Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nat Commun ; 11(1): 6294, 2020 12 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33293537

ABSTRACT

Biology can be misused, and the risk of this causing widespread harm increases in step with the rapid march of technological progress. A key security challenge involves attribution: determining, in the wake of a human-caused biological event, who was responsible. Recent scientific developments have demonstrated a capability for detecting whether an organism involved in such an event has been genetically modified and, if modified, to infer from its genetic sequence its likely lab of origin. We believe this technique could be developed into powerful forensic tools to aid the attribution of outbreaks caused by genetically engineered pathogens, and thus protect against the potential misuse of synthetic biology.


Subject(s)
Bioterrorism/prevention & control , DNA/analysis , Forensic Genetics/methods , Organisms, Genetically Modified/genetics , Security Measures , Animals , Biotechnology , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Communicable Diseases/microbiology , Communicable Diseases/transmission , Datasets as Topic , Genetic Engineering , Humans , Organisms, Genetically Modified/pathogenicity , Virulence/genetics
4.
Health Secur ; 17(6): 495-503, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31859570

ABSTRACT

Biosecurity and biosafety measures are designed to mitigate intentional and accidental biological risks that pose potentially catastrophic consequences to a country's health system, security, and political and economic stability. Unfortunately, biosecurity and biosafety are often under-prioritized nationally, regionally, and globally. Security leaders often deemphasize accidental and deliberate biological threats relative to other challenges to peace and security. Given emerging biological risks, including those associated with rapid technological advances and terrorist and state interest in weapons of mass destruction, biosecurity deserves stronger emphasis in health and security fora. The Global Biosecurity Dialogue (GBD) was initiated to align national and regional donor initiatives toward a common set of measurable targets. The GBD was launched by the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), with support from Global Affairs Canada's Weapons Threat Reduction Program and the Open Philanthropy Project, and in coordination with the government of The Netherlands as the 2018-19 Chair of the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) Action Package Prevent-3 (APP3) on Biosafety and Biosecurity. The GBD provides a multisectoral forum for sharing models, enabling new actions to achieve biosecurity-related targets, and promoting biosecurity as an integral component of health security. The GBD has contributed to new national and continent-wide actions, including the African Union and Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention's new regional Initiative to Strengthen Biosafety and Biosecurity in Africa. Here we present the GBD as a model for catalyzing action within APP3. We describe how the benefits of this approach could expand to other GHSA Action Packages and international health security initiatives.


Subject(s)
Bioterrorism/prevention & control , Containment of Biohazards/methods , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Global Health , International Cooperation , Security Measures/organization & administration , Capacity Building/methods , Capacity Building/organization & administration , Health Policy , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...