Re-Cellularization via Electroporation Therapy of the duodenum combined with GPL-1 receptor agonist to replace insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes; 12 months results of a first-in-human study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Studies have shown that hydrothermal duodenal mucosal ablation results in improved glycemic control. Re-Cellularization via Electroporation Therapy (ReCET) is a novel endoscopic procedure that uses electroporation to induce cellular apoptosis and subsequent reepithelization. In this study, we aimed to eliminate exogenous insulin treatment in T2D patients through a single ReCET procedure combined with a GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA). Feasibility, safety, and (dose) efficacy of ReCET were assessed. METHODS: First-in-human study including patients with T2D on basal insulin (28-75years; BMI 24-40kg/m2, HbA1c ≤64mmol/mol; C-peptide ≥0.2nmol/L). The electroporation dose was optimized during the study, starting with single 600V and ending with double 750V treatments. All patients underwent ReCET, after which insulin was discontinued and semaglutide (GLP-1RA) was initiated. Primary endpoints were: feasibility (procedure time [catheter in-out], technical success rate), safety, and efficacy (patients off insulin at 6 months; HbA1c ≤58mmol/mol). RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent endoscopic ReCET. Median procedure time was 58 (IQR 49-73) minutes. ReCET demonstrated a technical success rate of 100%. No device related SAEs or severe hypoglycemic events were observed. At 12 months follow up, 12 (86%) patients remained off exogenous insulin therapy with significant improvements in glycemic control, metabolic parameters. The 2 patients in whom insulin therapy was reintroduced both received ReCET at the lowest voltage (single 600V). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ReCET is feasible and safe. In combination with semaglutide, ReCET may be a promising therapeutic option to replace insulin therapy in selected T2D patients, while improving glycemic control and metabolic health.

Role of the Intestine and Its Gut Microbiota in Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity.

The metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) is currently one of the biggest global health challenges because of its impact on public health. MetSyn includes the cluster of metabolic disorders including obesity, high blood pressure, hyperglycemia, high triglyceride levels, and hepatic steatosis. Together, these abnormalities increase the cardiovascular risk of individuals and pose a threat to healthcare systems worldwide. To better understand and address this complex issue, recent research has been increasingly focusing on unraveling the delicate interplay between metabolic disorders and the intestines and more specifically our gut microbiome. The gut microbiome entails all microorganisms inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract and plays a pivotal role in metabolic processes and overall health of its host. Emerging evidence proves an association between the gut microbiome composition and aspects of MetSyn, such as obesity. Understanding these relationships is crucial because they offer valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying development and progression of metabolic disorders and possible treatment options. Yet, how should we interpret this relationship? This review focuses on the interplay between the gut and MetSyn. In addition, we have reviewed the existing evidence of the gut microbiome and its association with and impact on metabolic disorders, in an attempt to understand the complex interactions and nature of this association. We also explored potential therapeutic options targeting the gut to modify metabolic disorders and obesity.

Insulin sensitivity and beta cell function after Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing (DMR): An Open-Label, Mechanistic, Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The duodenum has been shown to play a key role in glucose homeostasis. Duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR) is an endoscopic procedure for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in which the duodenal mucosa is hydrothermally ablated. DMR improves glycemic control, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we report changes in glucoregulatory hormones and indices of insulin sensitivity and beta cell function after DMR. METHODS: We included 28 patients on non-insulin glucose lowering medications who underwent open-label DMR and a mixed meal test (MMT) in Revita-1 or Revita-2. Inclusion criteria were hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 7.6-10.4% and BMI 24-40kg/m2. Baseline and 3-months MMT data included plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) concentrations. Glucoregulatory hormones, insulin sensitivity indices (homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance [HOMA-IR], Matsuda index [MI] and hepatic insulin resistance [HIR]), and beta cell function (insulinogenic index [IGI], disposition index [DI] and insulin secretion rate [ISR]) were assessed. RESULTS: Fasting insulin, glucagon, and C-peptide decreased significantly. Insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR, MI, and HIR) and beta cell function (DI and ISR) all improved significantly. Decline in postprandial glucose, mainly driven by a decrease in fasting levels, was observed, as well as a decline in postprandial glucagon whereas GLP-1 and GIP did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion improved 3 months after DMR. It is unlikely that incretin changes are responsible for improved glucose control after DMR. These data add to the growing evidence validating the duodenum as a therapeutic target for patients with T2D.

Performance of diagnostic tools for acute cholangitis in patients with suspected biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Acute cholangitis is an infection requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and antibiotics. Several diagnostic tools help to diagnose cholangitis. Because diagnostic performance of these tools has not been studied and might therefore impose unnecessary ERCPs, we aimed to evaluate this. METHODS: We established a nationwide prospective cohort of patients with suspected biliary obstruction who underwent an ERCP. We assessed the diagnostic performance of Tokyo Guidelines (TG18), Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group (DPSG) criteria, and Charcot triad relative to real-world cholangitis as the reference standard. RESULTS: 127 (16%) of 794 patients were diagnosed with real-world cholangitis. Using the TG18, DPSG, and Charcot triad, 345 (44%), 55 (7%), and 66 (8%) patients were defined as having cholangitis, respectively. Sensitivity for TG18 was 82% (95% CI 74-88) and specificity 60% (95% CI 56-63). The sensitivity for DPSG and Charcot was 42% (95% CI 33-51) and 46% (95% CI 38-56), specificity was 99.7% (95% CI 99-100) and 99% (95% CI 98-100), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TG18 criteria incorrectly diagnoses four out of ten patients with real-world cholangitis, while DPSG and Charcot criteria failed to diagnose more than half of patients. As the cholangitis diagnosis has many consequences for treatment, there is a need for more accurate diagnostic tools or work-up towards ERCP.