ABSTRACT
Simulation involves the re-creation of real-life situations, processes, or structures for the purpose of improving safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of health care services: simulation provides a controlled and safe environment for training and assessment. In an age in which regulatory burdens, fiscal challenges, and renewed focus on patient safety increasingly constrain surgical residency programs, innovation in teaching is vital for the future of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) training. Of the simulation technologies in modern day health care education, many have found their way into OMS training. This article reviews these technologies, and some examples of their uses in OMS.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Educational Technology/trends , General Surgery/education , Internship and Residency , Otolaryngology/education , Simulation Training , Competency-Based Education , Educational Measurement , Humans , Internship and Residency/methods , Internship and Residency/trends , Plastic Surgery Procedures/education , Simulation Training/trendsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of our report was to determine clinically whether young adults who elect to retain their asymptomatic third molars (M3s) have a risk of undergoing 1 or more M3 extractions in the future. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To address our clinical question, we designed and implemented a systematic review. The studies included in the present review were prospective, had a sample size of 50 subjects or more with at least 1 asymptomatic M3, and had at least 12 months of follow-up data available. The primary study variables were the follow-up duration (in years) and the number of M3s extracted by the end of the follow-up period or the number of subjects who required at least one M3 extraction. The annual and cumulative incidence rates of M3 removal were estimated. RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The samples sizes ranged from 70 to 821 subjects, and the follow-up period ranged from 1 to 18 years. The mean incidence rate for M3 extraction of previously asymptomatic M3s was 3.0% annually (range 1 to 9%). The cumulative incidence rate for M3 removal ranged from 5% at 1 year to 64% at 18 years. The reasons for extraction were caries, periodontal disease, and other inflammatory conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative risk of M3 extraction for young adults with asymptomatic M3s is sufficiently high to warrant its consideration when reviewing the risks and benefits of M3 retention as a management strategy.
