Effects of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy on Osteoblastic Activity at Sites of Inflammatory and Structural Lesions in Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Prospective Proof-of-Concept Study Using Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Sacroiliac Joints and Spine.

OBJECTIVE: Proof-of-concept trial to determine the effects of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapy on osteoblastic activity at sites of inflammatory and structural lesions in patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), using fluorine 18-labeled NaF (18 F-NaF) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI). METHODS: Sixteen patients with clinically active radiographic axial SpA were prospectively enrolled to receive TNFi treatment and undergo 18 F-NaF PET/MRI of the sacroiliac (SI) joints and spine at baseline and at a follow-up visit 3-6 months after treatment initiation. Three readers (1 for PET/MRI and 2 for conventional MRI) evaluated all images, blinded to time point. Bone marrow edema, structural lesions (i.e., fat lesions, sclerosis, erosions, and ankylosis), and 18 F-NaF uptake at SI joint quadrants and vertebral corners (VCs) were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 11 male and 5 female patients (mean age ± SD 38.6 ± 12.0 years) were followed up for a mean duration of 4.6 months (range 3-6). 18 F-NaF PET/MRI was conducted on SI joints for 16 patients and the spine for 10; 128 SI joint quadrants and 920 VCs were analyzed at each time point. At baseline, 18 F-NaF uptake was demonstrated in 96.0% of SI joint quadrants with bone marrow edema, 94.2% with sclerosis, and 88.3% with fat lesions. At follow-up, 65.3% of SI joint quadrants with bone marrow edema (P < 0.001), 33.8% with sclerosis (P = 0.23), and 24.5% with fat lesions (P = 0.01) had less 18 F-NaF uptake, compared with baseline. For VCs, 18 F-NaF uptake at baseline was found in 81.5% of edges with sclerosis, 41.9% with fat lesions, and 33.7% with bone marrow edema. At follow-up, 73.5% of VCs with bone marrow edema (P = 0.01), 53.3% with fat lesions (P = 0.03), and 55.6% with sclerosis (P = 0.16) showed less 18 F-NaF uptake, compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: Anti-TNF antibody treatment led to a significant decrease in osteoblastic activity within 3-6 months, especially, but not solely, at sites of inflammation. Larger data sets are needed for confirmation of the antiosteoblastic effects of TNFi for the prevention of radiographic progression in axial SpA.

Free-breathing 3D Stack of Stars GRE (StarVIBE) sequence for detecting pulmonary nodules in 18F-FDG PET/MRI.

BACKGROUND: The free-breathing T1-weighted 3D Stack of Stars GRE (StarVIBE) MR sequence potentially reduces artifacts in chest MRI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate StarVIBE for the detection of pulmonary nodules in 18F-FDG PET/MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, conducted on a prospective clinical trial cohort, 88 consecutive women with newly diagnosed breast cancer underwent both contrast-enhanced whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI and computed tomography (CT). Patients' chests were examined on CT as well as on StarVIBE and conventional T1-weighted VIBE and T2-weighted HASTE MR sequences, with CT serving as the reference standard. Presence, size, and location of all detectable lung nodules were assessed. Wilcoxon test was applied to compare nodule features and Pearson's, and Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: Out of 65 lung nodules detected in 36 patients with CT (3.7 ± 1.4 mm), StarVIBE was able to detect 31 (47.7%), VIBE 26 (40%) and HASTE 11 (16.8%), respectively. Overall, CT showed a significantly higher detectability than all MRI sequences combined (65 vs. 36, difference 44.6%, p < 0.001). The VIBE showed a significantly better detection rate than the HASTE (23.1%, p = 0.001). Detection rates between StarVIBE and VIBE did not significantly differ (7.7%, p = 0.27), but the StarVIBE showed a significant advantage detecting centrally located pulmonary nodules (66.7% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.031). There was a strong correlation in nodule size between CT and MRI sequences (HASTE: ρ = 0.80, p = 0.003; VIBE: ρ = 0.77, p < 0.001; StarVIBE: ρ = 0.78, p < 0.001). Mean image quality was rated as good to excellent for CT and MRI sequences. CONCLUSION: The overall lung nodule detection rate of StarVIBE was slightly, but not significantly, higher than conventional T1w VIBE and significantly higher than T2w HASTE. Detectability of centrally located nodules is better with StarVIBE than with VIBE. Nevertheless, all MRI analyses demonstrated considerably lower detection rates for small lung nodules, when compared to CT.

