Cardiogenic Shock Challenges and Priorities: A Clinician Survey.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is common and survival outcomes have not substantially improved. Australia's geography presents unique challenges in the management of CS. The challenges and research priorities for clinicians pertaining to CS identification and management have yet to be described. METHOD: We used an exploratory sequential mixed methods design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 clinicians (medical and nursing) to identify themes for quantitative evaluation. A total of 143 clinicians undertook quantitative evaluation through online survey. The interviews and surveys addressed current understanding of CS, status of cardiogenic systems and future research priorities. RESULTS: There were 143 respondents: 16 (11%) emergency, cardiology 22 (16%), 37 (26%) intensive care, 54 (38%) nursing. In total, 107 (75%) believe CS is under-recognised. Thirteen (13; 9%) of respondents indicated their hospital had existing CS teams, all from metropolitan hospitals, and 40% thought additional access to mechanical circulatory support devices was required. Five (5; 11%) non-tertiary hospital respondents had not experienced a delay in transfer of a patient in CS. All respondents felt additional research, particularly into the management of CS, was required. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians report that CS is under-recognised and further research into CS management is required. Access to specialised CS services is still an issue and CS protocolised pathways may be of value.

The impact of small movements with dual lumen cannulae during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A computational fluid dynamics analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO) provides respiratory support to patients with severe lung disease failing conventional medical therapy. An essential component of the ECMO circuit are the cannulas, which drain and return blood into the body. Despite being anchored to the patient to prevent accidental removal, minor cannula movements are common during ECMO. The clinical and haemodynamic consequences of these small movements are currently unclear. This study investigated the risk of thrombosis and recirculation caused by small movements of a dual lumen cannula (DLC) in an adult using computational fluid dynamics. METHODS: The 3D model of an AVALON Elite DLC (27 Fr) and a patient-specific vena cava and right atrium were generated for an adult patient on ECMO. The baseline cannula position was generated where the return jet enters the tricuspid valve. Alternative cannula positions were obtained by shifting the cannula 5 and 15 mm towards inferior (IVC) and superior (SVC) vena cava, respectively. ECMO settings of 4 L/min blood flow and pulsatile flow at SVC and IVC were applied. Recirculation was defined as a scalar value indicating the infused oxygenated blood inside the drainage lumen, while thrombosis risk was evaluated by shear stress, stagnation volume, washout, and turbulent kinetic energy. RESULTS: Recirculation for all models was less than 3.1 %. DLC movements between -5 to 15 mm increased shear stress and turbulence kinetic energy up to 24.7 % and 11.8 %, respectively, compared to the baseline cannula position leading to a higher predicted thrombosis risk. All models obtained a complete washout after nine seconds except for when the cannula migrated 15 mm into the SVC, indicating persisting stasis and circulating zones. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, small DLC movements were not associated with an increased risk of recirculation. However, they may increase the risk of thrombosis due to increased shear rate, turbulence, and slower washout of blood. Developing effective cannula securement devices may reduce this risk.

Corrigendum to "Blend to Limit OxygEN in ECMO: A RanDomised ControllEd Registry (BLENDER) trial: Study protocol and statistical analysis plan" [Crit Care Resuscit 25 (2023) 118-125].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.06.001.].

Healthcare and economic cost burden of emergency medical services treated non-traumatic shock using a population-based cohort in Victoria, Australia.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the healthcare costs and impact on the economy at large arising from emergency medical services (EMS) treated non-traumatic shock. DESIGN: We conducted a population-based cohort study, where EMS-treated patients were individually linked to hospital-wide and state-wide administrative datasets. Direct healthcare costs (Australian dollars, AUD) were estimated for each element of care using a casemix funding method. The impact on productivity was assessed using a Markov state-transition model with a 3-year horizon. SETTING: Patients older than 18 years of age with shock not related to trauma who received care by EMS (1 January 2015-30 June 2019) in Victoria, Australia were included in the analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome assessed was the total healthcare expenditure. Secondary outcomes included healthcare expenditure stratified by shock aetiology, years of life lived (YLL), productivity-adjusted life-years (PALYs) and productivity losses. RESULTS: A total of 21 334 patients (mean age 65.9 (±19.1) years, and 9641 (45.2%) females were treated by EMS with non-traumatic shock with an average healthcare-related cost of $A11 031 per episode of care and total cost of $A280 million. Annual costs remained stable throughout the study period, but average costs per episode of care increased (Ptrend=0.05). Among patients who survived to hospital, the average cost per episode of care was stratified by aetiology with cardiogenic shock costing $A24 382, $A21 254 for septic shock, $A19 915 for hypovolaemic shock and $A28 057 for obstructive shock. Modelling demonstrated that over a 3-year horizon the cohort lost 24 355 YLLs and 5059 PALYs. Lost human capital due to premature mortality led to productivity-related losses of $A374 million. When extrapolated to the entire Australian population, productivity losses approached $A1.5 billion ($A326 million annually). CONCLUSION: The direct healthcare costs and indirect loss of productivity among patients with non-traumatic shock are high. Targeted public health measures that seek to reduce the incidence of shock and improve systems of care are needed to reduce the financial burden of this syndrome.

