Reaching out to Patients with Long COVID to Better Understand Their Life Experiences and How to Support Their Recovery: A Patient-Oriented Knowledge Sharing Session.

This article reports on participants' experiences with long COVID-19 (LC) (symptoms, impact, healthcare use, and perceived needs) and satisfaction with a patient-oriented knowledge-sharing session organized by a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals, researchers, and a patient partner. Twenty-six participants completed a pre-session survey. On average, they were 21 months post-COVID-19 infection (SD 10.9); 81% of them were female, and 84% were 40+ years old. The main symptoms reported included fatigue (96%), cognitive problems (92%), and general pain or discomfort (40%). More than half of the participants reported that LC has had a significant impact on their health-related quality of life. Eighty-one percent of the participants reported seeking medical help for their LC symptoms and found the services provided by physical therapists, primary care providers, and acupuncturists to be helpful in managing their condition. Participants would like to have access to healthcare providers and clinics specializing in LC. They liked the session and found the information presented useful. This information helps to better understand the experiences of people living with LC and how to support their recovery.

Pediatric Postmortem Tissue Donation in the Confines of a Pandemic: A Model of Collaboration.

BACKGROUND: Obtaining postmortem tissue from pediatric oncology patients is critical to research and may help grieving families heal. Since 2019, the national Gift from a Child program has made significant progress in collecting postmortem tissue from pediatric patients with central nervous system tumors to advance research. This progress was at risk during the onset of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic, when some autopsy programs came to a halt. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed autopsies of four patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center who underwent postmortem examination at Weill Cornell Medicine from June 2020 to March 2021. We collected patient demographics, Do not resuscitate status, time of death and procedure, restrictions due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and results of the tissue analysis. RESULTS: Three of four specimens were processed within 12 hours of the time of death. Two families required interpreter services to obtain consent. In all cases, tumor aliquots were flash frozen for further study. Cell line generation was successful in one case. All families expressed gratitude both for the opportunity to participate and for the handling of the procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the sensitive nature of these cases and the challenges presented by COVID-19 restrictions, clinicians should offer the option of a rapid autopsy to caregivers of pediatric patients based on the scientific need and the positive effect it has on grieving families. This article outlines the logistic efforts required for these donations to take place and provides a framework for providers to offer rapid autopsy as an option for families through this program.

A systematic literature review to identify ethical, legal, and social responsibilities of nonprofit organizations when funding clinical trials in pediatric cancer.

Nonprofit organizations (NPOs) play critical roles as funding sources, research partners, and disseminators of drug developments in pediatric cancer. Yet the literature provides limited guidance about ethical best practices when NPOs make trial funding decisions in this space. We conducted a systematic review of the literature indexed in PubMed and Web of Science to identify the ethical, legal, and social responsibilities of NPOs to four key stakeholder groups in funding pediatric cancer trials: (i) patients/families, (ii) researchers, (iii) industry sponsors, and (iv) donors. We applied the lifecycle framework for patient engagement in drug research and development proposed by Geissler and colleagues to analyze themes related to NPOs' responsibilities across 54 articles that met our inclusion criteria. Emergent themes included transparency surrounding conflicts of interest, the rigor of scientific review, and communication with patients/communities about trial progress. Our research identified critical gaps in best practices for negotiating research partnerships, managing competing research priorities, and pursuing alternative financing models including venture philanthropy. Results from our review informed a set of best practices to guide NPOs in making trial funding decisions that align with stakeholder values and interests.

Precision oncogenomics in pediatrics: a personal reflection.

Cindy Campbell, a bereaved parent who lost her son to a rare pediatric brain tumor, shares her experience and frustration over the lack of treatment options and minimal research funding in pediatric oncology. She invites Dr. Jeffrey P. Greenfield to reflect on the situation and share his professional experiences pertaining to advances in oncogenomics and pediatric brain tumors. They share a passion for making this technology available to all pediatric brain tumor patients in the future and using data to inform treatment protocols and improve outcomes.