Risk Factors for Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis in the Indomethacin Era - A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an essential procedure used to treat conditions affecting the biliopancreatic system, it can lead to several complications. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most frequent one, with an incidence ranging from 3 to 14%. Our aim was to assess the potential risk factors associated with PEP occurrence in patients undergoing ERCP with indomethacin prophylaxis. METHODS: Prospective, single-center, real-world observational study (January to December 2015) with inclusion of patients submitted to ERCP, where relevant patient-related and procedure-related data had been collected. Patients had to have been admitted for a minimum of 24 h in order to establish the presence of early complications. All patients were submitted to PEP prophylaxis with 1 or 2 methods: rectal indomethacin and pancreatic duct (PD) stenting. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients who had undergone ERCP were included (52.7% women; mean age 69.2 ± 16.0 years) and PEP was diagnosed in 13 (6.9%). PEP prophylaxis consisted of indomethacin in all cases (100%) and PD stenting in 7.4%. The pancreatitis was mild in 11 patients (84.6%) and severe in the other 2. One of them died (0.5%). None of the patient-related risk factors were associated with changes in PEP probability. Of all patients, 33.0% had 2 or more procedure-related risk factors. A higher number of synchronous procedure-related risk factors showed a statistically significant correlation with PEP occurrence, p = 0.040. CONCLUSIONS: The 6.9% PEP rate is considered acceptable since 33.0% patients had a medium-high risk for PEP due to challenging biliary cannulation. The total number of procedure-related risk factors seems to play a critical role in the development of PEP despite indomethacin prophylaxis.

INTRODUÇÃO E OBJETIVO: A colangiopancreatografia retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) é um método terapáutico crucial em doenças biliopancreáticas, mas pode levar a várias complicações. A pancreatite pós-CPRE (PPC) é a complicação mais frequente, podendo atingir uma incidáncia de 3 a 14%. O objetivo foi estudar os fatores de risco associados à PPC em doentes submetidos a CPRE com profilaxia por indometacina. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospetivo e observacional com inclusão (janeiro-dezembro 2015) de doentes submetidos a CPRE num centro terciário, em condições de prática real. Foram registados os dados relevantes do doente e procedimento. Os doentes foram observados em internamento por, pelo menos, 24 horas para deteção de complicações. Todos os doentes incluídos foram submetidos a profilaxia de PPC, com recurso a um ou dois métodos indometacina retal e prótese pancreática. RESULTADOS: Estudados 188 doentes, 52.7% mulheres, com idade média de 69.2 ± 16.0 anos. Profilaxia de PPC envolveu indometacina em todos os casos (100%) e colocação de prótese pancreática em 7.4%. Registou-se PPC em 13 doentes (6.9%), sendo que 11 (84.6% de PPC) tiveram pancreatite ligeira. Os restantes dois apresentaram pancreatite grave e um deles faleceu (0.5%). Nenhum dos fatores de risco do doente se relacionou com maior probabilidade de PPC. Do total de doentes, em 33.0% estiveram presentes 2 ou mais fatores de risco associados ao procedimento. A presença simultânea de um número superior de fatores de risco associados ao procedimento relacionou-se significativamente com a ocorráncia de PPC, p = 0.040. CONCLUSÕES: Considera-se aceitável a taxa de PPC de 6.9%, tendo em conta que 33.0% dos doentes apresentavam risco médio-alto para PPC devido a canulação biliar difícil. O número total de fatores de risco associados ao procedimento parece desempenhar um papel crucial no desenvolvimento de PPC, apesar da profilaxia com indometacina.

Cytomegalovirus ulcerative oesophagitis in a young healthy immunocompetent patient.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) gastrointestinal disease usually arises in patients with immunodeficiency or immunosuppression, being rare in immunocompetent hosts. Although increasing in incidence, few cases of CMV gastrointestinal disease have been described among young healthy patients. Currently, there is uncertainty in approaching these patients, including the need for antiviral therapy that remains to be established. This case report describes a CMV ulcerative oesophagitis in a young healthy immunocompetent patient with good evolution with no need for antiviral therapy, the youngest case being reported in the literature until now.

Ampullary Metastasis From Breast Cancer: A Rare Cause of Obstructive Jaundice.

Breast cancer is the most common tumor in women and the first cause of death for malignancy in the female. Bile ducts are not among the common sites of metastasis from breast cancer. Few cases of obstructive jaundice due to metastatic breast cancer have been described in the literature and they mostly resulted from widespread liver metastases that eventually involved the bile ducts. We report an exceptional case of ampullary metastasis in the absence of liver metastases. Sporadic reports have been published about the involvement of the ampulla by breast cancer metastasis. This case emphasizes the need to consider this diagnosis in women presenting with obstructive jaundice, especially when there is a clinical possibility of breast cancer.