Blood flow and emboli transport patterns during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A computational fluid dynamics study.

PROBLEM: Despite advances in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO), a significant mortality rate persists due to complications. The non-physiological blood flow dynamics of VA-ECMO may lead to neurological complications and organ ischemia. Continuous retrograde high-flow oxygenated blood enters through a return cannula placed in the femoral artery which opposes the pulsatile deoxygenated blood ejected by the left ventricle (LV), which impacts upper body oxygenation and subsequent hyperoxemia. The complications underscore the critical need to comprehend the impact of VA-ECMO support level and return cannula size, as mortality remains a significant concern. AIM: The aim of this study is to predict and provide insights into the complications associated with VA-ECMO using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. These complications will be assessed by characterising blood flow and emboli transport patterns through a comprehensive analysis of the influence of VA-ECMO support levels and arterial return cannula sizes. METHODS: Patient-specific 3D aortic and major branch models, derived from a male patient's CT scan during VA-ECMO undergoing respiratory dysfunction, were analyzed using CFD. The investigation employed species transport and discrete particle tracking models to study ECMO blood (oxygenated) mixing with LV blood (deoxygenated) and to trace emboli transport patterns from potential sources (circuit, LV, and aorta wall). Two cannula sizes (15 Fr and 19 Fr) were tested alongside varying ECMO pump flow rates (50%, 70%, and 90% of the total cardiac output). RESULTS: Cannula size did not significantly affect oxygen transport. At 90% VA-ECMO support, all arteries distal to the aortic arch achieved 100% oxygen saturation. As support level decreased, oxygen transport to the upper body also decreased to a minimum saturation of 73%. Emboli transport varied substantially between emboli origin and VAECMO support level, with the highest risk of cerebral emboli coming from the LV with a 15 Fr cannula at 90% support. CONCLUSION: Arterial return cannula sizing minimally impacted blood oxygen distribution; however, it did influence the distribution of emboli released from the circuit and aortic wall. Notably, it was the support level alone that significantly affected the mixing zone of VA-ECMO and cardiac blood, subsequently influencing the risk of embolization of the cardiogenic source and oxygenation levels across various arterial branches.

Impact of postoperative hyperlactatemia in orthotopic heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hyperlactatemia (HL) is a common phenomenon after cardiac surgery which is related to tissue hypoperfusion and hypoxia and associated with poor outcomes. It is also often seen in the postoperative period after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHTx), but the association between HL and outcomes after OHTx is not well known. We evaluated the incidence and outcome of HL after OHTx. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 209 patients who underwent OHTx between January 2011 and December 2020. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to their peak lactate levels within the first 72 h postoperatively: group 1, normal to mild hyperlactatemia (<5 mmol/L, n = 42); group 2, moderate hyperlactatemia (5-10 mmol/L, n = 110); and group 3, severe hyperlactatemia (>10 mmol/L, n = 57). The primary composite endpoint was all-cause mortality or postoperative initiation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) within 30 days. Secondary endpoints included duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Patients with higher postoperative peak lactate levels were more commonly transplanted from left ventricular assist device support (33.3 % vs 50.9 % vs 64.9, p < 0.01) and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time [127 min (109-148) vs 141 min (116-186) vs 153 min (127-182), p = 0.02]. Composite primary endpoint was met in 18 patients (8.6 %) and was significantly more common in patients with higher postoperative peak lactate levels (0.0 % vs 6.4 % vs 19.3 %, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Severe hyperlactatemia following orthotopic heart transplant was associated with an increased risk of post-transplant VA ECMO initiation and mortality at 30 days.

