Treatment with nanosomal paclitaxel lipid suspension versus conventional paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients - a multicenter, randomized, comparative, phase II/III clinical study.

Background: A novel nanosomal paclitaxel lipid suspension (NPLS), free from Cremophor EL (CrEL) and ethanol, was developed to address the solvent-related toxicities associated with conventional paclitaxel formulation. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of NPLS versus CrEL-based paclitaxel (conventional paclitaxel) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Design: A prospective, open-label, randomized, multiple-dose, parallel, phase II/III study. Methods: Adult (18-65 years) female patients with MBC who had previously failed at least one line of chemotherapy were randomized (2:2:1) to NPLS 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (Q3W, n = 48, arm A), NPLS 80 mg/m2 every week (QW, n = 45, arm B) without premedication or conventional paclitaxel (Taxol®, manufactured by Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA) 175 mg/m2 Q3W (n = 27, arm C) with premedication. In the extension study, an additional 54 patients were randomized (2:1) to arm A (n = 37) or arm C (n = 17). Results: Pooled data from the primary study and its extension phase included 174 patients. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). As per intent-to-treat analysis, ORR was significantly better in the NPLS QW arm as compared to conventional paclitaxel [44.4% (20/45) versus 22.7% (10/44), (p = 0.04)]. An improvement in ORR with NPLS Q3W versus conventional paclitaxel arm [29.4% (25/85) versus 22.7% (10/44)] (p = 0.53) was observed. Disease control rates observed were improved with NPLS Q3W versus conventional paclitaxel Q3W (77.7% versus 72.7%, p = 0.66) and with NPLS QW versus conventional paclitaxel Q3W (84.4% versus 72.7%, p = 0.20), although not significant. A lower incidence of grade III/IV peripheral sensory neuropathy, vomiting, and dyspnea was reported with NPLS Q3W versus conventional paclitaxel Q3W arms. Conclusion: NPLS demonstrated an improved tumor response rate and a favorable safety profile versus conventional paclitaxel. NPLS 80 mg/m2 QW demonstrated a significantly better response versus conventional paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 Q3W. Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI), CTRI/2010/091/001344 Registered on: 18 October 2010 (https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=MjEzNQ==&Enc=&userName=CTRI/2010/091/001344), CTRI/2015/07/006062 Registered on: 31 July 2015 (https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=MTE2Mjc=&Enc=&userName=CTRI/2015/07/006062).

Role of nanosomal paclitaxel lipid suspension (NPLS) in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) Why was the study done? Paclitaxel is a commonly used drug for the treatment of breast cancer. Conventional formulation of paclitaxel is known to cause side effects like injection site reactions. A newer formulation named NPLS was developed to overcome the limitations of the conventional paclitaxel. The current study was done to compare the safety and effectiveness of NPLS and conventional paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer. What did the researchers do? The research team conducted a large study in multiple hospitals across India, involving women with advanced breast cancer who had experienced treatment failure with previous chemotherapy. A total of 174 patients were randomly assigned to receive either of the three treatment schedules: (1) NPLS every 3 weeks, (2) NPLS every week, (3) conventional paclitaxel every 3 weeks. What did the researchers find? The results showed that NPLS, in a weekly schedule, led to better tumor response rates compared to conventional paclitaxel given every 3 weeks. Additionally, NPLS demonstrated a favorable safety profile, as compared to conventional paclitaxel. What do the findings mean? These findings suggest that NPLS could be a promising alternative for women with advanced breast cancer. NPLS improved the response to treatment, with a better safety profile compared to conventional paclitaxel.

Efficacy and Safety of Nanosomal Docetaxel Lipid Suspension (NDLS) versus Conventional Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy for Primary Operable Breast Cancer.

Objective: Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) is a novel formulation developed to overcome toxicity issues caused by excipients (polysorbate 80 and ethanol) present in commercially available docetaxel formulation. We conducted a prospective, observational study to compare the outcomes of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS)-based versus conventional docetaxel-based chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer. Methods: Sixty adult women with newly diagnosed stage IIb-III breast cancer were included. Patients received NDLS-based (n=30) or docetaxel-based (n=30) chemotherapy. Patients received (1) four cycles of preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by four cycles of NDLS or docetaxel (T) and surgery (neoadjuvant AC→NDLS [n=9], or neoadjuvant AC→T [n=10]), or (2) four cycles of preoperative AC followed by surgery and postoperative NDLS or T (neoadjuvant AC→adjuvant NDLS [n=14], or neoadjuvant AC→adjuvant T [n=15]), or (3) surgery followed by postoperative AC→NDLS or T (adjuvant AC→NDLS [n=7], or adjuvant AC→T [n=5]) regimens. The study outcomes were pathological complete response (pCR) rates, clinical overall response rates (ORR), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse event (AE) profile. Results: For neoadjuvant AC→T (n=10) vs neoadjuvant AC→NDLS (n=9), the pCR rates were 100% each, and the ORR were 100% vs 88.9% (p=1.0). All patients were alive at 6 months, and the median OS was not reached. Three patients had progressive disease (T: n=2, NDLS: n=1) with a DFS of 12 weeks in all three patients. Grade 3 infusion-related reactions were seen in five patients (16.7%) in T vs none in NDLS arms. Conclusion: NDLS-based neo/adjuvant chemotherapy was efficacious in the treatment of primary operable breast cancer and showed comparable pCR, ORR, DFS and OS rates versus conventional docetaxel. NDLS was better tolerated than conventional docetaxel.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Mitochondrial Modulator, TRC150094, in Overweight and Obese Subjects: A Randomized Phase-I Clinical Trial.

TRC150094, a novel mitochondrial modulator, can restore metabolic flexibility by improving insulin resistance in preclinical studies. This study primarily aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral TRC150094 after conducting two double-blind, randomized, Phase-I studies, single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD), with n = 46, in overweight/obese adult and elderly subjects. In addition, the effect of TRC150094 on pharmacodynamic (PD) efficacy markers was evaluated. PK assessments, including maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration (AUC), time to Cmax (Tmax), and elimination half-life (t½), were assessed at pre-specified time points. PD assessments included apolipoprotein B (ApoB), triglycerides, hepatic fat by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameters. TRC150094 was rapidly absorbed, and the AUC of TRC150094 increased in a dose-dependent manner across all doses in non-elderly and elderly cohorts. Cmax was more than the dose-proportional for all doses in all cohorts. Tmax ranged from 0.25 to 4 h, and t½ ranged from 15 to 18 h, making TRC150094 suitable for once-daily dosing. Food did not interfere with the overall absorption of the drug. The metabolites of TRC150094 were glucuronide and sulfate conjugates, and 20% of the drug was excreted unchanged in the urine. TRC150094 at 50 mg showed an improving trend in triglycerides. A significant reduction in Apo B was observed after 50 mg dose (-2.34 vs. 13.24%, p = 0.008), which was, however, not the case after 150 mg (8.78 vs. 13.24%, p = 0.1221). Other parameters such as hepatic fat and insulin sensitivity indices (HOMA-IR, MATSUDA Index derived from OGTT) showed an improving trend for the dose of 50 mg. In terms of safety, all the AEs reported were mild to moderate in severity. None of the adverse events was considered definitely or probably related to treatment, and there were no abnormal laboratory findings. In conclusion, the PK of TRC150094 was linear with no clinically significant food effect. TRC150094 and its metabolites suggest a lesser likelihood of drug-drug interactions. Overall, TRC150094 ensured safety and exhibited suitability for all subjects. Clinical Trial Registration: EUDRA CT: 2009-014941-10 (SAD) and CTR-India registration: CTRI/2009/091/000601 (MAD).

Efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension based chemotherapy in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

