Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 17(4): 133-140, 2024 Apr 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38562091

ABSTRACT

This article describes some of the key prevention services in the Leon Berard Comprehensive Cancer Center (CLB) Lyon, France, which are based on clinical prevention services, outreach activities, and collaboration with professional and territorial health communities. In addition, research is embedded at all stages of the prevention continuum, from understanding cancer causes through to the implementation of prevention interventions during and after cancer. Health promotion activities in the community and dedicated outpatient primary cancer prevention services for individuals at increased risk have been implemented. The CLB's experience illustrates how prevention can be integrated into the comprehensive mission of cancer centers, and how in turn, the cancer centers may contribute to bridging the current fragmentation between cancer care and the different components of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. With increasing cancer incidence, the shift toward integrated prevention-centered cancer care is not only key for improving population health, but this may also provide a response to the shortage of hospital staff and overcrowding in cancer services, as well as offer opportunities to reduce carbon emissions from cancer care.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Neoplasms , Humans , Neoplasms/prevention & control , France/epidemiology , Cancer Care Facilities
2.
Rev Infirm ; 71(281): 24-26, 2022 May.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35843637

ABSTRACT

In France, the number of cancer survivors is expected to increase significantly in the coming years. However, there seems to be a lack of identification and management of complications after treatment. Coordination nurses and advanced practice nurses play a fundamental and complementary role to physicians in responding to this problem.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Physicians , France , Humans
3.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 27(7): 729-737, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31480875

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Whilst antithrombotic therapy is recommended in people with atrial fibrillation, little is known about the survival benefits of antithrombotic treatment in those with both high ischaemic and bleeding risk scores. We aim to describe the distribution of these risk scores in those with a prior diagnosis of atrial fibrillation who have suffered stroke and to determine the net clinical benefit of antithrombotic treatment. METHODS: We used regional stroke register data in the UK. Patients with a prior diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke patients were selected and their ischaemic stroke risk score (CHA2DS2-VASc) and bleeding risk score (HEMORR2HAGES) scores retrospectively calculated. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to determine the association between antithrombotic therapy prior to stroke and in-hospital and long-term mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1928 stroke patients (mean age 81.3 years (standard deviation 8.5), 56.8% women) with prior atrial fibrillation were included. Of these, 1761 (91.3%) suffered ischaemic stroke. The most common phenotype (64%) was of those with both high CHA2DS2-VASc (≥2) and high HEMORR2HAGES score (≥4). In our fully adjusted model, patients on antithrombotic treatment with both high ischaemic and bleeding risk had a significant reduction in odds of 31% for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.48-1.00: p = 0.049)) and 17% relative risk reduction for long-term mortality (hazard ratio 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.71-0.97: p = 0.02)). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that antithrombotic treatment has a prognostic benefit following incident stroke in those with both high ischaemic risk and high bleeding risk. This should be considered when choosing treatment options in this group of patients.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Flutter/drug therapy , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Hemorrhagic Stroke/prevention & control , Ischemic Stroke/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Flutter/diagnosis , Atrial Flutter/mortality , Clinical Decision-Making , Female , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Hemorrhagic Stroke/diagnosis , Hemorrhagic Stroke/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Incidence , Ischemic Stroke/diagnosis , Ischemic Stroke/mortality , Male , Recurrence , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom/epidemiology
4.
BMC Hematol ; 18: 26, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30237894

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) accounts for 5% of mortality in African children aged < 5 years. Improving the care management and quality of life of patients with SCD requires a reliable diagnosis in resource-limited settings. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid Sickle SCAN® point-of-care (POC) test for SCD used in field conditions in two West-African countries. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study in Bamako (Mali) and Lomé (Togo). Known cases of sickle cell disease (HbSS, HbSC), trait (HbAS), HbC heterozygotes (HbAC) and homozygous (HbCC), aged ≥6 months were compared to Controls (HbAA), recruited by convenience. All subjects received both an index rapid POC test and a gold standard (high-performance liquid chromatography in Bamako; capillary electrophoresis in Lomé). Personnel conducting tests were blinded from subjects' SCD status. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each phenotype. Practicality was assessed by local healthcare professionals familiar with national diagnostic methods and their associated constraints. RESULTS: In Togo, 209 Cases (45 HbAS, 39 HbAC, 41 HbSS, 44 HbSC and 40 HbCC phenotypes) were compared to 86 Controls (HbAA). 100% sensitivity and specificity were observed for AA Controls and HbCC cases. Estimated sensitivity was 97.7% [95% confidence interval: 88.0-99.9], 97.6% [87.1-99.9%], 95.6% [84.8-99.5%], and 94.9% [82.7-99.4], for HbSC, HbSS, HbAS, and HbAC, respectively. Specificity exceeded 99.2% for all phenotypes. Among 160 cases and 80 controls in Mali, rapid testing was 100% sensitive and specific. Rapid testing was well accepted by local healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION: Rapid POC testing is 100% accurate for homozygote healthy people and excellent (Togo) or perfect (Mali) for sickle cell trait and disease patients. In addition to its comparable diagnostic performance, this test is cheaper, easier to implement, and logistically more convenient than the current standard diagnostic methods in use. Its predictive value indicators and diagnostic accuracy in newborns should be further evaluated prior to implementation in large-scale screening programs in resource-limited settings where SCD is prevalent.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...