Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Leukemia ; 31(2): 310-317, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27624670

ABSTRACT

The study was designed to compare clofarabine plus daunorubicin vs daunorubicin/ara-C in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Eight hundred and six untreated patients in the UK NCRI AML16 trial with AML/high-risk MDS (median age, 67 years; range 56-84) and normal serum creatinine were randomised to two courses of induction chemotherapy with either daunorubicin/ara-C (DA) or daunorubicin/clofarabine (DClo). Patients were also included in additional randomisations; ± one dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in course 1; 2v3 courses and ± azacitidine maintenance. The primary end point was overall survival. The overall response rate was 69% (complete remission (CR) 60%; CRi 9%), with no difference between DA (71%) and DClo (66%). There was no difference in 30-/60-day mortality or toxicity: significantly more supportive care was required in the DA arm even though platelet and neutrophil recovery was significantly slower with DClo. There were no differences in cumulative incidence of relapse (74% vs 68%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.93 (0.77-1.14), P=0.5); survival from relapse (7% vs 9%; HR 0.96 (0.77-1.19), P=0.7); relapse-free (31% vs 32%; HR 1.02 (0.83-1.24), P=0.9) or overall survival (23% vs 22%; HR 1.08 (0.93-1.26), P=0.3). Clofarabine 20 mg/m2 given for 5 days with daunorubicin is not superior to ara-C+daunorubicin as induction for older patients with AML/high-risk MDS.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Adenine Nucleotides/administration & dosage , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Arabinonucleosides/administration & dosage , Cause of Death , Clofarabine , Cytarabine/administration & dosage , Daunorubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
3.
Leukemia ; 29(6): 1312-9, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25676423

ABSTRACT

The development of new treatments for older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is an active area, but has met with limited success. Sapacitabine is a novel orally administered nucleoside analogue that has shown encouraging activity in unrandomised early-stage trials. We randomised 143 untreated patients with AML or with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (>10% marrow blasts) between sapacitibine and low-dose ara-C (LDAC) in our 'Pick a Winner' trial design. At the planned interim analysis there was no difference between LDAC and sapacitibine in terms of remission rate (CR/CRi, 27% vs 16% hazard ratio (HR) 1.98(0.90-4.39) P=0.09), relapse-free survival (10% vs 14% at 2 years, HR 0.73(0.33-1.61) P=0.4) or overall survival (OS; 12% vs 11% at 2 years, HR 1.24(0.86-1.78) P=0.2). Sapacitibine was well tolerated, apart from more grade 3/4 diarrhoea. On the basis of these findings sapacitibine did not show sufficient evidence of benefit over LDAC for the trial to be continued.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arabinonucleosides/administration & dosage , Cytarabine/administration & dosage , Cytosine/administration & dosage , Cytosine/analogs & derivatives , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Remission Induction , Survival Rate
4.
Leukemia ; 25(7): 1122-7, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21475252

ABSTRACT

Most patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) are older, with many unsuitable for conventional chemotherapy. Low-dose Ara-C (LDAC) is superior to best supportive care but is still inadequate. The combination of arsenic trioxide (ATO) and LDAC showed promise in an unrandomised study. We report a randomised trial of LDAC versus LDAC+ATO. Patients with AML according to WHO criteria or myelodysplastic syndrome with >10% blasts, considered as unfit for conventional chemotherapy, were randomised between subcutaneous Ara-C (20 mg b.d. for 10 days) and the same LDAC schedule with ATO (0.25 mg/kg) on days 1-5, 9 and 11, for at least four courses every 4 to 6 weeks. Overall 166 patients were entered; the trial was terminated on the advice of the DMC, as the projected benefit was not observed. Overall 14% of patients achieved complete remission (CR) and 7% CRi. Median survival was 5.5 months and 19 months for responders (CR: not reached; CRi: 14 months; non-responders: 4 months). There were no differences in response or survival between the arms. Grade 3/4 cardiac and liver toxicity, and supportive care requirements were greater in the ATO arm. This randomised comparison demonstrates that adding ATO to LDAC provides no benefit for older patients with AML.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Arsenic Trioxide , Arsenicals/administration & dosage , Arsenicals/adverse effects , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/etiology , Comorbidity , Cytarabine/administration & dosage , Cytarabine/adverse effects , Disease-Free Survival , Early Termination of Clinical Trials , Female , Gastrointestinal Diseases/chemically induced , Heart Diseases/chemically induced , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Acute , Male , Middle Aged , Oxides/administration & dosage , Oxides/adverse effects , Remission Induction , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...