Introduction of a standardized protocol for cardiac risk assessment in candidates for liver transplant - A retrospective cohort analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Recommendations on non-invasive imaging to assess pre-operative cardiac risk among liver transplant candidates vary amongst societal guidelines and individual institutional practices. In 2018, a standardized pre-transplant coronary evaluation protocol was established at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA, to ensure appropriate and consistent pre-operative testing was performed. METHODS: All patients who underwent liver transplant evaluation between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2019, were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three cohorts; before the introduction of the protocol (prior to 2018), initial protocol favoring invasive coronary angiography (ICA) (2018), and amended protocol favoring coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) (post-2018). We described clinical characteristics, candidacy for transplant, and cardiovascular complications during follow-up. As an unadjusted exploratory analysis, the Cochran-Armitage Exact Trend Test was used to examine univariate differences across time. RESULTS: A total of 462 patients underwent liver transplant evaluation during the study period. Among these, 218 (47.2%) patients underwent stress test, 50 (10.8%) underwent CCTA, and 68 (14.8%) underwent ICA. Across the three time periods, there was an increase in the proportion of CCTAs performed (3%, 6.3%, and 26.3% respectively; p <0.001) and proportion of patients diagnosed with obstructive CAD using CCTA (0%, 30%, and 51.4% respectively; p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in post-transplant cardiac complications among patients evaluated before 2018, during 2018, and after 2018 (5.9% vs. 5.6 vs. 6.0%; p=1.0). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest it is reasonable to shift practice to a less invasive approach utilizing CCTA or nuclear stress testing when assessing liver transplant candidates at increased cardiovascular risk.

Impact of an Outpatient Cardiology-managed Urgent Access and Observation Unit on Hospital Admissions.

INTRODUCTION: Alternatives to the emergency department (ED) for expedient and high-value team-based cardiology care for patients with chest pain, volume overload, palpitations, and other urgent, but not life-threatening cardiac conditions are lacking. Here, we report on the development of the Cardiac Direct Access Unit (CDAc), an ambulatory cardiology unit with exam rooms, observation bays, and an advanced heart failure clinic. METHODS: Patients referred to the CDAc are seen same-day by an attending cardiologist in a space independent from the ED. We performed a retrospective review of 1146 consecutive patients referred to the CDAc in its first year of operation. Among patients who were referred for urgent same-day evaluation, 60.1% were discharged home without observation. RESULTS: Among the patients observed or directly discharged from CDAc, 2.4% were readmitted within 30 days for a related symptom. The highest rate of readmission (7.5%) was for heart failure, which compares favorably with guidelines for readmission benchmarks. CONCLUSION: Our first year of data suggests that a cardiology-directed observation unit may serve as a high-value alternative to the ED for appropriately selected patients.