Flow characterization of Maquet and Bio-Medicus multi-stage drainage cannulae during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Drainage cannulae extract blood from a patient during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO), a treatment that temporarily supports patients undergoing severe heart and/or lung dysfunction. Currently, the two most commonly used multi-stage drainage cannulae are manufactured by Maquet and Bio-Medicus, but their designs vary in many aspects which impacts the generated flow dynamics. Therefore, this study aimed to use computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to explore the flow characteristics of the aforementioned cannulae and their impact on complications such as thrombosis. METHODS: The Maquet and Bio-Medicus cannulae were 3D modelled within a patient-specific geometry of the venous vasculature taken from a computed tomography scan of a patient undergoing VA ECMO. A drainage flow rate of 4 L/min was assigned to each cannula. Lastly, a stress blended eddy simulation turbulence model was employed to resolve bulk flow turbulence. RESULTS: The proximal row of side holes in both cannulae generated high intensity counter-rotating vortices, thus generating supraphysiological shear. These proximal rows were also responsible for the majority of flow extraction in both cannulae (>1.6 L/min). Despite identical simulation settings, each cannulae had differing impacts on global flow dynamics. For instance, the Bio-Medicus model produced a total stagnant blood volume of 25.6 ml, compared to 17.8 ml the Maquet cannula, thereby increasing the risk of thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our results demonstrate that differences in design clearly impact flow dynamics and risk of complications. Therefore, further work in optimizing cannula design may be beneficial to prevent harmful flow characteristics.

Oxygenation During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Physiology, Current Evidence, and a Pragmatic Approach to Oxygen Titration.

OBJECTIVES: This review aims to: 1) identify the key circuit and patient factors affecting systemic oxygenation, 2) summarize the literature reporting the association between hyperoxia and patient outcomes, and 3) provide a pragmatic approach to oxygen titration, in patients undergoing peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). DATA SOURCES: Searches were performed using PubMed, SCOPUS, Medline, and Google Scholar. STUDY SELECTION: All observational and interventional studies investigating the association between hyperoxia, and clinical outcomes were included, as well as guidelines from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from relevant literature was extracted, summarized, and integrated into a concise narrative review. For ease of reference a summary of relevant studies was also produced. DATA SYNTHESIS: The extracorporeal circuit and the native cardiorespiratory circuit both contribute to systemic oxygenation during venoarterial ECMO. The ECMO circuit's contribution to systemic oxygenation is, in practice, largely determined by the ECMO blood flow, whereas the native component of systemic oxygenation derives from native cardiac output and residual respiratory function. Interactions between ECMO outflow and native cardiac output (as in differential hypoxia), the presence of respiratory support, and physiologic parameters affecting blood oxygen carriage also modulate overall oxygen exposure during venoarterial ECMO. Physiologically those requiring venoarterial ECMO are prone to hyperoxia. Hyperoxia has a variety of definitions, most commonly Pa o2 greater than 150 mm Hg. Severe hypoxia (Pa o2 > 300 mm Hg) is common, seen in 20%. Early severe hyperoxia, as well as cumulative hyperoxia exposure was associated with in-hospital mortality, even after adjustment for disease severity in both venoarterial ECMO and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A pragmatic approach to oxygenation during peripheral venoarterial ECMO involves targeting a right radial oxygen saturation target of 94-98%, and in selected patients, titration of the fraction of oxygen in the mixture via the air-oxygen blender to target postoxygenator Pa o2 of 150-300 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperoxia results from a range of ECMO circuit and patient-related factors. It is common during peripheral venoarterial ECMO, and its presence is associated with poor outcome. A pragmatic approach that avoids hyperoxia, while also preventing hypoxia has been described for patients receiving peripheral venoarterial ECMO.

Nutrition delivery across hospitalisation in critically ill patients with COVID-19: An observational study of the Australian experience.