Comparison of nodal staging between CT, MRI, and [18F]-FDG PET/MRI in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare CT, MRI, and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F]-FDG PET/MRI) for nodal status, regarding quantity and location of metastatic locoregional lymph nodes in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty-two patients (mean age 52.7 ± 11.9 years) were included in this prospective double-center study. Patients underwent dedicated contrast-enhanced chest/abdomen/pelvis computed tomography (CT) and whole-body ([18F]-FDG PET/) magnet resonance imaging (MRI). Thoracal datasets were evaluated separately regarding quantity, lymph node station (axillary levels I-III, supraclavicular, internal mammary chain), and lesion character (benign vs. malign). Histopathology served as reference standard for patient-based analysis. Patient-based and lesion-based analyses were compared by a McNemar test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were assessed for all three imaging modalities. RESULTS: On a patient-based analysis, PET/MRI correctly detected significantly more nodal positive patients than MRI (p < 0.0001) and CT (p < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference was seen between CT and MRI. PET/MRI detected 193 lesions in 75 patients (41.2%), while MRI detected 123 lesions in 56 patients (30.8%) and CT detected 104 lesions in 50 patients, respectively. Differences were statistically significant on a lesion-based analysis (PET/MRI vs. MRI, p < 0.0001; PET/MRI vs. CT, p < 0.0001; MRI vs. CT, p = 0.015). Subgroup analysis for different lymph node stations showed that PET/MRI detected significantly more lymph node metastases than MRI and CT in each location (axillary levels I-III, supraclavicular, mammary internal chain). MRI was superior to CT only in axillary level I (p = 0.0291). CONCLUSION: [18F]-FDG PET/MRI outperforms CT or MRI in detecting nodal involvement on a patient-based analysis and on a lesion-based analysis. Furthermore, PET/MRI was superior to CT or MRI in detecting lymph node metastases in all lymph node stations. Of all the tested imaging modalities, PET/MRI showed the highest sensitivity, whereas CT showed the lowest sensitivity, but was most specific.

Prospective comparison of CT and 18F-FDG PET/MRI in N and M staging of primary breast cancer patients: Initial results.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced thoraco-abdominal computed tomography and whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI in N and M staging in newly diagnosed, histopathological proven breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 80 consecutive women with newly diagnosed and histopathologically confirmed breast cancer were enrolled in this prospective study. Following inclusion criteria had to be fulfilled: (1) newly diagnosed, treatment-naive T2-tumor or higher T-stage or (2) newly diagnosed, treatment-naive triple-negative tumor of every size or (3) newly diagnosed, treatment-naive tumor with molecular high risk (T1c, Ki67 >14%, HER2neu over-expression, G3). All patients underwent a thoraco-abdominal ceCT and a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI. All datasets were evaluated by two experienced radiologists in hybrid imaging regarding suspect lesion count, localization, categorization and diagnostic confidence. Images were interpreted in random order with a reading gap of at least 4 weeks to avoid recognition bias. Histopathological results as well as follow-up imaging served as reference standard. Differences in staging accuracy were assessed using Mc Nemars chi2 test. RESULTS: CT rated the N stage correctly in 64 of 80 (80%, 95% CI:70.0-87.3) patients with a sensitivity of 61.5% (CI:45.9-75.1), a specificity of 97.6% (CI:87.4-99.6), a PPV of 96% (CI:80.5-99.3), and a NPV of 72.7% (CI:59.8-82.7). Compared to this, 18F-FDG PET/MRI determined the N stage correctly in 71 of 80 (88.75%, CI:80.0-94.0) patients with a sensitivity of 82.1% (CI:67.3-91.0), a specificity of 95.1% (CI:83.9-98.7), a PPV of 94.1% (CI:80.9-98.4) and a NPV of 84.8% (CI:71.8-92.4). Differences in sensitivities were statistically significant (difference 20.6%, CI:-0.02-40.9; p = 0.008). Distant metastases were present in 7/80 patients (8.75%). 18 F-FDG PET/MRI detected all of the histopathological proven metastases without any false-positive findings, while 3 patients with bone metastases were missed in CT (sensitivity 57.1%, specificity 95.9%). Additionally, CT presented false-positive findings in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/MRI has a high diagnostic potential and outperforms CT in assessing the N and M stage in patients with primary breast cancer.

Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cohort of 154 therapy-naive patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer was enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MRI, computed tomography (CT) scan, and a bone scintigraphy prior to therapy. All datasets were evaluated regarding the presence of bone metastases. McNemar χ2 test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity between the modalities. RESULTS: Forty-one bone metastases were present in 7/154 patients (4.5%). Both [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone were able to detect all of the patients with histopathologically proven bone metastases (sensitivity 100%; specificity 100%) and did not miss any of the 41 malignant lesions (sensitivity 100%). CT detected 5/7 patients (sensitivity 71.4%; specificity 98.6%) and 23/41 lesions (sensitivity 56.1%). Bone scintigraphy detected only 2/7 patients (sensitivity 28.6%) and 15/41 lesions (sensitivity 36.6%). Furthermore, CT and scintigraphy led to false-positive findings of bone metastases in 2 patients and in 1 patient, respectively. The sensitivity of PET/MRI and MRI alone was significantly better compared with CT (p < 0.01, difference 43.9%) and bone scintigraphy (p < 0.01, difference 63.4%). CONCLUSION: [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI are significantly better than CT or bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Both CT and bone scintigraphy show a substantially limited sensitivity in detection of bone metastases. KEY POINTS: • [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone are significantly superior to CT and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. • Radiation-free whole-body MRI might serve as modality of choice in detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients.

Prospective Correlation of Prognostic Immunohistochemical Markers With SUV and ADC Derived From Dedicated Hybrid Breast 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to correlate prognostically relevant immunohistochemical parameters of breast cancer with simultaneously acquired SUVs and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived from hybrid breast PET/MRI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six women with newly diagnosed, therapy-naive, histologically proven breast cancer (mean age, 54.1 ± 12.0 years) underwent dedicated prone 18F-FDG breast PET/MRI. Diffusion-weighted imaging (b-values: 0, 500, 1000 s/mm2) was performed simultaneously with the PET acquisition. A region of interest encompassing the entire primary tumor on each patient's PET/MRI scan was used to determine the glucose metabolism represented by maximum and mean SUV as well as into corresponding ADC maps to assess tumor cellularity represented by mean and minimum ADC values. Histopathological tumor grading and prognostically relevant immunohistochemical markers, that is, Ki67, progesterone receptor, estrogen receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), were assessed. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to compare SUV and ADC values as well as the immunohistochemically markers and molecular subtype. For the comparison with the tumor grading, a Wilcoxon test was used. RESULTS: A significant inverse correlation between SUV and ADC values derived from breast PET/MRI (r = -0.49 for SUVmean vs ADCmean; r = -0.43 for SUVmax vs ADCmin; both P's < 0.001) was found. Tumor grading and Ki67 both showed a positive correlation with SUVmean from breast PET/MRI (r = 0.37 and r = 0.32, P < 0.01). For immunohistochemical markers, HER2 showed an inverse correlation with ADC values from breast PET/MRI (r = -0.35, P < 0.01). Molecular subtypes significantly correlate with SUVmax and SUVmean (r = 0.52 and r = 0.42, both P's < 0.05). In addition, estrogen receptor expression showed an inverse correlation with SUVmax and SUVmean from breast PET/MRI (r = -0.45 and r = -0.42, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present data show a correlation between increased glucose metabolism, cellularity, tumor grading, estrogen and HER2 expression, as well as molecular subtype of breast cancer primaries. Hence, simultaneous 18F-FDG PET and diffusion-weighted imaging from hybrid breast PET/MRI may serve as a predictive tool for identifying high-risk breast cancer patients in initial staging and guide-targeted therapy.

Impact of 18F-FDG PET/MR on therapeutic management in high risk primary breast cancer patients - A prospective evaluation of staging algorithms.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether potential differences in staging between a traditional staging imaging algorithm and 18F-FDG PET/MR lead to a change in patient management in breast carcinoma and to compare the diagnostic accuracy between the traditional staging algorithm and 18F-FDG PET/MR for the TNM classification. METHOD: In this prospective cohort study from two university hospitals 56 women with newly diagnosed, therapy-naive breast cancer and increased pre-test probability for distant metastases were included. All patients were examined by a traditional staging imaging algorithm (X-ray mammography, breast ultrasonography, chest plain radiography, bone scintigraphy, and ultrasonography of the liver and axillary fossa) and whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MR including dedicated 18F-FDG PET/MR breast examinations. Each patient was discussed two times in a separate tumor board session to determine a total of three therapy recommendations based on histopathological data of the primary tumor and (1) traditional algorithm only, (2) traditional algorithm and 18F-FDG PET/MR, and (3) 18F-FDG PET/MR only. Major changes in therapy recommendations and differences between the traditional staging algorithm and 18F-FDG PET/MR for the TNM classification were evaluated. RESULTS: Staging by 18F-FDG PET/MR led to a difference in treatment compared the traditional staging algorithm in 8/56 cases (14%). Therapy changes included therapy of the breast, locoregional nodes and systemic therapy. A trend to staging superiority was found for 18F-FDG PET/MRI without statistical significance (p = 0.3827). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, for breast cancer patients with elevated pre-test probability for distant metastases a change of the therapy regiment occurs in 14 % of patients when staged by 18F-FDG PET/MR and confirmed by histopathology compared to a traditional staging algorithm. In particular with regard to the amendment of the guideline further assessment of 18F-FDG-PET/MR in this setting is necessary to assess the true value of this modality.

