Panel of serum biomarkers for differential diagnosis of idiopathic interstitial lung disease and interstitial lung disease-secondary to systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) may complicate the course of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) and diagnostic biomarkers are needed. Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), ferritin (FER) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) have been involved in the ILD development. Our study aimed to compare KL-6, FER, IL-6 and soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) concentrations in a cohort of idiopathic and SARD-ILD. METHODS: 3169 patients were enrolled in the "UK Biomarkers in Interstitial Lung Disease (UK-BILD) Study". We selected patients affected by SARD-ILD and idiopathic ILD (usual interstitial pneumonia-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and fibrotic non-specific interstitial pneumonia). Serum marker concentrations were measured through chemiluminescent assays (Fujirebio Europe, Ghent, Belgium). RESULTS: 1013 patients were selected for the study: 520 (51.3%) had idiopathic ILD and 493 (48.7%) SARD-ILD. Idiopathic ILD patients displayed higher KL-6 values than SARD-ILD (p = 0.0002). FER and SMRP, though within normal ranges, were significantly higher in idiopathic ILD (p<0.0001). Logistic regression showed good sensitivity (69.4%) and specificity (80.4%) selecting the variables FER and KL-6 concentrations, age and gender-male correlated with a diagnosis of idiopathic ILD. CONCLUSION: Our study showed the excellent diagnostic value of KL-6 for detecting ILD, which irrespective of the final diagnosis and extent of disease, is always elevated and is a reliable biomarker of lung fibrosis in various diseases, ranging from idiopathic to autoimmune forms. Our study proposed an ILD differentiation model including clinical background. In this context, combination of serum markers and clinical data, as seen in our cohort, may lead to a further improvement in diagnostic accuracy for ILD.

Diagnostic Performance of CLEIA Versus FEIA for KL-6 Peripheral and Alveolar Concentrations in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Diseases: A Multicentre Study.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) is a group of lung disorders characterized by interstitial lung thickening due to inflammatory and fibrotic processes. Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is a molecule secreted by damaged type II alveolar pneumocytes in the alveolar space. The goal of the present study was to compare two detection methods of KL-6 in both bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and serum from ILD patients at the moment of diagnosis. METHODS: Patients with suspicious of ILD and followed at two Italian referral centres for rare lung diseases were included in the study. BAL fluid and serum were collected and analysed by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) and fluorescent enzyme immunoassay (FEIA) methods provided by Tosoh Biosciences. RESULTS: A total of 158 (mean age ± standard deviation, 61.5 ± 13.7, 65 females) patients were enrolled. A total of, 36 had diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 74 sarcoidosis, 15 connective tissue disease-ILD (CTD-ILD) and 33 other ILD. Diagnostic agreement between two methods was demonstrated for both BAL (r = 0.707, p < 0.0001) and serum (r = 0.816, p < 0.0001). BAL KL-6 values were lower than serum (p < 0.0001). IPF patients had higher serum KL-6 concentration than other ILDs (p = 0.0294), while BAL KL-6 values were lower in IPF than in non-IPF (p = 0.0023). CONCLUSION: This study explored KL-6 concentrations through the CLEIA method in serum and BAL of patients with various ILDs, showing significant differences of biomarkers concentrations between IPF and other non-IPF ILDs. Our findings are promising as they provided further knowledge concerning KL-6 expression across different ILDs and may suggest its utility in differential diagnosis.