BACKGROUND: Data on nutrition delivery over the whole hospital admission in critically ill patients with COVID-19 are scarce, particularly in the Australian setting. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe nutrition delivery in critically ill patients admitted to Australian intensive care units (ICUs) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with a focus on post-ICU nutrition practices. METHODS: A multicentre observational study conducted at nine sites included adult patients with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis admitted to the ICU for >24 h and discharged to an acute ward over a 12-month recruitment period from 1 March 2020. Data were extracted on baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes. Nutrition practice data from the ICU and weekly in the post-ICU ward (up to week four) included route of feeding, presence of nutrition-impacting symptoms, and nutrition support received. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included (71% male, age: 58 ± 14 years, body mass index: 30±7 kg/m2), of whom 41.7% (n = 43) received mechanical ventilation within 14 days of ICU admission. While oral nutrition was received by more patients at any time point in the ICU (n = 93, 91.2% of patients) than enteral nutrition (EN) (n = 43, 42.2%) or parenteral nutrition (PN) (n = 2, 2.0%), EN was delivered for a greater duration of time (69.6% feeding days) than oral and PN (29.7% and 0.7%, respectively). More patients received oral intake than the other modes in the post-ICU ward (n = 95, 95.0%), and 40.0% (n = 38/95) of patients were receiving oral nutrition supplements. In the week after ICU discharge, 51.0% of patients (n = 51) had at least one nutrition-impacting symptom, most commonly a reduced appetite (n = 25; 24.5%) or dysphagia (n = 16; 15.7%). CONCLUSION: Critically ill patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia were more likely to receive oral nutrition than artificial nutrition support at any time point both in the ICU and in the post-ICU ward, whereas EN was provided for a greater duration when it was prescribed. Nutrition-impacting symptoms were common.

Observed differences in nutrition management at two time points spanning a decade in critically ill trauma patients with and without head injury.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional needs of trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit may differ from general critically ill patients, but most current evidence is based on large clinical trials recruiting mixed populations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate nutrition practices at two time points that span a decade in trauma patients with and without head injury. METHODS: This observational study recruited adult trauma patients receiving mechanical ventilation and artificial nutrition from a single-centre intensive care unit between February 2005 to December 2006 (cohort 1), and December 2018 to September 2020 (cohort 2). Patients were categorised into head injury and non-head injury subgroups. Data regarding energy and protein prescription and delivery were collected. Data are presented as median [interquartile range]. Wilcoxon rank-sum test assessed the differences between cohorts and subgroups, with a P value ≤ 0.05. The protocol was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12618001816246). RESULTS: Cohort 1 included 109 patients, and 112 patients were included in cohort 2 (age: 46 ± 19 vs 50 ± 19 y; 80 vs 79% M). Overall, nutrition practice did not differ between head-injured and non-head-injured subgroups (all P > 0.05). Energy prescription and delivery decreased from time point one to time point two, regardless of subgroup (Prescription: 9824 [8820-10 581] vs 8318 [7694-9071] kJ; Delivery: 6138 [5130-7188] vs 4715 [3059-5996] kJ; all P < 0.05). Protein prescription did not change from time point one to time point two. Although protein delivery remained constant from time point one to time point two in the head injury group, protein delivery reduced in the non-head injury subgroup (70 [56-82] vs 45 [26-64] g/d, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this single-centre study, energy prescription and delivery in critically ill trauma patients reduced from time point one to time point two. Protein prescription did not change, but protein delivery reduced from time point one to time point two in non-head injury patients. Reasons for these differing trajectories require exploration. STUDY REGISTRATION: Trial registered at www.anzctr.org.au. TRIAL ID: ACTRN12618001816246.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest in Australia: a narrative review.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in patients with prolonged or refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is likely to be beneficial when used as part of a well developed emergency service system. ECPR is technically challenging to initiate and resource-intensive, but it has been found to be cost-effective in hospital-based ECPR programs. ECPR expansion within Australia has thus far been reactive and does not provide broad coverage or equity of access for patients. Newer delivery strategies that improve access to ECPR for patients with OHCA are being trialled, including networked hospital-based ECPR and pre-hospital ECPR programs. The efficacy, scalability, sustainability and cost-effectiveness of these programs need to be assessed. There is a need for national collaboration to determine the most cost-effective delivery strategies for ECPR provision along with its place in the OHCA survival chain.

