Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Breast ; 49: 17-24, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31675683

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Time to First Metastatic Recurrence (TFMR) could be considered as an indirect reflection of the tumour growth kinetics which plays an important role in cancer. Molecular subtypes such as expression of estrogen receptor are known predictive factors of TFMR. The CinéBreast study aimed to identify predictive factors of the time to TFMR. METHODS: The French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Database (NCT03275311) was used, which contains data from a cohort of metastatic breast cancer patients from 2008 to 2016 using retrospective data collection. It is a national multi-centre database. The impact of TFMR on overall survival (OS) since first metastasis was also evaluated. RESULTS: Among 16 702 patients recorded in the ESME MBC database, 10 595 had an initially localised breast cancer with hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status available, with a metastatic recurrence. Median follow up was 56 months. Median TFMR was 59 months (<24: 20%, 24-60: 31%, 60-120: 25%, >120: 24%). HER2+ and TNBC were respectively 4 times and 12 times (p < 0.0001) more likely to have a recurrence within 2 years when compared to the luminal subgroup. Short TFMR and HR-/HER2-subtype significantly correlated with a poor OS in multivariate analysis. Some patients with MBC (20% in HER2+, 10% in ER+/HER2-and <5% in the ER-/HER2-) were long-term survivors in all 3 subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale real-life data study, patients with a TNBC metastatic recurrence had a shorter TFMR. Short TFMR significantly correlated with worse overall survival.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Progression-Free Survival , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Databases, Factual , Female , Follow-Up Studies , France/epidemiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology
2.
3.
Ann Oncol ; 27(9): 1725-32, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27436849

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab combined with paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has led to mixed results in randomized trials, with an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) but no statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit. Real-life data could help in assessing the value of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study aimed to describe the outcome following first-line paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) database of MBC patients, established in 2014 by Unicancer. The primary and secondary end points were OS and PFS, respectively. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2013, 14 014 MBC patient files were identified, including 10 605 patients with a HER2-negative status. Of these, 3426 received paclitaxel and bevacizumab (2127) or paclitaxel (1299) as first-line chemotherapy. OS adjusted for major prognostic factors was significantly longer in the paclitaxel and bevacizumab group compared with paclitaxel [hazard ratio (HR) 0.672, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.601-0.752; median survival time 27.7 versus 19.8 months]. Results were consistent in all supportive analyses (using a propensity score for adjustment and as a matching factor for nested case-control analyses) and sensitivity analyses. Similar results were observed for the adjusted PFS, favoring the combination (HR 0.739, 95% CI 0.672-0.813; 8.1 versus 6.4 months). CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale, real-life setting, patients with HER2-negative MBC who received paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy had a significantly better OS and PFS than those receiving paclitaxel. Despite robust methodology, real-life data are exposed to important potential biases, and therefore, results need to be treated with caution. Our data cannot therefore support extension of current use of bevacizumab in MBC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Aged , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Treatment Outcome
4.
Bull Cancer ; 94(12): 1107-11, 2007 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18156121

ABSTRACT

The French Cancer Plan 2003-2007 has made translational research central to its research programme, to ensure the care-research continuum and the quickest application possible for the most recent discoveries, for the patients' benefit. This is a new field of research, still little-known or ill-understood. A working group, composed of physicians and researchers from academic research and industrial research, sought to define translational research in cancerology and define the issues at stake in it. Translational research needs to develop in close connection with the patients in order to enable a bi-directional flow of knowledge from cognitive research toward medical applications and from observations made on patients toward cognitive research. Placed under the aegis of the French National Cancer Institute and Leem Research, the group has put forth a strategy for implementing translational research in cancerology in France to make it attractive, competitive and efficient and to foster the development of public-private partnerships.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Diffusion of Innovation , Neoplasms/therapy , Biomedical Research/standards , France , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Models, Animal , Neoplasms/genetics , Patient Participation/methods
5.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 37(7): 669-75, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16501591

ABSTRACT

Topotecan has demonstrated activity in ovarian carcinomas. In order to increase the tumour response rate and to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan, we decided to develop a high-dose phase I regimen supported by stem cell support. High-doses schedules using a 1-day single administration have MTDs of 10.5 (24 h continuous infusion (CI)) or 22.5 mg/m2 (30 min infusion). Five-day CI induces grade IV mucositis at high doses (MTD<12 mg/m2). We chose to administer topotecan in a 5-day schedule with a 30 min daily infusion. Patients were scheduled to receive one cycle of therapy. The first dose level was 4.0 mg/m2/day x 5 days. Limiting toxicities were defined as toxic death, grade IV non-haematopoietic or haematopoietic toxicity >6 weeks. From August 1998 to April 2002, 49 patients were included. Forty-three patients have completed one course and 15 have received two cycles. One patient treated at level 7 mg/m2/day died of sepsis. Median duration of grade IV neutropenia was 9 days. Two episodes of grade IV diarrhoea were observed at level 9.5 mg/m2/day. Pharmacokinetic data were linear within the dose range of 4-9.0 mg/m2/day. The MTD was reached at 9 mg/m2/day x 5 days.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/drug therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Topotecan/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Combined Modality Therapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Middle Aged , Survival Rate , Topotecan/adverse effects , Topotecan/pharmacokinetics , Treatment Outcome
6.
Leukemia ; 18(10): 1717-21, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15295607