Prospective evaluation of whole-body MRI and 18F-FDG PET/MRI in N and M staging of primary breast cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic potential of whole-body MRI and whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI for N and M staging in newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 104 patients (age 53.4 ± 12.5) with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer were enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI. MRI and 18F-FDG PET/MRI datasets were evaluated separately regarding lesion count, lesion localization, and lesion characterization (malignant/benign) as well as the diagnostic confidence (5-point ordinal scale, 1-5). The N and M stages were assessed according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual in MRI datasets alone and in 18F-FDG PET/MRI datasets, respectively. In the majority of lesions histopathology served as the reference standard. The remaining lesions were followed-up by imaging and clinical examination. Separately for nodal-positive and nodal-negative women, a McNemar chi2 test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity of the N and M stages between 18F-FDG PET/MRI and MRI. Differences in diagnostic confidence scores were assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: MRI determined the N stage correctly in 78 of 104 (75%) patients with a sensitivity of 62.3% (95% CI: 0.48-0.75), a specificity of 88.2% (95% CI: 0.76-0.96), a PPV (positive predictive value) of 84.6% % (95% CI: 69.5-0.94), and a NPV (negative predictive value) of 69.2% (95% CI: 0.57-0.8). Corresponding results for 18F-FDG PET/MRI were 87/104 (83.7%), 75.5% (95% CI: 0.62-0.86), 92.2% (0.81-0.98), 90% (0.78-0.97), and 78.3% (0.66-0.88), showing a significantly better sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/MRI determining malignant lymph nodes (p = 0.008). The M stage was identified correctly in MRI and 18F-FDG PET/MRI in 100 of 104 patients (96.2%). Both modalities correctly staged all 7 patients with distant metastases, leading to false-positive findings in 4 patients in each modality (3.8%). In a lesion-based analysis, 18F-FDG PET/MRI showed a significantly better performance in correctly determining malignant lesions (85.8% vs. 67.1%, difference 18.7% (95% CI: 0.13-0.26), p < 0.0001) and offered a superior diagnostic confidence compared with MRI alone (4.1 ± 0.7 vs. 3.4 ± 0.7, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/MRI has a better diagnostic accuracy for N staging in primary breast cancer patients and provides a significantly higher diagnostic confidence in lesion characterization than MRI alone. But both modalities bear the risk to overestimate the M stage.

Incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the colon: value of contrast-enhanced CT correlation with colonoscopic findings.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of morphological information derived from contrast-enhanced CT in the characterization of incidental focal colonic uptake in 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations. METHODS: A total of 125 patients (female: n = 53, male: n = 72) that underwent colonoscopy secondary to contrast-enhanced, full-dose PET/CT without special bowel preparation were included in this retrospective study. PET/CT examinations were assessed for focal colonic tracer uptake in comparison with the background. Focal tracer uptake was correlated with morphological changes of the colonic wall in the contrast-enhanced CT images. Colonoscopy reports were evaluated for benign, inflammatory, polypoid, precancerous, and cancerous lesions verified by histopathology, serving as a reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for detection of therapeutic relevant findings were calculated for (a) sole focal tracer uptake and (b) focal tracer uptake with correlating CT findings in contrast-enhanced CT. RESULTS: In 38.4% (48/125) of the patients, a focal 18F-FDG uptake was observed within 67 lesions. Malignant lesions were endoscopically and histopathologically diagnosed in eleven patients, and nine of these were detected by focal 18F-FDG uptake. A total of 34 lesions with impact on short- or long-term patient management (either being pre- or malignant) were detected. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for sole 18F-FDG uptake for this combined group were 54%, 69%, 29%, 85%, and 65%. Corresponding results for focal 18F-FDG uptake with correlating CT findings were 38%, 90%, 50%, 86%, and 80%. This resulted in a statistically significant difference for diagnostic accuracy (p = 0.0001) CONCLUSION: By analyzing additional morphological changes in contrast-enhanced CT imaging, the specificity of focal colonic 18F-FDG uptake for precancerous and cancerous lesions can be increased but leads to a considerate loss of sensitivity. Therefore, every focal colonic uptake should be followed up by colonoscopy.