The current retrospective multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS; DoceAqualip) based chemotherapy in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. The medical charts of patients with gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma, who were treated with NDLS (50-75 mg/m2; 3 weekly cycles) based chemotherapy and followed-up from April 2014 to September 2018, were analyzed. The study endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in neoadjuvant and metastatic settings. Overall survival (OS) and safety were also evaluated. Of the 43 patients with gastric (n=39) and GEJ (n=4) adenocarcinoma, efficacy evaluation was available in 35 (neoadjuvant, 17/18 patients; metastatic, 18/25 patients). In the neoadjuvant setting, an ORR of 58.82% and a DCR of 94.11% were observed, whereas in the metastatic setting, the ORR was 77.77% and the DCR was 83.33%. In the neoadjuvant setting, at a follow-up ranging from 0.7 to 41.2 months, the median OS was not reached. In the metastatic setting, the median OS was 31.9 months at a follow-up ranging from 0.2 to 50.3 months. At least one adverse event (AE) was reported in 24 patients. Anemia, lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common hematological AEs, while nausea, vomiting and weakness were the most common non-hematological AEs. NDLS based treatment was well-tolerated without any new safety concerns. Overall, NDLS-based chemotherapy was effective and well-tolerated in the management of gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Nanosomal Docetaxel Lipid Suspension-Based Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Results from a Multicenter Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS, DoceAqualip)-based chemotherapy in breast cancer. METHODS: Medical charts of patients with breast cancer, who were treated and followed up with NDLS (75-100 mg/m2; 3-week cycle)-based chemotherapy from August 2014 to September 2018, were analyzed in this multicenter, retrospective study. The study endpoints were overall response rate (ORR: complete response [CR]+partial response [PR]) and disease control rate (DCR: CR+PR+stable disease [SD]) in neoadjuvant and metastatic settings. Overall survival (OS) and safety were evaluated for all settings. RESULTS: Of 91 patients (neoadjuvant: 12, adjuvant: 61, metastatic: 18), efficacy evaluation in 29 patients (neoadjuvant: 12/12, metastatic: 17/18) demonstrated an ORR and DCR of 100%, respectively, in the neoadjuvant setting, and an ORR of 64.7% and DCR of 70.6%, respectively, in the metastatic setting. At a median follow-up of 21.6 months (range: 2.1 to 49.9 months), median OS was not reached in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and it was 30.4 months in metastatic settings. At least one adverse event (AE) was reported in 59.3% of patients. Anemia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia were the most common hematological AEs reported while hyperglycemia and alteration in liver function tests were the most common non-hematological AEs. NDLS-based treatment was well tolerated without any new safety concerns. CONCLUSION: Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension-based chemotherapy was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of breast cancer. Further, NDLS is being evaluated prospectively in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03671044).

Efficacy and Safety of Nanosomal Docetaxel Lipid Suspension-Based Chemotherapy in Sarcoma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS, DoceAqualip) based chemotherapy in patients with sarcoma. METHODS: In this retrospective, multicenter (6 centers), observational study, we analyzed the medical charts of adult patients of either sex, who were treated with NDLS (75 mg/m2 in 3-weekly cycles) based chemotherapy for the treatment of sarcoma. The efficacy outcomes were overall response rate (ORR: complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)) and disease control rate (DCR: CR + PR + stable disease (SD)) in patients who received NDLS-based chemotherapy in neoadjuvant and metastatic settings. Overall survival (OS) and safety were evaluated for all settings. RESULTS: Of 11 patients (neoadjuvant: 1, adjuvant: 3, and metastatic: 7) in this study, majority had leiomyosarcoma (63.6%, 7/11) followed by extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC), high grade pleomorphic sarcoma of mandible, malignant fibrous histiocytoma of right thigh, and osteosarcoma of femur (9.1% each, 1/11 each). NDLS plus gemcitabine combination was used in 10 patients (90.9%), and NDLS plus cyclophosphamide was used in one patient with EMC (9.1%). Efficacy evaluation was performed for 7 patients (neoadjuvant: 1/1; metastatic: 6/7). Complete response was reported in one patient (soft tissue sarcoma of mandible) treated in neoadjuvant setting. In metastatic setting, ORR was 50% and DCR was 66.7% (CR: 16.7% (1/6), PR: 33.3% (2/6), SD: 16.7% (1/6)). At a median follow-up of 6.5 months (range: 0.06-20.2 months), median OS was not reached in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, but it was 15.8 months in metastatic setting. At least 1 AE was reported in 7 (63.6%) patients. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and anemia were the hematological AEs, whereas nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were the most common nonhematological AEs. NDLS treatment was well tolerated without any new safety concerns. CONCLUSION: Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension-based chemotherapy was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of sarcoma. Further prospective trials are needed to confirm the data.

Management of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the pancreas with a nanosomal paclitaxel lipid suspension-based regimen: A case report.

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the pancreas is a rare tumor with only a few case reports available. It is an aggressive form of pancreatic cancer with a poor prognosis. The diagnosis and optimal management of SCC of the pancreas is poorly defined due to the lack of standard treatment or guidelines and owing to the rarity of this malignancy. Patients suffering from SCC of the pancreas do not respond well to chemotherapy or radiotherapy and isolated reports are available on the use of gemcitabine and newer taxane formulations. Surgical resection of the tumor is the most effective modality; however, due to a delay in diagnosis, the majority of pancreatic SCCs remain unresectable. Herein, a case of SCC of the pancreatic tail is reported in a 60-year-old patient who was managed with a combination of albumin-free nanosomal paclitaxel lipid suspension (NPLS) and gemcitabine in a neoadjuvant setting. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such case report of a locally advanced SCC of the pancreatic tail showing an overall survival of 1 year following treatment with an NPLS based regimen. The treatment was well tolerated with no serious safety concerns.

Novel formulations of docetaxel, paclitaxel and doxorubicin in the management of metastatic breast cancer.