O cancro da mama é o tumor mais comum em mulheres e a principal causa de morte por neoplasia nesta população. A via biliar não é um local comum de metastização desta neoplasia. Poucos casos de icterícia obstrutiva devido a metástases mamárias têm sido descritos na literatura e ocorrem principalmente devido a metástases hepáticas que comprimem a via biliar. Relatamos um caso excepcional de metástase ampular na ausência de metástases hepáticas.Existem apenas relatos esporádicos do envolvimento da ampola por metástase mamárias. Este caso enfatiza a necessidade de considerar este diagnóstico perante um quadro de icterícia obstrutiva, especialmente em doentes com possível neoplasia mamária.

Portal Hypertensive Biliopathy: An Infrequent Cause of Biliary Obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Biliary obstruction is usually caused by choledocholithiasis. However, in some circumstances, alternative or concurring unusual ethiologies such as portal hypertensive biliopathy (PHB) must be considered. CLINICAL CASE: We present the case of a 36-year-old female complaining of jaundice and pruritus. Liver function tests were compatible with biliary obstruction and the ultrasound scan of the abdomen showed dilatation of the intrahepatic biliary ducts, a dilated common bile duct (CBD) and biliary calculi. The computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a portal cavernoma encasing the CBD. DISCUSSION: Portal cavernoma, the hallmark of extrahepatic portal venous obstruction, can cause PHB. When symptomatic, chronic cholestasis is present if a dominant stricture exists whereas biliary pain and acute cholangitis occur when choledocholithiasis prevails. Management must be individualized and usually includes endoscopic therapy to address choledocholithiasis and shunt surgery for definitive treatment.

INTRODUÇÃO: A causa mais comum de icterícia obstrutiva é a coledocolitíase. No entanto, no contexto clínico adequado, devem ser consideradas etiologias alternativas ou concomitantes, nomeadamente a biliopatia hipertensiva portal (BHP). CASO CLÍNICO: Apresentamos o caso de uma doente do sexo feminino com 36 anos de idade com icterícia e prurido. O estudo bioquímico era compatível com icterícia obstrutiva e o estudo ecográfico do abdómen revelou dilatação das vias biliares intra-hepáticas e do colédoco associados a litíase biliar. A tomografia computorizada abdominal realizada mostrou a existência um cavernoma da veia porta a envolver o colédoco. DISCUSSÃO: O cavernoma da porta, no contexto de obstrução portal venosa extra-hepática pode complicar-se com BHP. Quando sintomática manifesta-se por colestase crónica caso exista uma estenose dominante ou dor biliar e/ou colangite aguda quando predomina a litíase. O tratamento definitivo é individualizado, incluindo terapêutica endoscópica visando a litíase associada e uma derivação cirúrgica venosa porto-sistémica.

Left-Sided Portal Hypertension: A Sinister Entity.

INTRODUCTION: Sinistral, or left-sided, portal hypertension (SPH) is a rare entity, with multiple potential causes. Gastrointestinal variceal bleeding and hypersplenism are its' major clinical manifestations. The main aim of the present study is to summarize the clinical features of patients with SPH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with present or previous diagnosis of SHP, observed in a Gastroenterology Department, in a period of 2 years. Patients with clinical, radiological or laboratory alterations suggestive of cirrhosis were excluded. Causes of SPH, clinical manifestations and outcomes were registered. Potential factors associated with gastrointestinal bleeding were analyzed. RESULTS: In the study period a total of 22 patients (male - 17; mean age - 59.6 ± 10.6 years) with SHP were included. Clinical manifestations were: asymptomatic/unspecific abdominal pain (n = 14); gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 8). Eleven (50%) patients had increased aminotransferases, GGT and/or alkaline phosphatase although liver function was normal in all of them. Causes of SPH were chronic pancreatitis (n = 7), acute pancreatitis (n = 7), pancreatic cancer (n = 4), pancreatic surgery (n = 3) and arteriovenous malformation (n = 1). All patients had gastric and/or esophageal varices and seven had splenomegaly. Five (22.7%) had thrombocytopenia, associated with hypersplenism. Five patients (22.7%) were submitted to endoscopic treatment and eight were submitted to splenic artery embolization and/or splenectomy. There were no cases of variceal rebleeding and two patients died. Patients without liver enzymes elevation had a higher probability of gastrointestinal bleeding (87.5% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Acute and chronic pancreatitis are the major causes of SHP. Gastrointestinal bleeding is the most important clinical manifestation and patients without liver enzyme elevation seem more prone to bleed. Specific treatment is seldom performed or needed.