Impact of different metal artifact reduction techniques on attenuation correction in 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of different metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithms on Hounsfield unit (HU) and standardized uptake values (SUV) in a phantom setting and verify these results in patients with metallic implants undergoing oncological PET/CT examinations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this prospective study, PET-CT examinations of 28 oncological patients (14 female, 14 male, mean age 69.5 ± 15.2y) with 38 different metal implants were included. CT datasets were reconstructed using standard weighted filtered back projection (WFBP) without MAR, MAR in image space (MARIS) and iterative MAR (iMAR, hip algorithm). The three datasets were used for PET attenuation correction. SUV and HU measurements were performed at the site of the most prominent bright and dark band artifacts. Differences between HU and SUV values across the different reconstructions were compared using paired t-tests. Bonferroni correction was used to prevent alpha-error accumulation (p < 0.017). RESULTS: For bright band artifacts, MARIS led to a non-significant mean decrease of 12.0% (345 ± 315 HU) in comparison with WFBP (391 ± 293 HU), whereas iMAR led to a significant decrease of 68.3% (125 ± 185 HU, p < 0.017). For SUVmean, MARIS showed no significant effect in comparison with WFBP (WFBP: 0.99 ± 0.40, MARIS: 0.96 ± 0.39), while iMAR led to a significant decrease of 11.1% (0.88 ± 0.35, p < 0.017). Similar results were observed for dark band artifacts. CONCLUSION: iMAR significantly reduces artifacts caused by metal implants in CT and thus leads to a significant change of SUV measurements in bright and dark band artifacts compared with WFBP and MARIS, thus probably improving PET quantification. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The present work indicates that MAR algorithms such as iMAR algorithm in integrated PET/CT scanners are useful to improve CT image quality as well as PET quantification in the evaluation of tracer uptake adjacent to large metal implants. A detailed analysis of oncological patients with various large metal implants using different MAR algorithms in PET/CT has not been conducted yet.

Prospective comparison of whole-body MRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To assess whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wb-MRI) for detection of biochemical recurrence in comparison to 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) in prostate cancer (Pca) patients after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: This was a prospective trial including 28 consecutive patients (mean age 65.3 ± 9.0 years) with newly documented biochemical recurrence of Pca (mean prostate-specific antigen, PSA, 2.09 ± 1.95 ng/ml) following radical prostatectomy. All patients underwent both wb-MRI including a dedicated pelvic imaging protocol and PET/CT with 166 ± 35 MBq 68Ga-PSMA within a time window of 11 ± 10 days. PET/CT and MRI datasets were separately evaluated regarding Pca lesion count, type, localization and diagnostic confidence (three-point Likert scale, 1-3) by two nuclear medicine specialists and two radiologists, respectively. The reference standard was based on histopathological results, PSA levels following targeted salvage irradiation and follow-up imaging. Lesion-based and patient-based detection rates were compared using the chi-squared test. Differences in diagnostic confidence were assessed using the Welch test. RESULTS: A total of 56 Pca lesions were detected in 20 of the 28 patients. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT detected 56 of 56 lesions (100%) in 20 patients (71.4%), while wb-MRI detected 13 lesions (23.2%) in 11 patients (39.3%). The higher detection rate with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was statistically significant on both a per-lesion basis (p < 0.001) and a per-patient basis (p = 0.0167). In 8 patients (28.6%) no relapse was detectable by either modality. All lesions detected by wb-MRI were also detected by 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Additionally, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT provided superior diagnostic confidence in identifying Pca lesions (2.7 ± 0.7 vs. 2.3 ± 0.6, p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT significantly out-performed wb-MRI in the detection of biochemical recurrence in Pca patients after radical prostatectomy.

Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for thoracic staging of non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for primary and locoregional lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In this prospective study, a total of 84 patients (51 men, 33 women, mean age 62.5 ± 9.1 years) with histopathologically confirmed NSCLC underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT followed by 18F-FDG PET/MRI in a single injection protocol. Two readers independently assessed T and N staging in separate sessions according to the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual for 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/MRI, respectively. Histopathology as a reference standard was available for N staging in all 84 patients and for T staging in 39 patients. Differences in staging accuracy were assessed by McNemars chi2 test. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and longitudinal diameters of primary tumors were correlated using Pearson's coefficients. RESULTS: T stage was categorized concordantly in 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in 38 of 39 (97.4%) patients. Herein, 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/MRI correctly determined the T stage in 92.3 and 89.7% of patients, respectively. N stage was categorized concordantly in 83 of 84 patients (98.8%). 18F-FDG PET/CT correctly determined the N stage in 78 of 84 patients (92.9%), while 18F-FDG PET/MRI correctly determined the N stage in 77 of 84 patients (91.7%). Differences between 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/MRI in T and N staging accuracy were not statistically significant (p > 0.5, each). Tumor size and SUVmax measurements derived from both imaging modalities exhibited excellent correlation (r = 0.963 and r = 0.901, respectively). CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT show an equivalently high diagnostic performance for T and N staging in patients suffering from NSCLC.

Local and whole-body staging in patients with primary breast cancer: a comparison of one-step to two-step staging utilizing 18F-FDG-PET/MRI.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of a one-step to a two-step staging algorithm utilizing 18F-FDG PET/MRI in breast cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 38 patients (37 females and one male, mean age 57 ± 10 years; range 31-78 years) with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer were prospectively enrolled in this trial. All PET/MRI examinations were assessed for local tumor burden and metastatic spread in two separate reading sessions: (1) One-step algorithm comprising supine whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI, and (2) Two-step algorithm comprising a dedicated prone 18F-FDG breast PET/MRI and supine whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI. RESULTS: On a patient based analysis the two-step algorithm correctly identified 37 out of 38 patients with breast carcinoma (97%), while five patients were missed by the one-step 18F-FDG PET/MRI algorithm (33/38; 87% correct identification). On a lesion-based analysis 56 breast cancer lesions were detected in the two-step algorithm and 44 breast cancer lesions could be correctly identified in the one-step 18F-FDG PET/MRI (79%), resulting in statistically significant differences between the two algorithms (p = 0.0015). For axillary lymph node evaluation sensitivity, specificity and accuracy was 93%, 95 and 94%, respectively. Furthermore, distant metastases could be detected in seven patients in both algorithms. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate the necessity and superiority of a two-step 18F-FDG PET/MRI algorithm, comprising dedicated prone breast imaging and supine whole-body imaging, when compared to the one-step algorithm for local and whole-body staging in breast cancer patients.

Heparin-bonded stent graft treatment for major visceral arterial injury after upper abdominal surgery.

PURPOSE: To analyse technical success, complications, and short- and intermediate-term outcomes after heparin-bonded stent graft implantation for the treatment of major abdominal vessel injury after upper abdominal surgery. METHODS: This retrospective, IRB-approved analysis included 29 consecutive patients (female: n = 6, male: n = 23, mean age 65.9 ± 11.2 years). All patients underwent angiography and attempted heparin-bonded stent-graft implantation because of a major visceral arterial injury after upper abdominal surgery. Electronic clinical records, angiographic reports and imaging datasets were reviewed to assess technical success and complications. Telephone interviews were performed to obtain follow-up information and to estimate short- (> 30 days) and intermediate-term (> 90 days) outcomes. RESULTS: Successful stent graft placement was achieved in 82.8% (24/29). Peri-interventional complications were observed in 20.7% (6/29) and delayed, angiography-associated complications were observed in 34.5% (10/29) of the patients. Symptomatic re-bleeding occurred in 24.1% (7/29). Short-term survival (> 30 days) was 72.4% (21/29). Intermediate survival (> 90 days) was 37.9% (11/29). CONCLUSION: Treatment of major vascular injuries with heparin-bonded stent grafts is feasible with a high technical success rate. However, survival depends on the underlying surgical condition, making interdisciplinary patient management mandatory. KEY POINTS: • Stent graft implantation is challenging, but has a high technical success rate. • Complications are frequent but surgical conversion is rarely necessary. • Survival depends on the underlying surgical condition causing the vascular injury. • Interdisciplinary management is crucial for the survival of these patients.

Dual-phase hybrid 18 F-Fluoride Positron emission tomography/MRI in ankylosing spondylitis: Investigating the link between MRI bone changes, regional hyperaemia and increased osteoblastic activity.