The management of breast cancer with advanced disease or metastasis is a common problem in India and other countries. A panel of 13 oncology experts deliberated on the sidelines of the 35th Indian Cooperative Oncology Network Conference held in Mumbai to formulate an expert opinion recommendation on the novel drug delivery system (NDDS) formulations in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The survey comprised of 39 questions related to limitations of conventional formulations and therapeutic positioning of NDDS formulations of docetaxel, paclitaxel and doxorubicin in the management of MBC. The experts used data from published literature and their practical experience to provide expert opinion and recommendations for use by the community oncologists. The experts opined that the newer NDDS formulations should provide a significant efficacy advantage in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival, or demonstrate better tolerability when compared with conventional formulations. The newer NDDS formulations of taxanes should be considered in special circumstances such as diabetes, in patients who have had hypersensitivity reactions and in cases where steroids need to be avoided. The novel formulations of doxorubicin should be used in the elderly and in patients with borderline cardiac function.

Efficacy and safety of DoceAqualip in a patient with locally advanced cervical cancer: A case report.

The standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer has been the combination of a taxane with platinum based therapy. Conventional docetaxel is known to cause hypersensitivity reactions, fluid retention and other toxicities due to polysorbate-80 and ethanol. Corticosteroid premedication prior to docetaxel administration is required to prevent these toxicities, however, toxicities are still observed, sometimes fatal, despite premedication. DoceAqualip, a nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension, developed with lipids generally regarded as safe (GRAS) by the US Food and Drug Administration, is devoid of polysorbate-80 and ethanol. DoceAqualip has been demonstrated to be effective and well-tolerated in various cancer types. The authors' report a case of a patient with Stage IIIB cervical cancer who was treated with carboplatin and DoceAqualip (concurrent ChemoRT) and achieved complete response without any serious adverse events.

Successful downstaging of locally recurrent penile squamous cell carcinoma with neoadjuvant nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) based regimen followed by curative surgery.

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) is a relatively rare disease in Western world but is a significant health problem in developing countries like India. We report here a case of successful multimodality management of recurrent pSCC with pelvic lymphadenopathy in a 56-year-old male patient with poorly controlled diabetes. The patient presented with ulceroproliferative growth over the residual penile stump clinically involving root of penis and with right pelvic lymphadenopathy. The patient had a history of partial penectomy done elsewhere 20 months ago. In view of the comorbidities, locally recurrent disease and presence of right Iliac lymphadenopathy, the patient was treated with nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS), cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF regimen) in the neoadjuvant setting followed by staged surgical resection. This is the first case report showing successful treatment of recurrent pSCC with NDLS-based TPF regimen in the neoadjuvant setting followed by staged surgery in a patient with poorly controlled diabetes.

Kinetics of 14carbon dioxide excretion from 14C-urea by oral commensal flora.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Previous studies have shown that while performing the (14)C-urea breath test ((14)C-UBT) for the detection of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), there is possibility of false-positive results due to the other urease producing bacteria present in oropharynx, if breath samples are obtained within 30 min after administration of non-capsulated (14)C-urea. Therefore, we have exclusively evaluated the kinetics of (14)carbon dioxide ((14)CO(2)) excretion by oral commensal flora to theoretically propose optimum breath collection timings for (14)C-UBT. METHODS: Multiple breath samples up to 15 min were collected in 0.25 mmol benzethonium hydroxide from 25 healthy volunteers after they withheld 37 kBq (1 muCi) of (14)C-urea in their mouths for 15 s and then expectorated the tracer. The test was repeated on the same subjects without and with mouth cleansing protocols. Breath (14)CO(2) content was measured by the Liquid Scintillation Counter (1409; Wallac, Turku, Finland) and results were expressed as (14)CO(2) excretion per mmol breath CO(2) (% administered dose). RESULTS: Peak breath radioactivity at 1 min in the former protocol was 3.53 times higher than the latter which declined subsequently with a half time of 1 min and 2.5 min, and reached baseline levels by 15 and 10 min, respectively. The peak radioactivity (100%) at 1 min declined by 94% and 97.8% in the former and later protocols, respectively, at 15 min. Although magnitude of the peak varied in different subjects, the shape of curve remained almost similar in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Without mouth cleansing, oral micro flora excreted more (14)CO(2) up to 15 min after administration of non-capsulated (14)C-urea. Therefore, it is proposed that two breath samples may be obtained either at 15 and 20 min without or at 10 and 15 min with mouth cleansing protocols for reliable analysis of (14)C-UBT data for H. pylori detection.