Efficacy and safety of a step-down regimen of low dosage of glucocorticoids combined with early administration of synthetic or biologic immunosuppressants in anti-synthetase syndrome: A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of anti-aminoacyl-transfer-RNA synthetase antibodies (ARS) and the involvement of muscles, skin, joints, and lungs. Despite increasing interest and evidence, optimal clinical management remains unclear due to a lack of randomized control trials. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a treatment regimen involving early co-administration of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants, with rapid prednisone tapering. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients referred to our multidisciplinary "Myositis Clinic" with a diagnosis of ASS. Clinical, serological, instrumental and medications data were collected at baseline and at 6 and 12 months follow-up. According to treatment protocol, patients were treated with traditional synthetic immunosuppressants or rituximab (RTX) depending on clinical manifestations. Prednisone (PDN) was gradually tapered and eventually discontinued within 6 or 12 months. RESULTS: A total of twenty-seven subjects were enrolled: arthritis, myositis and ILD were assessed in 9, 16 and 18 patients, respectively, and all of them had an active disease. RTX was administered after methotrexate (MTX) in 4 cases of refractory joint involvement and co-administration of a second immunosuppressant was necessary in 2 patients. When muscle involvement was present, first-line therapy was MTX, followed by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or RTX, which allowed to achieve low disease activity or remission, respectively. Eight ILD-patients were treated with MMF and switched to RTX in 5 cases of inefficacy, but all patients were in clinical remission at the end of follow-up. At 12 months, 12 patients discontinued PDN. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to prospectively report on the efficacy and safety of a stepwise, steroid-sparing treatment ASS encompassing various domains. MTX, as well as other synthetic immunosuppressants, showed limited efficacy in ASS-related arthritis, while RTX emerged as a promising option. This study recommends early RTX use in case of arthritis, suggesting it as a pivotal treatment for ILD too, and raises questions regarding maintenance therapy and treatment-free remission.

The management of Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis in different medical settings: Where does that leave us? An Italian nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis (FPF) is an emerging group of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) caused by mutations mainly involving "telomere-related genes" and "surfactant-related genes". Although, in 2023, European Respiratory Society proposed a statement for FPFs management, these still remain a burden. Our work aimed to evaluate the management and impact of FPF in three Italian different medical settings: University Hospitals (UHs), non-University Hospitals (N-UHs) and outpatient clinics. METHODS: This survey was created by ILDs Study Group Società Italiana di Pneumologia/ Italian Respiratory Society (SIP-IRS) and diffused via email to all SIP-IRS members. The descriptive statistical analysis was conducted through GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0).  Results: Twenty participants replied to the survey, of which 65% (13/20) worked at UH while the remaining 25% (6/20) and 5% (1/20) worked at N-UH and outpatient clinics, respectively. Centers with, at least, 150 ILD patients visits/year followed a higher number of FPF patients, regardless of University affiliation (p=0.0046). Despite significant discrepancies in genetic testing and availability of counselling were registered, no statistically significant differences in patients' anamnesis assessment were observed between UHs and N-UHs (p=0.4192 and p=0.6525). However, there were relevant differences in the number of FPF patients undergoing genetic assessment in the Centers with Genetics Lab or Unit inside the Hospital (p=0.0253). There was no consensus regarding the impact of FPF diagnosis on lung transplantation and screening of asymptomatic relatives. Similarly, no differences were reported in antifibrotic prescriptions between UHs and N-UHs. Although the typical UIP pattern was the most common radiological pattern observed in FPF patients, there were no differences in the prevalence of histopathological patterns between UH and N-UH. CONCLUSIONS: Improving pulmonologists' knowledge of the approach, diagnosis and management of FPF is a global medical topic. Scientific societies can provide significant support in raising physicians' awareness of this issue.