The effect of restrictive versus liberal selection criteria on survival in ECPR: a retrospective analysis of a multi-regional dataset.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is an established rescue therapy for both out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). However, there remains significant heterogeneity in populations and outcomes across different studies. The primary aim of this study was to compare commonly used selection criteria and their effect on survival and utilisation in an Australian ECPR cohort. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational study of three established ECPR centres in Australia, including cases from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020 to establish the baseline cohort. We applied five commonly used ECPR selection criteria, ranging from restrictive to liberal. RESULTS: The baseline cohort included 199 ECPR cases: 95 OHCA and 104 IHCA patients. Survival to hospital discharge was 20% for OHCA and 41.4% for IHCA. For OHCA patients, strictly applying the most restrictive criteria would have resulted in the highest survival rate 7/16 (43.8%) compared to the most liberal criteria 16/73 (21.9%). However, only 16/95 (16.8%) in our cohort strictly met the most restrictive criteria versus 73/95 (76.8%) with the most liberal criteria. Similarly, in IHCA, the most restrictive criteria would have resulted in a higher survival rate in eligible patients 10/15 (66.7%) compared to 27/59 (45.8%) with the most liberal criteria. With all criteria a large portion of survivors in IHCA would not have been eligible for ECMO if strictly applying criteria, 33/43 (77%) with restrictive and 16/43 (37%) with the most liberal criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to different selection criteria impacts both the ECPR survival rate and the total number of survivors. Commonly used selection criteria may be unsuitable to select IHCA ECPR patients.

Implementation of Recommendations on the Use of Corticosteroids in Severe COVID-19.

Importance: Research diversity and representativeness are paramount in building trust, generating valid biomedical knowledge, and possibly in implementing clinical guidelines. Objectives: To compare variations over time and across World Health Organization (WHO) geographic regions of corticosteroid use for treatment of severe COVID-19; secondary objectives were to evaluate the association between the timing of publication of the RECOVERY (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy) trial (June 2020) and the WHO guidelines for corticosteroids (September 2020) and the temporal trends observed in corticosteroid use by region and to describe the geographic distribution of the recruitment in clinical trials that informed the WHO recommendation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study of 434 851 patients was conducted between January 31, 2020, and September 2, 2022, in 63 countries worldwide. The data were collected under the auspices of the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium (ISARIC)-WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol for Severe Emerging Infections. Analyses were restricted to patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 (a subset of the ISARIC data set). Exposure: Corticosteroid use as reported to the ISARIC-WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol for Severe Emerging Infections. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number and percentage of patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 who received corticosteroids by time period and by WHO geographic region. Results: Among 434 851 patients with confirmed severe or critical COVID-19 for whom receipt of corticosteroids could be ascertained (median [IQR] age, 61.0 [48.0-74.0] years; 53.0% male), 174 307 (40.1%) received corticosteroids during the study period. Of the participants in clinical trials that informed the guideline, 91.6% were recruited from the United Kingdom. In all regions, corticosteroid use for severe COVID-19 increased, but this increase corresponded to the timing of the RECOVERY trial (time-interruption coefficient 1.0 [95% CI, 0.9-1.2]) and WHO guideline (time-interruption coefficient 1.9 [95% CI, 1.7-2.0]) publications only in Europe. At the end of the study period, corticosteroid use for treatment of severe COVID-19 was highest in the Americas (5421 of 6095 [88.9%]; 95% CI, 87.7-90.2) and lowest in Africa (31 588 of 185 191 [17.1%]; 95% CI, 16.8-17.3). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study showed that implementation of the guidelines for use of corticosteroids in the treatment of severe COVID-19 varied geographically. Uptake of corticosteroid treatment was lower in regions with limited clinical trial involvement. Improving research diversity and representativeness may facilitate timely knowledge uptake and guideline implementation.

Expert consensus on training and accreditation for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation an international, multidisciplinary modified Delphi Study.

