Protocol of a clinical trial on the effectiveness of pudendal nerve block with and without neurostimulation in reducing posthemorroidectomy pain.

INTRODUCTION: Hemorrhoidal pathology is the most frequent proctological problem with a prevalence of 44% of the adult population. The most effective treatment is surgery but it also has the highest postoperative pain rate with moderate to severe pain rates of 30-40% during the first 24-48 hours. Here lies the importance of seeking measures to improve this situation, such as the pudendal nerve block with local anesthetic. However, the variability of the pudendal nerve sometimes makes its blockade ineffective and for this reason nerve location methods are sought to achieve a higher rate of success. The main aim of the study is to compare pain in the immediate postoperative period (24 h) after hemorrhoidectomy in patients with pudendal nerve block guided by anatomical references and guided by neurostimulation. METHODS: The present project proposes the performance of a single-center, triple-blind, randomized clinical trial of efficacy, carried out under conditions of routine clinical practice. Patients over 18 years old with hemorrhoids refractory to medical treatment, symptomatic grade III-IV and grade II hemorrhoids that do not respond to conservative procedures in a third level hospital in Spain and that are subsidiaries of surgery in major ambulatory surgery will be included. Demographic variables, variables on hemorrhoidal pathology, details of surgery, verbal numeric pain scale in the preoperative period and surgical complications will be collected. RESULTS: Not avaliable until the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: The pudendal nerve block guided by anatomical landmarks has been shown to be useful in postoperative pain control after hemorrhoidectomy although the use of the neurostimulator has not been well studied and we believe it may improve outcom.

Surgical treatment trends and outcomes for anal fistula: fistulotomy is still accurate and safe. Results from a nationwide observational study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to analyse current surgical treatment preferences for anal fistula (AF) and its subtypes and nationwide results in terms of success and complications. METHODS: A retrospective multicentre observational cohort study was conducted. The study period was 1 year (2019), with a follow-up period of at least 1 year. A descriptive analysis of patient characteristics and trends regarding technical options was performed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to analyse factors associated with healing and faecal incontinence (FI). RESULTS: Fifty-one hospitals were involved, providing data on 1628 patients with AF. At a median follow-up of 18.3 (9.9-28.3) months, 1231 (75.9%) patients achieved healing, while 390 (24.1%) did not; failure was catalogued as persistence in 279 (17.2.0%) patients and as recurrence in 111 (6.8%). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with healing were fistulotomy (OR 5.5; 95% CI 3.8-7.9; p < 0.001), simple fistula (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.5-2.8; p < 0.001), single tract (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.3-2.8; p < 0.001) and number of preparatory surgeries (none vs. 3; HR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2-2.8; p = 0.006). Regarding de novo FI, in the multivariate analysis previous anal surgery (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.4, p = 0.037), age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, p = 0.002) and being female (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5, p = 0.008) were statistically related. CONCLUSIONS: Anal fistulotomy is the most used procedure for AF, especially for simple AF, with a favourable overall balance between healing and continence impairment. Sphincter-sparing or minimally invasive sphincter-sparing techniques resulted in lower rates of healing. In spite of their intended sphincter-sparing design, a certain degree of FI was observed for several of these techniques.

Epidemiology, oncologic results and risk stratification model for metachronous peritoneal metastases after surgery for pT4 colon cancers: results from an observational retrospective multicentre long-term follow-up study.

PURPOSE: Metachronous peritoneal metastases (MPM) following a curative surgery procedure for pT4 colon cancer is a challenging condition. Current epidemiological studies on this topic are scarce. METHODS: A retrospective multicentre trial was designed. All consecutive patients who underwent operations to treat pT4 cancers between 2015 and 2017 were reviewed. Demographic, clinical, operative, pathological and oncological follow-up variables were included. MPM were described as any oncological disease at the peritoneum, clearly different from a local recurrence. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were constructed. A risk stratification model was created on a cumulative factor basis. According to the calculated hazard ratio (HR), a scoring system was designed (HR < 3, 1 point; HR > 3, 2 points) and a scale from 0 to 6 was calculated for peritoneal disease-free rate (PDF-R). A risk stratification model was also created on the basis of these calculations. RESULTS: Fifty different hospitals were involved, which included a total of 1356 patients. Incidence of MPM was 13.6% at 50 months median follow-up. The strongest independent risk factors for MPM were positive pN stage [HR 3.72 (95% CI 2.56-5.41; p < 0.01) for stage III disease], tumour perforation [HR 1.91 (95% CI 1.26-2.87; p < 0.01)], mucinous or signet ring cell histology [HR 1.68 (95% CI 1.1-2.58; p = 0.02)], poorly differentiated tumours [HR 1.54 (95% CI 1.1-2.2; p = 0.02)] and emergency surgery [HR 1.42 (95% CI 1.01-2.01; p = 0.049)]. In the absence of additional risk factors, pT4 tumours showed 98% and 96% PDF-R in 1-year and 5-year periods based on Kaplan-Meier curves. CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative MPM incidence was 13.6% at 5-year follow-up. The sole presence of a pT4 tumour resulted in high rates of PDF-R at 1-year and 5-year follow-up (98% and 96% respectively). Five additional risk factors different from pT4 status itself were identified as possible MPM indicators during follow-up.