INTRODUÇÃO: A hipertensão portal esquerda ou sinistra (HTPS) é uma entidade rara, que pode resultar de diferentes etiologias. A hemorragia gastrointestinal de origem varicosa e o hiperesplenismo são as principais manifestações clínicas. O principal objetivo do presente estudo consiste em estabelecer os achados clínicos mais relevantes num grupo de doentes com HTPS. DOENTES E MÉTODOS: Foi efetuada uma análise retrospetiva de um grupo consecutivo de doentes com HTPS diagnosticados ou acompanhados no serviço de Gastrenterologia durante o período de 2 anos. Os doentes com estigmas clínicos, radiológicos ou laboratoriais sugestivos de cirrose hepática foram excluídos. Foram registadas as etiologias, manifestações clínicas, tratamentos e evolução. Também foram analisados potenciais fatores associados com hemorragia digestiva como forma de apresentação. RESULTADOS: Neste período foram incluídos 22 doentes (sexo masculino ­ 17; média etária ­ 59,6 ± 10,6 anos). As manifestações clínicas foram: assintomático/dor abdominal inespecífica (n = 14); hemorragia gastrointestinal (n = 8). A função hepática era normal em todos os doentes mas 11 (50%) apresentavam uma elevação da enzimologia hepática (aminotransferases, GGT e/ou fosfatase alcalina). As principais etiologias da HTPS foram a pancreatite crónica (n = 7), a pancreatite aguda (n = 7), os carcinomas pancreáticos (n = 4), as cirurgias pancreáticas prévias (n = 3) e uma malformação arterio-venosa (n = 1). Foram identificadas varizes gástricas e/ou esofágicas em todos os doentes e 7 apresentavam esplenomegália. A trombocitopenia, associada ao hiperesplenismo, estava presente em 5 doentes (22,7%). Cinco doentes foram submetidos a tratamento endoscópico e oito foram sujeitos a embolização da artéria esplénica e/ou esplenectomia. Não se verificaram casos de recidiva hemorrágica e ocorreram duas mortes. Os doentes sem alterações da enzimologia hepática foram os mais propensos a apresentar hemorragia gastrointestinal (87,5% vs. 28,6%; p = 0,024). CONCLUSÕES: A pancreatite aguda e a pancreatite crónica são as principais causas da HTPS. A hemorragia gastrointestinal é a manifestação clínica mais relevante e os doentes sem alterações da enzimologia hepática parecem apresentar um risco superior para desenvolver esta complicação. O tratamento específico raramente é necessário/realizado.

Clinical relevance of proliferation biomarkers and p53 expression in rectal mucosa and sporadic colonic adenomas: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Prospective study to evaluate 1) the pattern of proliferation biomarkers and p53 expression in rectal mucosa and adenomatous tissue, and 2) the clinical relevance of these biomarkers as predictors for adenoma recurrence. METHODOLOGY: 40 patients with sporadic adenomas underwent colonoscopic polypectomy and rectal biopsies. Assessment of proliferation biomarkers--Ornithine decarboxylase, PCNA and Ki-67--was done in adenomas and rectal mucosa, while p53 was performed in adenomas. After polypectomy, 34 adenoma patients were followed for 36 months to detect metachronous polyps. 20 controls underwent colonoscopy and rectal biopsies, with assessment of proliferation biomarkers. RESULTS: Mean values of ornithine decarboxylase, PCNA and Ki-67 in rectal mucosa from adenoma patients were not significantly different when compared with the control group. The expression of these biomarkers was significantly increased in adenomas versus rectal mucosa. Only 6 (15%) out of 40 adenomas were found to overexpress p53 protein. During follow-up, recurrent polyps were detected in 12 patients (relapsing group). Mean values of ornithine decarboxylase, detected at index colonoscopy, were not significantly higher in relapsing group versus non-relapsing group. Mean values of PCNA and Ki-67 detected in adenomas at index colonoscopy were significantly higher in relapsing group when compared with non-relapsing group. Adenoma recurrence was observed in all patients with p53 overexpression. CONCLUSIONS: Ornithine decarboxylase, PCNA and Ki-67 expression in rectal mucosa did not show clinical relevance. Yet, increased expression of PCNA or Ki-67 in adenomatous tissue may be a predictor of adenoma recurrence. Positive p53 might have the same predictive value.