Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 26
Filter
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 16(2): e0010141, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35148313

ABSTRACT

Monkeypox, a zoonotic disease caused by an orthopoxvirus, results in a smallpox-like disease in humans. Since monkeypox in humans was initially diagnosed in 1970 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), it has spread to other regions of Africa (primarily West and Central), and cases outside Africa have emerged in recent years. We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed and grey literature on how monkeypox epidemiology has evolved, with particular emphasis on the number of confirmed, probable, and/or possible cases, age at presentation, mortality, and geographical spread. The review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020208269). We identified 48 peer-reviewed articles and 18 grey literature sources for data extraction. The number of human monkeypox cases has been on the rise since the 1970s, with the most dramatic increases occurring in the DRC. The median age at presentation has increased from 4 (1970s) to 21 years (2010-2019). There was an overall case fatality rate of 8.7%, with a significant difference between clades-Central African 10.6% (95% CI: 8.4%- 13.3%) vs. West African 3.6% (95% CI: 1.7%- 6.8%). Since 2003, import- and travel-related spread outside of Africa has occasionally resulted in outbreaks. Interactions/activities with infected animals or individuals are risk behaviors associated with acquiring monkeypox. Our review shows an escalation of monkeypox cases, especially in the highly endemic DRC, a spread to other countries, and a growing median age from young children to young adults. These findings may be related to the cessation of smallpox vaccination, which provided some cross-protection against monkeypox, leading to increased human-to-human transmission. The appearance of outbreaks beyond Africa highlights the global relevance of the disease. Increased surveillance and detection of monkeypox cases are essential tools for understanding the continuously changing epidemiology of this resurging disease.


Subject(s)
Monkeypox virus/physiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Democratic Republic of the Congo , Female , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Male , Mpox (monkeypox)/history , Mpox (monkeypox)/mortality , Mpox (monkeypox)/virology , Monkeypox virus/genetics , Travel-Related Illness , Young Adult
2.
Vaccine ; 40(2): 196-205, 2022 01 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33526283

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a global health concern as outbreaks continue to occur. Since 1999, several countries have introduced universal vaccination (UV) of children against HAV according to approved two-dose schedules. Other countries have implemented one-dose UV programs since 2005; the long-term impact of this schedule is not yet known. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in four electronic databases for data published between January 2000 and July 2019 to assess evidence for one-dose and two-dose UV of children with non-live HAV vaccines and describe their global impact on incidence, mortality, and severity of hepatitis A, vaccine effectiveness, vaccine efficacy, and antibody persistence. RESULTS: Of 3739 records screened, 33 peer-reviewed articles and one conference abstract were included. Rapid declines in incidence of hepatitis A and related outcomes were observed in all age groups post-introduction of UV programs, which persisted for at least 14 years for two-dose and six years for one-dose programs according to respective study durations. Vaccine effectiveness was ≥95% over 3-5 years for two-dose programs. Vaccine efficacy was >98% over 0.1-7.5 years for one-dose vaccination. Antibody persistence in vaccinated individuals was documented for up to 15 years (≥90%) and ten years (≥74%) for two-dose and one-dose schedules, respectively. CONCLUSION: Experience with two-dose UV of children against HAV is extensive, demonstrating an impact on the incidence of hepatitis A and antibody persistence for at least 15 years in many countries globally. Because evidence is more limited for one-dose UV, we were unable to draw conclusions on immune response persistence beyond ten years or the need for booster doses later in life. Ongoing epidemiological monitoring is essential in countries implementing one-dose UV against HAV. Based on current evidence, two doses of non-live HAV vaccines are needed to ensure long-term protection.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis A Vaccines , Hepatitis A , Adolescent , Child , Hepatitis A/prevention & control , Hepatitis A Antibodies , Humans , Vaccination , Vaccine Efficacy
3.
Health Policy ; 125(8): 1108-1113, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34134899

