Comparative evaluation of different doses of PPAR-γ agonist alone and in combination with sulfasalazine in experimentally induced inflammatory bowel disease in rats.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an idiopathic, chronic inflammatory condition, which affects the gastrointestinal tract and has no curative treatment. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of different doses of pioglitazone alone and in combination with sulfasalazine in TNBS (trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid)-induced inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in rats. METHODS: A total of 36 animals were included in the study. Animals were divided into five groups (n = 6): group I--vehicle (ethanol), group II--TNBS + ethanol, group IIIA--TNBS + pioglitazone (15 mg/kg), group IIIB--TNBS + pioglitazone (30 mg/kg), group IV--TNBS + sulfasalazine (360 mg/kg), group V--TNBS + sulfasalazine (360 mg/kg) + pioglitazone (least effective dose found in group III). Group III was divided into two subgroups, namely IIIA and IIIB, on the basis of different doses of pioglitazone used. After completion of two weeks of treatment, rats were sacrificed under ether anesthesia by cervical dislocation for assessment of intestinal inflammation, histological analysis, myeloperoxidase assay, malondialdehyde assay and TNF-α estimation. RESULTS: All the drug-treated groups showed both gross morphological and microscopic score either 1 or 2. None of them showed score of > 2 on both gross and microscopic morphological examination. Both MDA levels and MPO activity were significantly reduced in the drug-treated groups, with maximum reduction seen in the combination group. TNF-α was reduced in pioglitazone group. It was highly reduced in sulfasalazine group (group V) as compared to TNBS group thereby indicating that pioglitazone is protective in TNBS-induced inflammatory bowel disease. CONCLUSION: The present study showed reduction in lipid peroxidation, malondialdehyde levels and TNF-α levels in pioglitazone-treated group and hence, there was significant improvement in gross and microscopic features, too. However, combination of pioglitazone and sulfasalazine has shown greater efficacy.

Effect of esomeprazole on pharmacokinetics of phenytoin in rabbits.

Esomeprazole is commonly prescribed proton pump inhibitor for gastritis and peptic ulcer disease. Most of the time in clinical practice, phenytoin and esomeprazole are prescribed for patients of generalized seizures with concomitant peptic ulcer. Hence there are chances of drug-drug interaction because of modulations of isoenzymes CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, are involved in metabolism of phenytoin and esomeprazole. But it is important to maintain the therapeutic level of phenytoin in plasma for effective seizures control. So, the aim of the study was to determine the effect of esomeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of phenytoin in rabbits. In a parallel design study, phenytoin, 30 mg/kg/day per oral was given daily for 14 days. On day 15, blood samples were taken at various time intervals between 0-24 hours. In esomeprazole-phenytoin group, phenytoin was administered for seven days as mentioned earlier and from day 8th onward, esomeprazole 2.8 mg/kg along with phenytoin 30 mg/kg/day was administered till 14th days and blood samples were drawn as above on 15th day. Plasma phenytoin levels were assayed by HPLC and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. In esomeprazole-phenytoin group, there was a significant increase of t1/2el than phenytoin alone group and significant increase in AUC0-24 was also observed in the esomeprazole and phenytoin treated group. These results suggest that esomeprazole alters the pharmacokinetics of phenytoin. Confirmation of these results in further clinical studies will warrant changes in phenytoin dose or frequency when esomeprazole is co-administered.

Comparative evaluation of different doses of green tea extract alone and in combination with sulfasalazine in experimentally induced inflammatory bowel disease in rats.

BACKGROUND: The exact etiopathology of inflammatory bowel disease is still unclear. Most of the therapies present are directed towards symptomatic improvement. Surgical therapy in the form of restorative proctocolectomy is reserved for the terminal stage disease, which is unresponsive to medical therapy. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of green tea in experimentally induced inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: A total of 36 animals were included in the study. The animals were divided into five groups (n = 6): Group I-Vehicle (ethanol), group II-TNBS + ethanol, group III-green tea-treated group was divided into two sub-groups on the basis of different doses: group IIIA-TNBS + green tea (35 mg/kg), group IIIB-TNBS + green tea (70 mg/kg), group IV-TNBS + sulfasalazine (360 mg/kg), group V-TNBS + sulfasalazine (360 mg/kg) + green tea (least effective dose found in group III). After completion of 2 weeks of treatment, the rats were killed under ether anesthesia by cervical dislocation for assessment of intestinal inflammation, histological analysis, myeloperoxidase assay, malondialdehyde assay, and TNF-α estimation. RESULTS: The study showed that green tea alone and in combination with sulfasalazine reduced inflammatory changes induced by tri nitro benzene sulfonic acid in rats. This reduction is associated with reduced malondialdehyde, lipid peroxidation, and TNF-α. This correlates well with both gross morphological and histopathological scores. CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that a combination of green tea extract with sulfasalazine showed greater efficacy than single drug treatment.

Bacteria in cancer therapy: a novel experimental strategy.

Resistance to conventional anticancer therapies in patients with advanced solid tumors has prompted the need of alternative cancer therapies. Moreover, the success of novel cancer therapies depends on their selectivity for cancer cells with limited toxicity to normal tissues. Several decades after Coley's work a variety of natural and genetically modified non-pathogenic bacterial species are being explored as potential antitumor agents, either to provide direct tumoricidal effects or to deliver tumoricidal molecules. Live, attenuated or genetically modified non-pathogenic bacterial species are capable of multiplying selectively in tumors and inhibiting their growth. Due to their selectivity for tumor tissues, these bacteria and their spores also serve as ideal vectors for delivering therapeutic proteins to tumors. Bacterial toxins too have emerged as promising cancer treatment strategy. The most potential and promising strategy is bacteria based gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy. Although it has shown successful results in vivo yet further investigation about the targeting mechanisms of the bacteria are required to make it a complete therapeutic approach in cancer treatment.

Pharmacokinetic and toxicological profile of artemisinin compounds: an update.

Artemisinin has been used effectively in malaria treatment. With the emerging resistance to malaria, the optimum and judicial use of the drug has become important. The drug metabolism and toxicology can have an impact on the therapeutic profile and clinical use of this antimalarial agent. In this review, we discuss the pharmacokinetics and toxicological aspects of artemisinin and its therapeutic implications. Artemisinins have several dosing routes including oral, intramuscular, intravenous and rectal. With repeated dosing, artemisinin has propensity for autoinduction, leading to decreased plasma levels on repeated dosing. Combination with other antimalarials in most cases did not influence the pharmacokinetics of artemisinins. Interactions with cytochrome P(450) inhibitors are known but these neither affect the efficacy nor the toxicity of the respective derivative. Artemisinins are generally regarded to be of low toxicity. Two major problems associated with them are neurotoxicity and reproductive toxicity. But the extent of this neurotoxicity is dependent on the nature of the compound, on the route of administration, and on the nature of the formulation. Moreover, it occurs in humans at very high doses. However, as a matter of precaution, the use of artemisinins in the first trimester of pregnancy has been contraindicated.