Considerations on methodology used in the World Health Organization 2000 Report.

The article analyzes the World Health Organization Report for 2000, with emphasis placed on the methodology used to analyze the indicators utilized to compare and classify the performance of the health systems of the 191 member countries. The Report's contribution was the compromise of monitoring the performance of the health systems of member countries, but because of the inconsistent way it was elaborated, and the utilization of questionable scientific evaluation methodologies, the Report fails to give a clear picture. A criterion-based methodology revision is imposed. The main problems in evidence are the choice of individual indicators of disparity in health that discount the population profile, the inadequate control of the impact of social disparities over the performance of the systems, the evaluation of the responsibility of systems that are only partially articulated to the right of the citizens, the lack of data for a great number of countries, consequently having inconsistent estimations, and the lack of transparency in the methodological procedures in the calculation of some indicators. The article suggests a wide methodological revision of the Report.

[Health promotion and health education at the school of governance in health, National School of Public Health, Brazil]. / Promoção e educação em saúde no âmbito da Escola de Governo em Saúde da Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública/Fiocruz.

Schools of public health should define their teaching, research, and technical cooperative programs on the basis of epidemiological, epistemological, and health care parameters, which are heavily affected by the socioeconomic context of their countries. Brazil's demographic and epidemiological transition has been characterized by an increasing prevalence of diseases and risk factors associated with life styles, thus requiring an extensive and in-depth change in the country's health care model, with a greater supply of evidence-based services and preventive and health promotion measures, including new initiatives in information, education, and communications. This article approaches the recent experience at the Brazilian National School of Public Health, which has added to its long-standing academic tradition with a strategic reorientation known as the School of Governance in Health, including distance education as one of its main teaching options. Given Brazil's prevailing social and health situation, we conclude by highlighting the importance of training health professionals and promoting research and technological development in the fields of health promotion and education within the context of the School of Governance in Health at the National School of Public Health.