Potential impairment of spinal cord around the apical vertebral level in hyperkyphotic patients: findings from diffusion tensor imaging.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the neuronal metrics/microstructure of the spinal cord around apical region in patients with hyperkyphosis using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with hyperkyphosis aged 45.5 ± 19.6 years old who underwent 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination with DTI sequence were prospectively enrolled from July 2022 to July 2023. Patients were divided into three groups according to spinal cord/ cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) architecture on sagittal-T2 MRI of the thoracic apex (the axial spinal cord classification): Group A-circular cord with visible CSF, Group B-circular cord without visible CSF at apical dorsal, and Group C-spinal cord deformed without intervening CSF. The fractional anisotropy (FA) values acquired from DTI were compared among different groups. Correlations between DTI parameters and global kyphosis (GK)/sagittal deformity angular ratio (sagittal DAR) were evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients. RESULTS: In all patients, FA values were significantly lower at apical level as compared with those at one level above or below the apex (0.548 ± 0.070 vs. 0.627 ± 0.056 versus 0.624 ± 0.039, P < 0.001). At the apical level, FA values were significantly lower in Group C than those in Group B (0.501 ± 0.052 vs. 0.598 ± 0.061, P < 0.001) and Group A (0.501 ± 0.052 vs. 0.597 ± 0.019, P < 0.001). Moreover, FA values were significantly lower in symptomatic group than those in non-symptomatic group (0.498 ± 0.049 v. 0.578 ± 0.065, P < 0.001). Pearson correlation analysis showed that GK (r2 = 0.3945, P < 0.001) and sagittal DAR (r2 = 0.3079, P < 0.001) were significantly correlation with FA values at apical level. CONCLUSION: In patients with hyperkyphosis, the FA of spinal cord at apical level was associated with the neuronal metrics/microstructure of the spinal cord. Furthermore, the DTI parameter of FA at apical level was associated with GK and sagittal DAR.

Cosmetic evaluation in type II congenital scoliosis with long-spanned curve: a case-matched comparison with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Background: There is an acknowledged discrepancy between radiographic and cosmetic parameters for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, no study has specifically evaluated cosmesis in patients with congenital scoliosis (CS). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the cosmetic differences between patients with CS and case-matched patients with AIS and to investigate the correlation between radiological measurements and clinical cosmetic assessment indices. Methods: A total of 37 adolescents with CS and 37 sex-, age-, and curve magnitude-matched patients with AIS were included. Cobb angle, shoulder height difference (SHD), coronal balance (CB), T1 tilt, first rib angle (FRA), clavicle angle (CA), clavicle-rib cage intersection (CRCI), and apical vertebra translation (AVT) were measured in the full X-ray of the spine. Shoulder area index 1 (SAI1), shoulder area index 2 (SAI2), shoulder angle (SA), axilla angle (AA), thoracolumbar area index (TLAI), and right and left waist angle difference (RLWAD) were measured on the clinical images from a posterior view. Hump index (HI) was measured in the forward bending photography. All patients completed the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Results: No significant difference was noted in the radiographic parameters between the AIS and CS groups (P>0.05). However, patients with CS exhibited significantly lower SAI1 (0.91 vs. 0.98; P=0.002) and SAI2 (0.85 vs. 0.95; P=0.001) than did the patients with AIS. The SRS-22 scores for self-image and mental health in patients with CS were significantly lower than those in patients with AIS (P<0.05). The correlation coefficients with statistical significance between radiographic and cosmetic measurements in patients with CS and those with AIS ranged from -0.493 to 0.534 and from -0.653 to 0.717, respectively. None of the correlation coefficients exceeded 0.8, indicating that the current radiological indices only exhibited a limited level of consistency with patients' cosmesis. Conclusions: As compared with age-, gender-, and curve pattern-matched patients with AIS, patients with CS exhibited worse cosmesis and had clinically significantly lower SRS-22 scores despite having relatively small clinical differences. Although the radiographic parameters may not always align with clinical presentation, this discrepancy could be observed in both patients with CS and those with AIS.