Krebs von den Lungen-6 as biomarker of the new progressive fibrotic phenotype of interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Novel progressive fibrotic phenotype has recently been proposed characterized by progressive and inexorable worsening of the disease. Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) has been proposed as fibrotic-ILD biomarker. We aimed to assess the role of KL-6 in fibrotic-ILD and the progressive phenotype in accordance with serial serum KL-6. METHODS: 107 patients were enrolled in the study (median age,IQR, 65(54-71)y/o) followed at respiratory diseases and rheumatology units of University of Siena. Thirty-five had diagnoses of IPF, 18 sarcoidosis, 10 PLCH, 5 LAM, 24 fibrotic HP(fHP), 13 RA (4/13 RA-ILD) and 22 SSc (18/22 SSc-ILD). Serial serum samples were collected before therapy (t0) and 24 months later (t1) from IPF, SSc- and RA-ILD patients. Twenty-two healthy controls (HC) were enrolled. Serum samples were assayed for KL-6 concentrations (Fujirebio Europe, Gent, Belgium). RESULTS: Higher KL-6 concentrations were reported in IPF, fHP and SSc-ILD patients than HC (p<0.0001). KL-6 cut-off value of 885 U/mL identified fibrotic-ILD patients. Logistic regression analysis indicated KL-6 (p=0.004) and smoking-habit (p=0.005) affected the ILD diagnosis. The decision tree model showed KL-6>1145 U/mL, DLco≤60.15 %, FVC≤86 % to classify 86 % IPF patients. Inverse correlation between T0-KL-6 and T1-FVC%(r=-0.314, p=0.046) and T1-DLco%(r=-0.327, p=0.038) in the progressive group. CONCLUSION: KL-6 proved to be a reliable marker for diagnosis and prognosis of fibrotic ILD patients with predictive value in progressive fibrotic patients and a useful marker to identify the new and similar progressive phenotype of IPF and SSc-ILD patients assessing the functional progression in accordance with serial serum KL-6 measurements.

Exploring the Interplay between Cellular Senescence, Immunity, and Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases: Challenges and Opportunities.

Fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are characterized by the gradual and irreversible accumulation of scar tissue in the lung parenchyma. The role of the immune response in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis remains unclear. In recent years, substantial advancements have been made in our comprehension of the pathobiology driving fibrosing ILDs, particularly concerning various age-related cellular disturbances and immune mechanisms believed to contribute to an inadequate response to stress and increased susceptibility to lung fibrosis. Emerging studies emphasize cellular senescence as a key mechanism implicated in the pathobiology of age-related diseases, including pulmonary fibrosis. Cellular senescence, marked by antagonistic pleiotropy, and the complex interplay with immunity, are pivotal in comprehending many aspects of lung fibrosis. Here, we review progress in novel concepts in cellular senescence, its association with the dysregulation of the immune response, and the evidence underlining its detrimental role in fibrosing ILDs.

Evaluation of multiple-flows exhaled nitric oxide and its clinical significance in severe asthmatic patients treated with biologics: a prospective real-life study.

BACKGROUND: Specific biomarkers, such as eosinophilia in peripheral blood or fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), can guide us in the choice of biologic therapy, allowing a more personalized approach. Although there are multiple evidences in the literature about the role of FeNO as a predictor of response to different biologic treatments, there are no data on the relationship between FeNO changes and clinical response to the four biologic drugs currently in use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and to compare the expression of multiple-flows FeNO parameters in a cohort of patients with severe asthma (SA) before and during the treatment with biologics to evaluate the performance of these biomarkers in predicting the achievement of clinical remission. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 50 patients with severe asthma eligible for biologic therapy. Patients underwent clinical and functional monitoring at baseline (T0) and after 1, 6, and 12 months of treatment (T1, T6, T12), including multiple flows FeNO assessment. RESULTS: A statistically significant reduction of FeNO50 values and J'awNO was observed only in benralizumab and dupilumab subgroups. Among biomarkers, the reduction of FeNO 50 values at T1 was associated with a higher probability of achieving clinical remission at T12 (p = 0.003), which was also confirmed by ROC curve analysis (AUC 0.758, p = 0.002; sensitivity 60% and specificity 74% for a reduction of 16 ppb). CONCLUSION: These data confirm the potential of this biomarker in predicting clinical response to biologic treatment in patients with severe asthma in order to guide clinical decisions and evaluate a shift to other biologic therapy.

Altered serum concentrations of IL-8, IL-32 and IL-10 in patients with lung impairment 6 months after COVID-19.

