ABSTRACT
Introduction: Pedicle screw placement is a common procedure in spinal surgery. The misplacement rate with lateral and medial cortical perforation is 5-11%. Several techniques are used to decrease this rate. Many studies proved that electrical conductivity increases accuracy during pedicle screw placement but no study has interpreted conductivity values. Methods: The data are collected from patients operated for scoliosis in a single university hospital. After the posterior surgical approach is made, each pedicle is prepared classically. Instead of the classic curved pedicle probe, the surgeon uses a probe with the same shape that measures the conductivity at its tip. Conductivity values are recorded through a Bluetooth application. Each pedicle trajectory is then qualified after manual palpation with a feeler. A trajectory is qualified as optimal when palpation shows a bone tunnel without any breach, breached when there was a breach, and a modification of the probe direction was needed. A trajectory that does not meet the abovementioned definitions is excluded from the statistical analysis. Results: 21 patients with 457 pedicles are recorded. The average age of the population is 14.71 ± 1.86 years. 17 patients (81%) have idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. One patient has Rett syndrome, one has hypotonia, one has cerebral palsy, and one has congenital malformation. The depth of the instrument is measured semiautomatically. This technique is validated when compared with the manual technique using the Bland-Altman agreement method (mean differences = -0.279 mm, upper limit = 2.2 mm, and lower limit = -2.7 mm) and Deming regression (slope = 1.06 ± 0.004). Conclusion: This study establishes a protocol to collect electrical conductivity signals in spine surgery with synchronization to the depth of the instrument. Real-time conductivity signal feedback alerts the surgeon of a probable breach in the spinal canal, so he can change the direction of the pedicle aim.
ABSTRACT
Objective We aimed to study the "in vitro" pullout strength of SpineGuard/Zavation Dynamic Surgical Guidance Z-Direct Screw (DSG Screw, SpineGuard Inc, Boulder, Colorado, USA), a screw designed to be inserted using a direct insertion technique. Methods Dynamic Surgical Guidance Screws of 5.5 and 6.5 mm were introduced into polyurethane blocks with a density of 10 PCF (0,16g/cm 3 ). According to the experimental group, screws were inserted without pilot hole, with pilot without tapping, undertapping and line-to-line tapping. Screw pullout tests were performed using a universal test machine after screw insertion into polyurethane blocks. Results Screws inserted directly into the polyurethane blocks without pilot hole and tapping showed a statistically higher pullout strength. Insertion of the screw without tapping or with undertapping increases the pullout screw strength compared with line-to-line tapping. Conclusion Dynamic Surgical Guidance Screw showed the highest pullout strength after its insertion without pilot hole and tapping.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Objective We aimed to study the "in vitro" pullout strength of SpineGuard/Zavation Dynamic Surgical Guidance Z-Direct Screw (DSG Screw, SpineGuard Inc, Boulder, Colorado, USA), a screw designed to be inserted using a direct insertion technique. Methods Dynamic Surgical Guidance Screws of 5.5 and 6.5 mm were introduced into polyurethane blocks with a density of 10 PCF (0,16g/cm3). According to the experimental group, screws were inserted without pilot hole, with pilot without tapping, undertapping and line-to-line tapping. Screw pullout tests were performed using a universal test machine after screw insertion into polyurethane blocks. Results Screws inserted directly into the polyurethane blocks without pilot hole and tapping showed a statistically higher pullout strength. Insertion of the screw without tapping or with undertapping increases the pullout screw strength compared with lineto-line tapping. Conclusion Dynamic Surgical Guidance Screw showed the highest pullout strength after its insertion without pilot hole and tapping.
Resumo Objetivo Nosso objetivo foi estudar a resistência à extração "in vitro" do parafuso SpineGuard/Zavation Dynamic Surgical Guidance Z-Direct (Parafuso DSG Guia Cirúrgico Dinâmico, SpineGuard Inc, Boulder, Colorado, USA), um parafuso projetado para ser inserido utilizando a técnica de inserção direta. Métodos Os parafusos DSG de 5,5 e 6,5 mm foram introduzidos em blocos de poliuretano com densidade de 10 PCF (0,16g/cm3). De acordo com o grupo experimental, os parafusos foram inseridos sem um orifício piloto, com um orifício piloto sem o macheamento, com macheamento e com macheamento linha a linha. Os testes de extração do parafuso foram realizados em uma máquina de teste universal, após a inserção do parafuso em blocos de poliuretano. Resultados Os parafusos inseridos diretamente nos blocos de poliuretano sem o orifício piloto e o macheamento mostraram uma resistência à extração estatisticamente maior. A inserção do parafuso sem o macheamento ou com o macho de menor diâmetro aumenta a resistência à extração do parafuso em comparação com o macheamento linha a linha. Conclusão O parafuso DSG apresentou a maior resistência à extração após a inserção sem o orifício piloto e o macheamento.