INTRODUCTION: Focal 18 F-Fluoride uptake on blood-pool phase PET represents regional hyperaemia, while it indicates osteoblastic activity on mineralization phase PET. This study investigates the link between regional hyperaemia and osteoblastic activity in inflammatory and chronic lesions of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) using dual-phase 18 F-Fluoride PET/MRI. METHODS: Thirteen patients (six men, seven women, age: 37 ± 10 years) with active AS prospectively underwent dual-phase 18 F-Fluoride PET/MRI. Blood-pool phase PET was acquired 6 min and mineralization phase PET 40 min after injection of 158 ± 8 MBq 18 F-Fluoride. SIJ quadrants (SQ) were assessed regarding inflammatory lesions represented by bone marrow oedema (BME), chronic AS lesions such as erosion, fat deposition (FD), sclerosis and ankylosis on MRI, and regarding focal 18 F-Fluoride uptake on both PET datasets. Image quality (IQ) of both PET datasets and MRI was evaluated using a 4-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of 104 SQ, there were 63.4% SQ with FD, 42.3% SQ with BME, 26.9% SQ with erosions, 26% SQ with sclerosis and 10.6% SQ with ankylosis. BME alone was associated with focal 18 F-Fluoride uptake in 63.6% SQ on blood-pool phase and 90.9% SQ on mineralization phase 18 F-Fluoride PET/MRI. Instead, FD, erosion, sclerosis, ankylosis were not associated with focal 18 F-Fluoride uptake on either blood-pool or mineralization phase 18 F-Fluoride PET/MRI. SQ showing BME alone or a combination of BME and chronic AS lesions had a significantly higher percentage of focal 18 F-Fluoride uptake on blood-pool phase and mineralization phase PET/MRI than SQ showing AS lesions without BME (P < 0.001). Both 18 F-Fluoride PET datasets provided high IQ, albeit IQ of mineralization phase PET was superior to blood-pool phase PET (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Dual-phase 18 F-Fluoride PET/MRI of the SIJ showed that inflammatory rather than chronic AS lesions are associated with regional hyperaemia and osteoblastic activity.

Evaluation of Practical Interpretation Hurdles in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in 55 Patients: Physiological Tracer Distribution and Incidental Tracer Uptake.

PURPOSE: To investigate the physiologic Ga-PSMA distribution and evaluate focal or diffuse radiotracer uptake in nonprostate cancer malignancies and in incidental findings. METHODS: Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans in 55 men performed for prostate cancer (49) or renal cell carcinoma (6) staging were analyzed retrospectively. Two radiologists evaluated the datasets in 2 reading sessions. First, physiological Ga-PSMA uptake was evaluated. Second, scans were analyzed for incidental uptake. SUVmax and SUVmean were recorded. Other imaging modalities, histopathology, or clinical follow-up served as standard of reference. RESULTS: Homogenous Ga-PSMA uptake of the lacrimal glands (SUVmax, 15.7 ± 7.2), parotid glands (SUVmax, 24.4 ± 8.1), submandibular glands (SUVmax, 26.7 ± 7.1), vocal cords (SUVmax, 8.4 ± 3), Waldeyer ring (SUVmax, 10.4 ± 4.3), liver (SUVmax, 8.2 ± 2.5), spleen (SUVmax, 10.9 ± 3.9), kidneys (SUVmax, 66.4 ± 25.4), and pars descendens duodeni (SUVmax, 17.6 ± 8.9) was observed in all patients. In 65% and 36%, respectively, homogenous Ga-PSMA uptake of the colon descendens (SUVmax, 10.6 ± 9.2) and the rectum (SUVmax, 3.7 ± 1.1) was found. Approximately 22% exhibited a Ga-PSMA uptake of the thyroid (SUVmax, 4.5 ± 1.2), and 21% exhibited a Ga-PSMA uptake of the knee's synovia (SUVmax, 2.9 ± 0.2). Furthermore, Ga-PSMA uptake was found in 1 patient because of fibrous dysplasia of the right os ilium (SUVmax, 7.7). CONCLUSIONS: Physiologic distribution of Ga-PSMA comprises uptake in lacrimal and salivary glands, vocal cords, Waldeyer ring, liver, spleen, and kidneys as well as various parts of the intestine. Moreover, nonspecific tracer uptake is regularly found in the thyroid and the synovia of the knee. Incidental Ga-PSMA uptake can occasionally reveal nonprostate cancer-associated remodeling processes, such as fibrous dysplasia.

