Recruitment Challenges of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Dissemination Study.

BACKGROUND: Dissemination strategies to reach underserved and minority populations to promote screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) are key to reducing disparities. We conducted a study to examine a tailored messaging approach to navigate individuals from communities (i.e., lower income, less access to care, and underscreened) to clinics to receive CRC screening. We encountered several political, demographic, and secular trend issues that required reconsideration and redesign of implementation strategies. OBJECTIVES: Through study implementation from 2012 to 2017, changes in medical reimbursement and immigration policies-at the state level and later at the national level-affected healthcare delivery systems that had initially committed to supporting the study and our recruitment methods. Although our selected zip codes and sites had previously yielded high rates of CRC screening nonadherence, within a few years, these sites showed substantially higher screening adherence rates-yielding limited numbers of eligible participants. In addition, state immigration policy trends created mistrust and fear, leading to lower participation rates than anticipated. This report documents and provides valuable insights on how we and the community network developed creative strategies to overcome these challenges. METHODS: New relationships with community partners were extended to tap advisory board input to meet the challenges. Criteria for clinic participation widened from originally selected Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) to various nonprofit, hybrid, and privately insured reimbursement types. Recruitment site options were creatively redefined to reach community participants where they live, work, and receive services. RESULTS: Strategies that engage community members in identifying alternative healthcare delivery structures and that link recruitment efforts to community-based service organizations were found to be critical to recapturing community trust in the face of unfavorable political environments. Widening the type of clinic partners from FQHCs to stand-alone nonprofits and private clinics and identifying unusual types of recruitment sites provided alternative solutions for successful study implementation. DISCUSSION: In prevention-based studies that face unplanned system and political barriers to recruitment, embedding the study in the community may aid in reestablishing trust levels to improve engagement and recruitment of clinic partners and eligible participants.

Cost-Effectiveness of Community-to-Clinic Tailored Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Underserved Population: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Group-Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: Although screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) lowers mortality and morbidity and is generally cost-effective, little is known about the cost-effectiveness of screening promotion. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a group-randomized trial. Setting: Multicultural, underinsured communities in the Phoenix, Arizona, area. SUBJECTS: English- or Spanish-speaking adults who were out of compliance for CRC screening guidelines. INTERVENTION: All participants received community-based group education (GE), and the intervention group also received tailored community-to-clinic navigation (GE+TN). MEASURES: Number of participants screened and costs of tailored navigation, clinic visits, and CRC screening tests. ANALYSIS: Incremental cost per additional person screened from the perspective of the healthcare system with bootstrapped confidence intervals. RESULTS: Community sites were recruited and randomized to GE (n = 120) and GE + TN (n = 119). Across these sites 1154 individuals were screened, 504 were eligible, and 345 attended the group education class (n = 134 GE; n = 211 GE + TN). Screening rates (26.5% GE + TN; 10.4% GE; 16.1% increase 95% CI: 7%, 23%) and costs per participant ($271 GE + TN; $167 GE; a net cost increase of $104 95% CI: $1, $189) were significantly higher in the intervention group. Incremental cost-effectiveness was $646 (95% CI: -$68, $953) per additional person screened. CONCLUSION: Depending on the value placed on an additional person screened, the addition of community-to-clinic tailored navigation to a community-based CRC screening promotion program may be highly cost-effective.

Startup and implementation costs of a colorectal cancer screening tailored navigation research study.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Despite improvements in screening, testing for CRC is underutilized in some populations, suggesting a need to identify efficient test promotion strategies. METHODS: Our intervention guided individuals from low-income, underserved communities into primary care clinics to receive CRC screening referrals. Community sites were randomized to education or education plus navigation. The Phase I community-to-clinic navigation outcome was clinic attendance; the Phase II clinic-to-screening navigation outcome was screening completion. We used micro-costing to determine costs necessary to replicate our project in a similar, non-research setting. RESULTS: Over the 4-year project, startup costs tended to decrease as implementation costs increased. The largest component of startup costs (32 % of total) was community site recruitment. Implementation costs per class attendee were higher in the navigation group ($1084) than control ($798). But costs per participant who made a clinic appointment ($3573 versus $6292) and per participant who completed screening ($4083 versus $7640) were lower in the navigation group. CONCLUSIONS: Our description of startup and implementation costs for this intervention provides decision makers with information needed to plan and budget for a similar project to guide individuals from community into clinics.

Effects of a Community-to-Clinic Navigation Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Underserved People.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening remains suboptimal among poor and underserved people. PURPOSE: We tested the effectiveness of a community-to-clinic navigator intervention to guide multicultural, underinsured individuals into primary care clinics to complete colorectal cancer screening. METHODS: This two-phase behavioral intervention study was conducted in Phoenix, Arizona (2012-2018). Community sites were randomized to group education or group education plus tailored navigation to increase attendance at primary care clinics (Phase I). Individuals who completed a clinic appointment received the tailored navigation in person or via phone (Phase II). RESULTS: In Phase I (N = 345), 37.9% of the intervention group scheduled a clinic appointment versus 19.4% of the comparison group. In Phase II, 26.5% of the original intervention group were screened versus only 10.4% of the original comparison group. Those in the intervention group were 3.84 times more likely to be screened than were those in the comparison group (odds ratio = 3.84; 95% confidence interval = 1.81-6.92). CONCLUSIONS: Translation of an efficacious tailored navigation intervention for colorectal cancer screening to a community-to-clinic context is associated with significantly increased rates of colorectal cancer screening. Navigation assistance to address barriers to screening may serve as the most important component of any educational program to increase individual adherence to colorectal cancer screening.

Self-reported physical activity patterns among low-income Latina women in Arizona.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to recommendations for physical activity (PA) among adults in the United States is reported as poor, particularly among low-income Latinos. In particular, Latina women are at increased risk for inactivity and chronic illness, but national health survey reports aggregate data across demographic strata, limiting descriptive information that could guide targeted PA promotion. The purpose of the study was to determine PA patterns among a low-income group of Latina women in the southwestern United States. METHODS: As part of a large community intervention trial to increase cancer prevention behaviors, PA data were collected from 1,006 Latina women using a modified version of the Arizona Activity Frequency Questionnaire. FINDINGS: The weekly PA mean across all exercise types was calculated to be 9.3 ± 16.4 hours, which is substantially higher than the daily PA recommendation of 30 minutes most days of the week. The highest daily PA means were associated with occupational activities: Cleaning, 2.7 hours; walking, 2.5 hours; lifting, 1.9 hours; and light yard work, 1.0 hours. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of low-income Latina women, the average PA hours per week exceed the current PA recommendations. Data collection instruments used in this population could more accurately assess PA if they included a wider range of activities and specific questions about work-related activity.