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Euthanasia Expertise Center (EEC) in the Netherlands provides euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide for patients who meet all requirements of the Dutch Euthanasia Law, but whose treating physician declined their request. Little is known about how life continues for a patient after a request for physician-assisted death (PAD) is also declined by EEC. OBJECTIVE: To follow-up patients whose request for PAD was declined at EEC. METHODS: Between December 2016 and January 2020, 66 patients were prospectively followed for one year after their request was declined. Their general well-being and health, persistence of the wish for PAD, and mortality was measured by means of a questionnaire administered after three, six and 12 months. Furthermore, information was extracted from the patient's medical record. FINDINGS: More than half (58%) of the included patients suffered from an accumulation of old-age complaints. In the year after the request was declined, 15 patients (23%) died, three of whom committed suicide. Almost all patients who were alive after one year, persisted in their wish for PAD. Moreover, they were often not doing well. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that EEC is a last resort for those who were not granted PAD elsewhere, and that the wish for PAD persists, aftercare services should be provided to people whose request has been declined.


Subject(s)
Euthanasia , Physicians , Suicide, Assisted , Humans , Netherlands , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
BMJ Open ; 11(2): e042024, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33526502

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise the published comparative effectiveness studies on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Results were compared with expectations formulated on the basis of trial results with specific attention to the patient years in each study. METHODS: All studies that compared the effectiveness or safety between at least two NOACs in patients with NVAF were eligible. We performed a systematic literature review in Medline and EMbase to investigate the way comparisons between NOACs were made, search date 23 April 2019. Critical appraisal of the studies was done using among others ISPOR Good Research Practices for comparative effectiveness research. RESULTS: We included 39 studies in which direct comparison between at least two NOACs were made. Almost all studies concerned patient registries, pharmacy or prescription databases and/or health insurance database studies using a cohort design. Corrections for differences in patient characteristics was applied in all but two studies. Eighteen studies matched using propensity scores (PS), 8 studies weighted patients based on the inverse probability of treatment, 1 study used PS stratification and 10 studies applied a proportional hazards model. These studies have some important limitations regarding unmeasured confounders and channelling bias, even though the larger part of the studies were well conducted technically. On the basis of trial results, expected differences are small and a naïve analysis suggests trials with between 7200 and 56 500 patients are needed to confirm the observed differences in bleedings and between 51 800 and 7 994 300 to confirm differences in efficacy. DISCUSSION: Comparisons regarding effectiveness and safety between NOACs on the basis of observational data, even after correction for baseline characteristics, may not be reliable due to unmeasured confounders, channelling bias and insufficient sample size. These limitations should be kept in mind when results of these studies are used to decide on ranking NOAC treatment options.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Stroke , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Humans , Propensity Score , Stroke/drug therapy
5.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 19(9): 795-805, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32955965

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization recommends vaccination against hepatitis A virus (HAV) for children aged 1 year and older in areas where endemicity has shifted from high to intermediate. There are no recent comprehensive reviews of the epidemiology of HAV infection in Latin America, but seroprevalence and socioeconomic data suggest that, with improved clean water and sanitation systems, countries are transitioning to intermediate endemicity. AREAS COVERED: We conducted a systematic literature review of the epidemiology of HAV infection in 25 countries in the Latin American region, which included gray literature. We compiled data on HAV incidence and prevalence, including the identification of epidemiological changes observed in countries that established pediatric HAV vaccination programs. EXPERT OPINION: We identified 59 relevant articles, including 34 peer-reviewed seroprevalence studies (12 recent studies from Brazil), three incidence studies, and six vaccine impact studies (three from Argentina). Based on the estimated age at midpoint of population immunity in each country, most have a high-intermediate, intermediate, or low-intermediate level of HAV endemicity, suggesting that national childhood immunization may be an appropriate disease prevention strategy. However, recent data were lacking for most countries. Improved data quality and continued epidemiological surveillance are required for this region.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis A Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis A/epidemiology , Hepatitis A/prevention & control , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Latin America/epidemiology , Prevalence , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Socioeconomic Factors
6.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 19(7): 621-638, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32772755

