ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Central neuropathic pain related to spinal cord injury is notoriously difficult to treat. So far most pharmacological and surgical options have shown but poor results. Recently ziconotide has been approved for use both neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain. In this cohort study, we assessed responder rate and long-term efficacy of intrathecal ziconotide in patients with pain related to spinal cord injury. METHODS: Patients presenting chronic neuropathic related to spinal cord lesions that was refractory to medical pain management were considered for inclusion. Those accepting were tested by lumbar puncture injection of ziconotide or continuous intrathecal infusion and if a significant decrease in pain scores (>40%) was noted they were implanted with a continuous infusion pump. They were then followed up for at least 1 year with constant assessment of the evolution of pain and side effects. RESULTS: Out of the 20 patients tested 14 had a decrease in pain scores of more than 40% but only 11 (55%) were implanted with permanent pumps due to side effects and patient choice. These were followed up on average for 3.59 years (±1.94) and in eight patients an above threshold decrease in pain scores was maintained. Overall in patients that responded to the test baseline VAS was 7.91 and 4.31 at last follow-up with an average dose of 7.2 µg of ziconotide per day. Six patients (30%) did not respond to any test and in three patients side effects precluded pump implantation. No significant long-term effects of the molecule were noted. CONCLUSION: This study shows response to intrathecal ziconotide test in 40% of the patients of a very specific population in whom other therapeutic options are not available. This data justifies the development further studies such as a long-term randomized controlled trial. SIGNIFICANCE: Intrathecal Ziconotide is a posible alternative for the treatment of pain in patients with spinal cord injury and below level neuropathic pain.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Spinal Cord Injuries/drug therapy , omega-Conotoxins/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Injections, Spinal , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management , Pain MeasurementABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The capsaïcine 8% cutaneous patch (Qutenza®) was recently approved for the management of patients with peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP). Considering its limited clinical efficacy data, its improvement of medical benefit was determined to be 5 which was insufficient to support its reimbursement in addition to diagnosis related groups'tarifs. Nevertheless its commercialization was associated with a marked interest considering the unmet therapeutic needs for patients with PNP. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to assess the effectiveness, the safety, and the economic impact of Qutenza® in real-life conditions. METHODS: An observational cost-consequences study was launched under the aegis of the Drug Committee of our hospital. Medical charts and prescriptions of all patients who received at least one patch application were analyzed. Effectiveness and safety were assessed after 12-week and 24-week of follow-up. The economic impact was measured within the Hospital and Health Insurance perspective and with limitation to direct costs. RESULTS: From March 2012 to October 2013, 91 patients (54.3 ± 14.1 years; 52.7% of male) received at least one application. The average follow- up duration was 188.3 ± 86.4 days. The PNP etiologies were mainly post-surgery (42.9%) and post-traumatology (20.8%). A therapeutic response (decrease of ENS score of least 30%) after 12 weeks and 24 weeks was observed in 27.9% and 37.1% of patients respectively. The SF-36 mental score was significantly improved. The safety profile was good. The application of the patch resulted in incremental costs of 154 euros per hospital stay without impact on outpatient-prescription drug expenditures. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the interest of Qutenza® for heavily pretreated, refractory patients with PNP. The clinical profile of responders has to be further investigated in large observational studies.