Post-COVID symptoms are reported in 10-35 % of patients not requiring hospitalization, and in up to 80 % of hospitalized patients and patients with severe disease. The pathogenesis of post-COVID syndrome remains largely unknown. Some evidence suggests that prolonged inflammation has a key role in the pathogenesis of most post-COVID manifestations. We evaluated a panel of inflammatory and immune-mediated cytokines in individuals with altered HRCT features and in patients without any long-term COVID symptoms. Blood samples of 89 adult patients previously hospitalized with COVID-19 were collected and stratified as patients with and without HRCT evidence of fibrotic lung alterations. Serum analyte concentrations of IL-4, IL-2, CXCL10 (IP-10), IL-1ß, TNF-α, CCL2 (MCP-1), IL-17A, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, IL-12p70 and TGF-ß1 (free active form) were quantified by bead-based multiplex assay. Clinical and functional data were recorded in a database. With the use of machine learning approach, IL-32, IL-8, and IL-10 proved to be associated with the development of HRCT evidence of lung sequelae at follow-up. Direct comparison of cytokine levels in the two groups showed increased levels of IL-32 and decreased levels of IL-8 in patients with lung impairment. After further stratification of patients by severity (severe versus mild/moderate) during hospitalization, IL-10 emerged as the only cytokine showing decreased levels in severe patients. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the immune response and potential prognostic markers in patients with lung sequelae after COVID-19.

Unlocking the Long-Term Effectiveness of Benralizumab in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: A Three-Year Real-Life Study.

Background: Benralizumab has been shown to restore good control of severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). Robust data on benralizumab effectiveness over periods longer than 2 years are scarce. Methods: This retrospective multicentric study was conducted on 108 Italian SEA patients treated with benralizumab for up to 36 months. Partial and complete clinical remission (CR) were assessed. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics or using linear, logistic, and negative binomial mixed-effect regression models. Results: At 36 months, benralizumab reduced the exacerbation rate by 89% and increased the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (+440 mL at 36 months, p < 0.0001). Benralizumab improved asthma control as well as sinonasal symptoms in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). Up to 93.33% of patients either reduced or discontinued OCS; benralizumab also decreased ICS use and other asthma medications. Overall, 84.31% of patients achieved partial or complete CR. Conclusions: Benralizumab improved asthma and sinonasal outcomes up to 36 months. These findings support the potential of benralizumab to induce CR, emphasizing its role as a disease-modifying anti-asthmatic drug for the management of SEA. Further research is warranted to expand these findings by minimizing data loss and assessing benralizumab's long-term safety.

SARS-CoV-2 and Dysphagia: A Retrospective Analysis of COVID-19 Patients with Swallowing Disorders.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 can lead to impairment of neural networks involved in swallowing, since the act of swallowing is coordinated and performed by a diffuse brain network involving peripheral nerves and muscles. Dysphagia has been identified as a risk and predictive factor for the severest form of SARS-CoV-2 infection. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between swallowing disorders and COVID-19 in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS: We collected demographic data, medical information specific to dysphagia and data on medical treatments of patients with COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 43 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty (46%) were evaluated positive for dysphagia and 23 (54%) were evaluated negative. Neurocognitive disorders and diabetes were mostly associated with patients who resulted positive for dysphagia. Respiratory impairment caused by COVID-19 seems to be a cause of dysphagia, since all patients who needed oxygen-therapy developed symptoms of dysphagia, unlike patients who did not. In the dysphagic group, alteration of the swallowing trigger resulted in the severest form of dysphagia. An association was found between the severest form of COVID-19 and dysphagia. This group consisted predominantly of males with longer hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of COVID-19 patients at risk for dysphagia is crucial for better patient management.

Sustained Effectiveness of Benralizumab in Naïve and Biologics-Experienced Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Patients: Results from the ANANKE Study.