ABSTRACT

Introduction Infants too young to be fully immunized are the most vulnerable to severe pertussis disease. To close this susceptibility gap, passive infant immunization through vaccination of pregnant women against pertussis was first introduced in 2011 in the United States and has been extended since then to more than 40 countries. Areas covered We conducted two systematic literature searches to describe the worldwide burden of pertussis disease in infants <6 months of age since 2005, and the effectiveness and impact of maternal pertussis vaccination in preventing infant pertussis since 2011. Expert opinion Pertussis disease incidence rates in infants aged <2-3 months were substantial in all countries with available data, exceeding 1000 cases per 100,000 population during outbreaks. Virtually all pertussis deaths occurred in this age group. Data from Africa, Eastern Mediterranean, and Asia were limited, but suggest a similar or higher disease burden than in Europe or the Americas. Estimates of effectiveness of second/third trimester pertussis vaccination in preventing pertussis disease in <2-3 months old infants were consistently high (69%-93%) across the observational studies reviewed, conducted in various settings with different designs. Maternal vaccination programs appear to be achieving their goal of reducing the burden of disease in very young infants. Plain language summary What is the context? Pertussis, also known as whooping cough, is a highly contagious disease of the respiratory tract. Infants too young to be fully vaccinated are at the highest risk of severe pertussis disease, hospitalization, and death. Vaccinating pregnant women against pertussis with a Tdap vaccine is recommended in more than 40 countries as a safe and effective strategy to protect infants for the first months of life. What is new? This review summarizes recent literature describing the burden of pertussis disease in infants worldwide prior to the introduction of maternal vaccination programs; pertussis disease incidence rates in infants aged <2-3 months were substantial in all countries with available data, exceeding 1000 cases per 100,000 population during outbreaks. Immunization of pregnant women with a Tdap vaccine can prevent about 70-90% of pertussis disease and up to 90.5% of pertussis hospitalizations in infants under 3 months of age. What is the impact? Limited available data suggest that incidence rates of pertussis disease after the introduction of Tdap maternal immunization have declined in infants. Current knowledge supports the implementation of Tdap maternal immunization programs.


Subject(s)
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Immunization, Passive/methods , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Cost of Illness , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/immunology , Female , Humans , Immunization Programs , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Vaccination/methods , Whooping Cough/epidemiology
7.
Euro Surveill ; 24(30)2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31362808

ABSTRACT

BackgroundPeople living with HIV (PLHIV) and people in prison are population groups with a potentially high risk and/or prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.AimWe conducted a systematic review in order to find prevalence and incidence estimates in these populations in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA).MethodsOriginal research articles published between January 2005 and February 2017 were retrieved from PubMed and Embase in February 2017.ResultsFifty-two articles were included, providing 97 estimates of HBV/HCV infection prevalence or incidence. Estimates of HBV infection prevalence ranged between 2.9% and43.4% in PLHIV and 0.0% and 25.2% in people in prison. Estimates of HCV infection prevalence ranged from 2.9% to 43.4% in PLHIV and 0.0% to 25.2% in people in prison. Incidence estimates ranged between 0.0 and 2.5 cases per 100 person-years for HBV infection in PLHIV. No such data was available for people in prison. HCV infection incidence ranged between 0.3 and 0.9 cases per 100 person-years in PLHIV and between 1 and 1.2 cases per 100 person-years in people in prison. Prevalence estimates were generally higher than in the general population, especially for HCV infection and among groups with multiple risk factors.ConclusionsPLHIV, people in prison and groups with multiple risk factors, have a high prevalence of HBV and HCV and may be at ongoing risk of infection. These groups should be among the populations prioritised and targeted for active case finding and prevention programmes in the EU/EEA.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Adult , Europe/epidemiology , European Union , Female , HIV Infections/complications , Hepacivirus/immunology , Hepatitis B/complications , Hepatitis B Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis B virus/immunology , Hepatitis C/complications , Hepatitis C Antibodies/blood , Humans , Incidence , Male , Prevalence , Prisoners , Young Adult
8.
J Viral Hepat ; 26(12): 1431-1453, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31332919