BACKGROUND: A multidisciplinary group of stakeholders were used to identify: (1) the core competencies of a training program required to perform in-hospital ECPR initiation (2) additional competencies required to perform pre-hospital ECPR initiation and; (3) the optimal training method and maintenance protocol for delivering an ECPR program. METHODS: A modified Delphi process was undertaken utilising two web based survey rounds and one virtual meeting. Experts rated the importance of different aspects of ECPR training, competency and governance on a 9-point Likert scale. A diverse, representative group was targeted. Consensus was achieved when greater than 70% respondents rated a domain as critical (> or = 7 on the 9 point Likert scale). RESULTS: 35 international ECPR experts from 9 countries formed the expert panel, with a median number of 14 years of ECMO practice (interquartile range 11-38). Participant response rates were 97% (survey round one), 63% (virtual meeting) and 100% (survey round two). After the second round of the survey, 47 consensus statements were formed outlining a core set of competencies required for ECPR provision. We identified key elements required to safely train and perform ECPR including skill pre-requisites, surrogate skill identification, the importance of competency-based assessment over volume of practice and competency requirements for successful ECPR practice and skill maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: We present a series of core competencies, training requirements and ongoing governance protocols to guide safe ECPR implementation. These findings can be used to develop training syllabus and guide minimum standards for competency as the growth of ECPR practitioners continues.

Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign.

INTRODUCTION: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign was developed to improve outcomes for all patients with sepsis. Despite sepsis being the primary cause of death after thermal injury, burns have always been excluded from the Surviving Sepsis efforts. To improve sepsis outcomes in burn patients, an international group of burn experts developed the Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign (SSABC) as a testable guideline to improve burn sepsis outcomes. METHODS: The International Society for Burn Injuries (ISBI) reached out to regional or national burn organizations to recommend members to participate in the program. Two members of the ISBI developed specific "patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcome" (PICO) questions that paralleled the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign [1]. SSABC participants were asked to search the current literature and rate its quality for each topic. At the Congress of the ISBI, in Guadalajara, Mexico, August 28, 2022, a majority of the participants met to create "statements" based on the literature. The "summary statements" were then sent to all members for comment with the hope of developing an 80% consensus. After four reviews, a consensus statement for each topic was created or "no consensus" was reported. RESULTS: The committee developed sixty statements within fourteen topics that provide guidance for the early treatment of sepsis in burn patients. These statements should be used to improve the care of sepsis in burn patients. The statements should not be considered as "static" comments but should rather be used as guidelines for future testing of the best treatments for sepsis in burn patients. They should be updated on a regular basis. CONCLUSION: Members of the burn community from the around the world have developed the Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign guidelines with the goal of improving the outcome of sepsis in burn patients.

Simvastatin in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of simvastatin in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is unclear. METHODS: In an ongoing international, multifactorial, adaptive platform, randomized, controlled trial, we evaluated simvastatin (80 mg daily) as compared with no statin (control) in critically ill patients with Covid-19 who were not receiving statins at baseline. The primary outcome was respiratory and cardiovascular organ support-free days, assessed on an ordinal scale combining in-hospital death (assigned a value of -1) and days free of organ support through day 21 in survivors; the analyis used a Bayesian hierarchical ordinal model. The adaptive design included prespecified statistical stopping criteria for superiority (>99% posterior probability that the odds ratio was >1) and futility (>95% posterior probability that the odds ratio was <1.2). RESULTS: Enrollment began on October 28, 2020. On January 8, 2023, enrollment was closed on the basis of a low anticipated likelihood that prespecified stopping criteria would be met as Covid-19 cases decreased. The final analysis included 2684 critically ill patients. The median number of organ support-free days was 11 (interquartile range, -1 to 17) in the simvastatin group and 7 (interquartile range, -1 to 16) in the control group; the posterior median adjusted odds ratio was 1.15 (95% credible interval, 0.98 to 1.34) for simvastatin as compared with control, yielding a 95.9% posterior probability of superiority. At 90 days, the hazard ratio for survival was 1.12 (95% credible interval, 0.95 to 1.32), yielding a 91.9% posterior probability of superiority of simvastatin. The results of secondary analyses were consistent with those of the primary analysis. Serious adverse events, such as elevated levels of liver enzymes and creatine kinase, were reported more frequently with simvastatin than with control. CONCLUSIONS: Although recruitment was stopped because cases had decreased, among critically ill patients with Covid-19, simvastatin did not meet the prespecified criteria for superiority to control. (REMAP-CAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02735707.).

Blend to Limit OxygEN in ECMO: A RanDomised ControllEd Registry (BLENDER) Trial: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan.