Purpose: Severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) patients often present overlapping inflammatory features rendering them eligible for multiple biologic therapies; switching biologic treatment is a strategy adopted to optimize asthma control when patients show partial or no response to previous biologics. Patients and Methods: ANANKE is a retrospective, multicenter Italian study (NCT04272463). Here, we outline the characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes in naïve-to-biologics and biologics-experienced patients treated with benralizumab for up to 96 weeks. Bio-experienced patients were split into omalizumab and mepolizumab subsets according to the type of biologic previously used. Results: A total of 124 (76.5%) naïve and 38 (23.5%) bio-experienced patients were evaluated at index date; 13 patients (34.2%) switched from mepolizumab, 21 patients (55.3%) switched from omalizumab, and four patients (10.5%) received both biologics. The mepolizumab subset was characterized by the longest SEA duration (median of 4.6 years), the highest prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) (76.5%), and the greatest oral corticosteroid (OCS) daily dosage (median of 25 mg prednisone equivalent). The omalizumab group showed the highest severe annual exacerbation rate (AER) (1.70). At 96 weeks, treatment with benralizumab reduced any and severe AER by more than 87% and 94%, respectively, across all groups. Lung function was overall preserved, with major improvements observed in the mepolizumab group, which also revealed a 100% drop of the median OCS dose. Asthma Control Test (ACT) score improved in the naïve group while its increment was more variable in bio-experienced patients; among these, a marked difference was noticed between omalizumab and mepolizumab subsets (median ACT score of 23.5 and 18, respectively). Conclusion: Benralizumab promotes durable and profound clinical benefits in naïve and bio-experienced groups, indicating that a nearly complete depletion of eosinophils is highly beneficial in the control of SEA, independently of previous biologic use.

Immunological Similarities and Differences between Post-COVID-19 Lung Sequelae and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary fibrosis is an irreversible condition that may be caused by known (including viral triggers such as SARS-CoV-2) and unknown insults. The latter group includes idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which is a chronic, progressive fibrosing interstitial pneumonia of unknown cause. The longer the insult acts on lung tissue, the lower the probability of a complete resolution of the damage. An emerging clinical entity post-COVID-19 is pulmonary fibrosis (PCPF), which shares many pathological, clinical, and immunological features with IPF. The fibrotic response in both diseases-IPF and PCPF-is orchestrated in part by the immune system. An important role regarding the inhibitory or stimulatory effects on immune responses is exerted by the immune checkpoints (ICs). The aim of the present study was to analyse the similarities and differences between CD4+, CD8+, and NK cells in the peripheral blood of patients affected by fibrotic disease, IPF, and PCPF compared with sarcoidosis patients and healthy controls. The second aim was to evaluate the expression and co-expression of PD-1 and TIGIT on CD4, CD8, and NK cells from our patient cohort. METHODS: One hundred and fifteen patients affected by IPF, PCPF, and sarcoidosis at the rare pulmonary disease centre of the University of Siena were enrolled. Forty-eight patients had an IPF diagnosis, 55 had PCPF, and 12 had sarcoidosis. Further, ten healthy controls were enrolled. PCPF patients were included between 6 and 9 months following hospital discharge for COVID-19. The peripheral blood samples were collected, and through flow cytometric analysis, we analysed the expression of CD4, CD8, NK cells, PD-1, and TIGIT. RESULTS: The results show a greater depletion of CD4 and NK cells in IPF patients compared to other groups (p = 0.003), in contrast with CD8 cells (p < 001). Correlation analysis demonstrated an indirect correlation between CD4 and CD8 cells in IPF and sarcoidosis patients (p < 0.001 = -0.87 and p = 0.042; r = -0.6, respectively). Conversely, PCPF patients revealed a direct correlation between CD4 and CD8 cells (p < 0.001; r = 0.90) accentuating an immune response restoration. The expression of PD-1 and TIGIT was abundant on T and NK cell subsets of the two lung fibrotic groups, IPF and PCPF. Analogously, the co-expression of PD-1 and TIGIT on the surfaces of CD4 and CD8 were increased in such diseases. Conclusions: Our study shines a spotlight on the immune responses involved in the development of pulmonary fibrosis, idiopathic and secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We observed a significant imbalance not only in CD4, CD8, and NK blood percentages in IPF and PCPF patients but also in their functional phenotypes evaluated through the expression of ICs.

