Anticuerpos anti-RNA polimerasa III en esclerosis sistémica: estudio multicéntrico de Argentina / Anti-RNA Polymerase III Antibodies in Systemic Sclerosis: Multicentric Study from Argentina

Objetivo: Describir la frecuencia del anticuerpo anti-RNA polimerasa III positivo en pacientes con esclerosis sistémica (ES) de un grupo de centros asistenciales de Argentina, y explorar las diferencias entre pacientes con anti-RNA polimerasa III positivo y negativo. Pacientes y métodos: Se recopilaron datos de las historias clínicas, anamnesis y exámenes físicos de 135 pacientes con ES (ACR/EULAR 2013), de los cuales se obtuvo una muestra de suero para la detección de anti-RNA polimerasa III IgG por ELISA. Resultados: El 92,6% fueron mujeres, la mediana de edad al diagnóstico fue de 53 años (rango: 12-87), el 77,7% tenía ES limitada, el 19,3% tenía ES difusa y el 2,9% con ES sine esclerodermia. El 67,5% de los pacientes pertenecían a la etnia mestiza o amerindia. La frecuencia de anti-RNA polimerasa III positivo fue del 5,9%. En 36 pacientes los anticuerpos anticentrómero (ACA) y anti-Scl70 fueron negativos; el anti-RNA polimerasa III fue positivo en el 16,7% de estos 36 pacientes. El grupo de pacientes con anti-RNA polimerasa III positivo tuvo una mayor frecuencia de cicatrices puntiformes e hipertensión arterial pulmonar, y una mayor edad al diagnóstico. No se encontró asociación con ectasia vascular gástrica antral. La única paciente con crisis renal esclerodérmica, fue anti-RNA polimerasa III positiva. Conclusiones: La frecuencia de anti-RNA polimerasa III encontrada en este estudio fue una de las más bajas reportadas, lo cual podría estar relacionado con el predominio de la etnia mestiza y amerindia. Si bien se necesitan más estudios, es posible que la detección del anti-RNA polimerasa III permita clasificar mejor a los pacientes con ES, conocer su pronóstico y mejorar el seguimiento.(AU)

Objective: To describe the frequency of anti-RNA polymerase III antibody in patients with Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) of a group of healthcare centres from Argentina and to explore differences among patients with positive and negative anti-RNA polymerase III antibody. Patients and Methods: Data from clinical records, anamnesis and physical examination were collected from 135 patients with SSc (ACR/EULAR 2013). A serum sample from each patient was obtained for the detection of anti-RNA polymerase III IgG antibodies by ELISA. Results: In all, 97.8% were women and the median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range: 12-87), 77.7% had limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSC), 19,3% patients had diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSC) and 2.9% had scleroderma sine scleroderma. The 67.5% of the patients were from a Mestizos or Amerindian ethnic group. Anti-RNA polymerase III was positive in 5.9% of the patients. In 36 patients, the anticentromere (ACA) and anti-Scl70 antibodies were negative; anti-RNA polymerase III was positive in 16.7% of these 36 patients. Pitting scars and pulmonary artery hypertension were more frequent in anti-RNA polymerase III positive patients who were also older at diagnosis. No association with gastric antral vascular ectasia was found. The only patient with scleroderma renal crisis was anti-RNA polymerase III positive. Conclusions: Anti-RNA polymerase III frequency found in this study was one of the lowest reported, which could be related to the predominance of the Amerindian and Mestizo ethnic group. It is possible that the detection of anti-RNA polymerase III allows better classification of SSc patients, to know their prognosis and to improve their follow-up, therefore more studies are needed.(AU)

Anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies in systemic sclerosis: Multicentric study from Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of anti-RNA polymerase III antibody in patients with Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) of a group of healthcare centres from Argentina and to explore differences among patients with positive and negative anti-RNA polymerase III antibody. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from clinical records, anamnesis and physical examination were collected from 135 patients with SSc (ACR/EULAR 2013). A serum sample from each patient was obtained for the detection of anti-RNA polymerase III IgG antibodies by ELISA. RESULTS: In all, 97.8% were women and the median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range 12-87), 77.7% had limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSC), 19,3% patients had diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSC) and 2.9% had scleroderma sine scleroderma. The 67.5% of the patients were from a Mestizos or Amerindian ethnic group. Anti-RNA polymerase III was positive in 5.9% of the patients. In 36 patients, the anticentromere (ACA) and anti-Scl70 antibodies were negative; anti-RNA polymerase III was positive in 16.7% of these 36 patients. Pitting scars and pulmonary artery hypertension were more frequent in anti-RNA polymerase III positive patients who were also older at diagnosis. No association with gastric antral vascular ectasia was found. The only patient with scleroderma renal crisis was anti-RNA polymerase III positive. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-RNA polymerase III frequency found in this study was one of the lowest reported, which could be related to the predominance of the Amerindian and Mestizo ethnic group. It is possible that the detection of anti RNA polymerase III allows better classification of SSc patients, to know their prognosis and to improve their follow-up, therefore more studies are needed.

Anti-RNA Polymerase III Antibodies in Systemic Sclerosis: Multicentric Study from Argentina. / Anticuerpos anti-RNA polimerasa III en esclerosis sistémica: estudio multicéntrico de Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of anti-RNA polymerase III antibody in patients with Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) of a group of healthcare centres from Argentina and to explore differences among patients with positive and negative anti-RNA polymerase III antibody. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from clinical records, anamnesis and physical examination were collected from 135 patients with SSc (ACR/EULAR 2013). A serum sample from each patient was obtained for the detection of anti-RNA polymerase III IgG antibodies by ELISA. RESULTS: In all, 97.8% were women and the median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range: 12-87), 77.7% had limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSC), 19,3% patients had diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSC) and 2.9% had scleroderma sine scleroderma. The 67.5% of the patients were from a Mestizos or Amerindian ethnic group. Anti-RNA polymerase III was positive in 5.9% of the patients. In 36 patients, the anticentromere (ACA) and anti-Scl70 antibodies were negative; anti-RNA polymerase III was positive in 16.7% of these 36 patients. Pitting scars and pulmonary artery hypertension were more frequent in anti-RNA polymerase III positive patients who were also older at diagnosis. No association with gastric antral vascular ectasia was found. The only patient with scleroderma renal crisis was anti-RNA polymerase III positive. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-RNA polymerase III frequency found in this study was one of the lowest reported, which could be related to the predominance of the Amerindian and Mestizo ethnic group. It is possible that the detection of anti-RNA polymerase III allows better classification of SSc patients, to know their prognosis and to improve their follow-up, therefore more studies are needed.

Changing rate of serious infections in biologic-exposed rheumatoid arthritis patients. Data from South American registries BIOBADABRASIL and BIOBADASAR.

OBJECTIVE: Most reports on serious infections (SI) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are from the USA and Western Europe. Data from other regions are largely missing. We report data from South American countries with different backgrounds and health-care systems but similar registries. METHODS: We merged 2010-2016 data from two registries, BIOBADABRASIL (Brazil) and BIOBADASAR (Argentina), which share the same protocol, online platform and data monitoring process. Patients with active RA were included when they began the first bDMARD or a conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD, control group). The SI incidence rate (IR) per 1000 patient/years and adjusted IR ratio (aIRR) were estimated for bDMARDs and csDMARDs. RESULTS: Data were analysed for 3717 RA patients with an exposure of 13,380 patient/years. The 2591 patients treated with bDMARDs (64% tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi)) had a follow-up of 9300 years, and the 1126 treated with csDMARDs had an exposure of 4081 patient/years. The SI IR was 30.54 (CI 27.18-34.30) for all bDMARDs and 5.15 (CI 3.36-7.89) for csDMARDs. The aIRR between the two groups was 2.03 ([1.05, 3.9] p = 0.034) for the first 6 months of treatment but subsequently increased to 8.26 ([4.32, 15.76] p < 0.001). The SI IR for bDMARDs decreased over time in both registries, dropping from 36.59 (28.41-47.12) in 2012 to 7.27 (4.79-11.05) in 2016. CONCLUSION: While SI remains a major concern in South American patients with RA treated with bDMARDs, a favourable trend toward a reduction was observed in the last years.Key Points• New comprehensive data on biologic drugs safety from international collaboration in South America.• First proposal for national registries data merging in South America.• Serious infections remain a major concern in RA patients treated with biologics.• A significant reduction of serious infections in RA patients exposed to biologics was observed over a 7 years period.

[Genetic polymorphisms of thiopurine methyltransferase and incidence of adverse events in patients with medical indication of azathioprine]. / Variantes genéticas de la tiopurina metiltransferasa e incidencia de eventos adversos en pacientes con indicación de azatioprina.

Azathioprine is a thiopurine which has a narrow therapeutic index and marked hematological and hepatic toxicity. Thiopurine s-methyltransferase is an enzyme involved in the metabolism of thiopurines. Mutations in the gene that encodes the enzyme may augment the risk of adverse events. For that reason, pharmacogenetic determinations prior to the initiation of therapy can provide useful information for the future therapeutic strategy. Nevertheless, its utility in the local environment is not completely established. Forty-five subjects (13 men) who had been prescribed azathioprine were included. The presence of *2, *3A, *3B and *3C mutations were determined by PCR-RFLP, and the relationship between genotype and incidence of adverse events related to the drug was analyzed. Nine carried at least one non-functional allele, one of them with *3A/*3A genotype. Among the eighteen patients who initiated treatment with azathioprine, toxicity was detected in 3 cases: 2 mild events were observed in patients with normal genotype, and the only serious event (bone marrow suppression) occurred in the individual with homozygous mutant genotype. The only homozygous mutant patient developed the most severe of the registered events, in spite of being under treatment with low doses of azathioprine. This is the reason why enzymatic determination could be of utility, even though it does not replace clinical and biochemical follow-up in patients under thiopurine treatment.

Variantes genéticas de la tiopurina metiltransferasa e incidencia de eventos adversos en pacientes con indicación de azatioprina / Genetic polymorphisms of thiopurine methyltransferase and incidence of adverse events in patients with medical indication of azathioprine

La azatioprina es una tiopurina que presenta rango terapéutico estrecho y marcada toxicidad hematológica y hepática. La tiopurina S-metiltransferasa es una enzima que metaboliza ese grupo de drogas. Mutaciones en el gen que codifica dicha enzima aumentan el riesgo de presentar eventos adversos, por lo que su estudio farmacogenético permite contar con información para el diseño de la estrategia terapéutica. Sin embargo, su utilidad en el medio local no está completamente establecida. Fueron incluidos 45 sujetos (13 hombres) con indicación de azatioprina. Se determinó la presencia de las mutaciones *2, *3A, *3B y *3C de TMPT por PCR-RFLP y se analizó la relación entre el genotipo y la incidencia de eventos adversos relacionados al fármaco. Nueve portaban al menos un alelo no funcional, uno de ellos con genotipo *3A/*3A. Se detectó toxicidad en 3 de los 18 que iniciaron tratamiento con azatioprina: 2 pacientes con genotipo normal presentaron eventos adversos leves, y el único evento adverso de gravedad (aplasia medular) ocurrió en el sujeto con genotipo homocigota mutado. El único que presentó genotipo homocigota mutado desarrolló el más grave de los eventos adversos registrados, a pesar de estar en tratamiento con dosis bajas de azatioprina. Por este motivo, la determinación del genotipo de la tiopurina metiltransferasa pareciera ser de utilidad, pero no reemplaza la necesidad de seguimiento clínico y bioquímico en pacientes en tratamiento con tiopurinas.

Azathioprine is a thiopurine which has a narrow therapeutic index and marked hematological and hepatic toxicity. Thiopurine s-methyltransferase is an enzyme involved in the metabolism of thiopurines. Mutations in the gene that encodes the enzyme may augment the risk of adverse events. For that reason, pharmacogenetic determinations prior to the initiation of therapy can provide useful information for the future therapeutic strategy. Nevertheless, its utility in the local environment is not completely established. Forty-five subjects (13 men) who had been prescribed azathioprine were included. The presence of *2, *3A, *3B and *3C mutations were determined by PCR-RFLP, and the relationship between genotype and incidence of adverse events related to the drug was analyzed. Nine carried at least one non-functional allele, one of them with *3A/*3A genotype. Among the eighteen patients who initiated treatment with azathioprine, toxicity was detected in 3 cases: 2 mild events were observed in patients with normal genotype, and the only serious event (bone marrow suppression) occurred in the individual with homozygous mutant genotype. The only homozygous mutant patient developed the most severe of the registered events, in spite of being under treatment with low doses of azathioprine. This is the reason why enzymatic determination could be of utility, even though it does not replace clinical and biochemical follow-up in patients under thiopurine treatment.