ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To define criteria to distinguish direct (type 1 or 3) from indirect endoleaks (type 2) in the arterial phase of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with endovascular aortic repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted from January 2009 to October 2020 and included consecutive patients treated endovascularly for a direct endoleak or an indirect endoleak associated with an enlarging aneurysm. The following characteristics were evaluated using contrast-enhanced CT: location, size, contact with the endograft, density, morphologic criteria, collateral artery enhancement, and endoleak-to-aortic density ratio. Statistical analysis included the Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson χ2 test, Fisher exact test, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Contrast-enhanced CT scans from 71 patients (87% men), who presented with 87 endoleaks (44 indirect and 43 direct endoleaks), treated by endovascular techniques were analyzed. Using visual criteria, 56% of the endoleaks were not characterizable as direct or indirect. An endoleak-to-aortic density ratio of >0.77 could properly distinguish direct from indirect endoleaks, with a theoretical accuracy of 98% (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.99), sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 96%. CONCLUSION: An endoleak-to-aortic density ratio of >0.77 in the arterial phase of contrast-enhanced CT could be a strong discriminant of a direct-type endoleak.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Male , Humans , Female , Endoleak/diagnostic imaging , Endoleak/etiology , Endoleak/therapy , Contrast Media , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the JETi8 peripheral thrombectomy system in treating acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 18 consecutive patients (mean age, 41 years old [range, 15-74 years old]; 5 men and 13 women). There were 21 instances of DVTs (9 iliofemoral, 10 axillosubclavian, and 2 portal), which were treated using the JETi8 thrombectomy device between November 2016 and July 2018. Thrombus was laced with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-TPA) (9.3 mg, on average; range, 2-12 mg) in 17 procedures (81%) prior to thrombectomy. Technical success was defined as restoration of antegrade flow using the JETi8 with or without additional treatment of an underlying obstructive lesion. Procedural success was defined as technical success with or without the addition of overnight catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) RESULTS: Mean procedure time was 83 minutes (range, 30-160 minutes), and mean thrombus reduction with the JETi8 alone was 92% (range, 60%-100%). Stent placement was required in 6 procedures (29%). Technical success using the JETi8 system alone was 76% (16 of 21 procedures), whereas 5 procedures (24%) required subsequent overnight CDT in the intensive care unit. Procedural success rate was 100% (20 of 20 procedures). Mean aspirated volume was 531 mL (range, 250-1,230 mL). The only adverse event was a subsegmental pulmonary embolism. Seven patients (33%) were discharged the same day. Recurrent thrombosis was observed in 5 patients (24%), of whom 3 were successfully treated with the JETi8 system. CONCLUSIONS: The JETi8 system may be a safe and effective option for thrombectomy of acute DVT.
