnosis. Subsequently, two experts in confocal microscopy revaluated, blinded from histology, RCM images. RESULTS: Of the 32 lesions analyzed, 23 (71.5%) were diagnosed histologically as nevi, and 9 (28.5%) as melanomas. 26 of 32 lesions (81.5%) exhibited regression >50% of the overall. On RCM, 11 lesions have been interpreted as malignant and 21 as benign. On RCM the majority of nevi exhibited regular architecture without cytological atypia. Epidermal disarray, pagetoid infiltration, disarranged dermo-epidermal junction architecture and atypical nests were considered as suspicious for malignancy. Good concordance between confocal readers has been detected. CONCLUSION: A combined dermoscopic/confocal approach can be used for the management of lesions exhibiting dermoscopic features of regression in order to provide a more conclusive pre-histological diagnosis avoiding a high number of unnecessary excisions. Limits of this study were represented by the relatively small number of lesions and the retrospective approach. Further, prospective studies on a larger number of cases, will be necessary in order to compare the efficacy of dermoscopy alone versus dermoscopy in combination with RCM for the evaluation of regression, suspected pigmented lesions.

Is the prognosis and course of acral melanoma related to site-specific clinicopathological features?

OBJECTIVE: Acral melanoma is an uncommon type of melanoma in Caucasian patients. However, acral melanoma is the most common type of melanoma in African and Asian patients. Comparison analyses between hand-acral melanoma and foot-acral melanoma have been rarely reported in the literature. Acral melanoma is an uncommon melanocytic tumor characterized by an intrinsic aggressiveness, with specific histological and clinicopathological features. Acral melanoma involves the palms, soles and sub-ungueal sites. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 244 patients with acral melanoma were included in our analysis. The current study was performed in three different medical centers: Sapienza University of Rome, San Gallicano Institute of Rome and University of Magna Graecia (Italy). The Kaplan-Meier product was used to estimate survival curves for disease-free survival and overall survival. The log-rank test was used to evaluate differences between the survival curves. Assuming that the effects of the predictor variables are constant over time, the independent predictive factors were assessed by Spearman's test and subsequently data were analyzed performing Cox proportional-hazard regression. RESULTS: In both univariate and multivariate analyses Breslow thickness (p < 0.0001) and ulceration (p = 0.003) remained the main predictors. General BRAF mutation was detected in 13.8% of cases. We found that median Breslow value and the percentage of recurrences were similar in hand-acral melanoma and foot-acral melanoma, as well as there were no differences in both short and long-term. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of differences in survival between hand-acral melanoma and foot-acral melanoma shows that the aggressiveness of the disease is related to distinct mutational rate, as well as to anatomical site-specific features, rather than to the visibility of the primary lesion.

Typical and atypical dermoscopic presentations of dermatofibroma.

BACKGROUND: Dermatofibroma is a common skin neoplasm that is usually easy to recognize, but in some cases its differentiation from melanoma and other tumours may be difficult. OBJECTIVE: To describe the dermoscopic features of dermatofibromas, with special emphasis on the characteristics of atypical patterns, and to calculate pattern frequency according to the patients age and gender, anatomical site and histopathological subtype. METHODS: Two groups of patients were consecutively seen, one with dermatofibromas that were surgically excised because of clinically and/or dermoscopically equivocal aspects or following patient request, and another with non-equivocal dermatofibromas. Each lesion was scored for previously reported global dermoscopic patterns and for additional features. RESULTS: A typical pattern was observed in 92 of 130 (70.8%) lesions, whereas an atypical pattern, that we named the 'non Dermatofibroma (DF)-like' pattern, was seen in 38 of 130 (29.2%). Atypical dermatofibromas showed features reminiscent of different conditions, such as melanoma in 21(16.2%) cases, vascular tumour in six (4.6%), basal cell carcinoma in five (3.8%), collision tumour in three (2.3%) and psoriasis in three (2.3%). A significant association was found between the 'melanoma-like' pattern/'vascular tumour-like' pattern and males, whereas a trend was observed between the above-mentioned patterns and hemosiderotic/aneurysmal DFs. 'Peripheral pigment network and central white scar-like patch' pattern was found associated with females and classic histopathological variant of DF. CONCLUSION: Dermatofibromas may display different morphological faces. The typical dermoscopic patterns allow a confident diagnosis, whereas a full surgical excision is always recommended in all doubtful cases.