ABSTRACT

An estimated 9 million individuals are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) across the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA), many of which are yet to be diagnosed. We performed a systematic review to identify interventions effective at improving testing offer and uptake in the EU/EEA. Original research articles published between 1 January 2008 and 1 September 2017 were retrieved from PubMed and EMBASE. Search strings combined terms for HBV/HCV, intervention, testing and geographic terms (EU/EEA). Out of 8331 records retrieved, 93 studies were selected. Included studies reported on testing initiatives in primary health care (9), hospital (12), other healthcare settings (31) and community settings (41). Testing initiatives targeted population groups such as migrants, drug users, prisoners, pregnant women and the general population. Testing targeted to populations at higher risk yielded high coverage rates in many settings. Implementation of novel testing approaches, including dried blood spot (DBS) testing, was associated with increased coverage in several settings including drug services, pharmacies and STI clinics. Community-based testing services were effective in reaching populations at higher risk for infection, vulnerable and hard-to-reach populations. In conclusion, our review identified several successful testing approaches implemented in healthcare and community settings, including testing approaches targeting groups at higher risk, community-based testing services and DBS testing. Combining a diverse set of testing opportunities within national testing strategies may lead to higher impact both in terms of testing coverage and in terms of reduction, on the undiagnosed fraction.


Subject(s)
Community Health Services , Delivery of Health Care , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Hepatitis B/virology , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/virology , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Primary Health Care , Public Health Surveillance
9.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 15(1): 49-71, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30230953

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: National pediatric vaccination programs have been introduced in Latin America (LatAm) to reduce the burden of diseases due to pathogens such as rotavirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and pneumococcus. Vaccination health benefits may extend to unvaccinated populations by reducing pathogen transmission. Understanding herd effect is important for implementation and assessment of vaccination programs. The objective was to conduct a systematic review of published epidemiological evidence of herd effect with Hib, rotavirus and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) in LatAm. METHODS: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Virtual Health Library (VHL), SciELO and SCOPUS databases, for studies reporting data on herd effect from Hib, rotavirus and PCV vaccination in LatAm, without age restriction. Searches were limited to articles published in English, Spanish or Portuguese (1990-2016). After screening and full-text review, articles meeting the selection criteria were included to be critically appraised following criteria for observational and interventional studies. The presence of a herd effect was defined as a significant decrease in incidence of disease, hospitalization, or mortality. RESULTS: 3,465 unique articles were identified, and 23 were included (Hib vaccine n = 5, PCV n = 8, rotavirus vaccine n = 10). Most studies included children and/or adolescents (age range varied between studies). Studies in adults, including older adults (aged > 65 years), were limited. Few studies reported statistically significant reductions in disease incidence in age groups not targeted for vaccination. Hib-confirmed meningitis hospitalization decreased in children but herd effect could not be quantified. Some evidence of herd effect was identified for PCV and rotavirus vaccine in unvaccinated children. Evidence for herd effects due to PCV in adults was limited. CONCLUSION: After introduction of Hib, PCV and rotavirus vaccination in LatAm, reductions in morbidity/mortality have been reported in children not targeted for vaccination. However, due to methodological limitations (e.g. short post-vaccination periods and age range studied), there is currently insufficient evidence to quantify the herd effect in adult populations. More research and higher quality surveillance is needed to characterize herd effect of these vaccines in LatAm.


Subject(s)
Immunity, Herd , Immunization Programs , Vaccination , Bacterial Capsules/immunology , Haemophilus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Haemophilus Vaccines/immunology , Humans , Latin America , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Pneumococcal Vaccines/immunology , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology
10.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 16(9): 919-932, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28770638

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE), which is endemic across large regions of Europe and Asia, is most effectively prevented through vaccination. Three-dose primary TBE vaccination schedules are either rapid (0,7,21-days) or conventional (0,28-84-days, 9-12-months). The second dose can also be administered at 14 days for faster priming and sero-protection). Areas covered: We used a three-step selection process to identify 21 publications comparing the immunogenicity and/or safety of different schedules. Expert commentary: Priming with two or three TBE vaccine doses was highly immunogenic. After conventional priming (0-28 days), 95% adults and ≥95% children had neutralization test (NT) titers ≥10 at 14 days post-dose-2 compared with 92% adults and 99% children at 21 days post-dose-3 (rapid schedule). Most subjects retained NT titers ≥10 at day 300. A single booster dose induced a strong immune response in all subjects irrespective of primary vaccination schedule or elapsed time since priming. GMT peaked at 42 days post-dose-1 (i.e., 21 days post-dose 3 [rapid-schedule], or 14-28 days post-dose-2 [conventional-schedule]), and declined thereafter. Adverse events were generally rare and declined with increasing doses. In the absence of data to recommend one particular schedule, the regimen choice will remain at the physician's discretion, based on patient constraints and availability.