Imaging children suffering from lymphoma: an evaluation of different 18F-FDG PET/MRI protocols compared to whole-body DW-MRI.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate and compare the diagnostic potential of different PET/MRI reading protocols, entailing non-enhanced / contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for lesion detection and determination of the tumor stage in pediatric lymphoma patients. METHODS: A total of 28 18F-FDG PET/MRI datasets were included for analysis of four different reading protocols: (1) PET/MRI utilizing sole unenhanced T2w and T1w imaging, (2) PET/MRI utilizing additional contrast enhanced sequences, (3) PET/MR imaging utilizing unenhanced, contrast enhanced and DW imaging or (4) WB-DW-MRI. Statistical analyses were performed on a per-patient and a per-lesion basis. Follow-up and prior examinations as well as histopathology served as reference standards. RESULTS: PET/MRI correctly identified all 17 examinations with active lymphoma disease, while WB-DW-MRI correctly identified 15/17 examinations. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were 96%, 96.5%, 97%, 95%, and 96% for PET/MRI1; 97%, 96.5%, 97%, 96.5%, and 97% for PET/MRI2; 97%, 96.5%, 97%, 96.5%, and 97% for PET/MRI3 and 77%, 96%, 96%, 78.5% and 86% for MRI-DWI. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/MRI is superior to WB-DW-MRI in staging pediatric lymphoma patients. Neither application of contrast media nor DWI leads to a noticeable improvement of the diagnostic accuracy of PET/MRI. Thus, unenhanced PET/MRI may play a crucial role for the diagnostic work-up of pediatric lymphoma patients in the future.

Silent progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: is DAS28 remission an insufficient goal in RA? Results from the German Remission-plus cohort.

BACKGROUND: Remission is arguably the ultimate therapeutic goal in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Applying modern strategies, clinical remission can be achieved in a substantial number of patients with early RA (ERA). Even in those patients, the number and scope of erosions can increase. We, therefore, investigated the value of MRI for the detection of radiological progression in patients with DAS28 improvement and/or clinical remission of the German Remission-plus cohort. METHODS: Data-sets of 80 RA patients (according to 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria) from the Remission-plus study cohort, who fulfilled the following criteria, were retrospectively analysed: availability of two consecutive MRI scans (low-field MRI, follow-up interval 1 year) of the clinically dominant hand and wrist, and the presence of DAS28 (CRP) scores at both time points, which was used to assess disease activity. RESULTS: Seventy-one of the 80 investigated patients presented a numerical improvement of the DAS28 (CRP) after 12 months (DAS28(CRP) T0 average (Ø) 4.96, SD 1.2; DAS28 T4 (12 month) Ø 2.6, SD 1.0), 73% of them also improved in the RAMRIS-Score, while 24% demonstrated an increase despite DAS28 improvement and 3% showed equal values. 48% of patients who improved in the DAS28 reached EULAR remission. 41% of these patients had an increase in the RAMRIS Erosion-subscore after 12 months. When considering EULAR response criteria (non-response (n = 7), moderate response (n = 19), good response (n = 45)), an increase of erosions was found in 71.4% of non-responders, 52.6% of moderate responders, and 31.1% of good responders after 12 months, all compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: Up to 40% of patients in this study demonstrated a progressive erosive disease detected by MRI despite DAS28 improvement or EULAR remission. Future studies are needed to determine the prognostic clinical impact of disease progression in MRI despite clinical remission, and to investigate if DAS28 remission may be an insufficient therapeutic goal and should be accompanied by MRI remission criteria.

Is integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in the differentiation of incidental tracer uptake in the head and neck area?

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI) compared with contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the characterization of incidental tracer uptake in examinations of the head and neck. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 81 oncologic patients who underwent contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT and subsequent PET/MRI was performed by two readers for incidental tracer uptake. In a consensus reading, discrepancies were resolved. Each finding was either characterized as most likely benign, most likely malignant, or indeterminate. Using all available clinical information including results from histopathologic sampling and follow-up examinations, an expert reader classified each finding as benign or malignant. McNemar's test was used to compare the performance of both imaging modalities in characterizing incidental tracer uptake. RESULTS: Forty-six lesions were detected by both modalities. On PET/CT, 27 lesions were classified as most likely benign, one as most likely malignant, and 18 as indeterminate; on PET/MRI, 31 lesions were classified as most likely benign, one lesion as most likely malignant, and 14 as indeterminate. Forty-three lesions were benign and one lesion was malignant according to the reference standard. In two lesions, a definite diagnosis was not possible. McNemar's test detected no differences concerning the correct classification of incidental tracer uptake between PET/CT and PET/MRI (P = 0.125). CONCLUSION: In examinations of the head and neck area, incidental tracer uptake cannot be classified more accurately by PET/MRI than by PET/CT.