Seven-point checklist of dermoscopy revisited.

BACKGROUND: Most dermoscopic algorithms to diagnose melanoma were established more than 10 years ago and have been tested primarily on clear-cut melanomas and excised melanocytic naevi. OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic performance of pattern analysis and seven-point checklist on lesions that reflect the current clinical setting, compared with a revised seven-point checklist with a lower threshold for excision. METHODS: Eight experienced dermatologists viewed dermoscopic images of 100 excised melanomas, 100 excised naevi and 100 monitored naevi. Each lesion was evaluated by pattern analysis and scored as naevus, melanoma or lesion to be excised. Images were then evaluated using the seven-point criteria, with both standard and revised thresholds for excision. RESULTS: Pooled data using the pattern analysis algorithm showed that 82% of melanomas and 87·5% of monitored naevi were correctly scored as lesion to be excised and benign naevus, respectively. Using the standard and revised thresholds for the seven-point checklist, excision was recommended for 77·9% and 87·8% of the lesions in the melanoma set, respectively. The standard threshold produced 'no excision' recommendations for 85·6% of the monitored naevi, compared with 74·5% using the revised threshold. Pattern analysis, standard seven-point and revised seven-point algorithms resulted in recommendations of 'excision' for 63·6%, 60·3% and 72·0% of the excised naevi, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic approach to naevi and melanoma should be adapted to the current clinical setting, in which patients may present with early-stage melanomas and multiple atypical naevi. To increase sensitivity, a revised seven-point checklist with a lower threshold for excision should be used.

Instrument-, age- and site-dependent variations of dermoscopic patterns of congenital melanocytic naevi: a multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Recently, we identified and described dermoscopic aspects, present with a higher frequency in congenital melanocytic lesions with respect to acquired naevi. We also classified small- and medium-sized congenital naevi (CN) into nine subtypes according to their macroscopic and dermoscopic aspects. OBJECTIVES: Because the recognition of dermoscopic features may be instrument dependent, in this study, we wanted to check whether dermoscopic patterns specific for CN can be identified in digital images acquired by means of different instruments. We also wanted to check the validity of our previously proposed classification and assess possible age- and site-dependent variations of dermoscopic patterns and naevus subtypes. PATIENTS/METHODS: Images corresponding to 384 small- or medium-sized CN were collected in eight different centres employing four different instruments. Lesion images were evaluated and checked for the presence of specific dermoscopic criteria, classified, and compared with a database of 350 acquired naevi. RESULTS: Specific and unspecific dermoscopic features were identifiable in images acquired by means of all four instrument types. The mean number of identified features per lesion did not vary according to the instrument employed for the acquisition of the images; however, it was lower for lesions recorded employing low magnifications. The previously proposed classification was easily applied to the whole image database. The variegated naevus type was identified as a highly specific clinical/dermoscopic pattern. Dermoscopic features varied according to age and location. The globular type prevailed in subjects under 11 years of age and on the trunk, whereas the majority of reticular lesions were located on the limbs. CONCLUSIONS: Because definite clinical and histological criteria for the diagnosis of the congenital nature of naevi are lacking, the use of dermoscopy can be of great help in identifying those lesions where the presence of specific dermoscopic features makes the diagnosis of CN more likely. Moreover, dermoscopy can be useful both for the classification of lesions already identified as congenital according to definite clinical and anamnestic data and for a possible correlation of naevus phenotype and dermoscopic patterns to the risk of developing a malignant melanoma in prospective studies.