Subject(s)
Encephalitis, Tick-Borne/prevention & control , Immunization Schedule , Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccines/immunology , Adult , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Neutralization Tests , Vaccines/adverse effects
11.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 13(11): 2695-2706, 2017 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28742983

ABSTRACT

Despite the burden of diabetes mellitus (DM), little is known about the role of this and other metabolic syndromes on the severity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) chronicity and liver disease progression. The value of hepatitis B vaccination and its impact on liver diseases and HCC has been largely demonstrated, adult vaccination coverage is however suboptimal and DM diagnosis represents an opportunity for the HCP to discuss hepatitis B and other adult vaccinations. We performed a systematic literature search to identify studies (January 2000 to January 2017) describing liver disease progression among patients with HBV by DM status. Risk factors were assessed including the relationship between HBV and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Data were extracted systematically and assessed descriptively. Twenty articles described liver disease progression and one article evaluated NASH among subjects with HBV by DM status. Fourteen articles reported that DM as a predictor for the outcome, including delayed seroclearance, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, transplant/mortality and death, whereas no association on liver outcomes was found in 7 studies. In summary, our review suggests that DM is associated with the progression of severe liver outcomes in adults with HBV, although more studies are needed to understand the benefits of HBV vaccination in adults with DM and liver-diseases.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/virology , Disease Progression , Hepatitis B Vaccines/adverse effects , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Adult , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/prevention & control , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/virology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Female , Hepatitis B/complications , Hepatitis B/physiopathology , Hepatitis B/virology , Hepatitis B virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis B, Chronic/prevention & control , Hepatitis B, Chronic/virology , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/prevention & control , Liver Cirrhosis/virology , Liver Neoplasms/prevention & control , Liver Neoplasms/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Vaccination Coverage
12.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 16(8): 811-832, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28573913

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Engerix B (GSK HepB, GSK, Belgium) was the first recombinant hepatitis B virus vaccine to be licensed, and marked its 30th anniversary in 2016. Vaccination of adult populations against HBV is usually implemented on a risk-based approach with varying degrees of success. Confirmation of ongoing vaccine effectiveness requires monitoring the performance of HBV immunization as reported in individual studies, using systematic methods. Areas covered: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to summarize 30 years of immunogenicity and safety data for GSK HepB in adult populations. Expert commentary: Primary 3-dose vaccination of healthy individuals is generally associated with seroprotection rates of 90% or more, although seroprotection decreases with older age. Accelerated 0, 1, 2-month or 0, 7 and 21-day schedules require the recommended booster dose to achieve similar rates of seroprotection. Lower rates of seroprotection were also observed in adults with underlying chronic disease and with a weakened immune system. GSK HepB had a clinically acceptable safety profile in all of the populations studied, including individuals with underlying co-morbidities and immunosuppression. GSK HepB will continue to contribute to global HBV control for the foreseeable future. Further investigation is needed into how to optimize seroprotection in less immune-competent groups.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B Vaccines/immunology , Hepatitis B virus/immunology , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/complications , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Middle Aged , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Young Adult
13.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 16(8): 789-809, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28586278