Umbilical hernia repair with composite prosthesis: a single-centre experience.

PURPOSE: Since 2004, composite prosthesis repair is the preferred procedure for umbilical hernia repair in our centre, although long-term results of this technique are lacking. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term results of a cohort of patients who underwent umbilical hernia repair with this procedure. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent umbilical hernia repair with composite prosthesis was conducted. Data were obtained from electronic medical records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze the factors associated with postoperative complications and hernia recurrence. RESULTS: Between March 2004 and December 2015, 2135 patients underwent umbilical hernia repair and composite prosthesis (Ventralex or Ventralex ST®) was used in 1538 patients. 179 patients were lost during the follow-up. Finally, 1359 patients were included in the study. The prosthesis was placed in the preperitoneal space in 93.4% of the patients. 86.3% of the patients underwent same-day surgery. Only 2.1% of the patients developed a complication during the follow-up, and 1.8% of the patients required a new surgery. After a mean follow-up of 4.1 years, hernia recurrence rate was 3.9%. Multivariate analysis showed that hernia recurrence was associated with female gender, recurrent hernia, and postoperative complication. Postoperative complications were related to follow-up time and smoking patients. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results after umbilical hernia repair with composite prosthesis are satisfactory, with a low percentage of complications and recurrences.

Incidence of new-onset benign anal disorders after bariatric surgery.

New-onset benign anal disorders (NBADs) represent a potential complication following bariatric surgery, although their incidence in this population is not well studied. The preoperative characteristics, weight loss, bowel habits and NBADs data of 196 patients with bariatric surgery were collected by telephone interviews and medical records review and evaluated retrospectively. Ninety-nine patients had undergone gastric bypass (GBP) and 97 had a modified biliopancreatic diversion (MBPD). Fifty-nine patients were excluded. The mean follow-up of the remaining 137 patients was 87.8 months, and 51 of them (37.2%) developed NBADs. Haemorrhoids were the most common diagnosis and 27.5% of the patients that developed NBADs were treated surgically. Patients who developed NBADs had a longer follow-up time (92.5 vs. 85.1 months, P = 0.003), and those with an abnormal bowel habit (diarrhoea or constipation) had a higher percentage of NBADs (54.5 vs. 28.3%, P = 0.003). NBADs were more frequent after MBPD (52.9%) than after GBP (21.7%) (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis found that only an abnormal bowel habit was associated with NBADs, with an odds ratio of 3.2 (95% CI: 1.5-6.9, P = 0.003). As NBADs are a common complication after bariatric surgery, further studies should be performed to find the reasons for these complications.

Predictive prognostic value of local and distant recurrence of F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with reference to World Health Organization classifications (2004, 2010). Case series study.

BACKGROUND: F-flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) have been claimed to be an important prognostic tool in different malignancies. However, its predictive prognostic value on pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is still under investigation. AIM: We study the prognostic impact of FDG-PET scan in neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors. METHODOLOGY: Between 2007 and 2012, 26 patients with no metastastatic histologically confirmed PNETs (mean age: 57 years) were examined with FDG-PET. We studied its captation in relation with the well established hystopathological prognostic markers assessed in the tumoral resected specimen according to the WHO 2004 and ENETS/WHO 2010 classification. RESULTS: FDG-PET captation was positive in 17 cases (65.4%). The median follow-up period was 34.4 months and recurrences occurred in 4 cases (15.4%). We found a significant correlation between this captation and Ki 67 index (p = 0.032), mitotic index (p = 0.002), tumor grade (p = 0.017) and tumor size (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET provides a good prognostic value for PNETs. Present results must be further validated with larger sample studies.

Proposed technique for inguinal hernia repair with self-gripping mesh: avoiding fixation to undesired structures.

PURPOSE: Self-gripping meshes have been developed to avoid fixing sutures during inguinal hernia repair. Operative time is shorter when using a self-gripping mesh than with conventional Lichtenstein repair. However, these meshes can be difficult to handle because they fix to undesired structures. The aim of this report is to describe a new technique to avoid this problem. TECHNIQUE: Inguinal hernia dissection is made as usual. Once dissection is finished, a Parietex ProGrip(®) (Covidien, Dublin, Ireland) flat sheet mesh is cut depending on the size needed. A small split is made between the lower and medium third of the mesh to mark where the split for the spermatic cord will be. Using this mark, the upper third of the mesh is folded over the medium third, hiding the microgrips that make this a self-gripping mesh. In this way, only the lower third of the mesh has the microgrips exposed and the mesh can be fixed to the pubic bone and inguinal ligament without fixation to undesired structures. Once the lower third of the mesh is fixed, the split for the spermatic cord is completed and the upper part of the mesh is passed below the spermatic cord. Then, the mesh is unfolded to expose the microgrips again and the medium and upper third of the mesh are descended to its final position. CONCLUSION: This proposed technique for inguinal hernia repair with self-gripping mesh makes the surgery easier, avoiding mesh fixation to undesired structures.