Unique portal venous phase imaging discordance between CEUS and MRI: a valuable predictor of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma?

PURPOSE: We have long noted unique portal venous phase (PVP) imaging discordance of focal liver masses between CEUS, showing rapid marked washout, and MRI, showing progressive or sustained enhancement. We postulate association of this unique discordance with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and causal relationship to different contrast agent behavior. We investigate this unique discordance, propose its clinical significance for ICC diagnosis, and confirm further histologic associations. METHODS: Cases were collected within our CEUS department and from pathology records over a ten-year interval. This retrospective review includes 99 patients, 73 with confirmed ICC and 26 other diagnoses, showing unique PVP discordance. The CEUS and MRI enhancement characteristics were compared for all patients. RESULTS: Unique discordance is identified in 67/73 (92%) ICC and difference between the PVP appearance on MRI and CEUS is statistically significant (p <  0.0001). Arterial phase enhancement did not show statistically significant difference between CEUS and MRI, p >  0.05. Other diagnoses showing unique discordance include especially lymphoma (n = 7), sclerosed hemangioma (n = 6), HCC (n = 4), metastases (n = 2), and other rare entities. CONCLUSION: ICC shows this discrepant intermodality enhancement pattern in a statistically significant number of cases and should be considered along with other LR-M features in at-risk patients. Discordance is also rarely seen in a number of other liver lesions.

Nodules Identified on Surveillance Ultrasound for HCC: CEUS or MRI as the Initial Test?

OBJECTIVES: Following positive surveillance ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended for further characterization. We propose contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) shows equivalent efficacy. METHODS: This prospective institutional review board approved study recruited 195 consecutive at-risk patients with a positive surveillance US. All had CEUS and MRI. Biopsy (n = 44) and follow-up are gold standard. MRI and CEUS results are classified according to liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) and patient outcome. RESULTS: As an US-based modality, CEUS is superior in confirming findings from surveillance US, correlation in 189/195 (97%) on CEUS compared to 153/195 (79%) on MRI. Within these negative MRI examinations, there are 2 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 1 cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) diagnosed on CEUS and proven by biopsy. From 195 patients, there are 71 malignant diagnoses from all sources, including 58 LR-5 (45 on MRI and 54 on CEUS) and 13 others, including HCC outside of LR-5 category, and LR-M with biopsy proven iCCA (3 on MRI and 6 on CEUS). CEUS and MRI show concordant results in the majority of patients (146/195, 75%), including 57/146 malignant and 89/146 benign diagnoses. There are 41/57 concordant LR-5 and 6/57 concordant LR-M. When CEUS and MRI are discordant, CEUS upgraded 20 (10 biopsy-proven) from MRI LR-3/4 to CEUS LR-5 or LR-M by showing washout (WO) that MRI failed to show. Additionally, CEUS characterized time and intensity of WO and diagnosed 13/20 LR-5 by showing late and weak WO and 7 LR-M by showing fast and marked WO. CEUS is 81% sensitive and 92% specific in diagnosing malignancy. MRI is 64% sensitive and 93% specific. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS performance is at least equivalent if not superior to MRI for initial evaluation of lesions from surveillance US.