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization recommends hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccines to be included in national immunization schedules everywhere, and has adopted the strategic goal of halting viral hepatitis as a major public health threat by 2030, under which vaccination plays a major role. Engerix™ B (GSK HepB, GSK, Belgium) was the first recombinant HBV vaccine to be licensed, and marked its 30th anniversary in 2016. Areas covered: We conducted a systematic review of the literature summarizing 30 years of immunogenicity and safety data for GSK HepB in children and adolescents. Expert commentary: Primary 3-dose vaccination of healthy infants and children, including infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers, using the standard 0, 1, 6 month schedule was associated with seroprotection rates ≥96.0%. In high-risk infants, vaccine efficacy at year 5 was 96.0% after 3-dose priming in infancy and immunoglobulin at birth. Lower seroprotection rates were observed in children with severe underlying disease including human immunodeficiency virus infection and cancer. GSK HepB had a clinically acceptable safety profile in all of the populations studied. HBV vaccines have demonstrated long-term impacts on rates of fulminant hepatitis, chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. GSK HepB will continue to contribute to global HBV control for the foreseeable future.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B Vaccines/immunology , Hepatitis B virus/immunology , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Adolescent , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Hepatitis B/complications , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology
14.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 13(3): 724-736, 2017 03 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27786671

ABSTRACT

The WHO recommends integration of universal mass vaccination (UMV) against hepatitis A virus (HAV) in national immunization schedules for children aged ≥1 year, if justified on the basis of acute HAV incidence, declining endemicity from high to intermediate and cost-effectiveness. This recommendation has been implemented in several countries. Our aim was to assess the impact of UMV using monovalent inactivated hepatitis A vaccines on incidence and persistence of anti-HAV (IgG) antibodies in pediatric populations. We conducted a systematic review of literature published between 2000 and 2015 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, LILACS, IBECS identifying a total of 27 studies (Argentina, Belgium, China, Greece, Israel, Panama, the United States and Uruguay). All except one study showed a marked decline in the incidence of hepatitis A post introduction of UMV. The incidence in non-vaccinated age groups decreased as well, suggesting herd immunity but also rising susceptibility. Long-term anti-HAV antibody persistence was documented up to 17 y after a 2-dose primary vaccination. In conclusion, introduction of UMV in countries with intermediate endemicity for HAV infection led to a considerable decrease in the incidence of hepatitis A in vaccinated and in non-vaccinated age groups alike.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis A Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis A Vaccines/immunology , Hepatitis A/epidemiology , Hepatitis A/prevention & control , Mass Vaccination , Global Health , Hepatitis A Antibodies/blood , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Incidence , Treatment Outcome , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology
15.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 12(11): 2862-2871, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27428517

ABSTRACT

To assess the risk of autoimmune disease (AD) in 9-25 year-old women within 1 year after the first AS04-HPV-16/18vaccine dose, a retrospective, observational database cohort study was conducted using CPRD GOLD. From CPRD GOLD 4 cohorts (65,000 subjects each) were retrieved: 1 exposed female cohort (received ≥1 AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine dose between Sep2008-Aug2010) and 3 unexposed cohorts: historical female (Sep2005-Aug2007), concurrent male, and historical male. Co-primary endpoints were confirmed neuroinflammatory/ophthalmic AD and other AD, secondary endpoints were confirmed individual AD. Risk of new onset of AD was compared between cohorts (reference: historical cohort) using Poisson regression. The main analysis using confirmed cases showed no neuroinflammatory/ophthalmic AD cases in the female exposed cohort. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) (95% CI) of other AD was 1.41 (0.86 to 2.31) in female and 1.77 (0.94 to 3.35) in male cohorts when compared to the female and male historical cohort, respectively. Secondary endpoints were evaluated for diseases with >10 cases, which were Crohn's disease (IRR: 1.21 [0.37 to 3.95] for female and 4.22 [0.47 to 38.02] for male cohorts), autoimmune thyroiditis (IRR: 3.75 [1.25 to 11.31] for female and no confirmed cases for male cohorts) and type 1 diabetes (IRR: 0.30 [0.11 to 0.83] for female and 2.46 [1.08 to 5.60] for male cohorts). Analysis using confirmed and non-confirmed cases showed similar results, except for autoimmune thyroiditis in females, IRR: 1.45 (0.79 to 2.64). There was no evidence of an increased risk of AD in women aged 9 to 25 years after AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccination.


