Autologous transplant vs oral chemotherapy and lenalidomide in newly diagnosed young myeloma patients: a pooled analysis.

In newly diagnosed myeloma patients, upfront autologous transplant (ASCT) prolongs progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) compared with chemotherapy plus lenalidomide (CC+R). Salvage ASCT at first relapse may still effectively rescue patients who did not receive upfront ASCT. To evaluate the long-term benefit of upfront ASCT vs CC+R and the impact of salvage ASCT in patients who received upfront CC+R, we conducted a pooled analysis of 2 phase III trials (RV-MM-209 and EMN-441). Primary endpoints were PFS1, progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), overall survival (OS). A total of 268 patients were randomized to 2 courses of melphalan 200 mg/m2 and ASCT (MEL200-ASCT) and 261 to CC+R. Median follow-up was 46 months. MEL200-ASCT significantly improved PFS1 (median: 42 vs 24 months, HR 0.53; P<0.001), PFS2 (4 years: 71 vs 54%, HR 0.53, P<0.001) and OS (4 years: 84 vs 70%, HR 0.51, P<0.001) compared with CC+R. The advantage was noticed in good and bad prognosis patients. Only 53% of patients relapsing from CC+R received ASCT at first relapse. Upfront ASCT significantly reduced the risk of death (HR 0.51; P=0.007) in comparison with salvage ASCT. In conclusion, these data confirm the role of upfront ASCT as the standard approach for all young myeloma patients.

Stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after lenalidomide induction therapy.

Lenalidomide has raised concerns regarding its potential impact on the ability to collect stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation, especially after prolonged exposure. The use of cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells may overcome this concern. In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, we investigated the influence of lenalidomide on stem cell collection. In a prospective study, 346 patients received four cycles of lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd). Stem cells were mobilized with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. Patients failing to collect a minimum of 4 × 10(6) CD34(+)/kg cells received a second mobilization course. After mobilization, a median yield of 8.7 × 10(6) CD34(+)/kg was obtained from patients receiving Rd induction. After first mobilization, inadequate yield was observed in 21% of patients, whereas only 9% of patients failed to collect the target yield after the second mobilization attempt. In conclusion, we confirm that a short induction with lenalidomide allowed sufficient stem cells collection to perform autologous transplantation in 91% of newly diagnosed patients.

Efficacy, toxicity and feasibility of a shorter schedule of DCEP regimen for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma.

From 2000 to 2004, 152 patients with multiple myeloma aged or=4 x 10(6) cells/kg. The proportion of patients in whom mobilization failed was similar in the two groups. The incidence of WHO grade III neutropenia was higher in group II, although the difference was not statistically significant; the percentage of patients requiring hospitalization for severe infections was similar in the two groups. The incidence of WHO grade IV thrombocytopenia did not differ between the two groups. The response rate was 72% in group I and 80% in group II with similar percentages of patients achieving good responses. DCEP-short is a good mobilizing regimen, sharing the same characteristics as infusional-DCEP: high mobilizing efficacy, low toxicity and good antitumor activity. This new schedule of DCEP does, however, allow complete outpatient management and so could be advantageously included in any high-dose therapy program.

Successful CD34+ cell mobilization by intermediate-dose Ara-C in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with sequential fludarabine and Campath-1H.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells could be undetectable by flow cytometry or polymerase chain reaction after sequential treatment with fludarabine and Campath-1H. Concern has been raised regarding the ability to mobilize sufficient peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for autografting after purine analogues, and there are few data about PBPC collection after Campath-1H. In all, 16 CLL patients responding to sequential chemo-immunotherapy entered the study. In 10, mobilization regimen consisted of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5-10 microg/kg/die. Patients failing mobilization or not achieving the target of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg underwent a second attempt using intermediate-dose (ID) Ara-C, 800 mg/m(2) every 12 h for six doses+G-CSF. PBPC collection after G-CSF alone was successful in two out of 10 patients. An adequate number of CD34+ cells were collected after ID Ara-C+G-CSF in eight patients failing the mobilization with G-CSF alone and in five out of six who did not receive G-CSF before. Greater yields of PBPCs were collected with Ara-C+G-CSF compared with G-CSF alone (13.8 vs 3.3). The extrahematologic toxicity was manageable. In conclusion, PBPC collection is feasible in CLL patients treated with sequential therapy including fludarabine and Campath-1H. Excellent yields were obtained in 92.8% of patients primed with ID Ara-C+G-CSF.