Large-scale evaluation of microorganism inactivation by bipolar ionization and photocatalytic devices.

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised awareness in the spread of disease via airborne transmission. As a result, there has been increasing interest in technologies that claim to reduce concentrations of airborne pathogens in indoor environments. The efficacy of many of these emerging technologies is not fully understood, and the testing that has been done is often conducted at a small scale and not representative of applied settings. There is currently no standard test method for evaluating air treatment technologies, making it difficult to compare results across studies or technology types. Here, a consistent testing approach in an operational-scale test chamber with a mock recirculating heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system was used to evaluate the efficacy of bipolar ionization and photocatalytic devices against the non-enveloped bacteriophage MS2 in the air and on surfaces. Statistically significant differences between replicate sets of technology tests and control tests (without technologies active) are apparent after 1 h, ranging to a maximum of 0.88 log10 reduction for the bipolar ionization tests and 1.8 log10 reduction for the photocatalytic device tests. It should be noted that ozone concentrations were elevated above background concentrations in the test chamber during the photocatalytic device testing. No significant differences were observed between control and technology tests in terms of the amount of MS2 deposited or inactivated on surfaces during testing. A standardized, large-scale testing approach, with replicate testing and time-matched control conditions, is necessary for contextualizing laboratory efficacy results, translating them to real-world conditions, and for facilitating technology comparisons.

Impact of test methodology on the efficacy of triethylene glycol (Grignard Pure) against bacteriophage MS2.

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised interest in using chemical air treatments as part of a strategy to reduce the risk of disease transmission, but more information is needed to characterize their efficacy at scales translatable to applied settings and to develop standardized test methods for characterizing the performance of these products. Grignard Pure, a triethylene glycol (TEG) active ingredient air treatment, was evaluated using two different test protocols in a large bioaerosol test chamber and observed to inactivate bacteriophage MS2 in air (up to 99.9% at 90 min) and on surfaces (up to 99% at 90 min) at a concentration of approximately 1.2 - 1.5 mg/m3. Introducing bioaerosol into a TEG-charged chamber led to overall greater reductions compared to when TEG was introduced into a bioaerosol-charged chamber, although the differences in efficacy against airborne MS2 were only significant in the first 15 min. Time-matched control conditions (no TEG present) and replicate tests for each condition were essential for characterizing treatment efficacy. These findings suggest that chemical air treatments could be effective in reducing the air and surface concentrations of infectious pathogens in occupied spaces, although standard methods are needed for evaluating their efficacy and comparing results across studies. The potential health impacts of chronic exposure to chemicals should also be considered, but those were not evaluated here.

Decontamination of soil contaminated at the surface with Bacillus anthracis spores using dry thermal treatment.

In the event of a large, aerosol release of Bacillus anthracis spores in a major metropolitan area, soils and other outdoor materials may become contaminated with the biological agent. A study was conducted to assess the in-situ remediation of soil using a dry thermal treatment approach to inactivate a B. anthracis spore surrogate inoculated into soil samples. The study was conducted in two phases, using loam, clay and sand-based soils, as well as biological indicators and spore-inoculated stainless-steel coupons. Initial experiments were performed in an environmental test chamber with temperatures controlled between 80 and 110 °C, with and without added humidity, and with contact times ranging from 4 h to 7 weeks. Tests were then scaled up to assess the thermal inactivation of spores in small soil columns, in which a heating plate set to 141 °C was applied to the soil surface. These column tests were conducted to assess time requirements to inactivate spores as a function of soil depth and soil type. Results from the initial phase of testing showed that increasing the temperature and relative humidity reduced the time requirements to achieve samples in which no surrogate spores were detected. For the test at 80 °C with no added humidity, 49 days were required to achieve soil samples with no spores detected in clay and loam. At 110 °C, 24 h were required to achieve samples in which no spores were detected. In the column tests, no spores were detected at the 2.5 cm depth at four days and at the 5.1 cm depth at 21 days, for two of the three soils. The experiments described in the study demonstrate the feasibility of using dry thermal techniques to decontaminate soils that have been surficially contaminated with B. anthracis spores.