COVID-19 induced bradyarrhythmia and relative bradycardia: An overview.

Novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has been the focus of the medical community since its emergence in December 2019 and has already infected more than 100 million patients globally. Primarily described to cause a respiratory illness, COVID-19 has been found to affect almost every organ system. Bradycardia is a newly recognized ramification of COVID-19 that still has unknown prognostic value. Studies have shown an increase in the incidence of arrhythmias, cardiomyopathies, myocarditis, acute coronary syndromes, and coagulopathies in infected patients as well as an increased risk of mortality in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease. While the pathogenesis of bradycardia in COVID-19 may be multifactorial, clinicians should be aware of the mechanism by which COVID-19 affects the cardiovascular system and the medication side effects which are used in the treatment algorithm of this deadly virus. There has yet to be a comprehensive review analyzing bradyarrhythmia and relative bradycardia in COVID-19 infected patients. We aim to provide a literature review including the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of COVID-19 induced bradyarrhythmia.

Outcomes of Renal Function in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With or Without Mechanical Circulatory Support.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to compare the renal outcomes in patients presenting with all-cause cardiogenic shock who were supported by either Impella devices (Abiomed, Danvers, MA), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), or vasopressors alone. Outcomes of cardiogenic shock remain poor even with the advancement of early revascularization and circulatory supportive care. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device has emerged as an effective strategy in protecting end organ function especially renal function during high risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and in patients with cardiogenic shock. Currently, comparative data amongst various MCS modalities and their association with improvement of renal function in cardiogenic shock patients have not been well characterized. METHODS: Data from New Jersey Cardiac Catheterization Data registry of cardiogenic shock patients from a single tertiary care institution that underwent cardiac catheterization and the modality used to treat were obtained, either with Impella devices, IABP, or treatment with vasopressors alone. Retrospective chart review was conducted to assess the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) on patients with cardiogenic shock prior to and after cardiac catheterization and renal function was evaluated over the course of 96 h after cardiac catheterization. Statistical analysis was performed to ascertain significant difference in creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients who received Impella devices, IABP, or were treated with vasopressors alone. RESULTS: A total of 61 all-cause cardiogenic shock patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study with 19 receiving IABPs, 15 receiving Impella devices, and 27 treated with vasopressors alone. Baseline characteristics among these three groups did not show any statistically significant difference. A total of 29 cardiogenic shock patients had experienced AKI prior to cardiac catheterization in which those receiving Impella devices showed statistically significant decrease in creatinine and increase in eGFR at 72 and 96 h (P < 0.05) compared to baseline. Within the same cohort, Impella group showed statistically significant lower creatinine at 96 h when compared to IABP. Patients that experienced AKI after cardiac catheterization did not show any statistically significant changes in renal function regardless of modality used. CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that Impella devices improve renal function in all-cause cardiogenic shock patients who experience AKI prior to undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Psoriasis as risk factor for non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a population-based cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition commonly associated with psoriatic arthritis, malignancy, diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, and cardiovascular disease. Several reports and studies have reported an association between psoriasis and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM). We aim to study the relationship between psoriasis and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy in a large population-based study. METHODS: We utilized the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample 2017 database, which represents a 20% sample of all payer hospitalizations in the United States. We investigated hospitalizations for patients aged 18 years old or older with diagnoses of any type of psoriasis and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Psoriasis, cardiomyopathy, and other comorbidities were identified through their international classification of diseases, 10th revision codes recorded in the discharge record for each hospitalization. RESULTS: Of a total of 6,084,184 all-cause admissions, 0.5% were admissions for patients with psoriasis (n = 32,807). Of the patients with and without psoriasis who had non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, after adjusting for age, sex, race, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, alcohol abuse, cocaine abuse, arrhythmias, and obesity in a multivariate analysis, the presence of psoriasis was not significantly associated with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSION: Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune disorder which carries a higher cardiovascular events and more prevalent traditional atherosclerotic risk factors in comparison to the general population. However, association with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy or NIDCM in particular has not been studied sufficiently. Our study, being one of the first larger studies to assess this correlation, indicated no relationship between psoriasis and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Unusual Longevity of Edwards Syndrome: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Trisomy 18, also known as Edwards syndrome, was first described in the 1960s and is now defined as the second most common trisomy. While this genetic disease has been attributed to nondisjunction during meiosis, the exact mechanism remains unknown. Trisomy 18 is associated with a significantly increased mortality rate of about 5-10% of patients surviving until 1 year of age. We present a case of a 26-year-old female diagnosed with trisomy 18, well outliving her life expectancy, maintaining a stable state of health. CASE PRESENTATION: A 26-year-old female with non-mosaic Edwards syndrome presented to the clinic for follow up after recent hospitalization for aspiration pneumonia. The definitive diagnosis of trisomy 18 was made prenatally utilizing chromosomal analysis and G-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on cells obtained via amniocentesis. Her past medical history is characterized by severe growth and intellectual limitations; recurrent history of infections, especially respiratory system infections; and a ventricular septal defect (VSD) that was never surgically repaired. She remains in good, stable health and is under close follow-up and monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that Edwards syndrome carries a significantly high mortality rate due to several comorbidities, recent literature including this case report has identified patients surviving into adulthood. Advancements in early detection and parent education have likely allowed for these findings. We aim to present a case of an adult with trisomy 18, living in stable condition, with an importance on medical follow-up.

Prevalence of chronic kidney disease among patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary interventions.

BACKGROUND: While transradial approach to conduct percutaneous coronary interventions offers multiple advantages, the procedure can cause radial artery damage and occlusion. Because radial artery is the preferred site for the creation of an arteriovenous fistula to provide dialysis, patients with chronic kidney disease are particularly dependent on radial artery for their long-term survival. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we investigated the prevalence of chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing coronary interventions via radial artery. Stage of chronic kidney disease was based on estimated glomerular filtration rate and National Kidney Foundation - Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary interventions were included. Over 70.4% (350/497) of the patients had chronic kidney disease. Stage II chronic kidney disease was observed in 243 (69%) patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate = 76.0 ± 8.4 mL/min). Stage III was observed in 93 (27%) patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate = 49 ± 7.5 mL/min). Stage IV chronic kidney disease was observed in 5 (1%) patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate = 25.6 ± 4.3 mL/min) and Stage V chronic kidney disease was observed in 9 (3%) patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate = 9.3 ± 3.5 mL/min). Overall, 107 of 350 patients (30%) had advanced chronic kidney disease, that is, stage III-V chronic kidney disease. Importantly, 14 of the 107 (13%) patients had either stage IV or V chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSION: This study finds that nearly one-third of the patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary interventions have advanced chronic kidney disease. Because many of these patients may require dialysis, the use of radial artery to conduct percutaneous coronary interventions must be carefully considered in chronic kidney disease population.

Subcutaneous defibrillators for dialysis patients.

Defibrillation can be successfully provided by the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) without the leads. In contrast, traditional ICDs require leads that can cause central venous stenosis, lead-induced endocarditis, and carry the risk of tricuspid regurgitation by valve adhesion, perforation, coaptation interference, or entanglement. Central venous stenosis, infection, and tricuspid regurgitation are all critically important considerations in hemodialysis patients. Recent reports are supporting the use of subcutaneous ICDs in renal patients maintained on long-term hemodialysis. This article provides the risks associated with leads of traditional defibrillators and raises awareness of the subcutaneous ICD and their benefits for hemodialysis patients.

Quantitation of fluphenazine in equine serum following fluphenazine decanoate administration.

Fluphenazine, a potent antipsychotic used to treat schizophrenia in humans, is used in racehorses as a performance-enhancing drug, and for that reason it has been banned by the Association of Racing Commissioners International. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for detecting and quantitating fluphenazine in equine serum was developed and validated. The method was then employed to quantitate fluphenazine in serum samples collected from three study horses after intramuscular injection of fluphenazine decanoate. Stability testing showed that fluphenazine is stable in unextracted and processed samples as well as samples that have been subjected to up to three freeze-thaw cycles. The limit of detection and lower limit of quantitation of fluphenazine were determined to be 0.05 and 0.1 ng/mL, respectively. Precision was evaluated based on one-way analysis of variance of replicate quality control samples and was determined to be 27.2% at the 0.2 ng/mL level and 18.1% at the 2 ng/mL level. Bias was determined to be 0.55% at the 0.2 ng/mL level and 3.66% at the 2 ng/mL level. In two of three horses, fluphenazine was detected in serum up to 14 days post-administration. The highest detected concentration of fluphenazine in serum was 1.4 ng/mL.

Pyrilamine and O-desmethylpyrilamine detection in equine serum and urine.

Pyrilamine (mepyramine) is an H1-receptor antagonist used in human and veterinary medicine. It has the potential to produce central nervous system effects in horses and therefore may have some impact on an outcome of a horse race. A single oral dose of pyrilamine (300 mg/horse) was given to three animals. Serum samples were collected before drug administration and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 144 h, and 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 days post-administration. Urine samples were collected at 0-1, 1-2, 2-4, 4-6, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 144 h, and 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 days post-administration. Urine and serum samples were initially screened by the pyrilamine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit with subsequent confirmation and quantitation utilizing a newly developed and validated gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method for pyrilamine and its major metabolite O-desmethylpyrilamine with chlorpromazine as an internal standard. Prior to the basic extraction, urine specimens were hydrolyzed using beta-glucuronidase. The urine extracts as well as the serum samples were then subjected to solid-phase extraction on Bond Elut LRC-PRS columns. Pyrilamine was not found in any of the urine samples but it was present in serum in low concentrations (4-123 ng/mL) up to 6 h after drug administration. The limit of detection and limit of quantitation for the GC-MS method for pyrilamine in serum were 1.5 and 3.1 ng/mL, respectively, and for O-desmethylpyrilamine in urine were 5 and 6.2 ng/mL, respectively. Pyrilamine concentration in serum peaked at 15 min, 30 min, and 1 h in horse #1, #2, and #3, respectively. Urine specimens were screened positive for pyrilamine and its metabolites using ELISA for extended periods of time (4 days in one horse and 9 days in two other animals). Using GC-MS, O-desmethylpyrilamine was detected in urine for 11 days in horse #1, 4 days in horse #2, and 9 days in horse #3. While pyrilamine was eliminated from the bloodstream rather quickly, the metabolite level remained in the urine for days after administration. When evaluating laboratory results, regulators must take into account that a urine sample positive for O-desmethylpyrilamine does not necessarily indicate that the drug remains active in the horse's system, possibly affecting the outcome from the race.