Differential effects of pesticides on dioxin receptor signaling and p53 activation.

As modern agricultural practices increase their use of chemical pesticides, it is inevitable that we will find a number of these xenobiotics within drinking water supplies and disseminated throughout the food chain. A major problem that arises from this pollution is that the effects of most of these pesticides on cellular mechanisms in general, and how they interact with each other and affect human cells are still poorly understood. In this study we make use of cultured human cancer cells to measure by qRT-PCR how pesticides affect gene expression of stress pathways. Immunoblotting studies were performed to monitor protein expression levels and activation of signaling pathways. We make use of immunofluorescence and microscopy to visualize and quantify DNA damage events in those cells. In the current study, we evaluate the potential of a subset of widely used pesticides to activate the dioxin receptor pathway and affect its crosstalk with estrogen receptor signaling. We quantify the impact of these chemicals on the p53-dependent cellular stress response. We find that, not only can the different pesticides activate the dioxin receptor pathway, most of them have better than additive effects on this pathway when combined at low doses. We also show that different pesticides have the ability to trigger crosstalk events that may generate genotoxic estrogen metabolites. Finally, we show that some, but not all of the tested pesticides can induce a p53-dependent stress response. Taken together our results provide evidence that several xenobiotics found within the environment have the potential to interact together to elicit significant effects on cell systems. Our data warrants caution when the toxicity of substances that are assessed simply for individual chemicals, since important biological effects could be observed only in the presence of other compounds, and that even at very low concentrations.

Are 20-hydroxyecdysone and related genes potential biomarkers of sublethal exposure to lipid-altering contaminants?

In Daphnia magna, 20-hydroecdysone (20E) is the main molting hormone and its metabolism is of interest to identify new biomarkers of exposure to contaminants. The present study aimed to (i) assess baseline levels of 20E and transcription levels of four related-genes (shade, neverland, ultraspiracle, and ecdysteroid receptor); and (ii) evaluate effects in D. magna after 21 days of exposure to fenarimol (anti-ecdysteroid) and a mixture of gemfibrozil and clofibric acid (lipid-lowering drugs) at sublethal concentrations. Endpoints included transcription of the target genes and quantification of 20E, mortality, and reproduction of daphnids. Baseline results showed that average responses were relatively similar and did not vary more than 2-fold. However, intra-day variation was generally high and could be explained by sampling individuals with slightly different stages of their development. Exposure tests indicated a significant decrease in daphnid reproduction following chronic exposure to a concentration of 565 µg/L of fenarimol. However, no difference was observed between the control and exposed groups for any of the investigated genes, nor for the levels of 20E after 21 days of exposure. Following exposition to gemfibrozil and clofibric acid at 1 µg/L, no changes were observed for the measured parameters. These results suggest that changes in transcription levels of the target genes and concentrations of 20E may not be sensitive endpoints that can be used as biomarkers of sublethal exposure to the target compounds in D. magna. Measuring multiple time points instead of a single measure as well as additional molecular endpoints obtained from transcriptomic and metabolomic studies could afford more insights on the changes occurring in exposed daphnids to lipid-altering compounds and identify efficient biomarkers of sublethal exposure.