Selective inner muscle layer myotomy is associated with lower pain and same clinical efficacy that full-thickness myotomy in patients treated by POEM for achalasia: A multicenter retrospective comparative analysis of 158 patients.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the impact of the depth of myotomy (selective inner layer myotomy (SIM) vs. full-thickness myotomy (FTM)) on the outcome of patients treated with POEM for achalasia. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, conducted in two tertiary centers between October 2018 and September 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: SIM and FTM. The primary endpoint was clinical efficacy at 6 months, while secondary endpoints were postoperative criteria (such as pain, length of hospital stay, complications) and occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (esophagitis at 6 months, heartburn, and pH-metry). RESULTS: 158 patients were included in the study (33 in the FTM group and 125 in the SIM group). The success rates at 6 and 12 months were similar in both groups, with 84 % and 70 % in the SIM group versus 90 % and 80 % in the FTM group, respectively (p = 0.57 and p = 0.74). However, more opioid analgesics were consumed in the FTM group compared to the SIM group (41% vs 21 %, p < 0.01). The length of hospitalization was longer in the FTM group than in the SIM group (2.17 ± 2.62 vs 2.94 ± 2.33, p < 0.001). The rate of esophagitis at 6 months was comparable (16 % in the SIM group vs 12 % in the FTM group, p = 0.73). There was no significant difference in terms of heartburn at 6 or 12 months between the SIM and FTM groups (18.5% vs 3.8 %, p = 0.07 and 27% vs 12.5 %, p = 0.35, respectively). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in terms of clinical efficacy and GERD occurrence between FTM and SIM. However, full-thickness myotomy was associated with more postoperative pain and a longer length of hospital stay. Therefore, selective internal myotomy should be preferred over full-thickness myotomy.

Real-world comparison of the effectiveness between ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis exposed to at least one anti-TNF agent.

BACKGROUND: Both vedolizumab and ustekinumab can be considered for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) but head-to-head trials are lacking. AIM: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of vedolizumab and ustekinumab after anti-TNF failure in UC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter study, we included consecutive adult patients with UC, with partial Mayo score >2 and prior anti-TNF exposure, treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab between January 2019 and August 2022. Comparisons were performed using propensity score analyses (inverse probability of treatment weighting). RESULTS: Among a total of 293 patients included, 151 and 142 received vedolizumab and ustekinumab, respectively. After propensity-score analysis, steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) (Mayo score partial ≤ 2) was achieved at week 16 in 38.0% and 40.3%, of patients treated with vedolizumab and ustekinumab, respectively (aOR = 1.11 [0.39-3.13], p = 0.85). Rate of SFCR in patients exposed to one line, 2 lines and 3 lines of biologics/small molecules among patients treated with vedolizumab and ustekinumab were respectively 53.3% vs 62.1% (p=0.52), 44.4% vs 33.8% (p=0.52) and 2.6% vs 19.1% (p=0.027). Endoscopic remission (SFCR and endoscopic Mayo score ≤1) and histological remission (SFCR, endoscopic remission and Nancy histological index ≤1) at W16 were achieved in respectively, 5.3% vs 17.5% (aOR = 3.77 [1.25-11.36], p=0.018) and 2.1% vs 11.1% (aOR = 5.85 [1.47-23.30], p=0.012) in vedolizumab and ustekinumab groups. No difference regarding the risk of drug discontinuation between the two groups (aHR = 1.03 [0.51-2.08], p = 0.92) were observed. While no factor was identified for vedolizumab, primary failure to at least one biologic/small molecule (OR=0.31, 95%CI [0.11-0.82], p=0.018) was significantly associated with decreased rate of SFCR among patients treated with ustekinumab. CONCLUSION: While no difference in terms of short-term clinical remission was observed, ustekinumab appears to be more effective than vedolizumab to induce endoscopic and histological remission at week 16 after failure of anti-TNFs in UC.

Long-term Outcome of Risankizumab in Crohn's Disease: a Real-world GETAID Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of risankizumab maintenance treatment in a large real-world cohort of patients with Crohn's Disease (CD). METHODS: From May 2021 to August 2023, all consecutive patients with CD treated with risankizumab in 25 GETAID centers have been retrospectively included. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index [HBI] <5) at 52 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 174 patients included, 99%, 93%, and 96% had been previously exposed to anti-TNF, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab, respectively. All patients had received ≥3 biologics, and 108 (62%) had previous intestinal resection. Median follow-up was 13.7 months (interquartile range, 10.0-18.1 months). The rates of steroid-free clinical remission and clinical remission at week 26 were 47% (72/152) and 52% (79/152), and 46% (58/125), and 48% (60/125) at week 52, respectively. Risankizumab persistence rates were 94%, 89%, and 79% at weeks 12, 26, and 52, respectively. At the end of follow-up, 45 (45/174; 26%) patients had discontinued risankizumab (loss of response, 42%; primary failure, 37%; intolerance, 13%). Thirty-six patients (36/174; 20.9%) were hospitalized, and 22 (22/174; 12.6%) required intestinal resection. Fifty-one patients (29%) had an adverse event, including 26 (15%) serious adverse events (CD flare, n = 17). One death (myocardial infarction) and one cancer (papillary thyroid carcinoma) were observed. CONCLUSION: This is the first real-life study to report long-term outcomes in patients with refractory CD treated with risankizumab. One-half of the patients achieved steroid-free clinical remission after 1 year, and the safety profile was consistent with the literature.

Effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided choledochoduodenostomy vs. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage for jaundice in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Retrospective, multicenter study (GALLBLADEUS Study).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) vs. EUS-gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) in cases of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for jaundice resulting from malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with obstructive jaundice secondary to MDBO who underwent EUS-GBD or EUS-CDS with lumen-apposing metal stents after failed ERCP. The primary end-point was clinical success rate. Secondary end-points were technical success, periprocedural adverse events rate (<24 h), late adverse events rate (>24 h), overall survival, and time to recurrent biliary obstruction. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were included: 41 underwent EUS-GBD and 37 underwent EUS-CDS. MDBO was mainly the result of pancreatic cancer (n = 63/78, 80.7%). Clinical success rate was similar for both procedures: 87.8% for EUS-GBD and 89.2% for EUS-CDS (P = 0.8). Technical success rate was 100% for EUS-GBD and 94.6% for EUS-CDS (P = 0.132). Periprocedural morbidity (<24 h) rates were similar between both groups: 4/41 (9.8%) for EUS-GBD and 5/37 (13.5%) for EUS-CDS (P = 0.368). There was a significantly higher rate of late morbidity (>24 h) among patients in the EUS-CDS group (8/37 [21.6%]) than in the EUS-GBD group (3/41 [7.3%]) (P = 0.042). The median follow-up duration was 4.7 months. Overall survival and time to recurrent biliary obstruction did not significantly differ between the groups. DISCUSSION: After failed ERCP for MDBO, EUS-GBD and EUS-CDS show comparable clinical success rates and technical success. EUS-GBD appears to be a promising alternative for MDBO, even as a second-line treatment after failed ERCP. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and compare the long-term outcomes of EUS-GBD and EUS-CDS.

The risk of COVID-19 in IBD patients is increased by urban living and is not influenced by disease activity or intravenous biologics.

Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may have a modified immune response to SARS-CoV-2. The objectives were to evaluate the prevalence of COVID-19 in patients treated with infliximab or vedolizumab, to analyze the factors associated with the infection, the impact of treatments and trough levels. Methods: Patients with IBD treated with intravenous biologics in 14 French centers were included between March and June 2020 and followed-up for 6 months. Blood samples were collected for serologies and trough levels. The analysis of factors associated with COVID-19 was conducted in a matched 1:1 case-control sub-study with positive patients. Results: In total, 1026 patients were included (74.9% infliximab). Over the follow-up period, 420 patients reported the occurrence of COVID-19 symptoms; 342 had been tested of whom 18 were positive. At the end of follow-up, 38 patients had a positive serology. Considering both nasal tests and serologies together, 46 patients (4.5%) had been infected. The risk of COVID-19 was related neither to the use of treatments (whatever the trough levels) nor to disease activity. Infections were more frequent when using public transport or living in flats in urban areas. Conclusions: The prevalence rate of COVID-19 in this IBD population treated with intravenous infliximab or vedolizumab was the same as the one in the French population before the start of the vaccination campaign. The risk was increased by urban living and was not influenced by disease activity or biologics. Sanitary barrier measures remain the best way to protect against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with IBD in biological therapy.

Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Extraintestinal Manifestations and Their Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The EXTRA-Intestinal Manifestation Prospective Study From the Groupe d'Etude Thérapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du Tube Digestif.

INTRODUCTION: Extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are challenging clinical situation. No prospective study assessed remission risk factors of EIMs. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the epidemiology, risk factors of EIM occurrence, and EIM remission in a large IBD cohort. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 30 French referral centers. Between May 2021 and June 2021, all consecutive patients attending to hospital appointment were systematically invited to fill out a questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 1,971 consecutive patients with IBD were analyzed. There were 1,056 women (53.8%), and the median age of patients was 41 years (31-54). The median disease duration was 11 years (1-18). Overall, 544 (27.6%) had at least 1 EIM. In 20.2% of cases, patients had multiple EIMs. The most frequent EIMs were rheumatological (19%) and dermatological (10%) manifestations. Immunosuppressant treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 2.56; P < 0.001) was a risk factor of EIM, while the Montreal A3 classification (OR = 0.61, P = 0.023) and male gender (OR = 0.61, P < 0.001) were associated with a lower risk of EIM occurrence. IBD current clinical remission (OR = 2.42; P < 0.001) and smoking cessation (OR = 2.98; P < 0.001) were associated factors of EIM remission. Conversely, age at IBD diagnosis (OR = 0.98; P < 0.018) was associated with a lower risk of EIM remission. DISCUSSION: One quarter of patients had at least 1 EIM. Beyond factors associated with the presence of EIMs, patients with IBD current clinical remission and smoking cessation are more likely to achieve EIM remission, while increasing age at IBD diagnosis is associated with decreased chance of remission.

Use of endoscopic submucosal dissection or full-thickness resection device to treat residual colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic resection: a multicenter historical cohort study.

INTRODUCTION : Residual colorectal neoplasia (RCN) after previous endoscopic mucosal resection is a frequent challenge. Different management techniques are feasible including endoscopic full-thickness resection using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) system and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these two techniques for the treatment of such lesions. METHODS : All consecutive patients with RCN treated either using the FTRD or by ESD were retrospectively included in this multicenter study. The primary outcome was the R0 resection rate, defined as an en bloc resection with histologically tumor-free lateral and deep margins. RESULTS : 275 patients (median age 70 years; 160 men) who underwent 177 ESD and 98 FTRD procedures for RCN were included. R0 resection was achieved in 83.3 % and 77.6 % for ESD and FTRD, respectively (P = 0.25). Lesions treated by ESD were however larger than those treated by FTRD (P < 0.001). The R0 rates for lesions of 20-30 mm were 83.9 % and 57.1 % in the ESD and FTRD groups, respectively, and for lesions of 30-40 mm were 93.6 % and 33.3 %, respectively. On multivariable analysis, ESD procedures were associated with statistically higher en bloc and R0 resection rates after adjustment for lesion size (P = 0.02 and P < 0.001, respectively). The adverse event rate was higher in the ESD group (16.3 % vs. 5.1 %), mostly owing to intraoperative perforations. CONCLUSION: ESD is effective in achieving R0 resection for RCN whatever the size and location of the lesions. When residual lesions are smaller than 20 mm, the FTRD is an effective alternative.

Management of the Zenker diverticulum: multicenter retrospective comparative study of open surgery and rigid endoscopy versus flexible endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Zenker's diverticulum is a rare disease that affects quality of life due to dysphagia and regurgitation. This condition can be treated by various surgical or endoscopic methods. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Patients treated for Zenker's diverticulum in three centers in the south of France between 2014 and 2019 were included. The primary objective was clinical efficacy. Secondary objectives were technical success, morbidities, recurrences, and need for a new procedure. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four patients with a total of one hundred sixty-five procedures performed were included. A significant difference was found between the different groups in terms of clinical success (97% for open surgery versus 79% for rigid endoscopy versus 90% for flexible endoscopy, p = 0.009). Technical failure occurred more frequently in the rigid endoscopy group than in the flexible endoscopy and surgical groups (p = 0.014). Median procedure duration, median time to resumption of feeding, and hospital discharge were statistically shorter for endoscopies than for open surgery. On the other hand, more recurrences occurred in patients treated by endoscopy than those treated by surgery, and more reinterventions were required. CONCLUSION: Flexible endoscopy appears to be as effective and safe as open surgery in the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. Endoscopy allows a shorter hospital stay at the expense of a higher risk of recurrence of symptoms. It could be used as an alternative to open surgery for the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum, especially in frail patients.

Endoscopic resection of early esophageal tumors in patients with cirrhosis or portal hypertension: a multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: Liver cirrhosis and esophageal cancer share several risk factors, such as alcohol intake and excess weight. Endoscopic resection is the gold standard treatment for superficial tumors. Portal hypertension and coagulopathy may increase the bleeding risk in these patients. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection for early esophageal neoplasia in patients with cirrhosis or portal hypertension. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter international study included consecutive patients with cirrhosis or portal hypertension who underwent endoscopic resection in the esophagus from January 2005 to March 2021. RESULTS: 134 lesions in 112 patients were treated, including by endoscopic submucosal dissection in 101 cases (75 %). Most lesions (128/134, 96 %) were in patients with liver cirrhosis, with esophageal varices in 71 procedures. To prevent bleeding, 7 patients received a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, 8 underwent endoscopic band ligation (EBL) before resection, 15 received vasoactive drugs, 8 received platelet transfusion, and 9 underwent EBL during the resection procedure. Rates of complete macroscopic resection, en bloc resection, and curative resection were 92 %, 86 %, and 63 %, respectively. Adverse events included 3 perforations, 8 delayed bleedings, 8 sepsis, 6 cirrhosis decompensations within 30 days, and 22 esophageal strictures; none required surgery. In univariate analysis, cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection was associated with delayed bleeding (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with liver cirrhosis or portal hypertension, endoscopic resection of early esophageal neoplasia appeared to be effective and should be considered in expert centers with choice of resection technique, following European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines to avoid undertreatment.

Preoperative Predictors of Neoplasia in Patients Undergoing Small Bowel Resection for Complicated Crohn's Disease: A Multicentre Case-Control Study.

Crohn's disease (CD) is associated with an increased risk of small bowel neoplasia (SBN). We aimed to assess preoperative predictors of SBN in CD patients. We conducted a retrospective case-control study including CD patients who underwent surgery: cases were diagnosed with SBN on histopathological analysis and controls had no neoplasia. Preoperative cross-sectional imaging was reviewed by a panel of blinded expert radiologists. Fifty cases were matched to one hundred and fifty consecutive controls. In multivariable analysis, predictors of SBN were age ≥ 50 years (OR = 28, 95% CI = 5.05-206), median CD duration ≥ 17.5 years (OR = 4.25, 95% CI = 1.33-14.3), and surgery for stricture (OR = 5.84, 95% CI = 1.27-35.4). The predictors of small bowel adenocarcinoma were age ≥ 50 years (OR = 5.14, 95% CI = 2.12-12.7), CD duration ≥ 15 years (OR = 5.65, 95% CI = 2.33-14.3), and digestive wall thickening > 8 mm (OR = 3.79, 95% CI = 1.45-11.3). A predictive score based on the aforementioned factors was constructed. Almost 73.7% of patients with a high score had SBA. Old age, long small bowel CD duration, and stricture predicted the presence of SBN, particularly adenocarcinoma when patients have digestive wall thickening > 8 mm on preoperative imaging.