Introduction: Critically ill patients supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) are at risk of developing severe arterial hyperoxia, which has been associated with increased mortality. Lower saturation targets in this population may lead to deleterious episodes of severe hypoxia. This manuscript describes the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Blend to Limit OxygEN in ECMO: A RanDomised ControllEd Registry (BLENDER) Trial. Design: The BLENDER trial is a pragmatic, multicentre, registry-embedded, randomised clinical trial., registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03841084) and approved by The Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee project ID HREC/50486/Alfred-2019. Participants and setting: Patients supported by VA ECMO for cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest who are enrolled in the Australian national ECMO registry. Intervention: The study compares a conservative oxygenation strategy (target arterial saturations 92-96%) with a liberal oxygenation strategy (target 97-100%). Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome is the number of intensive care unit (ICU)-free days for patients alive at day 60. Secondary outcomes include duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital mortality, the number of hypoxic episodes, neurocognitive outcomes, and health economic analyses. The 300-patient sample size enables us to detect a 3-day difference in ICU-free days at day 60, assuming a mean ICU-free days of 11 days, with a risk of type 1 error of 5% and power of 80%. Data will be analysed according to a predefined analysis plan. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications. Conclusions: This paper details the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the BLENDER trial, a registry-embedded, multicentre interventional trial comparing liberal and conservative oxygenation strategies in VA ECMO.

Intravenous Vitamin C for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: Two Harmonized Randomized Clinical Trials.

Importance: The efficacy of vitamin C for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is uncertain. Objective: To determine whether vitamin C improves outcomes for patients with COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two prospectively harmonized randomized clinical trials enrolled critically ill patients receiving organ support in intensive care units (90 sites) and patients who were not critically ill (40 sites) between July 23, 2020, and July 15, 2022, on 4 continents. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive vitamin C administered intravenously or control (placebo or no vitamin C) every 6 hours for 96 hours (maximum of 16 doses). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of organ support-free days defined as days alive and free of respiratory and cardiovascular organ support in the intensive care unit up to day 21 and survival to hospital discharge. Values ranged from -1 organ support-free days for patients experiencing in-hospital death to 22 organ support-free days for those who survived without needing organ support. The primary analysis used a bayesian cumulative logistic model. An odds ratio (OR) greater than 1 represented efficacy (improved survival, more organ support-free days, or both), an OR less than 1 represented harm, and an OR less than 1.2 represented futility. Results: Enrollment was terminated after statistical triggers for harm and futility were met. The trials had primary outcome data for 1568 critically ill patients (1037 in the vitamin C group and 531 in the control group; median age, 60 years [IQR, 50-70 years]; 35.9% were female) and 1022 patients who were not critically ill (456 in the vitamin C group and 566 in the control group; median age, 62 years [IQR, 51-72 years]; 39.6% were female). Among critically ill patients, the median number of organ support-free days was 7 (IQR, -1 to 17 days) for the vitamin C group vs 10 (IQR, -1 to 17 days) for the control group (adjusted proportional OR, 0.88 [95% credible interval {CrI}, 0.73 to 1.06]) and the posterior probabilities were 8.6% (efficacy), 91.4% (harm), and 99.9% (futility). Among patients who were not critically ill, the median number of organ support-free days was 22 (IQR, 18 to 22 days) for the vitamin C group vs 22 (IQR, 21 to 22 days) for the control group (adjusted proportional OR, 0.80 [95% CrI, 0.60 to 1.01]) and the posterior probabilities were 2.9% (efficacy), 97.1% (harm), and greater than 99.9% (futility). Among critically ill patients, survival to hospital discharge was 61.9% (642/1037) for the vitamin C group vs 64.6% (343/531) for the control group (adjusted OR, 0.92 [95% CrI, 0.73 to 1.17]) and the posterior probability was 24.0% for efficacy. Among patients who were not critically ill, survival to hospital discharge was 85.1% (388/456) for the vitamin C group vs 86.6% (490/566) for the control group (adjusted OR, 0.86 [95% CrI, 0.61 to 1.17]) and the posterior probability was 17.8% for efficacy. Conclusions and Relevance: In hospitalized patients with COVID-19, vitamin C had low probability of improving the primary composite outcome of organ support-free days and hospital survival. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04401150 (LOVIT-COVID) and NCT02735707 (REMAP-CAP).