Role of BAL and Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) in Patients with Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Background: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) encompass a diverse group of disorders affecting the lung interstitium, leading to inflammation, fibrosis, and impaired respiratory function. Currently, the identification of new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for ILDs turns out to be necessary. Several studies show the role of KL-6 in various types of interstitial lung disease and suggest that serum KL-6 levels can be used as a prognostic marker of disease. The aim of this study was to analyze KL-6 expression either in serum or bronchoalveolar lavage samples in order to: (i) make a serum vs. BAL comparison; (ii) better understand the local behavior of fibrosis vs. the systemic one; and (iii) evaluate any differences in patients with progressive fibrosis (PPF) versus patients with non-progressive fibrosis (nPPF). Methods: We used qRT-PCR to detect KL-6 expression both in serum and BAL samples. Mann-Whitney's U test was used to compare the differential expression between groups. Results: In serum, KL-6 is more highly expressed in PPF than in non-progressive fibrosis (p = 0.0295). This difference is even more significant in BAL (p < 0.001). Therefore, it is clear that KL-6 values are related to disease progression. Significant differences were found by making a comparison between BAL and serum. KL-6 was markedly higher in serum than BAL (p = 0.0146). Conclusions: This study identifies KL-6 as a promising biomarker for the severity of the fibrosing process and disease progression in ILDs, with significantly higher levels observed in PPF compared to nPPF. Moreover, the marked difference in KL-6 levels between serum and BAL emphasizes its potential diagnostic and prognostic relevance, providing enlightening insights into both the local and systemic aspects of ILDs.

Dupilumab Efficacy on Asthma Functional, Inflammatory, and Patient-Reported Outcomes across Different Disease Phenotypes and Severity: A Real-Life Perspective.

Dupilumab is currently approved for the treatment of Type 2 severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Few studies have specifically reported on dupilumab efficacy on asthma outcomes as a primary objective in a real-life setting, in patients with and without CRSwNP. Our study aimed to explore the efficacy of dupilumab on functional, inflammatory, and patient-reported outcomes in asthma patients across different disease phenotypes and severity, including mild-to-moderate asthma coexisting with CRSwNP. Data from 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up were analyzed. Asthma (FEV1%, Tiffeneau%, ACT, FeNO, oral steroid use, exacerbation rate, and blood eosinophilia) and polyposis (SNOT22, VAS, NPS) outcomes showed a rapid (3 months) and sustained (6 and 12 months) significant change from baseline, despite most of the patients achieving oral steroid withdrawal. According to the sensitivity analysis, the improvement was not conditioned by either the presence of polyposis or severity of asthma at baseline. Of note, even in the case of milder asthma forms, a significant further improvement was recorded during dupilumab treatment course. Our report provides short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up data on asthma outcomes across different diseases phenotypes and severity, contributing to the real-world evidence related to dupilumab efficacy on upper and lower airways T2 inflammation.

Osteoporosis and major fragility fractures (MOF) in sarcoidosis patients: association with disease severity.

BACKGROUND: The reports on bone mineral loss or major osteoporosis fracture (MOF) in sarcoidosis are scarce and have conflicting outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of MOF in sarcoidosis patients. METHODS: In a single-center cohort of 382 patients with sarcoidosis (55.8 ± 11.6 years) we evaluated bone mineral density at lumbar spine, at femoral neck and at total hip and the presence of MOF. Lung function measurements including diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were assessed. Chest X-rays were performed and radiological staging was done by Scadding score. RESULTS: Ninety patients (23.6%) with sarcoidosis have history of a MOF. BMD T-scores were lower in sarcoidosis with MOF with respect to those without MOF, but the difference was statistically significant only for BMD at femoral neck (p < 0.05). Moreover, BMD values at total hip was positively correlated with DLCO (%) (p < 0.001). Prevalence of MOF was higher in patients with sarcoidosis with lung parenchymal involvement (radiological stages 2-4) than in patients with sarcoidosis in chest X-ray stages 0 and 1 (28.3 vs 19.2% respectively, p < 0.05). Moreover, multiple regression analyses showed that X-ray Scadding score was positively associated with MOF. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that MOF represent a common and important complication in patients with moderate/severe sarcoidosis. The chest X-ray evaluation and the pulmonary function test could allow to define the risk of MOF in sarcoidosis patients.

