Induction therapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Data from adjuvant trials clearly indicate that one of the most important problems in patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is compliance to chemotherapy. In the postoperative setting, significant comorbidities and incomplete recovery after surgery often make it difficult for patients to tolerate or comply with systemic therapy. Therefore, it may be preferable to deliver chemotherapy before surgery as "neoadjuvant" or "induction" chemotherapy. The rationale for using induction chemotherapy is based on evidence that chemotherapy might reduce tumor burden and possess activity against micrometastases, resulting in improved results by surgery, radiotherapy, or a combination. Moreover, induction therapy facilitates in vivo assessment of tumor response or resistance. Potential drawbacks include the risk of perioperative complications, and the possibility that the tumor mass may become unresectable due to disease progression. During the past decade, four phase III randomized trials evaluated the role of induction chemotherapy in stage IIIA NSCLC. The first three studies consistently showed that induction chemotherapy improves survival compared with surgery alone. More recently, a large phase III trial performed by French investigators suggested a survival benefit in stage I/II patients, but not stage IIIA. The high activity of new platinum-based chemotherapy--based on response rate and 1-year survival in advanced disease--reinforces the rationale for the use of these new combinations in early-stage NSCLC, especially for a subset of patients traditionally treated with surgery alone. Several phase III trials are currently evaluating the role of new doublets as induction chemotherapy; these are discussed in the article. The results of these ongoing phase III trials should help clarify the role of induction chemotherapy in early-stage disease.

Akt phosphorylation and gefitinib efficacy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib, a specific epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has activity against approximately 10% of unselected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase (PI3K)/Akt and Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), the two main EGFR-signaling pathways, mediate EGFR effects on proliferation and survival. Because activation of these pathways is dependent on the phosphorylation status of the components, we evaluated the association between phosphorylation status of Akt (P-Akt) and MAPK (P-MAPK) and gefitinib activity in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 106) with NSCLC who had progressed or relapsed on standard therapy received gefitinib (250 mg/day) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. P-Akt and P-MAPK positivity was determined with immunohistochemistry using tumor tissues obtained before any anticancer treatment. Association of P-Akt and time to progression was determined by univariable and multivariable analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Of the 103 evaluable patients, 51 (49.5%) had tumors that were positive for P-Akt, and 23 (22.3%) had tumors that were positive for P-MAPK. P-Akt-positivity status was statistically significantly associated with being female (P<.001), with never-smoking history (P =.004), and with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma histology (P =.034). Compared with patients whose tumors were negative for P-Akt, patients whose tumors were positive for P-Akt had a better response rate (26.1% versus 3.9%; P =.003), disease control rate (60.9% versus 23.5%; P<.001), and time to progression (5.5 versus 2.8 months; P =.004). Response rate, disease control rate, and time to progression did not differ according to P-MAPK status. The multivariable analysis showed that P-Akt positivity was associated with a reduced risk of disease progression (hazard ratio = 0.58, 95% confidence interval = 0.35 to 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with P-Akt-positive tumors who received gefitinib had a better response rate, disease control rate, and time to progression than patients with P-Akt-negative tumors, suggesting that gefitinib may be most effective in patients with basal Akt activation.

Phase II study of gemcitabine-cisplatin-paclitaxel triplet as induction chemotherapy in inoperable, locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to determine the activity in terms of response rate, surgical resectability, and the tolerability of the new three-drug combination gemcitabine-cisplatin-paclitaxel (GCP) in unresectable stage IIIA(N2) and IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENT AND METHODS: Forty-two chemo-naive patients with stage IIIA(N2)-IIIB NSCLC, median age of 59 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and the ability to tolerate pneumectomy, received gemcitabine (Gem) 1000 mg/m(2) IV days 1 and 8, cisplatin (CDDP) 50 mg/m(2) IV days 1 and 8, paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) 1h infusion IV days 1 and 8, every 21 days for 3 cycles. After induction chemotherapy, patients were evaluated for surgery or definitive radiotherapy. RESULTS: Grade 3-4 neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity, occurring in 28% of patients. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was observed in only 11% of cases. No neutropenic fever or bleeding episodes were recorded. Severe non-hematologic toxicity was uncommon. Thirty (71%, 95% CI: 57.2-84.7%) of the 42 eligible patients had objective responses (1 complete and 29 partial responses). After induction chemotherapy, 21 patients (50%) went to surgery. Complete resection was obtained in 16 patients (38%). Viable tumor was present in 18 of 21 resection specimens. In three cases only necrotic tumor cells were identified, for a pathological complete response of 7%. With a median follow-up of 13.9 months, median time to progression was 17.4 months, median survival 21.7 months and estimated 1-year survival 92%. CONCLUSIONS: GCP combination is active and well tolerated in locally-advanced, non-resectable NSCLC. The activity profile, in terms of response and surgical resection rate, is comparable to that obtained with standard doublets.

Epidermal growth factor receptor targeted therapy by ZD 1839 (Iressa) in patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PURPOSE: We report four cases of Brain Metastases (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) responding to ZD 1839 therapy after standard therapy failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four patients with BM from NSCLC, pretreated with two or more lines of chemotherapy, received ZD 1839 (Iressa), on a compassionate use basis, at the daily dose of 250 mg until disease progression. Three patients received Iressa after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) failure. RESULTS: After 3 months of ZD 1839 therapy, one patient had complete response on the brain with stabilization of extracranial disease, while the other three patients had partial response both on the brain and on extracranial sites. At the time of this analysis, two patients discontinued the treatment after 5 and 7 months for disease progression, while two patients are still on treatment with no evidence of treatment failure after 3+ and 12+ months. ZD 1839 was generally well tolerated, with skin toxicity recorded in two patients. CONCLUSION: ZD 1839 may be effective in NSCLC patients with pretreated BM. Large and prospective trials need to clarify the role of ZD 1839 in the treatment of BM from NSCLC.

Gefitinib in pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): analysis of efficacy and correlation with HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor expression in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between HER2 expression and gefitinib (ZD 1839, Iressa; AstraZeneca, London, United Kingdom) efficacy in terms of response rate, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received gefitinib at a daily dose of 250 mg until disease progression. Tumor tissue specimens obtained at the time of primary diagnosis were collected to determine HER2/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: From February 2001 to June 2002, 63 consecutive patients were enrolled onto the study. The overall disease control rate was 58.7% (partial response [PR], 15.9%; stable disease [SD], 42.8%), median TTP was 3.3 months, and median OS was 4.1 months. Among the 43 patients in whom EGFR/HER2 status was determined, we observed six PRs (14%) and 18 SDs (42%). Disease control, including PR and SD, was 40% in the 15 patients overexpressing HER2 and 64.3% in the 28 patients not overexpressing HER2 (P =.126). No difference was found between the two groups in terms of TTP (3.5 v 3.7 months, respectively) and OS (5.7 v 6.8 months, respectively). In addition, we did not find any difference in TTP, OS, toxicity, and symptom outcome in the group of patients overexpressing both HER2 and EGFR compared with patients who had no overexpression of HER2 CONCLUSION: According to these data, efficacy, toxicity, and symptom outcome in patients with NSCLC treated with gefitinib do not seem to be related to HER2 expression.

Gemzar platinum combinations: phase III trials in non-small cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer accounts for about 28% of all cancer-related deaths. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes 80% of all lung cancer cases, and in 70% of patients, the disease is diagnosed when it is locally advanced or metastatic. In these situations, chemotherapy has played only a minor role in modifying the natural history according to a 1995 meta-analysis. New drugs such as gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and the taxanes have been combined with cisplatin and tested in several phase-II and phase-III clinical trials versus cisplatin alone and different cisplatin/new drug combinations. Overall, the data seem to confirm that, despite a possible increase in response rate, no major difference in long-term survival has been achieved. Moreover, toxicity and cost may be significant with some of the combinations and schedules. While the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine seems to be fairly active and better tolerated, we all look forward to the results of ongoing studies on the association of these regimens with the new biological drugs.