Subject(s)
Aluminum Hydroxide/adverse effects , Autoimmune Diseases/chemically induced , Autoimmune Diseases/epidemiology , Lipid A/analogs & derivatives , Papillomavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aluminum Hydroxide/administration & dosage , Child , Female , Humans , Lipid A/administration & dosage , Lipid A/adverse effects , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
16.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 15(7): 829-51, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26840060

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis A and B are two of the most common vaccine-preventable diseases and vaccination for Hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) is recommended for those at risk of contracting HAV and/or HBV through their occupation, travel or lifestyle. OBJECTIVE: To describe the vaccine efficacy, immunogenicity, effectiveness and safety of the combined vaccine against hepatitis A and hepatitis B. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature published between 1990 and 2015. RESULTS: Anti-HAV seropositivity rates ranged from 96.2% to 100% and anti-HBs seroprotection rates from 82% to 100%. Antibodies persisted up to 15 years and geometric mean concentration (GMC) remained above the seropositivity cut-off value for both. Anti-HAV and anti-HBs immune responses were lower in less immunocompetent individuals one month after completion of the immunization schedule. The safety profiles of Twinrix(TM) and monovalent hepatitis A and B vaccines were similar. CONCLUSION: The vaccine offers satisfactory long-term immunogenicity rates, expected duration of protection and safety profile similar to the monovalent hepatitis A or B vaccines.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis A Vaccines/adverse effects , Hepatitis A Vaccines/immunology , Hepatitis A/prevention & control , Hepatitis B Vaccines/adverse effects , Hepatitis B Vaccines/immunology , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Hepatitis A Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis B Antibodies/blood , Humans , Time Factors , Vaccines, Combined/adverse effects , Vaccines, Combined/immunology
17.
Vaccine ; 33(48): 6884-91, 2015 Nov 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26206268

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We assessed the risk of spontaneous abortion (SA) after inadvertent exposure to HPV-16/18-vaccine during pregnancy using an observational cohort design. METHODS: The study population included women aged 15-25 years registered with the Clinical Practice Research Datalink General Practice OnLine Database in the United Kingdom (UK), who received at least one HPV-16/18-vaccine dose between 1st September 2008 and 30th June 2011. Exposed women had the first day of gestation between 30 days before and 45 days (90 days for the extended exposure period) after any HPV-16/18-vaccine dose. Non-exposed women had the first day of gestation 120 days-18 months after the last dose. SA defined as foetal loss between weeks 1 and 23 of gestation (UK definition). RESULTS: The frequency of SA was 11.6% (among 207 exposed) and 9.0% (632 non-exposed), women: hazard ratio (HR) adjusted for age at first day of gestation 1.30 (95% confidence interval: 0.79-2.12). Sensitivity analysis per number of doses administered (-30 to +45-day risk period) showed a HR for SA of 1.11 (0.64-1.91) for 18/178 women with one dose during the risk period versus 2.55 (1.09-5.93) in 6/29 women with two doses within a 4-5 weeks period. The proportion of pre-term/full-term/postterm deliveries, small/large for gestational age infants, and birth defects was not significantly different between exposed and non-exposed women. Results were consistent using a (United States) SA definition of foetal loss between weeks 1-19 and/or the extended risk period. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of an increased risk of SA and other adverse pregnancy outcomes in young women inadvertently HPV-16/18-vaccinated around gestation. Nevertheless, women who are pregnant or trying to become pregnant are advised to postpone vaccination until completion of pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous/chemically induced , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Aluminum Hydroxide/administration & dosage , Aluminum Hydroxide/adverse effects , Lipid A/analogs & derivatives , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Papillomavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Pregnancy Outcome , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Lipid A/administration & dosage , Lipid A/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Risk Assessment , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
18.
Eur Spine J ; 19(5): 747-53, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20195651