Predictive Role of Cytokine and Adipokine Panel in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: Evaluation of Disease Severity, Survival and Lung Sequelae.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may determine a multisystemic chronic syndrome after resolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a significant percentage of patients. Persistent cytokine dysregulation can contribute to long-lasting inflammation and tissue damage, resulting in the diverse, often debilitating symptoms experienced by some patients (so-called long COVID syndrome). The aim of our study was to evaluate the value of a panel of serum biomarkers of severity and prognosis in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and also as predictive factors for the development of post-COVID lung sequelae after discharge from the hospital. All blood sampling was performed in the first 24 h after admission to the hospital. Serum analyte concentrations of IL-4, IL-2, CXCL10 (IP-10), IL-1ß, TNF-α, CCL2 (MCP-1), IL-17A, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, IL-12p70 and TGF-ß1 were quantified by bead-based multiplex LEGENDplex™ analysis and commercially available ELISA kits. A total of 108 COVID-19 patients were enrolled in the study. Comparative analysis of these proteins showed higher levels of TGF-ß and IL-6 and lower levels of RBP-4 and IL-10 in the severe group. Age, adiponectin, IL-8 and IL-32 resulted as the best predictors for survival. Moreover, IL-1ß, IL17A, TNF-α, TGF-ß, IL-4 and IL-6 were significantly higher in patients who showed HRCT evidence of fibrotic interstitial alterations at follow-up than patients who did not. The initial inflammatory status of patients on admission to the hospital with COVID-19, as reflected by the present panel of adipose tissue-related biomarkers and cytokines, offered insights into medium-term prognosis.

The effect of anti-IL5 monoclonal antibodies on regulatory and effector T cells in severe eosinophilic asthma.

INTRODUCTION: Biological treatments have redesigned the clinical management of severe eosinophilic asthmatic (SA) patients. Despite emerging evidence supporting the role of natural Killer (NK), and T regulatory cells (Treg) in the pathogenesis of asthma, no data is available on the effects of anti-IL5/IL5R therapies on these cell subsets. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled fourteen SA patients treated with benralizumab (n = 7) or mepolizumab (n = 7) and compared them with healthy controls (HC) (n = 11) and mild to moderate asthmatic (MM) patients (n = 9). Clinical parameters were collected at baseline (T0) and during follow-up. Cellular analysis, including the analysis of T/NK cell subsets, was determined through multicolor flow cytometry. RESULTS: At T0, SA patients showed higher percentages of CD4 TEM (33.3 ± 17.9 HC, 42.6 ± 16.6 MM and 66.1 ± 19.7 in SA; p < 0.0001) than HC and MM patients. With different timing, the two drugs induce a reduction of CD4 TEM ( 76 ± 19 T0; 43 ± 14 T1; 45 ± 23 T6; 62 ± 18 at T24; p < 0.0001 for mepolizumab and 55 ± 21 T0; 55 ± 22 T1; 43 ± 14 T6; 27 ± 12 at T24; p < 0.0001 for benralizumab) and an increase of Treg cells (1.2 ± 1.3 T0; 5.1 ± 2.5 T1; 6.3 ± 3.4 T6; 8.4 ± 4.6 at T24; p < 0.0001 for mepolizumab and 3.4 ± 1.7 T0; 1.9 ± 0.8 T1; 1.9 ± 1 T6; 5.1 ± 2.4 at T24; p < 0.0001 for benralizumab). The change of CD56dim PD-1+ significantly correlated with FEV1% (r = - 0.32; p < 0.01), while Treg expressing PD-1 correlates with the use of oral steroids ( r = 0.36 p = 0.0008) and ACT score (r = 0.36 p = 0.0008) p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Beyond the clinical improvement, anti-IL-5 treatment induces a rebalancing of Treg and T effector cells in patients with SA.

