Congenital asplenia study: clinical and laboratory characterisation of adults with congenital asplenia.

Congenital asplenia is a rare disorder commonly associated with other visceral and cardiac congenital anomalies. Isolated congenital asplenia is even less common than syndromic forms. The risk of severe bacterial infections associated with asplenia is the most concerning clinical implication and carries a significant mortality risk. Prophylactic measures against the clinical syndrome known as overwhelming postsplenectomy infections (OPSI) include vaccination, prophylactic and emergency antibiotics and health education including fever management and travel advice. This case series describes fourteen adults with congenital asplenia and polysplenia syndrome, most of whom were diagnosed incidentally as adults, and outlines the nature of their diagnosis, clinical phenotype, family history and key pathology findings.

Celebrating the career and contributions of Dr Henry T. Lynch (1928-2019).

This article celebrates the career of Dr Henry Lynch and his contributions to cancer genetics through his extensive research, clinical practice and his passion for personalising care by using a patient's genetic profile to determine management and treatment. Dr Lynch's contributions were momentous and continue to have relevance to medical practice, in particular in the fields of clinical genetics, medical oncology and gastroenterology.

Analysis of patient reports on the referral process to two NSW cancer genetic services.

To evaluate trends and associations surrounding patient referral to cancer genetics services in NSW. The specific aims of the questionnaire used to collect information were to: (1) quantify the types of cancers being referred, (2) identify the source of referral for the patients, (3) categorise the referral as being either sought by the patient or suggested by the doctor, (4) quantify how often family history was asked, (5) determine who first raised the topic of family history, (6) identify any discouragement faced by patients, (7) clarify the cancer status of patients referred. A comparative patient-reported study was carried out using a questionnaire as the data collection tool in structured short interviews. The questions were aimed at eliciting the patient's understanding of why they were referred to the clinic, whether family history was discussed at the time of referral and who raised the issue via a series of YES/NO and open response questions. Data were collected from March 2012 to August 2012 from two different clinics, St Vincent's Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Sydney and the Hunter Family Cancer Service, Newcastle-both in New South Wales, Australia. Written consent was obtained. The study found that specialists were responsible for the majority of the 150 referrals and were more likely to be proactive in referring, as opposed to GPs (Phi and Cramer's V test). Patients reported that at the time of referral their family history was not asked in 13.5 % of cases, despite being significant. In the 131 cases where family history was discussed, it was the patient on approximately 2 in 5 occasions that brought up the topic. The most common types of cancer seen were breast cancer and colorectal. At both services GP referrals were more common then specialist referrals. On three occasions patients sought referral after being notified that the bloods they had collected by their GP for genetic testing were held by the laboratory due to failure to follow protocol. Six patients reported being discouraged to attend when seeking a referral. At the time of referral 58.7 % of patients were considered to be without cancer. Overall, 20 % of patients requested their referral to the cancer genetics clinics. The discussion of family history in the context of familial cancer is key to accurate risk assessment and management advice. Further education of doctors is required as evidenced by the number of patients where family history was not asked and in those patients who had bloods collected by their GP without counselling.