ABSTRACT

High-dose intensification and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is widely used to consolidate patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), who have reached a stage of minimal residual disease. However, patients with persisting marrow and/or blood involvement and those who fail peripheral blood hemopoietic progenitor mobilization are excluded from ASCT. For such patients with no available graft to infuse, we developed 15 years ago, before the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapeutic era, the use of the BEAM pretransplant regimen followed only by the administration of three cytokines (erythropoietin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor). We report here on the long-term follow-up of 33 patients treated with this approach. In all, 33 NHL patients underwent the BEAM (carmustine, VP-16, cytosine-arabinoside, melphalan) followed by the administration of the three cytokines from January 1994-2000. A backup marrow, albeit infiltrated by tumor cells, had been collected earlier and stored in all. A total of 30 patients (91%) recovered normal hematopoiesis. In total, 32 patients (97%) recovered neutrophils (>500/microl) at a median of 19 days and 30 patients (91%) recovered platelets (>20,000/microl) at a median of 26 days. Age, richness of backup graft and blood-hemoglobin level at intensification had an impact on the time for hematopoietic recovery (P=0.014, P=0.014, P=0.048). The median follow-up was 62 months. Five patients died from toxicity related to the procedure. Eight patients relapsed and died. A total of 20 patients (61%) are alive, 16 (49%) in complete remission. A 5-year disease-free survival was 52+/-9%, relapse incidence 35+/-16%, mortality due to the procedure 12+/-12% and overall survival 61+/-10%. The BEAM regimen is not myeloablative. The BEAM+3CK procedure is a feasible therapeutic option that has shown efficacy in poor risk NHL patients who were not eligible for autografting because of persisting marrow/blood tumor contamination, or poor hemopoietic progenitor harvesting. It is unclear today whether some of these patients would have cleared their marrow/peripheral blood with the additional use of anti-CD20 treatment, thereby making the classical approach (BEAM followed by the infusion of a clean autograft) feasible.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carmustine/therapeutic use , Cytarabine/therapeutic use , Erythropoietin/therapeutic use , Etoposide/therapeutic use , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/drug therapy , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Adult , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Survival Rate , Time Factors
7.
Int J Hematol ; 77(2): 133-41, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12627848

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We compared the effects of the early-acting growth factors (GF), Flt-3 ligand (FL), c-Kit ligand (KL), and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), and the late-acting GF, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and megakaryocyte growth and development factor (MGDF), added alone in human long-term marrow culture (LTMC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The GF were used in primary cultures of mononuclear cells (MNC) and in cocultures of CD34+ cells on murine preestablished MS-5 stromal layers. GF activity was assessed as nonadherent and adherent progenitor cell production and cobblestone area formation at week 5. RESULTS: In this system, only FL, KL, and MGDF significantly stimulated early stages of hematopoiesis, whereas only G-CSF stimulated the proliferation of mature progenitor cells within the granulo-monocyte lineage and no effect was observed with LIF. FL displayed the strongest activity, and MGDF was more efficient than KL, both in primary cultures of MNC and in cocultures of CD34+ cells. However, the stimulatory effects of these GF used alone were dependent on the presence of a stromal layer. CONCLUSION: These LTMC data emphasize the particular roles for FL and MGDF in the stimulation of primitive hematopoiesis.


Subject(s)
Growth Substances/pharmacology , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/cytology , Interleukin-6 , Animals , Antigens, CD34 , Bone Marrow Cells/cytology , Cell Culture Techniques/methods , Cell Division/drug effects , Coculture Techniques , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/pharmacology , Growth Inhibitors/pharmacology , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/drug effects , Humans , Leukemia Inhibitory Factor , Lymphokines/pharmacology , Membrane Proteins/pharmacology , Mice , Stem Cell Factor/pharmacology , Stromal Cells/cytology , Thrombopoietin/pharmacology , Time Factors
8.
Lancet ; 354(9184): 1092-3, 1999 Sep 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10509503

ABSTRACT

We show that absolute and severe neutropenia after high-dose therapy with melphalan with or without total body irradiation can be abrogated by cells generated ex vivo. This may change the clinical practice of haematopoietic cell transplantation and high-dose chemotherapy because the morbidity and hospitalisation associated with neutropenia could be avoided or reduced.


Subject(s)
Antigens, CD34/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Melphalan/adverse effects , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Neutropenia/therapy , Adult , Antigens, CD34/blood , Antigens, CD34/isolation & purification , Cells, Cultured , Combined Modality Therapy , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/immunology , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/radiotherapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...