Immunological Pathways in Sarcoidosis and Autoimmune Rheumatic Disorders-Similarities and Differences in an Italian Prospective Real-Life Preliminary Study.

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of sarcoidosis involves T cells and B lymphocytes that produce autoantibodies. We compared the expression of different T and B cell subsets in sarcoidosis and three B-mediated rheumatic diseases that can affect the lungs in an attempt to identify similarities and differences that distinguish these diseases. METHODS: The study included patients referred to Siena University Hospital's respiratory disease and rheumatology units. Patients were enrolled prospectively and consecutively. Healthy volunteers were also included. Multicolor flow cytometry was performed on phenotype T and B cell subsets. Multivariate analysis was carried out to reduce the dimensionality of the data. RESULTS: Fifteen patients had a diagnosis of sarcoidosis, fourteen idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), five granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), ten microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and seven were controls. Thirty-five T and B cell subsets were phenotyped, 15 of which were significantly different in sarcoidosis, B-mediated rheumatic disorders, and controls. Principal components analysis distinguished the four groups of patients with a total explained variance of 54.7%. A decision tree was constructed to determine which clustering variables would be most useful for distinguishing sarcoidosis, IIM, MPA, and GPA. The model showed regulatory T helper cells (Th-reg) > 5.70% in 91% of sarcoidosis patients as well as Th-reg ≤ 5.70 and Th17 > 43.27 in 100% of MPA. It also showed Th-reg ≤ 5.70, Th17 ≤ 43.27 and Tfh-reg ≥ 7.81 in 100% of GPA patients, and Th-reg ≤ 5.70, Th17 ≤ 43.27 and Tfh-reg ≤ 7.81 in 100% of IIM patients. CONCLUSION: The immune cell profile sheds light on similarities and differences between sarcoidosis and B-mediated rheumatic diseases. Sarcoidosis and autoimmune diseases show similar patterns of cellular immune dysregulation, suggesting a common pathogenic pathway that may provide an opportunity for further understanding autoimmunity and exploring biological therapies to treat sarcoidosis.

MR-proADM as Prognostic Factor of Outcome in COVID-19 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Serum mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) has emerged as a marker of organ failure (mainly lungs and kidneys) and poor prognosis in patients admitted to intensive care (IC); some reports also suggest it and other markers, such as Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), as a prognostic biomarker of COVID-19. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance MR-proADM in hospitalized COVID-19 patients for predicting in-hospital mortality and need for non-invasive or invasive respiratory support. METHODS: We enrolled 74 patients hospitalized in the COVID Unit of Siena Hospital from March to May 2020, for whom serum samples were available on admission for assay of MR-proADM, KL-6 and IL-6. Demographic data, comorbidities, medical history and clinical laboratory data on days 1-3 of admission and Simplified Acute Physiology Score and Simplified Organ Failure Assessment scores calculated at day 1 were collected retrospectively, as well as mortality and IC admission data. RESULTS: 12 patients died in hospital (16%) and 14 patients were admitted to IC (19%). Serum concentrations of MR-proADM on admission and on day 1 were higher among non-survivors than among survivors (p = 0.015 and p = 0.045, respectively), while those on day 3 were not significantly different. Patients needing respiratory support had higher MR-proADM concentrations on admission than the others (p = 0.046), and those requiring invasive mechanical ventilation had higher MR-proADM on day 1 (p = 0.017). Serum concentrations of KL-6 and IL-6 were significantly higher in non-survivors (p = 0.03 and p = 0.004, respectively). ROC curve analysis showed that serum MR-proADM on day 1 had the best accuracy in predicting death and/or IC admission (AUC = 0.9583, p = 0.0006); the combination of all three biomarkers further improved the accuracy of prediction of death or IC admission (AUC = 0.9793; p = 0.00004). CONCLUSIONS: Our data sustain the potential of serum MR-proADM as a reliable prognostic biomarker of hospitalized COVID-19 patients and confirms the utility of the three markers in the management and risk stratification of hospitalized patients. The markers are collected mini-invasively and are quick to analyze and cost-effective.