Subject(s)
Spinal Fusion , Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , Bone Screws , Pedicle ScrewsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Study the in vitro pullout strength of SpineGuard/Zavation Dynamic Surgical Guidance Z-Direct Screw (DSG Screw), a screw pedicle designed to be inserted using a direct insertion technique. METHODS: DSG Screws of 5.5 mm and 6.5 mm were introduced into polyurethane blocks with a density of 10 PCF (0,16 g/cm3). According to the experimental group, screws were inserted without pilot hole, with pilot without tapping, undertapping and line-to-line tapping. Screw pullout tests were performed using a universal test machine after screw insertion into polyurethane blocks. RESULTS: Screws inserted directly into the polyurethane blocks without pilot hole and tapping showed a statistically higher pullout strength. Insertion of the screw without tapping or with undertapping increases the pullout screw strength compared to line-to-line tapping. CONCLUSION: DSG Screw showed the highest pullout strength after its insertion without pilot hole and tapping. Level of Evidence V, Expert Opinion.
OBJETIVO: Estudar a resistência ao arrancamento in vitro do parafuso de inserção direta da SpineGuard/Zavation (parafuso DSG), um parafuso pedicular projetado para ser inserido usando a técnica de inserção direta. MÉTODOS: Parafusos DSG de 5,5 mm e 6,5 mm foram introduzidos em blocos de poliuretano com densidade de 10 PCF (0,16 g/cm3). De acordo com o grupo experimental, os parafusos foram inseridos sem orifício piloto, com orifício e sem macheamento e macheamento diâmetro inferior com mesma geometria. Os testes de resistência dos parafusos foram realizados usando uma máquina de teste universal após a inserção dos parafusos nos blocos de poliuretano. RESULTADOS: Os parafusos inseridos diretamente nos blocos de poliuretano sem orifício piloto e sem macheamento apresentaram uma resistência de arrancamento com significância estatística maior. A inserção do parafuso sem macheamento ou com macheamento com diâmetro inferior apresenta maior resistência ao arrancamento em comparação com o macheamento do mesmo diâmetro. CONCLUSÃO: O parafuso DSG apresentou a maior resistência ao arrancamento após sua inserção sem orifício piloto e sem macheamento. Nível de Evidência V, Opinião do Especialista.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: Study the in vitro pullout strength of SpineGuard/Zavation Dynamic Surgical Guidance Z-Direct Screw (DSG Screw), a screw pedicle designed to be inserted using a direct insertion technique. Methods: DSG Screws of 5.5 mm and 6.5 mm were introduced into polyurethane blocks with a density of 10 PCF (0,16 g/cm3). According to the experimental group, screws were inserted without pilot hole, with pilot without tapping, undertapping and line-to-line tapping. Screw pullout tests were performed using a universal test machine after screw insertion into polyurethane blocks. Results: Screws inserted directly into the polyurethane blocks without pilot hole and tapping showed a statistically higher pullout strength. Insertion of the screw without tapping or with undertapping increases the pullout screw strength compared to line-to-line tapping. Conclusion: DSG Screw showed the highest pullout strength after its insertion without pilot hole and tapping. Level of Evidence V, Expert Opinion.
RESUMO Objetivo: Estudar a resistência ao arrancamento in vitro do parafuso de inserção direta da SpineGuard/Zavation (parafuso DSG), um parafuso pedicular projetado para ser inserido usando a técnica de inserção direta. Métodos: Parafusos DSG de 5,5 mm e 6,5 mm foram introduzidos em blocos de poliuretano com densidade de 10 PCF (0,16 g/cm3). De acordo com o grupo experimental, os parafusos foram inseridos sem orifício piloto, com orifício e sem macheamento e macheamento diâmetro inferior com mesma geometria. Os testes de resistência dos parafusos foram realizados usando uma máquina de teste universal após a inserção dos parafusos nos blocos de poliuretano. Resultados: Os parafusos inseridos diretamente nos blocos de poliuretano sem orifício piloto e sem macheamento apresentaram uma resistência de arrancamento com significância estatística maior. A inserção do parafuso sem macheamento ou com macheamento com diâmetro inferior apresenta maior resistência ao arrancamento em comparação com o macheamento do mesmo diâmetro. Conclusão: O parafuso DSG apresentou a maior resistência ao arrancamento após sua inserção sem orifício piloto e sem macheamento. Nível de Evidência V, Opinião do Especialista.
