Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Spec Oper Med ; 15(4): 117-124, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26630107

ABSTRACT

Medical intelligence is an underused or sometimes misapplied tool in the protection of our Soldiers and the execution of nonkinetic operations. The somewhat improved infrastructure of the operational environment in Iraq and Afghanistan led to an inevitable sense of complacency in regard to the threat of disease nonbattle injury (DNBI). The picture changed somewhat in 2010 with the advent of the village stability program and the establishment of SOF camps in austere locations with degraded living situations rife with exposure risks. In addition, the increasing deployments to unstable locations around the globe, reminiscent of typical Special Operations Forces (SOF) missions before the Global War on Terrorism, indicate a need for better preparation for deployment from the standpoint of disease risk and force health protection. A knowledge gap has developed because we simply did not need to apply as stringent an evaluation of DNBI risk in environments where improved life support mitigated the risk for us. The tools necessary to decrease or even eliminate the impact of DNBI exist but they must be shared and implemented. This article will present four vignettes from current and former SOF Force Health Protection personnel starting with a simple method of executing Medical Intelligence Prep of the Environment (MIPOE) and highlighting situations in which it either was or could have been implemented to mitigate risk and decrease the impact on mission accomplishment and individual operators. A follow-on article will present vignettes of the successful application of MIPOE to nonkinetic operations.


Subject(s)
Endemic Diseases/prevention & control , Insect Bites and Stings/prevention & control , Military Personnel , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Primary Prevention , Siphonaptera , Afghan Campaign 2001- , Altitude , Animals , Climate , Food Supply , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/prevention & control , Humans , Jordan , Liberia , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Refuse Disposal , Risk Assessment , United States , Water Supply
2.
J Spec Oper Med ; 15(2): 139-143, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26125179

ABSTRACT

Throughout the history of modern warfare, tales of atrocities have repeatedly surfaced that depict active and passive aggression toward prisoners of war (POWs). Yet, with each conflict, new tales are born and an undeniable reality of warfare inflicts fresh scars for aggressors to bear. It is understandable, based on human nature and the goals of war, that a government (or its representatives) will feel malice toward enemy prisoners captured during a conflict. It is unquestionably a challenge to overcome that human nature, despite the statutes that outline lawful treatment of POWs. While most aspects of warfare have been revolutionized throughout history, the means by which a military deals with its POWs remains somewhat mired in the reticence of leaders to acknowledge that it will factor into every conflict--that it will, in fact, become a source of controversy as long as it is handled as an afterthought. As shown in accounts dating back to the Revolutionary War, the law can only influence human nature to a point, especially when resources are limited, ignorance is a reality, and no one is watching.


Subject(s)
Military Personnel/history , Prisoners of War/history , Armed Conflicts/history , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Terrorism/history , Warfare
3.
J Spec Oper Med ; 14(3): 111-115, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25344719

ABSTRACT

The endemicity of dengue fever (DF) and, consequently, sequelae of DF are increasing worldwide. The increases are largely a result of widespread international travel and the increased range of the mosquito vectors. US Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) personnel are at an increased risk of exposure to dengue based on their frequent deployments to and presence in dengue endemic areas worldwide. Repeated deployments to different endemic areas can increase the risk for developing the more serious sequelae of dengue: dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS). Information about the seroprevalence rate of dengue in USASOC personnel, in particular, is lacking and is critical to assessing the risk, tailoring preventive medicine countermeasures, leveraging field diagnostics, and maintaining mission capability. In the first part of a two-part project to assess baseline seroprevalence in USASOC units, a random, unit-stratified sample of 500 anonymous serum specimens from personnel assigned to the highest-risk units in USASOC were screened for dengue using a microneutralization assay. Of the 500 specimens screened, 56 (11.2%) of 500 had neutralizing titers (NT) (MN50≥10) against at least one DENV serotype. Subsequent sample titration resulted in 48 (85.7%) of 56 of the samples with NT (MN50≥10) against at least one dengue serotype for an overall dengue exposure rate of 9.6% (48 of 500). The second part of the ongoing project, started in 2012, was a multicenter, serosurveillance project using predeployment and postdeployment sera collected from USASOC personnel deployed to South and Central America, Africa, and Southeast Asia. Preliminary results show a 13.2% (55 of 414) seropositivity rate. The significance of these findings as they relate to personal risk and operational impact is discussed.


Subject(s)
Dengue/epidemiology , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Culicidae , Dengue/immunology , Dengue Virus/immunology , Epidemiological Monitoring , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Severe Dengue/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
5.
Malar J ; 7: 30, 2008 Feb 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18267019

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mefloquine has historically been considered safe and well-tolerated for long-term malaria chemoprophylaxis, but its prescribing requires careful attention to rule out contraindications to its use, including a history of certain psychiatric and neurological disorders. The prevalence of these disorders has not been defined in cohorts of U.S. military personnel deployed to areas where long-term malaria chemoprophylaxis is indicated. METHODS: Military medical surveillance and pharmacosurveillance databases were utilized to identify contraindications to mefloquine use among a cohort of 11,725 active duty U.S. military personnel recently deployed to Afghanistan. RESULTS: A total of 9.6% of the cohort had evidence of a contraindication. Females were more than twice as likely as males to have a contraindication (OR = 2.48, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the importance of proper systematic screening prior to prescribing and dispensing mefloquine, and the need to provide alternatives to mefloquine suitable for long-term administration among deployed U.S. military personnel.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Malaria/prevention & control , Mefloquine , Adolescent , Adult , Afghanistan , Contraindications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Military Personnel , Prevalence , United States
6.
J Med Entomol ; 43(4): 647-62, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16892621

ABSTRACT

One of the most significant modern day efforts to prevent and control an arthropod-borne disease during a military deployment occurred when a team of U.S. military entomologists led efforts to characterize, prevent, and control leishmaniasis at Tallil Air Base (TAB), Iraq, during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Soon after arriving at TAB on 22 March 2003, military entomologists determined that 1) high numbers of sand flies were present at TAB, 2) individual soldiers were receiving many sand fly bites in a single night, and 3) Leishmania parasites were present in 1.5% of the female sand flies as determined using a real-time (fluorogenic) Leishmania-generic polymerase chain reaction assay. The rapid determination that leishmaniasis was a specific threat in this area allowed for the establishment of a comprehensive Leishmaniasis Control Program (LCP) over 5 mo before the first case of leishmaniasis was confirmed in a U.S. soldier deployed to Iraq. The LCP had four components: 1) risk assessment, 2) enhancement of use of personal protective measures by all personnel at TAB, 3) vector and reservoir control, and 4) education of military personnel about sand flies and leishmaniasis. The establishment of the LCP at TAB before the onset of any human disease conclusively demonstrated that entomologists can play a critical role during military deployments.


Subject(s)
Insect Bites and Stings/prevention & control , Insect Vectors/parasitology , Leishmaniasis/prevention & control , Military Personnel , Phlebotomus/parasitology , Animals , Culicidae , Dogs , Environment , Female , Housing/standards , Humans , Insect Bites and Stings/parasitology , Insect Control/instrumentation , Insect Control/methods , Iraq , Jackals , Leishmania/isolation & purification , Leishmania/pathogenicity , Leishmaniasis/transmission , Male , Military Personnel/education , Pest Control/methods , Pesticides , Population Surveillance , Rodentia , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...