Transvenous low energy internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: a review of clinical applications and future developments.

Low energy internal atrial cardioversion can be performed by delivering biphasic shocks between transvenous catheters positioned within the cardiac chambers or great vessels. Delivery of shocks results in effective cardioversion at energies < 6-10 J and the procedure can be effective even when external cardioversion has failed. Shock induced discomfort varies from patient to patient, but the procedure can be usually performed without general anesthesia and eventually under mild sedation. Nevertheless, tolerability has to be improved by obtaining a substantial reduction in defibrillating thresholds. With regard to safety, delivery of shocks for defibrillating the atria implies a potential risk of inducing ventricular fibrillation; to minimize this risk, shock delivery must be synchronous to the QRS and should be avoided during rapid RR cycles (< 300 ms). Presently, transvenous low energy cardioversion is an investigational procedure, but a widening of indications is expected in the near future. The cost of the procedure, which remains invasive and requires a brief hospital stay, must be balanced with the benefit of restoring sinus rhythm and the possibility of maintaining sinus rhythm for the medium- to long-term. Experimental and clinical investigations of low energy internal cardioversion have resulted in the development of devices for atrial defibrillation whose clinical role and cost-benefit ratio is currently under evaluation.

Management of patients with atrial fibrillation: different therapeutic options and role of electrophysiology-guided approaches.

At present the approach to atrial fibrillation treatment is based on the electrophysiological patterns of atrial fibrillation (on the basis of multiple intra-atrial recordings or sophisticated new mapping techniques) only in a restricted minority of patients, those who are candidate to ablation of the substrate and/or of the triggers. Atrial fibrillation has a broad spectrum of clinical presentations and a heterogeneous electrophysiological pattern. The treatment of this arrhythmia, both with drugs and non pharmacological treatments, has been based, classically, on empirical basis and on a clinically-guided staged-approach. The limitations of pharmacological treatment led in recent years to the development of a wide spectrum of non pharmacological treatments. This implies a change in the approach to atrial fibrillation and the need to identify potentially ideal candidates to complex and expensive treatments. In this view it is currently under investigation the possibility to identify potential responders to a definitive treatment or a combination of treatments (both pharmacological and non-pharmacological) on the basis of the electrophysiological pattern.

Predictors of atrial defibrillation threshold in internal cardioversion.

This study examined the clinical, echocardiographic, and electrophysiological factors influencing the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) in patients with chronic, persistent AF undergoing transvenous, low energy, atrial cardioversion. Twenty-two patients (age 57 +/- 15 years) with a mean AF duration of 7.8 +/- 7.1 months (range 2-32 months) underwent internal cardioversion with catheters placed in the right atrium and coronary sinus. Biphasic shocks (3/3 ms) were delivered in a step-up protocol. ADFT was defined as the lowest energy shock that converted AF to sinus rhythm. All patients were successfully cardioverted at a mean ADFT of 5.62 +/- 2.82 J (range 2.6-12.9 J). Fifteen variables, including clinical characteristics (age, body mass index, AF duration, etiology), echocardiographic measurements (atrial diameter and volumes, indexes of ventricular performance), hemodynamic measurements, and mean atrial cycle during AF were analyzed as possible predictors of ADFT. In univariate regression analysis, AF duration, mean RR interval, and cardiac index correlated with ADFT. In multivariate regression analysis, AF duration remained as the only significant predictor of ADFT (B coefficient 0.311, P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.194-0.427). AF duration was the most powerful predictor of ADFT. It should be considered when planning internal CV of AF to limit the number of shocks delivered. Furthermore, long intervals between AF onset and CV should be avoided.