Population pharmacokinetics and dynamics in phase II studies of the novel bioreductive alkylating cytotoxic indoloquinone EO9.

Population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis was prospectively integrated in the clinical phase II programme of EO9 to determine the population pharmacokinetic profile in a larger population of patients, to estimate individual patient pharmacokinetic parameters, and to investigate relationships between drug exposure and clinical outcome. A sparse sampling method was developed, which involved three sampling times, and was implemented during course 1. A Bayesian algorithm was used to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, in particular total plasma clearance (CL) of EO9 and area under the curve (AUC). In total, samples were collected of 85 (65%) of the patients. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was successful in 61 (72%) of the sampled patients. CL of EO9 showed substantial variability (median 5.08 l/min; range 2.67-6.42) and was of the same magnitude as in the phase I study where full pharmacokinetic profiles were used. No significant relationships were noticed between exposure parameters and safety, but overall limited toxicity was observed. No tumor responses were documented. Prospective implementation of large-scale population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis is feasible and may generate important findings, in particular when tumor responses and relevant toxicity are observed.

Interleukin-2, interferon-alpha and interleukin-2 plus interferon-alpha in renal cell carcinoma. A randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon (IFN), either alone or in combination, in comparable groups of patients affected by advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In order to limit selection biases, treatment was allocated on a random basis. Patients randomized to IL-2 alone were scheduled to receive eight rlL-2 24-hour i.v. infusion cycles, days 1 to 4, at a daily dose of 18 x 10(6) lU/m2 for a total of 25 weeks. Patients randomized to IFN alone were scheduled to receive rIFN-alpha at a daily dose of 6 x 10(6) IU/m2, days 1, 3 and 5, every week for a total of 52 weeks. Patients randomized to the combination of IFN and IL-2 were given the same drugs at the same daily doses for a total of 24 weeks. Drug dose was modified according to toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-three percent (95% CI:+/-17.5) of patients treated with IL-2 alone showed an objective response to treatment (9% CR). The corresponding figures in patients treated with IFN alone or IFN plus IL-2 were 9% (95% CI:+/-11.9) and 9% (95% CI:+/-11.9), respectively. Complete responses were observed only in patients treated with IL-2. The median duration of response in the IL-2 arm was 18 months (range, 9.5-24). The duration of the two responses achieved by IFN alone was seven and nine months, respectively. The corresponding figures in the two patients responding to the combination of IFN with IL-2 were 19 and 27 months, respectively. Total IL-2 dose appeared to be a major predictor of response. Only a minority of patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicity, the incidence being higher in those treated with IL-2 or IL-2 plus IFN. CONCLUSIONS: Neither IFN nor IL-2 or the combination of the two appear to be very active in patients with advanced RCC, even when trial entry was restricted to patients with relatively indolent disease. This stresses the need for the development of new approaches.

Paclitaxel as salvage therapy in advanced pretreated ovarian cancer: a phase II study.

The response rate to salvage chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer has been disappointing in patients who do not respond or who relapse after platinum-containing regimens. In these cases, the identification of new drugs is a substantial challenge. The efficacy of one of these, paclitaxel, has already been assessed in many phase II trials. From July 1993 to October 1995, 33 patients with advanced ovarian cancer, recurrent or refractory after platinum-based regimens, entered our study. Paclitaxel was given by 3-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. All the patients were evaluable for toxicity and 27 for response. Nine patients (33.3%) responded: 6 complete (22.2%) and 3 partial responses (11.1%). Six responses (35.3%) were observed in the 17 platinum-resistant patients and 3 (30%) in the 10 platinum-responders. World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3-4 neutropenia was common (13/33 patients, 39.4%) and peripheral neurotoxicity was observed in 29 patients (87.8%), but was WHO grade 3 in four cases (12.1%). Alopecia was ubiquitous, whereas other toxic effects were not significant. The overall response rate to paclitaxel in this study is similar to that reported in others and the high complete response (CR) rate should be emphasized. These data confirm the significant activity and safety of this drug in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, even in platinum-resistant cases.

Paclitaxel neurotoxicity: clinical and neurophysiological study of 23 patients.

Paclitaxel is the prototype of a new class of chemotherapeutic agents with an antimitotic effect that is related to its ability to interfere with the microtubule system. It causes peripheral neurological toxicity by means of its activity on the axonal microtubules. To define the clinical and neurophysiological characteristics of paclitaxel neuropathy 23 patients undergoing paclitaxel therapy at a dose of 175 mg/m2 were studied. The patients were divided into two groups, with only one group receiving pretreatment with potentially neurotoxic drugs such as cisplatin and carboplatin. The results showed a high incidence of mild neurotoxicity in both groups. Treatment was discontinued due to severe neurotoxicity in only one patient pretreated with platinum-compounds. The clinical and neurophysiological data make it possible to define paclitaxel neurotoxicity as a distal axonal neuropathy with a summatory effect in patients pretreated with cisplatin; the possible reversibility of paclitaxel neurotoxicity requires further confirmation.

Prolonged infusion gemcitabine: a clinical phase I study at low- (300 mg/m2) and high-dose (875 mg/m2) levels.

Gemcitabine (GEM) is a novel nucleoside analogue with a unique mechanism of action. Preliminary studies have shown a mild, schedule-dependent toxic profile with a broad range of MTDs and promising antitumor activity in various solid tumors. This phase I study describes the infusion length-effect relationships of low- (300 mg/m2) and high-dose (875 mg/m2) GEM, administered on days 1, 8 and 15 at 4-week intervals in a step-wise escalation of duration (> or = 33%) at a starting level of 60 minutes. At least 3 patients entered each infusion-level step and 3 more cases were treated in the presence of significant toxicity. Conservative criteria for toxicity were employed, including treatment delay until recovery with infusion de-escalation in the subsequent course. Forty-seven patients (29 at low- and 18 at high-dose GEM levels) with various solid tumors, including 9 (taken as a reference) who had received the same dose levels over 30 min. entered the study. All but 9 patients (with pancreatic cancer) had been previously treated with chemotherapy and all had extensive visceral disease. A striking infusional-effect relationship was observed at both GEM dose levels. Four escalation steps were required to define the maximum tolerated infusion time (MTIT) at 6 hours for 300 mg/m2 GEM, with leucopenia being dose-limiting. At 875 mg/m2, although no limiting toxicity was observed (in spite of increased severity of leucopenia), no escalation was attempted following the 1-hour infusion, due to the limiting rate (58% of 12 patients) of toxic delay requiring shorter infusions. Toxicity was usually mild (no grade 4 event was recorded) showing the usual profile, although there was a trend towards increased non-hematologic toxicity (i.e. LFT abnormalities) as compared with the MTD previously defined using a 30-min. infusion schedule (1,370 mg/m2). Eight patients achieved a PR: 1 with NSCLC, 1 with gastric and 2 with bladder cancer at 300 mg/m2 (1 with a 3- and 3 with a 6-hour infusion) and 2 with pancreatic, 1 with cervical and another with bladder cancer at 875 mg/m2 (all but one with a 1-hour infusion). These data clearly suggest that the infusion duration is an important independent factor that influences the clinical effects of GEM. The present study not only defined the toxic profiles and the MTITs of the selected dose levels but demonstrated that GEM retained the antitumor activity at doses as small as 300 mg/m2 when given as a prolonged infusion. Further studies should clarify the underlying mechanism(s) responsible for the erratic dose-effect dose-effect relationships of GEM and establish the optimal dose-infusion level in the treatment of solid tumors.

Delay in progression of bone metastases in breast cancer patients treated with intravenous pamidronate: results from a multinational randomized controlled trial. The Aredia Multinational Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: Bone metastases are a major cause of morbidity in breast cancer, resulting in complications that include pain, loss of mobility, pathologic fracture, and tumor-induced hypercalcemia (TIH). Inhibition of osteoclast-mediated bone destruction using bisphosphonates represents a promising new management approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients with bone metastases were randomly allocated to receive chemotherapy alone (152 patients) or chemotherapy plus pamidronate 45 mg in 250 mL of saline as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks (143 patients). Whenever possible, treatment continued until progression of disease (PD) in bone appeared on radiographs or bone scan. Time to PD in bone and pain reduction according to a self-assessment six-point scale were selected as primary end points. PD in bone was verified during extramural review (EMR) of all imaging studies by blinded observers, and these data were used as the main efficacy criterion. Analgesic intake, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status, and complications of bone metastases (radiotherapy, TIH, fractures, orthopedic surgery) were also compared in the two groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: At EMR, median time to PD in bone was increased by 48% in patients who received pamidronate (249 v 168 days; P = .02, Wilcoxon test). Marked pain relief, defined as a two-point decrease lasting for > or = 6 weeks, was reported by 44% of pamidronate patients and by 30% of controls (P = .025, chi 2 test). The infusions (median, nine per patient; range, 0 to 39) were well tolerated, with no major toxicities reported. Pamidronate by repeated infusion can significantly slow the progression of bone metastases and reduce attendant morbidity.

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation versus dexamethasone, cisplatin, and cytarabine in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with partial response to front-line chemotherapy: a prospective randomized italian multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate, in a prospective multicentric study, the efficacy of a conventional salvage chemotherapy (dexamethasone, cisplatin, and cytarabine [DHAP]) versus high-dose chemotherapy (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide [BEAC]) followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in clinical partial response (PR) after two thirds of a conventional front-line therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 1988 to August 1991, 286 patients with aggressive NHL were randomized in seven Italian institutions to receive fluorouracil, methotrexate, cytarabine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (F-MACHOP) or methotrexate with leucovorin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin (MACOP-B) as front-line therapy. Of the 286 patients enrolled onto the trial, 77 (27%) were considered in PR after two thirds of the front-line therapy, and 49 of 77 (64%) were randomized: 27 to receive DHAP chemotherapy and 22 to receive BEAC followed by ABMT. RESULTS: The response after second-line treatment was as follows: in the DHAP group, four patients (15%) achieved a complete remission (CR), 12 (44%) remained in stable PR, and 11 (41%) showed progressive disease; in the ABMT group, three patients (14%) obtained a CR, 18 (82%) obtained a stable PR, and one (4%) progressed, with an overall response (CR + stable PR) of 59% and 96% (P < .001) in the DHAP and ABMT groups, respectively. The overall survival was 59% versus 73% and the progression-free survival (PFS) was 52% versus 73% in the DHAP and ABMT groups, respectively (P, not significant). The toxicity was mild, particularly in the ABMT group, and no treatment-related deaths occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: Because of the small number of patients randomized, we were unable to determine whether ABMT or a standard salvage regimen (DHAP) is superior for PR patients. However, we confirmed that myeloablative treatment is a safe and well-tolerated procedure in this category of patients and this may enable us to evaluate its role as part of a front-line treatment in poor-risk NHL patients.

A combination of ifosfamide and mitoxantrone as salvage therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Ifosfamide (IFX) and mitoxantrone (MXN) have been found to be effective against advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The combination of these two agents has not yet been tested in this setting but seems to be rational, given the different action mechanisms of these drugs and their not completely overlapping side effects. Between June 1987 and November 1991, 37 patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma recurrent or refractory to primary cisplatin-based chemotherapy entered the study. Therapy consisted of MXN, given i.v. at 10 mg/m2 on day 1 and IFX given i.v. at 2,000 mg/m2 per day on days 1-3 with mesna. The cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Four patients achieved a complete remission and three achieved a partial remission, for response rates of 18.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.3-31.5%] in the whole sample and 38.8% (95% CI 16.3-61.3%) in the subset of 18 patients responding to first-line cisplatin. No response was obtained in the remaining patients, whose disease was refractory to primary platinum-based chemotherapy. Clinically significant toxicity (WHO grades 3-4) included leukopenia in 46% of the patients and anemia in 32.5%. The non-hematologic toxicity was mild, except for reversible alopecia (57%) and nausea and vomiting (48.5%). This regimen seems attractive for patients who have either failed or not received platinum retreatment, especially when limiting neurotoxicity occurs. Further studies are warranted to establish the relative impact of both of these agents.

Final report of a phase II study of interleukin 2 and interferon alpha in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Fifty-seven patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with interleukin 2 (IL-2) 7.8 MIU m-2 day-1 as a continuous infusion for 4 days combined with interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) 6 MIU m-2 day-1 subcutaneously on days 1 and 4. The cycle was repeated every 2 weeks for a maximum number of 13 cycles. Of the 51 evaluable patients, one (2%) achieved a complete and seven (14%) a partial response (total response rate 16%; CI 7-29%). Median time to progression and median survival were 2.5 and 11.3 months respectively. This regimen of IL-2 and IFN-alpha appeared to be only moderately active.

Biological response modifiers.

Biological response modifiers (BRMs) of current clinical interest may be divided into two categories: immunomodulating agents and colony stimulating factors (CSFs). The first are employed to potentiate the host defences towards the tumor but results have proved disappointing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With regard to the second, the real dose increment which may be ascribed to CSFs is not sufficient to overcome chemoresistance of NSCLCs. CSFs can, however, reduce the hematologic toxicity of chemotherapy, which represents the most significant result.

Oral doxifluridine in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer chemotherapy in elderly patients is an important and under-researched area. Doxifluridine is a fluoropyrimidine derivative and is activated to 5-fluorouracil by uridine phosphorylase, which is more highly expressed in malignant cells. Because of the high bioavailability and low toxicity of oral doxifluridine we conducted this phase II trial to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and activity of a home therapy with oral doxifluridine in elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients entered the study: their median ECOG performance status was 1 (0-2) and median age 74 years (69-83), the predominant site of metastasis was liver and all but one of the patients had received no previous chemotherapy. Doxifluridine was given orally at the initial daily total dose of 2250 mg for 4 consecutive days every week. The daily dose was reduced to 1500 mg if toxicities greater than grade 2 (WHO) occurred. RESULTS: Forty-two patients are evaluable for toxicity: treatment was well tolerated, with the most common side effect being diarrhea, severe in 7 (17%) patients (6 grade 3 and 1 grade 4). Thirty-six patients are evaluable for response and 2 complete and 3 partial responses have been observed (response rate 14%; 95% confidence limit interval 5%-29%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a home therapy with oral doxifluridine in elderly advanced colorectal cancer patients is feasible, with a relatively low rate of toxicity, and has moderate activity, comparable to that of intravenous 5-fluorouracil. Therefore, this treatment may be considered for the management of advanced colorectal cancer in the elderly.

Phase II studies of Elsamitrucin in breast cancer, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and ovarian cancer. EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group.

PURPOSE: To test the antitumor activity of Elsamitrucin in metastatic cancer of the breast, colon and rectum, non-small cell lung and ovary. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility required histologically proven cancer. Patients with colorectal or non-small cell lung cancer could not have received prior chemotherapy. Patients were entered if WHO PS was < or = 2 and organ functions were normal. Treatment consisted of Elsamitrucin 25 mg/m2/week given as a 5-10 min infusion for at least 3-6 weekly doses. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients entered the studies, 97 were eligible, 94 are evaluable for toxicity and 75 for response. Toxicity mainly consisted of mild nausea/vomiting, and less frequently reversible hepatotoxicity and malaise. No objective responses were seen. CONCLUSION: Elsamitrucin at this dose and schedule is not an active drug in metastatic breast cancer, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer or ovarian cancer.

Weekly gemcitabine in advanced bladder cancer: a preliminary report from a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine (2'2-difluorodeoxycytidine; GEM) is a novel deoxycytidine analogue with promising antitumor activity, currently under phase II investigation at doses > or = 800 mg/m2/week. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present report summarizes the results obtained in a cohort of 15 patients with metastatic bladder cancer included in a larger phase I study, receiving GEM at therapeutically active doses (> or = 875 mg/m2/week x 3 every 28 days). Except for 1 chemotherapy-naive patient, all had received prior chemotherapy with the M-VAC regimen. RESULTS: All but 1 patient were given GEM doses exceeding 1,000 mg/m2 (1 case at 875, 3 at 1,095 and 11 at 1,370 mg/m2) for a total of 50 delivered courses. One complete and 2 partial remissions were seen among 14 previously treated patients. Furthermore, 1 additional partial remission was observed in the single case with no prior chemotherapy, for an overall response rate of 27% (90% C.I. 4.3%-49.1%). All responders had visceral sites of disease. Dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was found at 1,370 mg/m2/wk as underscored by the higher number of toxic treatment delays requiring subsequent dose attenuation in 6 of 11 patients. Toxicity was mild and easily managed. It included (patients with WHO grade 2-3): leukopenia (53%), thrombocytopenia (20%), anemia (53%), AST/ALT rise (27%) and (grade 2 only) fever (60%) and emesis (40%). CONCLUSIONS: The favourable tolerability and evidence of antitumor activity of GEM in patients with bladder cancer and prior M-VAC at doses > or = 875 mg/m2/wk are encouraging and deserve confirmation in larger phase II studies.

High dose-intense chemotherapy alone or in combination with interleukin-2 for small cell lung cancer: a pilot study.

Given the antitumor activity of interleukin-2 (IL-2) against some drug-resistant cancer cells, 17 previously untreated patients with small cell lung cancer entered a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and immunological effects of combining 12-week high dose-intense chemotherapy based on a modified Evans regimen (CAV/PE) with different IL-2 schedules (6-12 MU/m2 week as a 48-72-h infusion using the same cumulative dose, 72 MU/m2). Despite significant myelotoxicity, up to 70% of the intended dose intensity was delivered, showing no differences with regard to the IL-2 schedule used. Immunotherapy-induced toxicity was usually mild and manageable. No limiting effects were observed in patients receiving immunotherapy except for a very poor compliance to the 12-week IL-2 regimen. The low-dose 72-h infusion was the optimal IL-2 schedule. As given in this study, neither of the alternating CAV/PE regimens abrogated the effects of IL-2 on T-cell and NK-cell subsets, showing typical kinetics with rebound in lymphocytes following each discontinuation of the IL-2. While immunological changes cannot predict the antitumor effect of IL-2, they are consistent with those described for IL-2 alone, suggesting its compatibility with high dose-intense chemotherapy. Although no definite advantages have been demonstrated in this small pilot study with significant unbalanced prognostic factors (12% 2-year survival), both the preserved immunostimulatory effects and the lack of limiting overlapping toxicity make this combined approach promising and worthy of further clinical investigation.

Weekly gemcitabine in advanced or metastatic solid tumors. A clinical phase I study.

Gemcitabine (GEM) is a novel deoxycytidine analogue which has shown promising antitumor activity in solid tumor models and a broad range of schedule-dependent MTDs (12-4560 mg/m2) in preliminary clinical studies. The present phase I trial evaluated escalating doses of weekly GEM using a 30-min infusion at a starting dose-level of 300 mg/m2/wk x 3 every 28 days. At least 3 patients entered each dose-level step and 3 more cases were treated when significant toxicity was seen. A total of 39 patients with various advanced solid tumors and prior chemotherapy entered this study. Six escalation steps (102 courses) were tested to define the MTD at 1,370 mg/m2/wk. No definite dose-effect relationships were observed for myelosuppression up to 1,095 mg/m2/wk. However, increased severity of leucopenia (dose-limiting) and greater non-hematologic toxicity as well as a higher number of toxic treatment delays, requiring subsequent dose attenuation in 6 out of 12 patients, were observed at 1,370 mg/m2/wk. In all, 6 out of 11 patients experiencing WHO grade > or = 3 toxicity (11/21 events recorded in 11/18 courses) were treated at the MTD. Clinically significant toxicity included (patients with WHO grade 2-3): leucopenia (44%), thrombocytopenia (26%), anemia (23%), fever (69%), emesis (38%) and AST/ALT rise (26%). Mild proteinuria, ankle edema, skin rash, hair loss and mucositis were seen in < or = 5%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of the selective aromatase inhibitor formestane with tamoxifen as first-line hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

A total of 409 postmenopausal patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either formestane (Lentaron) 250 mg every 2 weeks by intramuscular injection, or tamoxifen 30 mg/day orally. Treatment continued until tumor progression. The groups were well matched for pretreatment characteristics including age, performance status, hormone receptor status (patients with known negative receptor status of their primary tumor were excluded), site and extent of metastases, disease-free interval, and previous primary and adjuvant therapy. Patients were assessed for antitumor efficacy at 3-monthly intervals using UICC criteria. Of the 348 patients evaluable for response, 33% had an objective response to formestane (14 complete and 43 partial responses), while 37% had an objective response to tamoxifen (10 complete and 54 partial responses). Median duration of response was 15 months for formestane and 20 months for tamoxifen; survival was 35 and 38 months respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatments for all these variables, but time to disease progression and time to treatment failure significantly favoured tamoxifen. Systemic tolerability was excellent for both treatments. Local side effects due to intramuscular injection of formestane were mild and transient. In this comparative trial of first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer, formestane gave results comparable to tamoxifen for both efficacy and tolerability. We conclude that formestane is an effective and well tolerated addition to the therapeutic options available for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

Delayed progression of bone metastases with pamidronate therapy in breast cancer patients: a randomized, multicenter phase III trial.

A total of 295 patients with lytic bone metastases from breast cancer were randomized to receive chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus pamidronate (Aredia) 45 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. Primary endpoints were time to progressive bone disease (evaluated by blind extramural review), and improvement in pain (according to a 6-point self-assessment scale). Secondary endpoints included incidence of bone-related complications (pathological fractures, tumor-induced hypercalcemia, need for radiotherapy), sclerotic response of lytic lesions, WHO performance status, and analgesic score. Median time to bone progression was 249 days and 168 days in the pamidronate and control groups respectively (p = 0.02). Marked improvement in bone pain was observed in 44% of patients receiving pamidronate compared to 30% in controls (p = 0.025). With respect to secondary endpoints, pamidronate reduced the need for radiotherapy (66 times vs. 82 times in controls), and median time to radiotherapy was 697 days with pamidronate, 571 in the control arm. No severe adverse reactions or worsening of chemotherapy-induced toxicities were observed during 1598 pamidronate infusions. We conclude that intravenous pamidronate is well tolerated, significantly prolongs time to progressive bone disease, and significantly improves bone pain in patients with osteolytic metastases from breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) for infiltrating transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

BACKGROUND: Based on the excellent results with combination chemotherapy such as M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) in patients with advanced disease, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been advocated to improve survival and in some cases to permit bladder conservation. METHODS: A Phase II study of neoadjuvant M-VAC chemotherapy was performed in patients with T2-T4N0M0 bladder tumors. After clinical staging, three cycles of M-VAC were given. After patients underwent postchemotherapy clinical restaging, pathologic restaging (partial or radical cystectomy) was planned. RESULTS: Forty-six patients are evaluable. A clinical response was attained in 78%. Six patients (13%) had stable disease, and four (9%) had progression. After chemotherapy, 17 patients underwent radical cystectomy, none of whom were pTO. In this group, 10 of the 17 (59%) are alive at a median follow-up of 37+ months (range, 8-62+ months). Eleven patients had a partial cystectomy; 7 of the 11 (64%) are alive, 6 (55%) with a preserved bladder. Eighteen patients had clinical restaging only, and did not have pathologic staging. Median follow-up for this group is 36+ months (11-65+ months). Twenty-one of the 29 (72%) patients managed with conservative surgery or transurethral resection of the bladder alone are alive with a functional bladder. Median survival for all patients has not yet been reached. Two-year survival is 82%, and 3-year survival is 70%. CONCLUSIONS: The current study is of interest in terms of bladder conservation. Assessment of the true success of any bladder-preserving treatment will require longer follow-up.

Carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil in poor performance status patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

BACKGROUND: In view of the difficulties in administering aggressive treatment to elderly patients, frequently with concomitant medical problems, a treatment program with the combination of carboplatin and 5-FU for advanced urothelial tumors was designed. The aim was to maintain an efficacious therapeutic schedule while minimizing toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with advanced bidimensionally measurable urothelial carcinoma were given carboplatin 100 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 days 1-3 which was escalated to carboplatin 125 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 625 mg/m2. 5 patients were > 70 years, the ECOG performance status was 2-3 in 10 patients (43%), and the creatinine was > 2.0 mg/dl in 3 patients (13%). Five patients (22%) had pre-existing cardiac disease, and 1 had hepatopathy. Nine patients (39%) had prior cisplatin. RESULTS: Ten patients remained at level 1, and 12 others had the dosage escalated to level 2. Twenty-one patients are evaluable for response. Response was observed in 5 of 21 (24%) evaluable patients (95% confidence limits 15%-33%), only at dose level 2. There was 1 CR (5%) and 4 PR (19%). There were no responses in patients who had prior DDP versus 5 of 13 (38%) responses in patients who had not had prior DDP. The median time to response was 2 months. The median duration of response was 8 months. At level 2 myelotoxicity was significant, and led to a return to level 1 in 2 patients. Nine of 12 patients (75%) treated at level 2 had grade 3 leukopenia, and 1 patient had nadir sepsis. 4 patients (33%) had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate activity was shown with this regimen in untreated patients at level 2. This regimen presents a feasible outpatient alternative for patients who are unable to undergo more aggressive chemotherapy.

Prospective randomised trial comparing fluorouracil versus doxifluridine for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Doxifluridine (dFUR) is a fluoropyrimidine derivative that has shown activity on a variety of solid tumours. The purpose of this study was to compare its therapeutic effect with a standard fluorouracil (FU) regimen in patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. 222 previously untreated patients were randomised to receive dFUR (4000 mg/m2) or FU (500 mg/m2) daily for 5 days every 28 days. The primary tumour originated in the colon in two-thirds of the cases in both groups; approximately 90% of patients had metastatic extension, and liver involvement was present in 69% of the patients in the dFUR and FU groups. A good performance status (ECOG 0-1) was recorded in 90% of cases in both arms. A median of five cycles was administered to the patients (range 1-12). Only one partial response among 110 patients in the FU arm and one complete response and five partial responses out of 112 evaluable patients in the dFUR group were observed. Time to progression was significantly longer in the dFUR group (P = 0.02); overall survival, while longer in the dFUR arm (48 weeks vs. 39 weeks), was not significantly so (P = 0.08). Toxicity was acceptable in both arms, although grade 3-4 neurological side-effects and leukopenia were more common after dFUR infusion. Despite the low response rate, our results indicate that dFUR may be a superior alternative to FU. The possibility of enhancing significantly the activity of dFUR with biochemical modulators should be further investigated.