1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
; 35(5): 1033-1037, 2024 May.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38454560
2.
Anatol J Cardiol
; 27(4): E11-E12, 2023 04.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-36995058
3.
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars
; 50(Suppl 3): 1-56, 2022 11.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-36540046
4.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
; 33(11): 2403-2406, 2022 11.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-36150136
5.
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag
; 12(9): 4682-4684, 2021 Sep.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34595052
ABSTRACT
In equivocal or suspected cases of Brugada syndrome (BrS), ajmaline testing is frequently used in the diagnostic approach. However, the administration of sodium channel blockers can not only elicit the coved ST-segment elevation characteristic of type 1 Brugada pattern but also induce right bundle branch block (RBBB), which can preclude the electrocardiographic manifestations of BrS. We describe a case report wherein RBBB posed a diagnostic challenge during the ajmaline test for suspected BrS.