ABSTRACT

Trials often do not succeed in including as many patients as anticipated beforehand. The aim of this paper was to describe why we were not able to include more than a few patients in our randomized controlled treatment trial on the effectiveness of bracing patients with idiopathic scoliosis, and to describe which lessons can be learnt. A pilot study on the willingness to participate in such a trial was conducted amongst 21 patients and their parents. A description of how we prepared and designed this trial, the problems we faced and how we tried to improve the inclusion are given. A total of four patients were included, and 14 refused to participate in an 18-month period. There were a lot less eligible patients than anticipated (40 instead of 100 per year), and the patients' participation rate was much lower than we had found in our pilot study (21% instead of 70%). The trial failed to include more than a few patients because of an overestimation of the number of eligible patients and because a lot less eligible patients were willing to participate compared to our pilot study. One reason for a low participation rate could be that this trial evaluated a frequently used existing treatment instead of a new treatment, and patients and parents might be afraid of not being treated (despite an intensive secure system for the control arm).


Subject(s)
Braces , Patient Participation , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Scoliosis/therapy , Humans , Patient Selection , Research Design , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
19.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 35(1): 57-63, 2010 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20023605

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reduction in the risk of surgery that scoliosis patients would require in order to consider brace treatment as acceptable, and to elicit the trade-offs individuals make between characteristics of brace treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The effectiveness of brace treatment in idiopathic scoliosis patients has not been established in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Treatment with a brace can be quite bothersome. Patients' preferences for brace treatment are unknown. Insight into patients' preferences for (characteristics of) brace treatment will be useful for future trials and for the development of braces that may optimize compliance with brace treatment. METHODS: A total of 197 patients who had completed treatment (brace and/or surgery) for scoliosis were approached for the study, of which 135 gave informed consent. A discrete choice experiment was designed in which patients had to choose between hypothetical brace treatment profiles that differed in following 4 treatment attributes: effectiveness, visibility, discomfort, and treatment duration. A multinomial logit model was used to analyze the relative importance of these attributes. Subgroup analyses were conducted for brace-only, brace-surgery, and surgery-only patients. RESULTS: The response rate was 86% (116/135). All treatment attributes proved to be important for patients' choices. All subgroups were prepared to initiate treatment with a Boston brace if the brace would reduce the need for surgery by 53%. Risk reductions in a range of 32% to 74% were required for acceptance of a treatment duration of 3 years. CONCLUSION: Scoliosis patients stated to be prepared to undergo brace treatment only if it provides sizeable reduction of the risk of surgery. Effectiveness and discomfort in wearing a brace were the most important determinants of the choices. These results are important if RCTs would conclusively establish that bracing is effective, and show directions for the further technical development of braces to increase the compliance with brace treatment.


Subject(s)
Braces , Choice Behavior , Patient Preference/psychology , Scoliosis/therapy , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Compliance , Patient Satisfaction , Regression Analysis , Scoliosis/psychology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
20.
Cancer ; 113(2): 396-404, 2008 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18484588

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) screening is an important new tool for the early detection of lung cancer. In the current study, the authors assessed the discomfort associated with CT scanning and the subsequent wait for results and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over time. METHODS: A total of 351 participants in the Dutch-Belgian randomized controlled trial for lung cancer screening in high-risk subjects (the NELSON trial) who had an appointment for a baseline CT scan were asked to complete questionnaires regarding their experienced discomfort and HRQoL before, 1 day after, and approximately 6 months after the CT scan. HRQoL was measured as generic HRQoL (12-item Short Form [SF-12] and EuroQol questionnaire [EQ-5D]), generic anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI-6]), and lung cancer-specific distress (Impact of Event Scale [IES]). Approximately 76.9% of the participants completed all 3 questionnaires. RESULTS: Approximately 87% to 99% of participants reported experiencing no discomfort related to the CT scan. The median SF-12, EQ-5D, STAI-6, and IES scores did not appear to change relevantly over time. Approximately 46.0% and 51.3%, respectively, of the participants reported discomfort in connection with having to wait for the results of the CT scan and dreading those results. These patients had relevantly higher STAI-6 and IES scores (P < .01) (unfavorable) at all 3 assessments. CONCLUSIONS: The current evaluation of the potential adverse effects of CT screening for lung cancer on HRQoL demonstrated no negative effects. However, waiting for the CT scan results was reported to be discomforting by approximately half of the participants. Minimizing the waiting time for the test results is therefore recommended.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Female , Health , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL