Robot-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Lobectomy: Can a Robotic Approach Improve Short-Term Outcomes and Operative Safety?

Background Minimally invasive surgery has been recently recommended for treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Despite the recent increase of robotic surgery, the place and potential advantages of the robot in thoracic surgery has not been well defined until now. Methods We reviewed our prospective database for retrospective comparison of our first 28 video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomies (V group) and our first 28 robotic lobectomies (R group). Results No significant difference was shown in median operative time between the two groups (185 vs. 190 minutes, p = 0.56). Median preincision time was significantly longer in the R group (80 vs. 60 minutes, P < 0.0001). The rate of emergency conversion for uncontrolled bleeding was lower in the R group (one vs. four). Median length of stay was comparable (6 days in the R group vs. 7 days in the V group, p = 0.4) with no significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications (eight Grade I in both groups, four Grade III or IV in the V group vs. six in the R group, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, p = 0.93). No postoperative cardiac morbidity was observed in the R group. Median drainage time was similar (5 days, p = 0.78), with a rate of prolonged air leak slightly higher in the R group (25 vs. 17.8%, p = 0.74). Conclusion Perioperative outcomes are similar even in the learning period but robotic approach seems to offer more operative safety with fewer conversions for uncontrolled bleeding.

Fluoroscopic guidance for placing a double lumen endotracheal tube in adults.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the right placement of the double lumen endotracheal tube with fluoroscopic guidance, which is used in first intention prior to the fiberscope in our institution. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. The study was conducted in vascular and thoracic operating rooms. We enrolled 205 patients scheduled for thoracic surgery, with ASA physical statuses of I (n = 37), II (n = 84), III (n = 80), and IV (n = 4). Thoracic procedures were biopsy (n = 20), wedge (n = 34), culminectomy (n = 6), lobectomy (n = 82), pneumonectomy (n = 4), sympathectomy (n = 9), symphysis (n = 47), and thymectomy (n = 3). The intubation with a double lumen tube was performed with the help of a laryngoscope. Tracheal and bronchial balloons were inflated and auscultation was performed after right and left exclusions. One shot was performed to locate the position of the bronchial tube and the hook. Fluoroscopic guidance was used to relocate the tube in case of a wrong position. When the fluoroscopic guidance failed to position the tube, a fiberscope was used. Perioperative collapse of the lung was assessed by the surgeon during the surgery. RESULTS: Correct fluoroscopic image was obtained after the first attempt in 58.5% of patients therefore a misplaced position was encountered in 41.5%. The fluoroscopic guidance allowed an exact repositioning in 99.5% of cases, and the mean duration of the procedure was 8 minutes. A fiberscope was required to move the hook for one patient. We did not notice a moving of the double lumen endotracheal tube during the surgery. The surgeon satisfaction was 100%. CONCLUSION: The fluoroscopy evidenced the right position of the double lumen tube and allowed a right repositioning in 99.5% of patients with a very simple implementation.

Peribulbar anesthesia in 750 patients treated with oral anticoagulants.

AIM: To check the safety of continuation of oral anticoagulants in ophthalmic procedures requiring a peribulbar anesthesia. METHOD: A prospective case control study included 750 patients with oral anticoagulants in group A and 750 patients who had never been treated with oral anticoagulant in group B. Hemorrhages were graded as follows: 1) spot ecchymosis of eyelid and or subconjunctival hemorrhage; 2) eyelid ecchymosis involving half of the lid surface area; 3) eyelid ecchymosis all around the eye, no increase in intraocular pressure; 4) retrobulbar hemorrhage with increased intraocular pressure. RESULTS: In group A, grade 1 was observed in 13 patients (1.74%) and grade 2 in 2 patients (0.26%). In group B, grade 1 was observed in 12 patients (1.6%) and grade 2 was absent. No 3 or 4 hemorrhage grade was encountered in both groups. There was not significant difference in grade 1 hemorrhage between both groups (P=0.21). CONCLUSION: Oral anticoagulants were not associated with a significant increase in potentially sight-threatening local anesthetic complications.

Toxic plasma concentration of ropivacaine after a paravertebral block in a patient suffering from severe hypoalbuminemia.

A case of systemic ropivacaine toxicity from a continuous thoracic paravertebral block in an adult patient who received a lobectomy is presented. The catheter was placed by the surgeon. Eleven hours after the start of the infusion, the patient experienced an arrhythmia leading to death. The total venous plasma concentration of ropivacaine was high (3.2 µg/mL). Furthermore, the patient had severe hypoalbuminemia (albumin 24 g/L), which resulted in the increase of the unbound ropivacaine plasma concentration that was responsible for the toxic side effects.

Peribulbar block in patients scheduled for eye procedures and treated with clopidogrel.

Our hypothesis was that the continuation of clopidogrel does not increase the risk of eye hemorrhage, compared to patients not treated with clopidogrel, when a peribulbar anesthesia is required. Our prospective case-control study enrolled two groups of 1,000 patients scheduled for intraocular eye surgery requiring a peribulbar block. Patients treated with clopidogrel were included in group A (1,000 patients). Patients who had never been treated with clopidogrel constituted the control group (group B, 1,000 patients). Hemorrhages were graded as follows: 1 = spot ecchymosis of eyelid and or subconjunctival hemorrhage; 2 = eyelid ecchymosis involving half the lid surface area; 3 = eyelid ecchymosis all around the eye, no increase in intraocular pressure; 4 = retrobulbar hemorrhage with increased intraocular pressure. Grade 1 hemorrhages were observed in 30 patients (3.0 %) in group A and in 20 patients (2.0 %) in group B. No grade 2, 3, or 4 hemorrhage was encountered. There was no significant difference in the grading of hemorrhage between the groups (p = 0.017). Clopidogrel was not associated with a significant increase in potentially sight-threatening local anesthetic complications.

Temporary quadriplegia following continuous thoracic paravertebral block.

A case of temporary quadriplegia following a continuous thoracic paravertebral block in an adult patient scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopy is presented. An 18-gauge Tuohy needle was inserted under direct vision by the surgeon but the tip of the catheter was not localized. Postoperatively, the patient developed temporary quadriplegia 90 minutes after the start of a continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2%. Imaging studies showed that the catheter was localized in the intrathecal space.

Peribulbar block in 500 patients scheduled for eye procedures and treated with acetyl salicylic acid.

OBJECTIVES: No guidelines are available in France for peribulbar block for eye procedures. It is our hypothesis that continued use of acetyl salicylic acid for forestalling myocardial or cerebrovascular ischemic events does not increase the risk of hemorrhage, compared with discontinuation of its use in patients who undergo eye procedures under peribulbar block. METHODS: For this prospective control study we enrolled two groups of 500 patients scheduled for intra-ocular eye surgery requiring a peribulbar block. Patients treated with acetyl salicylic acid were included in group A (500 patients). Patients who had never been treated with acetyl salicylic acid constituted the control group (group B: 500 patients). Hemorrhages were graded as follows: 1=spot ecchymosis; 2=lid ecchymosis involving half of the lid surface area or less; 3=lid ecchymosis all around the eye, without increase in intra-ocular pressure; 4=retrobulbar hemorrhage with increased intraocular pressure. RESULTS: In group A, lid hemorrhages (grade 1) were observed in 30 patients (6.0%). No grade 2, 3 or 4 hemorrhages were encountered in this group. In group B, lid hemorrhage (grade 1) was observed in 20 patients (4.0%) and grade 2 in one patient (0.2 %), but no grade 3 or 4 hemorrhages were encountered. Statistical tests showed the absence of significance between both groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude that between the groups with and without pre-operative acetyl salicylic acid the occurrence rate of lid hemorrhage was not significant in peribulbar block.

Antibiotics concentrations in a patient with postoperative endophthalmitis.

We report a case of endophthalmitis who underwent a vitreous biopsy to assess sensitivity and to inject broad-spectrum intraocular antibiotics. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of antibiotics against a coagulase-negative staphylococcus and Proprionibacterium acnes were also assessed.

Sub-Tenon infiltration or classical analgesic drugs to relieve postoperative pain.

BACKGROUND: In a prospective randomized double-blind study, the analgesic effect produced by sub-Tenon infiltration was compared with classic analgesic drugs in patients scheduled for posterior segment surgery under general anaesthesia. METHODS: One hundred patients were randomized into two groups of 50. One group received sub-Tenon infiltration (group 1) with 3 mL of bupivacaine 0.50% by the surgeon before the end of the surgery and the other (group 2) received only classical analgesic drugs postoperatively. A visual analogue scale (VAS) (graded from 1 to 10) was used to assess pain. For both groups, when VAS was between 1 and 3 paracetamol (3 g/24 h) associated with ketoprofen (200 mg/24 h) was given; between 3 and 6 nalbuphine (0.2 mg/kg slowly intravenously repeated every 4 h if necessary) was given; and over 6 morphine was given. Morphine 1 mg was injected every 2 min until VAS below 3 was obtained. RESULTS: All patients in group 2 (control) experienced pain in the recovery room period; however, no patient in group 1 required analgesic drugs in the first 6 h after the sub-Tenon infiltration. In the recovery room period, the VAS pain score in patients who received sub-Tenon infiltration (group 1) was 0.6 +/- 1.3 (mean +/- SD) compared to 3.4 +/- 2.2 in group 2. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.000001). All patients in group 2 asked for analgesic drugs in the recovery room, some of whom required morphine. Despite the administration of drugs the pain score was statistically higher in group 2. Between the end of the recovery room period and the 6th hour, the VAS pain score in group 1 was statistically lower. From the 6th until the 24th hour, the pain score was not statistically significantly different between the groups. Regarding consumption of analgesic drugs from the recovery room until the 24th hour, the consumption of level 1 analgesic drugs (paracetamol, ketoprofen) and level 3 (morphine) was statistically lower in group 1 (P = 0.0009). The difference was not significant for level 2, probably because the number of patients was not sufficient. CONCLUSION: Sub-Tenon infiltration with 3 mL of bupivacaine 0.50% offers excellent postoperative analgesia for about 6 h and is an excellent alternative to classical drugs. Furthermore, it is highly reliable and safe.

Peribulbar anaesthesia using a combination of lidocaine, bupivocaine and clonidine in vitreoretinal surgery.

PURPOSE: The efficacy and safety of peribulbar anaesthesia was assessed using a combination of lidocaine, bupivacaine and clonidine during eye surgery. METHODS: We prospectively studied 100 vitreo-retinal surgical procedures performed by several surgeons. The exclusion criteria included age below 30 years and, axial length of the orbit above 28 mm. Peribulbar was performed using Hamilton's technique. A mixed anaesthetic solution of equal quantity of lidocaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% with clonidine (1 mg/kg) was injected. Patients received a mean volume of 14.5 ml +/- 3.5 of the mixture. Akinesia and analgesia were assessed 15 minutes later by the surgeon. Whenever required, supplemental lidocaine 2% (3 ml) by sub-Tenon infiltration was added by the surgeon. Supplemental injections were given only to patients who failed to develop analgesia. RESULTS: The mean age of patients (male 52%, female 48%) was 66 years +/- 10 (mean +/- SD, range 44-90). The 100 surgical procedures were made up of vitrectomy +/- gas +/- silicone oil (22/100), vitrectomy and lensectomy (6/100), vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane +/- laser coagulation +/- gas +/- silicone oil (35/100), scleral buckling or encircling +/- gas (36/100), and cryosurgery +/- gas (1/100). Analgesia was adequate throughout surgery without any supplementation in 85% of cases and with a sub-Tenon infiltration in 99%. Akinesia was complete in 84%, mild in 12% and absent in 4% of cases. The sub-Tenon injection was performed in 15% of cases. Three patients (3%) were agitated during surgery. No neurologic or cardiac complication was seen. In one patient, the systolic blood pressure decreased from 170 to 110 mmHg, 30 minutes after the institution of the peribulbar block. CONCLUSION: Our results show that peribulbar anaesthesia in the proposed mixture offers excellent analgesia in 85% of patients, and in 99% of the patients when supplemented by a subtenon injection. The current mixture of lidocaine, bupivacaine and clonidine is an excellent alternative to the previously used mixture etidocaine, bupivacaine and hyaluronidase for vitreoretinal surgery. However, a randomized controlled clinical trial is needed to prove the efficacy and safety of these results.