Factors associated with bicycle helmet use and proper fit: a cross-sectional survey of Montreal cyclists during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: With increased bicycle use during the COVID-19 pandemic and growing availability of bicycle-sharing programs in Montreal, we hypothesize helmet use has decreased. The aim of this study was to evaluate helmet use and proper fit among Montreal cyclists during the pandemic relative to historical data. METHODS: Nine observers collected data on bike type, gender, helmet use, and ethnicity using the iHelmet© app at 18 locations across the island of Montreal from June to September 2021. Proper helmet wear was assessed at one busy location. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with helmet wear and results were compared to a historical study. RESULTS: Of the 2200 cyclists observed, 1109 (50.4%) wore a helmet. Males (OR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.65-0.95), young adults (OR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.51-0.84), visible minorities (OR = 0.38, 95%CI = 0.28-0.53), and bike-share users (OR = 0.21, 95%CI = 0.15-0.28) were less likely to be wearing a helmet, whereas children (OR = 3.92, 95%CI = 2.17-7.08) and cyclists using racing bicycles (OR = 3.84, 95%CI = 2.62-5.62) were more likely to be wearing a helmet. The majority (139/213; 65.3%) of assessed cyclists wore properly fitting helmets. Children had the lowest odds of having a properly fitted helmet (OR = 0.13, 95%CI = 0.04-0.41). Compared to 2011, helmet use during the pandemic increased significantly (1109/2200 (50.4%) vs. 2192/4789 (45.8%); p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Helmet use among Montreal cyclists was associated with age, gender, ethnicity, and type of bicycle. Children were least likely to have a properly fitted helmet. The recent increase in popularity of cycling and expansion of bicycle-sharing programs reinforce the need for bicycle helmet awareness initiatives, legislation, and funding prioritization.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Avec la popularité grandissante du vélo durant la pandémie COVID-19 et l'expansion du vélopartage à Montréal, nous croyons que le port du casque a diminué. L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer l'utilisation du casque et le port adéquat parmi les cyclistes montréalais et de comparer nos résultats avec des données historiques. MéTHODE: Neuf observateurs, stationnés à 18 emplacements, ont recueilli les informations suivantes en utilisant l'application mobile iHelmet© : type de vélo, sexe, origine ethnique et port du casque. Le port adéquat du casque a été observé à un endroit. L'association de chaque variable avec le port et le port adéquat a été fait par régression multivariable et comparé à des données historiques. RéSULTATS: Des 2 200 cyclistes observés, 1 109 (50,4 %) portaient un casque. Les enfants (OR = 3,92, IC95% = 2,17­7,08) et les cyclistes de performance (OR = 3,84, IC95% = 2,62­5,62) portaient le casque plus fréquemment tandis que les hommes (OR = 0,78, IC95% = 0,65­0,95), les jeunes adultes (OR = 0,65, IC95% = 0,51­0,84), les minorités visibles (OR = 0,38, IC95% = 0,28­0,53), et les utilisateurs de vélopartage (OR = 0,21, IC95% = 0,15­0,28) le portaient moins. La majorité (139/213; 65,3 %) des casques étaient portés adéquatement. Les enfants étaient plus à risque de porter un casque mal ajusté (OR = 0,13, IC95% = 0,04­0,41). L'utilisation d'un casque chez les cyclistes montréalais a augmenté significativement depuis 2011 (1 109/2 200 (50,4 %) c. 2 192/4 789 (45,8 %); p = 0,032). CONCLUSION: Le port du casque à vélo à Montréal est associé à l'âge, le sexe, l'origine ethnique et le type de vélo. Les enfants sont plus à risque de mal porter un casque. Des stratégies de promotion ainsi que la législation peuvent favoriser des comportements sécuritaires à vélo.

Incidence and risk factors for autism spectrum disorder among infants born <29 weeks' gestation.

Objective: This study was aimed to assess the incidence of and risk factors for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) among preterm infants born <29 weeks' gestational age (GA). Methods: A retrospective cohort study of infants born <29 weeks' GA admitted to two tertiary neonatal intensive care units (2009 to 2017) and followed ≥18 months corrected age (CA) at a neonatal follow-up clinic. The primary outcome was ASD, diagnosed using standardized testing or provisional diagnosis at ≥18 months CA. Patient data and 18-month CA developmental outcomes were obtained from the local Canadian Neonatal Follow Up Network database and chart review. Stepwise logistic regression assessed factors associated with ASD. Results: Among 300 eligible infants, 26 (8.7%) were diagnosed with confirmed and 21 (7.0%) with provisional ASD for a combined incidence of 15.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.7 to 20.3). The mean follow-up duration was 3.9 ± 1.4 years and the mean age of diagnosis was 3.7 ± 1.5 years. Male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.63, 95% CI 2.12 to 10.10), small for gestational age status (aOR 3.03, 95% CI 1.02 to 9.01), maternal age ≥35 years at delivery (aOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.57) and smoking during pregnancy (aOR 5.67, 95% CI 1.86 to 17.29) were significantly associated with ASD. Among ASD infants with a complete 18-month CA developmental assessment, 46% (19/41) had no neurodevelopmental impairment (Bayley-III<70, deafness, blindness, or cerebral palsy). Conclusions: ASD is common among infants born <29 weeks' GA and possibly associated with identified risk factors. Such findings emphasize the importance of ASD evaluation among infants <29 weeks' GA and for continued reporting of developmental outcomes beyond 18-months of corrected age.