Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
North Clin Istanb ; 8(5): 425-434, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34909580

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography of the thorax (Thorax CT) is frequently used to diagnose viral pneumonia in moderate to severe COVID-19 patients, but its diagnostic performance in mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients is still unclear. Assessing the diagnostic performance of thorax CT in mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients was the purpose of our study. METHODS: Mildly symptomatic and clinically stable, suspected COVID-19 patients scanned with Thorax CTs between March 11, 2020, and April 13, 2020, were included in this study. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, positive and negative predictive values, and the respective accuracies were calculated for diagnostic purposes. RESULTS: Among the 1119 patients enrolled in our study, abnormal thorax CT scans were 527 out of which 363/527 (68.9%) had typical CT features for COVID-19. According to analysis of typical COVID findings, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive value, and the accuracy of Thorax CTs with were 51.45%, 86.07%, 78.24%, 64.55%, and 68.99%, respectively. When typical CT findings and atypical CT findings were combined for the statistical analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy observed 68.84%, 74%, and 71.49%. CONCLUSION: Diagnosing pneumonia can be challenging in mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients since the Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction test results, when compared with symptoms are not always evident. According to our study, thorax CT sensitivity was higher when atypical COVID-19 CT findings were included compared to those with typical COVID-19 CT findings alone. Our study which included the largest number of patients among all other similar studies indicates that not only typical but also atypical CT findings should be considered for an accured diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia.

2.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 67(11): 1531-1537, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34909874

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to describe lung computed tomography findings of patients with COVID-19 diagnosed by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test, investigate whether the findings differ regarding age and gender, and evaluate the diagnostic performance of chest computed tomography based on the duration of symptoms at the time of presentation to the hospital. METHODS: From March 11 to May 11, 2020, 1271 consecutive patients (733 males and 538 females) were included in this retrospective, cross-sectional study. Based on age, patients were divided into five separate subgroups. Then based on the duration of symptoms, patients were divided into five separate phases. The presence of lung lesion(s) and their characteristics, distribution patterns, and the presence of concomitant pleural thickening/effusion and other findings (malignancy, metastasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, bronchiectasis, bronchiectasis, cardiomegaly, pericardial effusion) were evaluated by five radiologists independently. RESULTS: The "normal lung computed tomography finding" was the most common chest CT finding (37%), followed by ground-glass opacity (31%). Regardless of the shape of the lesion, the distribution features were significant (peripheral, subpleural, and lower lobe distribution) (p<0.05). The presence of pleural thickening posteriorly and adjacent to the lesion was statistically different in groups 1-3 (p<0.05). Other concomitant pathologies, except pulmonary congestion, did not suppress the typical findings of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Chest computed tomography findings were mostly normal in the early phase (P1). Therefore, it may be appropriate to perform the first computed tomography screening of COVID-19 after 6 days to decrease the radiation exposure.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Lung , Male , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Turkey
3.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.) ; 67(11): 1531-1537, Nov. 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1360691

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to describe lung computed tomography findings of patients with COVID-19 diagnosed by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test, investigate whether the findings differ regarding age and gender, and evaluate the diagnostic performance of chest computed tomography based on the duration of symptoms at the time of presentation to the hospital. METHODS: From March 11 to May 11, 2020, 1271 consecutive patients (733 males and 538 females) were included in this retrospective, cross-sectional study. Based on age, patients were divided into five separate subgroups. Then based on the duration of symptoms, patients were divided into five separate phases. The presence of lung lesion(s) and their characteristics, distribution patterns, and the presence of concomitant pleural thickening/effusion and other findings (malignancy, metastasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, bronchiectasis, bronchiectasis, cardiomegaly, pericardial effusion) were evaluated by five radiologists independently. RESULTS: The "normal lung computed tomography finding" was the most common chest CT finding (37%), followed by ground-glass opacity (31%). Regardless of the shape of the lesion, the distribution features were significant (peripheral, subpleural, and lower lobe distribution) (p<0.05). The presence of pleural thickening posteriorly and adjacent to the lesion was statistically different in groups 1-3 (p<0.05). Other concomitant pathologies, except pulmonary congestion, did not suppress the typical findings of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Chest computed tomography findings were mostly normal in the early phase (P1). Therefore, it may be appropriate to perform the first computed tomography screening of COVID-19 after 6 days to decrease the radiation exposure.


Subject(s)
Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Vaccination/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Acta Radiol ; 61(6): 821-829, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31653187

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance myelography (MRM) with three-dimensional (3D) T2-weighted (T2W) turbo spin echo (TSE) sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) may be a guide to the etiology of low back pain. PURPOSE: To research the efficiency of a 3D T2W TSE SPACE MRM sequence for visualization of anatomic details of spinal nerve root at the spinal canal and lateral recess levels in the patients with low back pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lumbar spinal MRM 3D T2W TSE SPACE was performed in a total of 70 patients (median age 46 years). Patients were imaged while lying in a supine position with straightened legs. According to the degree of facet arthropathy findings, patients were divided into four separate subgroups in our retrospective cross-sectional study. Spinal nerve root angle was measured within the spinal canal and at lateral recess level, and facet joint angle and lumbar lordosis measurements were measured by two radiologists, independently. RESULTS: Lumbar level was strongly negatively correlated with facet joint angle (r = -0.95) as well as nerve root angle within the spinal canal (NRASC) (r = -0.857) and at the lateral recess level (NRALR) (r = -0.947). Intracanal decline of the spinal root angle caused by spinal stenosis findings was also observed (P < 0.05). For the measurements of NRASC and NRALR, inter-observer correlation was 0.85 and 0.82 for the spinal canal and at lateral recess level, respectively. CONCLUSION: 3D T2W SPACE in NRASC and NRALR provided high resolution images for evaluation. Therefore, this method may be a qualitative guide for the clinician and the surgeon in terms of root anatomy before any intervention.


Subject(s)
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Myelography/methods , Spinal Canal/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Nerve Roots/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Stenosis/complications , Young Adult
5.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 51(5): 312-315, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28474979

ABSTRACT

The contained rupture of thoracic aortic aneurysm and related bone deformities is a rare condition. The diagnosis is critical due to potential and fatal complications. Radiologic evaluation is required to show the location, extension, and complications. Herein we present the X-ray radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance images of a giant dissected and contained rupture of the thoracic aortic aneurysm. The aneurysm destructed the adjacent vertebrae and rib, resulting in compression of dural sac and spinal cord, and obliteration of the neural foramina. Our case demonstrates a gigantic expansion of an aneurysm (14 cm) with chronic skeletal complications.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/complications , Aortic Rupture/complications , Bone Diseases/etiology , Ribs , Spine , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Rupture/diagnostic imaging , Aortography/methods , Bone Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Ribs/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Cord Compression/etiology , Spinal Stenosis/etiology , Spine/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL